Top

Asia Pacific Journal of Management

Published in:

01-12-2016

Group harmony in the workplace: Conception, measurement, and validation

Authors: Chao C. Chen, Ali F. Ünal, Kwok Leung, Katherine R. Xin

Published in: Asia Pacific Journal of Management | Issue 4/2016

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

Based on a literature review of Chinese traditional philosophies and social science research on social harmony we formulated the group harmony construct, developed a scale, and tested its validity in two studies on 167 top management groups from China. Study 1 demonstrated convergent and discriminant validity of group harmony and evaluated its predictive validity against well-established constructs of relationship conflict, task conflict, group cohesiveness, psychological safety, and conflict avoidance. Study 2 further examined the construct and nomological validity of group harmony and tested the effects of group harmony and found that, as hypothesized, group harmony enhanced group innovative performance through increasing knowledge sharing among group members. However, instead of motivating innovative performance through fostering moderate levels of task conflict, group harmony enhanced innovative performance through reducing task conflict on the one hand and neutralizing the negative effect of task conflict on the other. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.

previous article The changing face of China’s billionaire-entrepreneurs

next article Erratum to: Group harmony in the workplace: Conception, measurement, and validation

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Simsek et al. (2005) expanded on Hambrick’s (1994) concept of behavior integration and claimed that their behavioral integration concept is an all-encompassing meta-construct. However, the authors as well as Hambrick (1994) differentiate behavior integration from social integration in that the former is about social relationships whereas the latter is about task related collaboration and coordination.

Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. 1991. Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park: Sage.

Amabile, T. M. 1988. A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.). Research in organizational behavior, Vol. 10: 123–167. Greenwich: JAI.

Amabile, T. M., Barsade, S. G., Mueller, J. S., & Staw, B. M. 2005. Affect and creativity at work. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50: 367–403.CrossRef

Amason, A. 1996. Distinguishing the effects of functional and dysfunctional conflict on strategic decision making: Resolving a paradox for the top management teams. Academy of Management Journal, 39: 123–148.CrossRef

Ames, T. A., & Rosemont, H. 1998. The analects of Confucius: A philosophical translation. New York: Ballantine Books.

Arbuckle, J., & Wothke, W. 1999. AMOS 4 user’s reference guide. Chicago: Smallwaters Corporation.

Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. 1989. Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14: 20–39.

Barkema, H., Chen, X. P., George, G., Luo, Y., & Tsui, A. 2011. West meets East: New concepts and theories. Academy of Management Journal, 54(3): 642–644.

Barsade, S. G. 2002. The ripple effect: Emotional contagion and its influence on group behavior. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47(4): 644–675.CrossRef

Blader, S. L., & Tyler, T. R. 2003. A four-component model of procedural justice: Defining the meaning of a “fair” process. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29: 747–758.CrossRef

Blau, P. 1977. Inequality and heterogeneity. New York: Free Press.

Bliese, P. 2000. Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. In K. J. Klein & S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.). Multilevel theory, research and methods in organizations: 512–556. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Bond, M. H., & Hwang, K. K. 1986. The social psychology of Chinese people. In M. H. Bond (Ed.). The psychology of the Chinese people: 213–266. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.

Brown, M. E., Treviño, L. K., & Harrison, D. A. 2005. Ethical leadership: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 97(2): 117–134.CrossRef

Carnevale, P. J., & Probst, T. M. 1998. Social values and social conflict in creative problem solving and categorization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(5): 1300–1309.CrossRef

Chen, G., Liu, C., & Tjosvold, D. 2005. Conflict management for effective top management teams and innovation in China. Journal of Management Studies, 42(2): 277–300.

Chua, R. Y. J. 2013. The costs of ambient cultural disharmony: Indirect intercultural conflicts in social environment undermine creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 56(6): 1545–1577.CrossRef

Chuang, C. H., Jackson, S. E., & Jiang, Y. 2013. Can knowledge-intensive teamwork be managed? Examining the roles of HRM systems, leadership and tacit knowledge. Journal of Management, 20(10): 1–31.

