Skip to main content
Disciplines
Automotive Business IT + Informatics Construction + Real Estate Electrical Engineering + Electronics Energy + Sustainability Insurance + Risk Finance + Banking Management + Leadership Marketing + Sales Mechanical Engineering + Materials
Events
DE
EN
Books
Journals
Topic Page
Marketing
Start single access now
Access for companies
EXTENDED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering
Published in: Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering 2/2022

26-10-2021 | Research Article-Computer Engineering and Computer Science

Gene Selection for Microarray Cancer Classification based on Manta Rays Foraging Optimization and Support Vector Machines

Authors: Essam H. Houssein, Hager N. Hassan, Mustafa M. Al-Sayed, Emad Nabil

Published in: Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering | Issue 2/2022

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

In DNA microarray applications, many techniques are proposed for cancer classification in order to detect normal and cancerous humans or classify different types of cancers. Gene selection is usually required as a preliminary step for a cancer classification problem. This step aims to select the most informative genes among a great number of genes, which represent an important issue. Although many studies have been proposed to address this issue, they lack getting the most informative and fewest number of genes with the highest accuracy and little effort from the high dimensionality of microarray datasets. Manta ray foraging optimization(MRFO) algorithm is a new meta-heuristic algorithm that mimics the nature of manta ray fishes in food foraging. MRFO has achieved promising results in other fields, such as solar generating units. Due to the high accuracy results of the support vector machines (SVM), it is the most commonly used classification algorithm in cancer studies, especially with microarray data. For exploiting the pros of both algorithms (i.e., MRFO and SVM), in this paper, a hybrid algorithm is proposed to select the most predictive and informative genes for cancer classification. A binary microarray dataset, which includes colon and leukemia1, and a multi-class microarray dataset that includes SRBCT, lymphoma, and leukemia2, are used to evaluate the accuracy of the proposed technique. Like other optimization techniques, MRFO suffers from some problems related to the high dimensionality and complexity of the microarray data. For solving such problems as well as improving the performance, the minimum redundancy maximum relevance (mRMR) method is used as a preprocessing stage. The proposed technique has been evaluated compared to the most common cancer classification algorithms. The experimental results show that our proposed technique achieves the highest accuracy with the fewest number of informative genes and little effort.
previous article The Archerfish Hunting Optimizer: A Novel Metaheuristic Algorithm for Global Optimization
next article Federated Learning: Sum Power Constraints Optimization Design

