Top

The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment

Published in:

01-02-2015 | CRITICAL REVIEW

On the scientific justification of the use of working hours, child labour and property rights in social life cycle assessment: three topical reviews

Authors: Rickard Arvidsson, Henrikke Baumann, Jutta Hildenbrand

Published in: The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment | Issue 2/2015

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

Purpose

Working hours, child labour and property rights have been suggested as topics to assess in social life cycle assessment (SLCA). The purpose of this study is to investigate the scientific justification of the current use of these topics. The long-term aim is to contribute to the future development of SLCA.

Methods

A literature review was conducted for each of the three topics. One thousand scientific articles were analysed for each topic, and relevant articles were selected. The articles were analysed based on whether the topics facilitated or obstructed beneficial social values, and whether they facilitated or obstructed adverse social values.

Results and discussion

The results show that the three topics both facilitate and obstruct beneficial social values. They also show that the topics both facilitate and obstruct adverse social values. Considering the complex and ambiguous nature of these topics reported in the scientific literature, the current use of these topics in the SLCA literature is found not to be completely scientifically justified.

Conclusions

Based on this study, the current use of working hours, child labour and property rights in SLCA studies should be questioned. We suggest that the fields of social science and economics may be fruitfully considered when seeking scientific justification for topics to assess in SLCA.

next article Life cycle assessment of Norwegian road tunnel

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Adger WN, Luttrell C (2000) Property rights and the utilisation of wetlands. Ecol Econ 35(1):75–89CrossRef

Akiyama T, Furukawa Y (2009) Intellectual property rights and appropriability of innovation. Econ Lett 103(3):138–141CrossRef

Altavilla C, Garofalo A, Vinci CP (2005) Evaluating the effects of working hours on employment and wages. J Policy Model 27(6):647–664CrossRef

Ambadekar NN, Wahab SN, Zodpey SP, Khandait DW (1999) Effect of child labour on growth of children. Public Health 113(6):303–306CrossRef

Basu K, Zarghamee H (2009) Is product boycott a good idea for controlling child labor? A theoretical investigation. J Dev Econ 88(2):217–220CrossRef

Baumann H (2009) Don't fence me in…. In: Boons F, Howard-Grenville J (eds) The social embeddedness of industrial ecology. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham

Baumann H, Arvidsson R, Tong H, Wang Y (2013) Does the production of an airbag injure more people than it saves in traffic? Discussing an alternative approach to S-LCA methodology. J Ind Ecol 17(4):517–527CrossRef

Benoît C, Mazijn B, Andrews ES, Barthel L-P, Beck T, Ciroth A, Cucuzzella C, Gensch C-O, Hébert J, Lesage P, Manhart A, Mazeau P, Methot A-L, Moberg A, Norris G, Parent J, Prakash S, Reveret J-P, Spillemaeckers S, Ugaya CML, Valdivia S, Weidema BP (2009) Guidelines for social life cycle assessment of products. United Nations Environment Programme and Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, Nairobi

Benoit-Norris C, Vickery-Niederman G, Valdivia S, Franze J, Traverso M, Ciroth A, Mazijn B (2011) Introducing the UNEP/SETAC methodological sheets for subcategories of social LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 16(7):682–690CrossRef

Benoît Norris C, Traverso M, Valdivia S, Vickery-Niederman G, Franze J, Azuero L, Ciroth A, Mazijn B, Aulision D (2013) The Methodological Sheets for Sub-Categories in Social Life Cycle Assessment (S-LCA). United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) and Society for Environmental Toxicology and Chemiastry (SETAC)

Boholm M, Arvidsson R (2014) Controversy over antibacterial silver: implications for environmental and sustainability assessments. J Clean Prod 68:135–143CrossRef

Boholm M, Arvidsson R, Boholm Å, Corvellec H, Molander S (2014) Dis-Ag-reement: the construction and negotiation of risk in the Swedish controversy over antibacterial silver. J Risk Res. doi:10.1080/13669877.2013.879492

Boons F, Baumann H, Hall J (2012) Conceptualizing sustainable development and global supply chains. Ecol Econ 83:134–143CrossRef

Borg J, Selmer JK (2012) From Ghana to Magnum Ice Cream: tracking down the organisation of sustainable cocoa product chains Gothenburg. Chalmers Univeristy of Technology

Bose N, Murshid AP, Wurm MA (2012) The growth effects of property rights: the role of finance. World Dev 40(9):1784–1797CrossRef

Bose-O’Reilly S, Lettmeier B, Matteucci Gothe R, Beinhoff C, Siebert U, Drasch G (2008) Mercury as a serious health hazard for children in gold mining areas. Environ Res 107(1):89–97CrossRef

Boulay A-M, Bulle C, Bayart J-B, Deschênes L, Margni M (2011) Regional characterization of freshwater use in LCA: modeling direct impacts on human health. Environ Sci Tech 45(20):8948–8957CrossRef

Bouzid A, Padilla M (2014) Analysis of social performance of the industrial tomatoes food chain in Algeria. New Medit 13(1):60–65

Branstetter L, Fisman R, Foley CF, Saggi K (2011) Does intellectual property rights reform spur industrial development? J Int Econ 83(1):27–36CrossRef

Chen Y, Puttitanun T (2005) Intellectual property rights and innovation in developing countries. J Dev Econ 78(2):474–493CrossRef

