Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal of Technology and Design Education 3/2018

07-06-2017

Using software to engage design students in academic writing

Authors: Adam Aitken, Darrall G. Thompson

Published in: International Journal of Technology and Design Education | Issue 3/2018

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

First year undergraduate design students have found difficulties in realising the standards expected for academic writing at university level. An assessment initiative was used to engage students with criteria and standards for a core interdisciplinary design subject notable for its demanding assessment of academic writing. The same graduate attribute categories linked to assessment criteria and web-based software (REVIEW™) were used for assessing students’ other design assignments. Students engaged with criterion-referenced assessment of an essay exemplar in order to reflect on their own essay writing process. Tutor marking of the exemplar and student essays used a visual mark on a grading scale to reveal the variation between the tutor’s marks and students’ own judgments against each criterion. Data from the software and post-semester focus group discussions and questionnaires showed that the initiative promoted engagement and dialogue between tutors and students and fostered independence and confidence. Results suggest that students’ understanding of the required academic writing standards was improved by this reflective intervention and increased their appreciation that writing and research skills are important attributes for designers.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
go back to reference Black, P., Harrison, C., & Lee, C. (2003). Assessment for learning: Putting it into practice (p. 135). New York: McGraw-Hill. Black, P., Harrison, C., & Lee, C. (2003). Assessment for learning: Putting it into practice (p. 135). New York: McGraw-Hill.
go back to reference Boud, D., & Falchikov, N. (2006). Aligning assessment with long-term learning. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(4), 399–413.CrossRef Boud, D., & Falchikov, N. (2006). Aligning assessment with long-term learning. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(4), 399–413.CrossRef
go back to reference Boud, D. J., Lawson, R., & Thompson, D. G. (2013). Does student engagement in self-assessment calibrate their judgement over time? Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(8), 941–956.CrossRef Boud, D. J., Lawson, R., & Thompson, D. G. (2013). Does student engagement in self-assessment calibrate their judgement over time? Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(8), 941–956.CrossRef
go back to reference Boud, D., & Molloy, E. (2013). Rethinking models of feedback for learning: The challenge of design. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(6), 698–712.CrossRef Boud, D., & Molloy, E. (2013). Rethinking models of feedback for learning: The challenge of design. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(6), 698–712.CrossRef
go back to reference Carless, D. (2006). Differing perceptions in the feedback process. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 219–233.CrossRef Carless, D. (2006). Differing perceptions in the feedback process. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 219–233.CrossRef
go back to reference Catt, R., & Gregory, G. (2006). The point of writing: Is student writing in higher education developed or merely assessed? In L. Ganobcsick-Williams (Ed.), Teaching academic writing in UK higher education (pp. 16–29). Houndmills, Basingstoke Hampshire: Palgrave McMillan.CrossRef Catt, R., & Gregory, G. (2006). The point of writing: Is student writing in higher education developed or merely assessed? In L. Ganobcsick-Williams (Ed.), Teaching academic writing in UK higher education (pp. 16–29). Houndmills, Basingstoke Hampshire: Palgrave McMillan.CrossRef
go back to reference Handley, K., & Williams, L. (2011). From copying to learning: Using exemplars to engage students with assessment criteria and feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 36(1), 95–108.CrossRef Handley, K., & Williams, L. (2011). From copying to learning: Using exemplars to engage students with assessment criteria and feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 36(1), 95–108.CrossRef
go back to reference Hendry, G. D., Armstrong, S., & Bromberger, N. (2012). Implementing standards-based assessment effectively: Incorporating discussion of exemplars into classroom teaching. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 37(2), 149–161.CrossRef Hendry, G. D., Armstrong, S., & Bromberger, N. (2012). Implementing standards-based assessment effectively: Incorporating discussion of exemplars into classroom teaching. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 37(2), 149–161.CrossRef
go back to reference Hendry, G. D., Bromberger, N., & Armstrong, S. (2011). Constructive guidance and feedback for learning: The usefulness of exemplars, marking sheets and different types of feedback in a first year law subject. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 36(1), 1–11.CrossRef Hendry, G. D., Bromberger, N., & Armstrong, S. (2011). Constructive guidance and feedback for learning: The usefulness of exemplars, marking sheets and different types of feedback in a first year law subject. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 36(1), 1–11.CrossRef