Cohen, S. G., & Bailey, D. E. 1997. What makes teams work: Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite. Journal of Management, 23: 239–290.CrossRef

Colquitt, J. A., Conlon, D. E., Wesson, M. J., Porter, C. O., & Ng, K. Y. 2001. Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3): 425–445.CrossRef

Costa, A. C., & Anderson, N. 2011. Measuring trust in teas: Development and validation of a multifaceted measure of formative and reflective indicators of team trust. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 20(1): 119–154.CrossRef

Creed, W. E. D., & Miles, R. E. 1996. Trust in organizations: A conceptual framework. In R. M. Kramer & T. R. Tyler (Eds.). Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research: 16–39. London: Sage.CrossRef

Cua, A. S. 1979. Dimensions of li (propriety): Reflections on an aspect of Hsun Tzu’s ethics. Philosophy East and West, 29(4): 373–394.

Cua, A. S. 1987. Hsun Tzu and the unity of virtues. Journal of Chinese Philosophy, 14: 381–400.CrossRef

De Dreu, C. K. W., & Weingart, L. R. 2003. Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: a meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(4): 741–749.CrossRef

de Wit, F. R. C., Greer, L. L., & Jehn, K. A. 2012. Paradox of intragroup conflict: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(2): 360–390.CrossRef

Deutsch, M. 1973. The resolution of conflict: Constructive and destructive processes. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Edmondson, A. 1999. Psychological safety and leaning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44: 350–383.CrossRef

Ellis, A. P. J., Hollenbeck, J. R., Ilgen, D. R., Porter, C. O. L. H., West, B. J., & Moon, H. 2003. Team learning: Collectively connecting the dots. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88: 821–835.CrossRef

Farh, J. L., Lee, C., & Farh, C. I. C. 2010. Task conflict and team creativity: A question of how much and when. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(6): 1173–1180.CrossRef

Farh, J. L., Zhong, C. B., & Organ, D. W. 2004. Organizational citizenship behavior in the People’s Republic of China. Organization Science, 15: 241–253.CrossRef

Farjoun, M. 2010. Beyond dualism: Stability and change as a duality. Academy of Management Review, 35: 202–225.CrossRef

Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. 1991. Social cognition, 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Forgas, J. P. 1990. Affective influences on individual and group judgments. European Journal of Social Psychology, 20: 441–453.CrossRef

Fornell, C. & Larcker, D. F. 1981. Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 382–388.

Friedman, R., Chi, S., & Liu, L. A. 2006. An expectancy model of Chinese-American differences in conflict-avoiding. Journal of International Business Studies, 37: 76–91.CrossRef

George, J. M. 1990. Personality, affect, and behavior in groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(2): 107–116.CrossRef

George, G. 2014. Rethinking management scholarship. Academy of Management Journal, 57: 1–6.CrossRef

Gully, S. M., Devine, D. J., & Whitney, D. J. 1995. A meta-analysis of cohesion and performance. Effects of level of analysis and task interdependence. Small Group Research, 26(4): 497–520.CrossRef

Haas, M. R., & Hansen, M. T. 2007. Different knowledge, different benefits: Toward a productivity perspective on knowledge sharing in organizations. Strategic Management Journal, 28: 1133–1153.CrossRef

Hambrick, D. C. 1994. Top management teams: A conceptual integration and reconsideration of the “team” label. Research in Organizational Behavior, 16: 171.

Harrison, D. A., Price, K. H., & Bell, M. P. 1998. Beyond relational demography: Time and the effects of surface- and deep-level diversity of work group cohesion. Academy of Management Journal, 41: 96–107.CrossRef

Herzberg, F., Mausner, B., & Snyderman, B. 1959. The motivation to work. New York: Wiley.

