Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal of Technology and Design Education 3/2018

03-06-2017

If you build it, will they come? Student preferences for Makerspace environments in higher education

Published in: International Journal of Technology and Design Education | Issue 3/2018

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The Maker Movement inspires people to express their creativity by making things in a self-directed and, often, collaborative learning endeavor. The excitement of the movement has spurred the development of various types of Makerspaces across the United States and the World to further enable people to make and innovate. The education community has recognized the potential for Makerspaces as learning environments that can foster interdisciplinary collaboration and self-directed learning. As such, there is much excitement to create Makerspaces within K-12 schools, libraries, colleges and universities. However, contrary to the formal design process used to build many school facilities, successful grass-roots makerspaces are most often created when those with like-minded interests come together and adapt the building around them to fit their needs. The research in this paper focuses on the design of such spaces by applying the environmental preferences predictors psychology construct. The study surveyed 276 students from art and design, engineering, and liberal arts majors to better understand their preferences as related to images of eight different Makerspaces. The results are broken down by the four predictors of preference, major, and gender. The results highlight differences among the images along with design considerations for creating spaces that welcome a broader audience.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
go back to reference Baichtal, J. (2014). Maker pro: Essays on making a living as a maker. San Francisco, CA: Maker Media Inc. Baichtal, J. (2014). Maker pro: Essays on making a living as a maker. San Francisco, CA: Maker Media Inc.
go back to reference Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W.H. Freeman and Company. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W.H. Freeman and Company.
go back to reference Barrett, T., Pizzico, M., Levy, B. D., Nagel, R. L., Linsey, J. S., Talley, K. G., Forest, C. R., & Newstetter, W. C. (2015). A review of university maker spaces. In Proceedings of annual conference of American Society of Engineering Education. Seattle, WA. Barrett, T., Pizzico, M., Levy, B. D., Nagel, R. L., Linsey, J. S., Talley, K. G., Forest, C. R., & Newstetter, W. C. (2015). A review of university maker spaces. In Proceedings of annual conference of American Society of Engineering Education. Seattle, WA.
go back to reference Bettman, J. R., Luce, M. F., & Payne, J. W. (2008). Preference construction and preference stability: Putting the pillow to rest. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 18(3), 170–174.CrossRef Bettman, J. R., Luce, M. F., & Payne, J. W. (2008). Preference construction and preference stability: Putting the pillow to rest. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 18(3), 170–174.CrossRef
go back to reference Brandt, C. B., Cennamo, K., Douglas, S., Vernon, M., McGrath, M., & Reimer, Y. (2013). A theoretical framework for the studio as a learning environment. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 23(2), 329–348.CrossRef Brandt, C. B., Cennamo, K., Douglas, S., Vernon, M., McGrath, M., & Reimer, Y. (2013). A theoretical framework for the studio as a learning environment. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 23(2), 329–348.CrossRef
go back to reference Crowther, P. (2013). Understanding the signature pedagogy of the design studio and the opportunities for its technological enhancement. Journal of Learning Design, 6(3), 18–28.CrossRef Crowther, P. (2013). Understanding the signature pedagogy of the design studio and the opportunities for its technological enhancement. Journal of Learning Design, 6(3), 18–28.CrossRef
go back to reference Day, L. L. (1992). Placemaking by design: Fitting a large new building into a historic district. Environment and Behavior, 24(3), 326–346.CrossRef Day, L. L. (1992). Placemaking by design: Fitting a large new building into a historic district. Environment and Behavior, 24(3), 326–346.CrossRef
go back to reference Doorley, S., & Witthoft, S. (2012). Make space: How to set the stage for creative collaboration. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. Doorley, S., & Witthoft, S. (2012). Make space: How to set the stage for creative collaboration. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
go back to reference Dougherty, D. (2013). The maker mindset. In M. Honey & D. E Kanter (Eds.), Design, make, play: Growing the next generation of STEM innovators (pp. 7–11). New York, NY: Routledge. Dougherty, D. (2013). The maker mindset. In M. Honey & D. E Kanter (Eds.), Design, make, play: Growing the next generation of STEM innovators (pp. 7–11). New York, NY: Routledge.