go back to reference Hendry, G., & Tomitsch, M. (2014). Implementing an exemplar-based approach in an interaction design subject: Enhancing students’ awareness of the need to be creative. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 24(3), 337–348.CrossRef Hendry, G., & Tomitsch, M. (2014). Implementing an exemplar-based approach in an interaction design subject: Enhancing students’ awareness of the need to be creative. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 24(3), 337–348.CrossRef
go back to reference Hunter, K., & Docherty, P. (2011). Reducing variation in the assessment of student writing. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 36(1), 109–124.CrossRef Hunter, K., & Docherty, P. (2011). Reducing variation in the assessment of student writing. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 36(1), 109–124.CrossRef
go back to reference Ivanič, R., Richard Edwards, R., Satchwell, C., & Smith, J. (2007). Possibilities for pedagogy in further education: Harnessing the abundance of literacy. British Educational Research Journal, 33(5), 703–721.CrossRef Ivanič, R., Richard Edwards, R., Satchwell, C., & Smith, J. (2007). Possibilities for pedagogy in further education: Harnessing the abundance of literacy. British Educational Research Journal, 33(5), 703–721.CrossRef
go back to reference Lea, M., & Street, B. (1998). Student writing in higher education: An academic literacies approach. Studies in Higher Education, 23(2), 157–173.CrossRef Lea, M., & Street, B. (1998). Student writing in higher education: An academic literacies approach. Studies in Higher Education, 23(2), 157–173.CrossRef
go back to reference Lillis, T. (2007). New voices in academia? The regulative nature of academic writing conventions. Language and Education, 11(3), 189–199. Lillis, T. (2007). New voices in academia? The regulative nature of academic writing conventions. Language and Education, 11(3), 189–199.
go back to reference O’Donovan, B., Price, B. M., & Rust, C. (2004). Know what I mean? Enhancing student understanding of assessment standards and criteria. Teaching in Higher Education, 9(3), 325–335.CrossRef O’Donovan, B., Price, B. M., & Rust, C. (2004). Know what I mean? Enhancing student understanding of assessment standards and criteria. Teaching in Higher Education, 9(3), 325–335.CrossRef
go back to reference Orr, S. (2007). Assessment moderation: Constructing the marks and constructing the students. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 32(6), 645–656.CrossRef Orr, S. (2007). Assessment moderation: Constructing the marks and constructing the students. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 32(6), 645–656.CrossRef
go back to reference Price, M., Handley, K., Millar, J., & O’Donovan, B. (2010). Feedback: All that effort, but what is the effect? Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(3), 277–289.CrossRef Price, M., Handley, K., Millar, J., & O’Donovan, B. (2010). Feedback: All that effort, but what is the effect? Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(3), 277–289.CrossRef
go back to reference Rust, C., Rust, M., & O’Donavan, B. (2003). Improving students’ learning by developing their understanding of assessment criteria and processes. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 28(2), 147–164.CrossRef Rust, C., Rust, M., & O’Donavan, B. (2003). Improving students’ learning by developing their understanding of assessment criteria and processes. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 28(2), 147–164.CrossRef
go back to reference Sadler, D. R. (1987). Specifying and promulgating achievement standards. Oxford Review of Education, 13(2), 191–209.CrossRef Sadler, D. R. (1987). Specifying and promulgating achievement standards. Oxford Review of Education, 13(2), 191–209.CrossRef
go back to reference Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18(2), 119–144.CrossRef Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18(2), 119–144.CrossRef
go back to reference Sadler, D. R. (2005). Interpretations of criteria-based assessment and grading in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(2), 175–194.CrossRef Sadler, D. R. (2005). Interpretations of criteria-based assessment and grading in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(2), 175–194.CrossRef
go back to reference Sadler, D. R. (2010). Beyond feedback: Developing student capability in complex appraisal. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(5), 535–550.CrossRef Sadler, D. R. (2010). Beyond feedback: Developing student capability in complex appraisal. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(5), 535–550.CrossRef
go back to reference Sadler, R. (1998). Formative Assessment: Revisiting the territory. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 5(1), 77–84.CrossRef Sadler, R. (1998). Formative Assessment: Revisiting the territory. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 5(1), 77–84.CrossRef
go back to reference Sadler, R. (2007). Perils in the meticulous specification of goals and assessment criteria. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 14(3), 387–392.CrossRef Sadler, R. (2007). Perils in the meticulous specification of goals and assessment criteria. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 14(3), 387–392.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Using software to engage design students in academic writing
Authors
Adam Aitken
Darrall G. Thompson
Publication date
07-06-2017
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
International Journal of Technology and Design Education / Issue 3/2018
Print ISSN: 0957-7572
Electronic ISSN: 1573-1804
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-017-9413-4

Other articles of this Issue 3/2018

International Journal of Technology and Design Education 3/2018 Go to the issue

Premium Partner