Hinkin, T. R. 1998. A brief tutorial on the development of measures for use in survey questionnaires. Organizational Research Methods, 1(1): 104–121.CrossRef

Hogg, M. A., & Terry, D. J. 2000. Social identity and self-categorization processes in organizational contexts. Academy of Management Review, 25: 121–140.

Huang, L. L. 1999. Interpersonal harmony and conflict . Taipei: Gui Guan (in Chinese).

Hwang, K. K. 1998. Guanxi and mientze: Conflict resolution in Chinese society. Intercultural Communication Studies, 7(1): 17–42.

Isen, A. M. 2003. Positive affect as a source of human strength. In L. G. Aspinwall & U. M. Staudinger (Eds.). A psychology of human strengths: Fundamental questions and future directions for a positive psychology: 179–195. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Jackson, S. E., Brett, J. F., Sessa, V. I., Cooper, D. M., Julin, J. A., & Peyronnin, K. 1991. Some differences make a difference: Individual dissimilarity and group heterogeneity as correlates of recruitment, promotions, and turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 76(5): 675–689.

Jackson, S. E., Chuang, C., Harden, E. E., & Jiang, Y. 2006. Toward developing human resource management systems for knowledge-intensive teamwork. In J. J. Martocchio (Ed.). Research in personnel and human resources management, Vol. 25: 27–70. Greenwich: JAI.

James, L. R., Demaree, R. J., & Wolf, G. 1984. Estimating within group interrater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69: 85–98.CrossRef

Janis, I. L. 1972. Victims of groupthink: A psychological study of foreign-policy decisions and fiascoes. Oxford: Houghton Mifflin.

Jehn, K. A. 1995. A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(2): 256–282.CrossRef

Jehn, K. A., Rispens, S., & Thatcher, S. M. B. 2010. The effects of conflict asymmetry on work group and individual outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 53(3): 596–616.CrossRef

Jiang, Y., Jackson, S. E., & Chen, C. C. 2011. Transformational leadership and group performance: The mediating roles of cooperative norms and knowledge sharing. Paper presented at the Academy of Management Annual Conference, San Antonio, Texas.

Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. 1978. The social psychology of organizations. New York: Wiley.

Kim, K. I., Park, H. J., & Suzuki, N. 1990. Reward allocations in the United States, Japan and Korea: A comparison of individualistic and collectivistic cultures. Academy of Management Journal, 33(1): 188–198.CrossRef

Klimoski, R. J., & Mohammed, S. 1994. Team mental model: Construct or metaphor?. Journal of Management, 20: 403–437.CrossRef

Kramer, R. M. 1999. Trust and distrust in organizations: Emerging perspectives, Enduring Questions. Annual Review of Psychology, 50: 569–598.CrossRef

Larsen, R. J., & Diener, E. 1992. Promises and problems with the circumplex model of emotion. In M. Clark (Ed.). Emotion: 25–59. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Lee, Y. T., Han, A. G., Byron, T. K., & Fan, H. X. 2008. Daoist leadership: Theory and application. In C. C. Chen & Y. T. Lee (Eds.). Leadership and management in China: Philosophies, theories, and practices: 51–79. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Legge, J. 1970/1895. The works of Mencius. New York: Dover.

Leung, K. 2012. Indigenous Chinese management research: Like it or not, we need it. Management and Organization Review, 8(1): 1–5.CrossRef

Leung, K., & Brew, F. P. 2009. A cultural analysis of harmony and conflict: Toward an integrative model of conflict styles. In R. S. Wyer, C. Y. Chiu, & Y. Y. Hong (Eds.). Understanding culture: Theory, research and application: 411–428. New York: Psychology Press.