go back to reference Dym, C. L., Agogino, A. M., Eris, O., Frey, D. D., & Leifer, L. J. (2005). Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 103–120.CrossRef Dym, C. L., Agogino, A. M., Eris, O., Frey, D. D., & Leifer, L. J. (2005). Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 103–120.CrossRef
go back to reference Espey, M. (2008). Does space matter? Classroom design and team-based learning. Review of Agricultural Economics, 30(4), 764–775.CrossRef Espey, M. (2008). Does space matter? Classroom design and team-based learning. Review of Agricultural Economics, 30(4), 764–775.CrossRef
go back to reference Feldman, J. M., & Lynch, J. G. (1988). Self-generated validity and other effects of measurement on belief, attitude, intention, and behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73(3), 421.CrossRef Feldman, J. M., & Lynch, J. G. (1988). Self-generated validity and other effects of measurement on belief, attitude, intention, and behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73(3), 421.CrossRef
go back to reference Goodsell, C. T. (2003). The concept of public space and its democratic manifestations. The American Review of Public Administration, 33(4), 361–383.CrossRef Goodsell, C. T. (2003). The concept of public space and its democratic manifestations. The American Review of Public Administration, 33(4), 361–383.CrossRef
go back to reference Hadim, H. A. & Esche, S. K. (2002). Enhancing the engineering curriculum through project-based learning. In Frontiers in education, 2002. FIE 2002. 32nd Annual. IEEE. Hadim, H. A. & Esche, S. K. (2002). Enhancing the engineering curriculum through project-based learning. In Frontiers in education, 2002. FIE 2002. 32nd Annual. IEEE.
go back to reference Hatch, M. (2013). The maker movement manifesto: rules for innovation in the new world of crafters, hackers, and tinkerers. New York: McGraw Hill Professional. Hatch, M. (2013). The maker movement manifesto: rules for innovation in the new world of crafters, hackers, and tinkerers. New York: McGraw Hill Professional.
go back to reference Herzog, T. R., Gray, L. E., Dunville, A. M., Hicks, A. M., & Gilson, E. A. (2011). Preference and tranquility for houses of worship. Environment and Behavior, 45(4), 504–525.CrossRef Herzog, T. R., Gray, L. E., Dunville, A. M., Hicks, A. M., & Gilson, E. A. (2011). Preference and tranquility for houses of worship. Environment and Behavior, 45(4), 504–525.CrossRef
go back to reference Herzog, T. R., Gray, L. E., Dunville, A. M., Hicks, A. M., & Gilson, E. A. (2013). Preference and tranquility for houses of worship. Environment and Behavior, 45(4), 504–525.CrossRef Herzog, T. R., Gray, L. E., Dunville, A. M., Hicks, A. M., & Gilson, E. A. (2013). Preference and tranquility for houses of worship. Environment and Behavior, 45(4), 504–525.CrossRef
go back to reference Herzog, T. R., & Shier, R. L. (2000). Complexity, age, and building preference. Environment and Behavior, 32(4), 557–575.CrossRef Herzog, T. R., & Shier, R. L. (2000). Complexity, age, and building preference. Environment and Behavior, 32(4), 557–575.CrossRef
go back to reference Hlubinka, M., Dougherty, D., Thomas, P., Chang, S., Hoefer, S., Alexander, I., et al. (2013). Makerspace playbook: School edition. San Francisco, CA: Maker Media. Hlubinka, M., Dougherty, D., Thomas, P., Chang, S., Hoefer, S., Alexander, I., et al. (2013). Makerspace playbook: School edition. San Francisco, CA: Maker Media.
go back to reference Ikemi, M. (2005). The effects of mystery on preference for residential facades. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25(2), 167–173.CrossRef Ikemi, M. (2005). The effects of mystery on preference for residential facades. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25(2), 167–173.CrossRef
go back to reference Kaplan, S. (1987). Aesthetics, affect, and cognition: Environmental preference from an evolution perspective. Environment and Behavior, 19(1), 3–32.CrossRef Kaplan, S. (1987). Aesthetics, affect, and cognition: Environmental preference from an evolution perspective. Environment and Behavior, 19(1), 3–32.CrossRef
go back to reference Kent, R. L. (1989). The role of mystery in preferences for shopping malls. Landscape Journal, 8(1), 28–35.CrossRef Kent, R. L. (1989). The role of mystery in preferences for shopping malls. Landscape Journal, 8(1), 28–35.CrossRef
go back to reference Knight, D. W., Carlson, L. E., & Sullivan, J. (2007). Improving engineering student retention through hands-on, team based, first-year design projects. In Proceedings of the international conference on research in engineering education. Honolulu, HI. Knight, D. W., Carlson, L. E., & Sullivan, J. (2007). Improving engineering student retention through hands-on, team based, first-year design projects. In Proceedings of the international conference on research in engineering education. Honolulu, HI.
go back to reference Marra, R. M., Palmer, B., & Litzinger, T. A. (2000). The effects of a first-year engineering design course on student intellectual development as measured by the perry scheme. Journal of Engineering Education, 89(1), 39–45.CrossRef Marra, R. M., Palmer, B., & Litzinger, T. A. (2000). The effects of a first-year engineering design course on student intellectual development as measured by the perry scheme. Journal of Engineering Education, 89(1), 39–45.CrossRef