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now
Literature
1.
Dubitzky, W.; Granzow, M.; Downes, C.S.; Berrar, D.: Introduction to microarray data analysis. In: A Practical Approach to Microarray Data Analysis. Springer, pp. 1–46. (2003)
2.
Benso, A.; Di Carlo, S.; Politano, G.; Savino, A.: Gpu acceleration for statistical gene classification. In: 2010 IEEE International Conference on Automation, Quality and Testing, Robotics (AQTR), Vol. 2, IEEE, pp. 1–6. (2010)
3.
Golub, T.R.; Slonim, D.K.; Tamayo, P.; Huard, C.; Gaasenbeek, M.; Mesirov, J.P.; Coller, H.; Loh, M.L.; Downing, J.R.; Caligiuri, M.A.; et al.: Molecular classification of cancer: class discovery and class prediction by gene expression monitoring. Science 286(5439), 531–537 (1999)CrossRef
4.
Alshamlan, H.M.; Badr, G.H.; Alohali, Y.: A study of cancer microarray gene expression profile: objectives and approaches. In: Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering, Vol. 2, pp. 1–6 (2013)
5.
Ghorai, S.; Mukherjee, A.; Sengupta, S.; Dutta, P.K.: Multicategory cancer classification from gene expression data by multiclass NPPC ensemble. In: 2010 International Conference on Systems in Medicine and Biology, IEEE, (2010), pp. 41–48
6.
Guo, S.-B.; Lyu, M.R.; Lok, T.-M.: Gene selection based on mutual information for the classification of multi-class cancer. In: International Conference on Intelligent Computing, Springer, pp. 454–463 (2006)
7.
Alanni, R.; Hou, J.; Azzawi, H.; Xiang, Y.: A novel gene selection algorithm for cancer classification using microarray datasets. BMC Med. Genomics 12(1), 10 (2019)CrossRef
8.
Alshamlan, H.M.; Badr, G.H.; Alohali, Y.A.: The performance of bio-inspired evolutionary gene selection methods for cancer classification using microarray dataset, International Journal of Bioscience. Biochem. Bioinf. 4(3), 166 (2014)
9.
Narendra, P.M.; Fukunaga, K.: A branch and bound algorithm for feature subset selection. IEEE Trans. Comput. 9, 917–922 (1977)MATHCrossRef
10.
Watada, J.; Arunava, R.; Jingru, L.; Bo, W.; Shuming, W.: A dual recurrent neural network-based hybrid approach for solving convex quadratic bi-level programming problem. Neurocomputing 407, 136–154 (2020)CrossRef
11.
Zhao, W.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, L.: Manta ray foraging optimization: an effective bio-inspired optimizer for engineering applications. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 87, 103300103300 (2020)CrossRef
12.
Guyon, I.; Weston, J.; Barnhill, S.; Vapnik, V.: Gene selection for cancer classification using support vector machines. Mach. Learn. 46(1–3), 389–422 (2002)MATHCrossRef
13.
Huerta, E.B.; Duval, B.; Hao, J.-K.: A hybrid GA/SVM approach for gene selection and classification of microarray data. In: Workshops on Applications of Evolutionary Computation, Springer, pp. 34–44(2006)
14.
Mukherjee, S.: Classifying microarray data using support vector machines. In: A practical Approach to Microarray Data Analysis. Springer, pp. 166–185 (2003)
15.
Alshamlan, H.; Badr, G.; Alohali, Y.: A comparative study of cancer classification methods using microarray gene expression profile. In: Proceedings of the First International Conference on Advanced Data and Information Engineering (DaEng-2013), Springer, pp. 389–398 (2014)
16.
Heidari, A.A.; Mirjalili, S.; Faris, H.; Aljarah, I.; Mafarja, M.; Chen, H.: Harris hawks optimization: algorithm and applications. Future Generat. Comput. Syst. 97, 849–872 (2019)CrossRef
17.
Hayyolalam, V.; Kazem, A.A.P.: Black widow optimization algorithm: a novel meta-heuristic approach for solving engineering optimization problems. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 87, 103249 (2020)CrossRef
18.
Mirjalili, S.; Mirjalili, S.M.; Lewis, A.: Grey wolf optimizer. Adv. Eng. softw. 69, 46–61 (2014)CrossRef