Leung, K., Brew, F. P., Zhang, Z. X., & Zhang, Y. 2011. Harmony and conflict: A cross-cultural investigation in China and Australia. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 42: 795–816.CrossRef

Leung, K., Koch, P. T., & Lu, L. 2002. A dualistic model of harmony and its implications for conflict management in Asia. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 19(2–3): 201–220.CrossRef

Leventhal, G. S., Michaels, J. W., & Sanford, C. 1972. Inequity and interpersonal conflict: Reward allocation and secrecy about reward as methods of preventing conflict. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 23(1): 88.CrossRef

Li, C. 2006. The Confucian ideal of harmony. Philosophy East & West, 56: 583–603.CrossRef

Li, P. P. 2012. Toward an integrative framework of indigenous research: The geocentric implications of the Yin-Yang balance. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 29(4): 849–872.CrossRef

Li, P. P., Leung, K., Chen, C. C., & Luo, J. D. 2012. Indigenous research on Chinese management: What and how. Management and Organization Review, 8(1): 7–24.CrossRef

Man, M. M., & Bond, M. H. 2005. A lexically derived measure of relationship concord in Chinese culture. Journal of Psychology in Chinese Societies, 6: 109–128.

Mayer, D. M., Kuenzi, M., Greenbaum, R., Bardes, M., & Salvador, R. 2009. How low does ethical leadership flow? Test of a trickle-down model. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 108: 1–13.

Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. 1995. An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3): 709–734.

Mayer, R. C., & Gavin, M. 2005. Trust in management and performance: Who minds the shop while the employees watch the boss?. Academy of Management Journal, 48(5): 874–888.CrossRef

Miron-Spektor, E., Erez, M., & Naveh, E. 2011. The effect of conformist and attentive-to-detail members on team innovation: Reconciling the innovation paradox. Academy of Management Journal, 54(4): 740–760.CrossRef

Mooney, A. C., Holahan, P. J., & Amason, A. C. 2006. Don’t take it personally: Exploring cognitive conflict as a mediator of affective conflict. Journal of Management Studies, 44(5): 733–758.CrossRef

Morris, M. W., Leung, K., Ames, D., & Lickel, B. 1999. Views from inside and outside: Integrating emic and etic insights about culture and justice judgment. Academy of Management Review, 24(4): 781–796.

Morris, M. W., Williams, K. Y., Leung, K., Larrick, R., Mendoza, M. T., Bhtnagar, D., Li, J., Kondo, M., Luo, J. L., & Hu, J. C. 1998. Conflict management style: Accounting for cross-national differences. Journal of International Business Studies, 19(4): 729–748.CrossRef

Nisbett, R., Peng, K., Choi, I., & Norenzayan, A. 2001. Culture and systems of thought: Holistic versus analytic cognition. Psychological Review, 108: 291–310.CrossRef

O’Reilly, C. A., III, & Caldwell, D. F. 1985. The impact of normative social influence and cohesiveness on task perceptions and attitudes: A social information processing approach. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 58: 193–206.CrossRef

O’Reilly, C. A., III, Caldwell, D. F., & Barnett, W. P. 1989. Work group demography, social integration, and turnover. Administrative Science Quarterly, 34: 21–37.CrossRef

Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. 2008. Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3): 879–891.CrossRef

Rahim, M. A. 1983. A measurement of styles of handling interpersonal conflict. Academy of Management Journal, 26: 368–376.CrossRef

Rahim, M. A. 2000. Managing conflict in organizations, 2nd ed. Westport: Quorum.

Rokeach, M. 1973. The nature of human values. New York: Free Press.

Schaubroeck, J. M., Hannah, S. T., Avolio, B. J., Kozlowski, S. W. J., Lord, R. G., Treviño, L. K., Dimotakis, N., & Peng, A. C. 2012. Embedding ethical leadership within and across organization levels. Academy of Management Journal, 55(5): 1053–1078.CrossRef

Schwab, D. P. 1980. Construct validity in organization behavior. In B. Staw & L. Cummings (Eds.). Research in organizational behavior: 3–43. Greenwich: JAI.

Scott, B. A., & Judge, T. A. 2009. The popularity contest at work: Who wins, why, and what do they receive?. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(1): 20–33.CrossRef

Seashore, S. E. 1954. Group cohesiveness in the industrial work group. Ann Arbor: Survey Research Center, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan.