go back to reference Martinez, S., & Stager, G. (2013). Invent to learn: Making, tinkering, and engineering in the classroom. Torrance: Constructing modern knowledge press. Martinez, S., & Stager, G. (2013). Invent to learn: Making, tinkering, and engineering in the classroom. Torrance: Constructing modern knowledge press.
go back to reference McCoy, J. M., & Evans, G. W. (2002). The potential role of the physical environment in fostering creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 14(3–4), 409–426.CrossRef McCoy, J. M., & Evans, G. W. (2002). The potential role of the physical environment in fostering creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 14(3–4), 409–426.CrossRef
go back to reference Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R., Schkade, D. A., Schwarz, N., & Gregory, R. (1999). Measuring constructed preferences: Towards a building code. In B. Fischhoff & C. F. Manski (Eds.), Elicitation of preferences (pp. 243–275). Dordrecht: Springer. Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R., Schkade, D. A., Schwarz, N., & Gregory, R. (1999). Measuring constructed preferences: Towards a building code. In B. Fischhoff & C. F. Manski (Eds.), Elicitation of preferences (pp. 243–275). Dordrecht: Springer.
go back to reference Peppler, K., & Bender, S. (2013). Maker movement spreads innovation one project at a time. Phi Delta Kappan, 95(3), 22–27.CrossRef Peppler, K., & Bender, S. (2013). Maker movement spreads innovation one project at a time. Phi Delta Kappan, 95(3), 22–27.CrossRef
go back to reference Rands, M. L., & Gansemer-Topf, A. M. (2017). The room itself is active: How classroom design impacts student engagement. Journal of Learning Spaces, 6(1), 26–33. Rands, M. L., & Gansemer-Topf, A. M. (2017). The room itself is active: How classroom design impacts student engagement. Journal of Learning Spaces, 6(1), 26–33.
go back to reference Scott, S. C. (1993a). Complexity and mystery as predictors of interior preferences. Journal of Interior Design, 19(1), 25–33.CrossRef Scott, S. C. (1993a). Complexity and mystery as predictors of interior preferences. Journal of Interior Design, 19(1), 25–33.CrossRef
go back to reference Scott, S. C. (1993b). Visual attributes related to preference in interior environments. Journal of Interior Design, 18(1–2), 7–16.CrossRef Scott, S. C. (1993b). Visual attributes related to preference in interior environments. Journal of Interior Design, 18(1–2), 7–16.CrossRef
go back to reference Self, J. A., & Baek, J. S. (2016). Interdisciplinarity in design education: Understanding the undergraduate student experience. International Journal of Technology and Design Education. doi:10.1007/s10798-016-9355-2. Self, J. A., & Baek, J. S. (2016). Interdisciplinarity in design education: Understanding the undergraduate student experience. International Journal of Technology and Design Education. doi:10.​1007/​s10798-016-9355-2.
go back to reference Simonson, I. (2008). Regarding inherent preferences. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 18(3), 191–196.CrossRef Simonson, I. (2008). Regarding inherent preferences. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 18(3), 191–196.CrossRef
go back to reference Slovic, P. (1995). The construction of preference. American Psychologist, 50(5), 364.CrossRef Slovic, P. (1995). The construction of preference. American Psychologist, 50(5), 364.CrossRef
go back to reference Van der Jagt, A. P., Craig, T., Anable, J., Brewer, M. J., & Pearson, D. G. (2014). Unearthing the picturesque: The validity of the preference matrix as a measure of landscape aesthetics. Landscape and Urban Planning, 124, 1–13.CrossRef Van der Jagt, A. P., Craig, T., Anable, J., Brewer, M. J., & Pearson, D. G. (2014). Unearthing the picturesque: The validity of the preference matrix as a measure of landscape aesthetics. Landscape and Urban Planning, 124, 1–13.CrossRef
go back to reference Zavotka, S. L. (1995). Characteristics that influence individuals’ preferences for levels of complexity in interior design furnishings. Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal, 23(4), 393–408.CrossRef Zavotka, S. L. (1995). Characteristics that influence individuals’ preferences for levels of complexity in interior design furnishings. Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal, 23(4), 393–408.CrossRef
go back to reference Zube, E. H., Simcox, D. E., & Law, C. S. (1987). Perceptual landscape simulations: History and prospect. Landscape Journal, 6(1), 62–80.CrossRef Zube, E. H., Simcox, D. E., & Law, C. S. (1987). Perceptual landscape simulations: History and prospect. Landscape Journal, 6(1), 62–80.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
If you build it, will they come? Student preferences for Makerspace environments in higher education
Publication date
03-06-2017
Published in
International Journal of Technology and Design Education / Issue 3/2018
Print ISSN: 0957-7572
Electronic ISSN: 1573-1804
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-017-9412-5

Other articles of this Issue 3/2018

International Journal of Technology and Design Education 3/2018 Go to the issue

Premium Partner