19.
Whitley, D.: A genetic algorithm tutorial. Stat. Comput. 4(2), 65–85 (1994)CrossRef
20.
Mirjalili, S.; Lewis, A.: The whale optimization algorithm. Adv. Eng. softw. 95, 51–67 (2016)CrossRef
21.
Kennedy, J.; Eberhart, R.: Particle swarm optimization. In: Proceedings of ICNN’95-International Conference on Neural Networks, Vol. 4, IEEE, pp. 1942–1948 (1995)
22.
Karaboga, D.: An idea based on honey bee swarm for numerical optimization, Tech. rep., Technical report-tr06, Erciyes university, engineering faculty, computer (2005).
23.
Alon, U.; Barkai, N.; Notterman, D.A.; Gish, K.; Ybarra, S.; Mack, D.; Levine, A.J.: Broad patterns of gene expression revealed by clustering analysis of tumor and normal colon tissues probed by oligonucleotide arrays. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 96(12), 6745–6750 (1999)CrossRef
24.
Khan, J.; Wei, J.S.; Ringner, M.; Saal, L.H.; Ladanyi, M.; Westermann, F.; Berthold, F.; Schwab, M.; Antonescu, C.R.; Peterson, C.; et al.: Classification and diagnostic prediction of cancers using gene expression profiling and artificial neural networks. Nature Med. 7(6), 673–679 (2001)CrossRef
25.
Alizadeh, A.A.; Eisen, M.B.; Davis, R.E.; Ma, C.; Lossos, I.S.; Rosenwald, A.; Boldrick, J.C.; Sabet, H.; Tran, T.; Yu, X.; et al.: Distinct types of diffuse large b-cell lymphoma identified by gene expression profiling. Nature 403(6769), 503–511 (2000)CrossRef
26.
Armstrong, S.A.; Staunton, J.E.; Silverman, L.B.; Pieters, R.; den Boer, M.L.; Minden, M.D.; Sallan, S.E.; Lander, E.S.; Golub, T.R.; Korsmeyer, S.J.: Mll translocations specify a distinct gene expression profile that distinguishes a unique leukemia. Nature Genetics 30(1), 41–47 (2002)CrossRef
27.
Peng, H.; Long, F.; Ding, C.: Feature selection based on mutual information criteria of max-dependency, max-relevance, and min-redundancy. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. intell. 27(8), 1226–1238 (2005)CrossRef
28.
Lazar, C.; Taminau, J.; Meganck, S.; Steenhoff, D.; Coletta, A.; Molter, C.; de Schaetzen, V.; Duque, R.; Bersini, H.; Nowe, A.: A survey on filter techniques for feature selection in gene expression microarray analysis. IEEE/ACM Trans. Comput. Biol. Bioinf. (TCBB) 9(4), 1106–1119 (2012)CrossRef
29.
Tabakhi, S.; Moradi, P.; Akhlaghian, F.: An unsupervised feature selection algorithm based on ant colony optimization. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 32, 112–123 (2014)CrossRef
30.
Liao, B.; Jiang, Y.; Liang, W.; Zhu, W.; Cai, L.; Cao, Z.: Gene selection using locality sensitive laplacian score. IEEE/ACM Trans. Comput. Biol. Bioinf. (TCBB) 11(6), 1146–1156 (2014)CrossRef
31.
He, X.; Cai, D.; Niyogi, P.: Laplacian score for feature selection. In: Advances in neural information processing systems, pp. 507–514. (2006)
32.
Cai, R.; Hao, Z.; Yang, X.; Wen, W.: An efficient gene selection algorithm based on mutual information. Neurocomputing 72(4–6), 991–999 (2009)CrossRef
33.
Raileanu, L.E.; Stoffel, K.: Theoretical comparison between the gini index and information gain criteria. Ann. Math. Artif. Intell. 41(1), 77–93 (2004)MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
34.
Ding, C.; Peng, H.: Minimum redundancy feature selection from microarray gene expression data. J. Bioinf. Comput. Biol. 3(02), 185–205 (2005)CrossRef
35.
Bertoni, A.; Folgieri, R.; Valentini, G.: Bio-molecular cancer prediction with random subspace ensembles of support vector machines. Neurocomputing 63, 535–539 (2005)CrossRef
36.
Lai, C.; Reinders, M.J.; Wessels, L.: Random subspace method for multivariate feature selection. Pattern Recognit. Lett. 27(10), 1067–1076 (2006)CrossRef
37.
Li, X.; Zhao, H.: Weighted random subspace method for high dimensional data classification. Statistics and its Interface 2(2), 153 (2009)MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