Shaw, J. D., Zhu, J., Michelle, K. D., Scott, K. L., Shih, H., & Susanto, E. 2011. A contingency model of conflict and team effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(2): 391–400.CrossRef

Simons, T. L., & Peterson, R. S. 2000. Task conflict and relationship conflict in top management teams: The pivotal role of intragroup trust. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(1): 102–111.CrossRef

Simsek, Z., Veiga, J. F., Lubatkin, M. H., & Dino, R. N. 2005. Modeling the multilevel determinants of top management team behavioral integration. Academy of Management Journal, 48(1): 69–84.CrossRef

Singh, R. 1985. A test of the relative ratio model of reward division with students and managers in India. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 111: 363–384.

Singh, R. 1997. Group harmony and interpersonal fairness in reward allocation: On the loci of the moderation effect. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 72(2): 158–183.CrossRef

Standifer, R. L., Lester, S. W., Schultz, N. J., & Windsor, J. M. 2013. How age similarity preference, uncertainty, and workplace challenges affect conflict. Human Relations, 66(12): 1597–1618.CrossRef

Tjosvold, D. 1998. Cooperative and competitive goal approach to conflict: accomplishments and challenges. Applied Psychology, 47(3): 285–313.CrossRef

Tjosvold, D., Poon, M. C. C., & Yu, Z. Y. 2005. Team effectiveness in China: Cooperative conflict for relationship building. Human Relations, 58(3): 341–367.CrossRef

Triandis, H. C. 1995. Individualism and collectivism. Boulder: Westview.

Welbourne, T. M., Johnson, D. E., & Erez, A. 1998. The role-based performance scale: Validity analysis of a theory-based measure. Academy of Management Journal, 41(5): 540–555.CrossRef

West, M. A. 2002. Sparkling fountains or stagnant ponds: An integrative model of creativity and innovation implementation in work groups. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 51: 355–424.CrossRef

Woodman, R. W., Sawyer, J. E., & Griffin, R. W. 1993. Toward a theory of organizational creativity. Academy of Management Review, 18: 293–321.

Worthington, R. L., & Whittaker, T. A. 2006. Scale development research: A content analysis and recommendations for best practices. Counseling Psychologist, 34(6): 806–838.CrossRef

Yang, X. H., Peng, Y. Q., & Lee, Y. T. 2008. The Confucian and Mencian philosophy of benevolent leadership. In C. C. Chen & Y. T. Lee (Eds.). Leadership and management in China: Philosophies, theories, and practices: 31–50. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Zand, D. E. 1972. Trust and managerial problem solving. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(2): 229–239.CrossRef

Zhang, Z. X., Chen, C. C., Liu. L. A., & Liu, X. F. 2008. Chinese traditions and western theories: Influences on business leaders in China. In C. C. Chen & Y. T. Lee (Eds.). Leadership and management in China: Philosophies, theories, and practices: 239–271. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Title: Group harmony in the workplace: Conception, measurement, and validation
Authors: Chao C. Chen
Ali F. Ünal
Kwok Leung
Katherine R. Xin
Publication date: 01-12-2016
Publisher: Springer US
Published in: Asia Pacific Journal of Management / Issue 4/2016
Print ISSN: 0217-4561
Electronic ISSN: 1572-9958
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-016-9457-0

Springer Professional

Abstract

Please log in to get access to your license.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Other articles of this Issue 4/2016

Implementing high performance HR practices in Asia: HR practice consistency, employee roles, and performance

How do dynamic capabilities transform external technologies into firms’ renewed technological resources? – A mediation model

CEO transformational leadership and firm performance: A moderated mediation model of TMT trust climate and environmental dynamism

Erratum to: Group harmony in the workplace: Conception, measurement, and validation

Economic governance, dual networks and innovative learning in five Chinese industrial clusters

The changing face of China’s billionaire-entrepreneurs