38.
Haindl, M.; Somol, P.; Ververidis, D.; Kotropoulos, C.: Feature selection based on mutual correlation. In: Iberoamerican Congress on Pattern Recognition, Springer, pp. 569–577 (2006)
39.
Ghazavi, S.N.; Liao, T.W.: Medical data mining by fuzzy modeling with selected features. Artif. Intell. Med. 43(3), 195–206 (2008)CrossRef
40.
Ferreira, A.J.; Figueiredo, M.A.: An unsupervised approach to feature discretization and selection. Pattern Recognit. 45(9), 3048–3060 (2012)CrossRef
41.
Ferreira, A.J.; Figueiredo, M.A.: Efficient feature selection filters for high-dimensional data. Pattern Recognit. Lett. 33(13), 1794–1804 (2012)CrossRef
42.
Yu, L.; Liu, H.: Feature selection for high-dimensional data: A fast correlation-based filter solution. In: Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML-03), 2003, pp. 856–863
43.
Yu, L.; Liu, H.: Efficient feature selection via analysis of relevance and redundancy. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 5(Oct), 1205–1224 (2004)MathSciNetMATH
44.
Gheyas, I.A.; Smith, L.S.: Feature subset selection in large dimensionality domains. Pattern recognition 43(1), 5–13 (2010)MATHCrossRef
45.
Saeys, Y.; Inza, I.; Larrañaga, P.: A review of feature selection techniques in bioinformatics. Bioinformatics 23(19), 2507–2517 (2007)CrossRef
46.
Sahu, B.; Mishra, D.: A novel feature selection algorithm using particle swarm optimization for cancer microarray data. Procedia Eng. 38, 27–31 (2012)CrossRef
47.
Martinez, E.; Alvarez, M.M.; Trevino, V.: Compact cancer biomarkers discovery using a swarm intelligence feature selection algorithm. Comput. Biol. Chem. 34(4), 244–250 (2010)CrossRef
48.
Li, Y.; Wang, G.; Chen, H.; Shi, L.; Qin, L.: An ant colony optimization based dimension reduction method for high-dimensional datasets. J. Bionic Eng. 10(2), 231–241 (2013)CrossRef
49.
Kabir, M.M.; Shahjahan, M.; Murase, K.: A new hybrid ant colony optimization algorithm for feature selection. Expert Syst. Appl. 39(3), 3747–3763 (2012)CrossRef
50.
Yu, H.; Gu, G.; Liu, H.; Shen, J.; Zhao, J.: A modified ant colony optimization algorithm for tumor marker gene selection. Genomics Proteomics Bioinf. 7(4), 200–208 (2009)CrossRef
51.
Srivastava, A.; Chakrabarti, S.; Das, S.; Ghosh, S.; Jayaraman, V.K.: Hybrid firefly based simultaneous gene selection and cancer classification using support vector machines and random forests. In: Proceedings of Seventh International Conference on Bio-Inspired Computing: Theories and Applications (BIC-TA 2012), Springer, pp. 485–494 (2013)
52.
Inza, I.; Sierra, B.; Blanco, R.; Larrañaga, P.: Gene selection by sequential search wrapper approaches in microarray cancer class prediction. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 12(1), 25–33 (2002)MATH
53.
Inza, I.; Larrañaga, P.; Blanco, R.; Cerrolaza, A.J.: Filter versus wrapper gene selection approaches in DNA microarray domains. Artif. Intell. Med. 31(2), 91–103 (2004)CrossRef
54.
Ghoneimy, M.; Nabil, E.; Badr, A.; El-Khamisy, S.F.: Bioscience research.
55.
Alshamlan, H.M.; Badr, G.H.; Alohali, Y.A.: Abc-svm: artificial bee colony and svm method for microarray gene selection and multi class cancer classification. Int. J. Mach. Learn. Comput. 6(3), 184 (2016)CrossRef
56.
Alba, E.; Garcia-Nieto, J.; Jourdan, L.; Talbi, E.-G.: Gene selection in cancer classification using PSO, SVM and GA, SVM hybrid algorithms. In: IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation. IEEE 2007, 284–290 (2007)
57.
Rani, R.R.; Ramyachitra, D.: Microarray cancer gene feature selection using spider monkey optimization algorithm and cancer classification using SVM. Procedia Comput. Sci. 143, 108–116 (2018)CrossRef
58.
Almugren, N.; Alshamlan, H.: Ff-svm: New firefly-based gene selection algorithm for microarray cancer classification. In: 2019 IEEE Conference on Computational Intelligence in Bioinformatics and Computational Biology (CIBCB), IEEE, pp. 1–6 (2019)
59.
Maulik, U.; Chakraborty, D.: Fuzzy preference based feature selection and semisupervised svm for cancer classification. IEEE Trans. Nanobiosci. 13(2), 152–160 (2014)CrossRef
60.
Chen, M.-S.; Ho, T.-Y.; Huang, D.-Y.: Online transductive support vector machines for classification. In: 2012 International Conference on Information Security and Intelligent Control, IEEE, pp. 258–261 (2012)
61.
Zhang, L.; Zhou, W.; Wang, B.; Zhang, Z.; Li, F.: Applying 1-norm svm with squared loss to gene selection for cancer classification. Appl. Intell. 48(7), 1878–1890 (2018)CrossRef
62.
Zhao, W.; Wang, G.; Wang, H.; Chen, H.; Dong, H.; Zhao, Z.: A novel framework for gene selection. Int. J. Adv. Comput. Technol. 3(3), 184–191 (2011)
63.
Lee, C.-P.; Leu, Y.: A novel hybrid feature selection method for microarray data analysis. Appl. Soft Comput. 11(1), 208–213 (2011)CrossRef
64.
Leung, Y.; Hung, Y.: A multiple-filter-multiple-wrapper approach to gene selection and microarray data classification. IEEE/ACM Trans. Comput. Biol. Bioinf. (TCBB) 7(1), 108–117 (2010)CrossRef
65.
Zibakhsh, A.; Abadeh, M.S.: Gene selection for cancer tumor detection using a novel memetic algorithm with a multi-view fitness function. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 26(4), 1274–1281 (2013)CrossRef
66.
Alshamlan, H.; Badr, G;, Alohali, Y.: mrmr-abc: a hybrid gene selection algorithm for cancer classification using microarray gene expression profiling. Biomed. Res. Int. (2015)
67.
Alshamlan, H.M.; Badr, G.H.; Alohali, Y.A.: Genetic bee colony (gbc) algorithm: a new gene selection method for microarray cancer classification. Comput. Biol. Chem. 56, 49–60 (2015)CrossRef
68.
Díaz-Uriarte, R.; De Andres, S.A.: Gene selection and classification of microarray data using random forest. BMC Bioinf. 7(1), 3 (2006)CrossRef
69.
Wang, G.; Song, Q.; Xu, B.; Zhou, Y.: Selecting feature subset for high dimensional data via the propositional foil rules. Pattern Recognit. 46(1), 199–214 (2013)CrossRef
70.
Duan, K.-B.; Rajapakse, J.C.; Wang, H.; Azuaje, F.: Multiple SVM-RFE for gene selection in cancer classification with expression data. IEEE trans. Nanobiosci. 4(3), 228–234 (2005)CrossRef
71.
Duan, K.-B.; Rajapakse, J.C.; Nguyen, M.N.: One-versus-one and one-versus-all multiclass svm-rfe for gene selection in cancer classification. In: European Conference on Evolutionary Computation, Machine Learning and Data Mining in Bioinformatics, Springer, pp. 47–56 (2007)
72.
Ghosh, K.K.; Guha, R.; Bera, S.K.; Kumar, N.; Sarkar, R.: S-shaped versus v-shaped transfer functions for binary manta ray foraging optimization in feature selection problem.
73.
Fathy, A.; Rezk, H.; Yousri, D.: A robust global MPPT to mitigate partial shading of triple-junction solar cell-based system using manta ray foraging optimization algorithm. Solar Energy 207, 305–316 (2020)CrossRef
74.
El-Hameed, M.A.; Elkholy, M.M.; El-Fergany, A.A.: Three-diode model for characterization of industrial solar generating units using manta-rays foraging optimizer: Analysis and validations. Energy Convers. Manage. 219, 113048 (2020)CrossRef
75.
Selem, S.I.; Hasanien, H.M.; El-Fergany, A.A.: Parameters extraction of PEMFC’s model using manta rays foraging optimizer. Int. J. Energy Res. 44(6), 4629–4640 (2020)CrossRef
76.
El Akadi, A.; Amine, A.; El Ouardighi, A.; Aboutajdine, D.: A new gene selection approach based on minimum redundancy-maximum relevance (MRMR) and genetic algorithm (GA). In: 2009 IEEE/ACS International Conference on Computer Systems and Applications, IEEE, pp. 69–75 (2009)
77.
Liu, H.; Liu, L.; Zhang, H.: Ensemble gene selection by grouping for microarray data classification. J. Biomed. Inf. 43(1), 81–87 (2010)CrossRef
78.
Abdi, M.J.; Hosseini, S.M.; Rezghi, M.: A novel weighted support vector machine based on particle swarm optimization for gene selection and tumor classification. Comput. Math. Methods Med. (2012)
79.
Yun, C.; Oh, B.; Yang, J.; Nang, J.: Feature subset selection based on bio-inspired algorithms. J. Inf. Sci. Eng. 27(5), 1667–1686 (2011)MathSciNet
80.
Huang, T.; Wang, P.; Ye, Z.-Q.; Xu, H.; He, Z.; Feng, K.-Y.; Hu, L.; Cui, W.; Wang, K.; Dong, X.; et al.: Prediction of deleterious non-synonymous SNPS based on protein interaction network and hybrid properties. PLoS ONE 5(7), e11900 (2010)CrossRef
81.
Rodríguez-Peérez, R.; Vogt, M.; Bajorath, J.: Support vector machine classification and regression prioritize different structural features for binary compound activity and potency value prediction. ACS Omega 2(10), 6371–6379 (2017)CrossRef
82.
Wang, X.; Gotoh, O.: Microarray-based cancer prediction using soft computing approach, Cancer informatics 7 CIN–S2655. (2009)
83.
Shen, Q.; Shi, W.-M.; Kong, W.; Ye, B.-X.: A combination of modified particle swarm optimization algorithm and support vector machine for gene selection and tumor classification. Talanta 71(4), 1679–1683 (2007)CrossRef
84.
Abdi, M.J.; Giveki, D.: Automatic detection of erythemato-squamous diseases using PSO-SVM based on association rules. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 26(1), 603–608 (2013)CrossRef
85.
Huang, H.-L.; Chang, F.-L.: Esvm: Evolutionary support vector machine for automatic feature selection and classification of microarray data. Biosystems 90(2), 516–528 (2007)MathSciNetCrossRef
86.
Huang, H.-L.; Lee, C.-C.; Ho, S.-Y.: Selecting a minimal number of relevant genes from microarray data to design accurate tissue classifiers. Biosystems 90(1), 78–86 (2007)CrossRef
87.
Yang, C.-S.; Chuang, L.-Y.; Ke, C.-H.; Yang, C.-H.: A hybrid feature selection method for microarray classification., IAENG Int. J. Comput. Sci. 35(3)
88.
Peng, S.; Xu, Q.; Ling, X.B.; Peng, X.; Du, W.; Chen, L.: Molecular classification of cancer types from microarray data using the combination of genetic algorithms and support vector machines. FEBS Lett. 555(2), 358–362 (2003)CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Gene Selection for Microarray Cancer Classification based on Manta Rays Foraging Optimization and Support Vector Machines
Authors
Essam H. Houssein
Hager N. Hassan
Mustafa M. Al-Sayed
Emad Nabil
Publication date
26-10-2021
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering / Issue 2/2022
Print ISSN: 2193-567X
Electronic ISSN: 2191-4281
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-021-06102-8

Other articles of this Issue 2/2022

Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering 2/2022 Go to the issue

Research Article-Computer Engineering and Computer Science

Hybrid Model Based on ReliefF Algorithm and K-Nearest Neighbor for Erythemato-Squamous Diseases Forecasting

Research Article-Computer Engineering and Computer Science

A Novel Approach Based on Average Swarm Intelligence to Improve the Whale Optimization Algorithm

Review-Computer Engineering and Computer Science

RFID in IoT, Miniaturized Pentagonal Slot-based Data Dense Chipless RFID Tag for IoT Applications

Research Article-Computer Engineering and Computer Science

Comparative Analysis of AlexNet, ResNet18 and SqueezeNet with Diverse Modification and Arduous Implementation

Research Article-Computer Engineering and Computer Science

Energy-Efficient Time-Sharing Multichannel MAC Protocol for Wireless Body Area Networks

Research Article-Computer Engineering and Computer Science

A Comparative Study on Classifying Human Activities Using Classical Machine and Deep Learning Methods

Premium Partners

    Image Credits