Chu AC, Peng S-K (2011) International intellectual property rights: effects on growth, welfare and income inequality. J Macroecon 33(2):276–287CrossRef

Chu AC, Cozzi G, Galli S (2014) Stage-dependent intellectual property rights. J Dev Econ 106:239–249CrossRef

Ciroth A, Franze J (2011) LCA of an ecolableded notebook—consideration of social and environmental impacts along the entire life cycle. GreenDeltaTC GmbH, Berlin

Clift R, Sim S, Sinclair P (2013) Sustainable consumption and production: quality, luxury and supply chain equity. In: Jawahir IS, Sikdar SK, Huang Y (eds) Treatise on sustainability science and engineering. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, pp 291–309CrossRef

Costa G (2011) Editorial for special issue of applied ergonomics on working hours. Appl Ergon 42(2):193–195CrossRef

Costa G, Sartori S (2005) Flexible work hours, ageing and well-being. Int Congr Ser 1280:23–28CrossRef

Dahl AL (2012) Achievements and gaps in indicators for sustainability. Ecol Indic 17:14–19CrossRef

Dessy S, Pallage S (2005) A theory of the worst forms of child labour. Econ J 115(500):68–87CrossRef

Dinopoulos E, Segerstrom P (2010) Intellectual property rights, multinational firms and economic growth. J Dev Econ 92(1):13–27CrossRef

Dreyer LC, Hauschild MZ, Schierbeck J (2006) A framework for social life cycle impact assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 11(2):88–97CrossRef

Ekener-Petersen E, Finnveden G (2013) Potential hotspots identified by social LCA—part 1: a case study of a laptop computer. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18(1):127–143CrossRef

Fergusson L (2013) The political economy of rural property rights and the persistence of the dual economy. J Dev Econ 103:167–181CrossRef

Fernandez L (2006) Natural resources, agriculture and property rights. Ecol Econ 57(3):359–373CrossRef

Franze J, Ciroth A (2011) A comparison of cut roses from Ecuador and the Netherlands. Int J Life Cycle Assess 16(4):366–379CrossRef

Frønes I (2007) Theorizing indicators. Soc Indic Res 83(1):5–23CrossRef

Furukawa Y (2007) The protection of intellectual property rights and endogenous growth: is stronger always better? J Econ Dyn Control 31(11):3644–3670CrossRef

Galiani S, Schargrodsky E (2010) Property rights for the poor: effects of land titling. J Public Econ 94(9–10):700–729CrossRef

Gallopín GC (1996) Environmental and sustainability indicators and the concept of situational indicators. A systems approach. Environ Model Assess 1:101–117CrossRef

Gangopadhyay K, Mondal D (2012) Does stronger protection of intellectual property stimulate innovation? Econ Lett 116(1):80–82CrossRef

Gharaibeh M, Hoeman S (2003) Health hazards and risks for abuse among child labor in Jordan. J Pediatr Nurs 18(2):140–147CrossRef

Glass AJ, Saggi K (2002) Intellectual property rights and foreign direct investment. J Int Econ 56(2):387–410CrossRef

Gorton W (2010) The philosophy of social science, http://www.iep.utm.edu/soc-sci/. Encyclopedia of Philisophy. Accessed 07 13 2014

Grossman HI (2005) Inventors and pirates: creative activity and intellectual property rights. Eur J Polit Econ 21(2):269–285CrossRef

Hauschild M, Wenzel H (1998) Environmental assessment of products, volume 2. Chapman and Hall, London

Hilson G (2008) ‘A load too heavy’: critical reflections on the child labor problem in Africa’s small-scale mining sector. Child Youth Serv Rev 30(11):1233–1245CrossRef

Hosseinijou S, Mansour S, Shirazi M (2014) Social life cycle assessment for material selection: a case study of building materials. Int J Life Cycle Assess 19(3):620–645CrossRef

Hudson J, Minea A (2013) Innovation, intellectual property rights, and economic development: a unified empirical investigation. World Dev 46:66–78CrossRef

Hunkeler D (2006) Societal LCA methodology and case study. Int J Life Cycle Assess 11(6):371–382CrossRef

International Labour Organization (2008) Measurement of decent work. International Labour Office, Geneva

International Labour Organization and Inter-Parliamentary Union (2002) Eliminating the worst forms of child labour: a practical guide to ILO Convention No. 182 Handbook for parliamentarians No. 3. International Labour Office, Geneva

Jørgensen A, Le Bocq A, Nazarkina L, Hauschild M (2008) Methodologies for social life cycle assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13(2):96–103CrossRef

Jørgensen A, Lai LCH, Hauschild MZ (2010) Assessing the validity of impact pathways for child labour and well-being in social life cycle assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15:5–16CrossRef

Knabe A, Rätzel S (2010) Income, happiness, and the disutility of labour. Econ Lett 107:77–79CrossRef

Lai ELC, Qiu LD (2003) The North’s intellectual property rights standard for the South? J Int Econ 59(1):183–209CrossRef

Lehmann A, Russi D, Bala A, Finkbeiner M, Fullana-i-Palmer P (2011) Integration of social aspects in decision support, based on life cycle thinking. Sustainability 3(4):562–577CrossRef

MacEachen E, Polzer J, Clarke J (2008) “You are free to set your own hours”: governing worker productivity and health through flexibility and resilience. Soc Sci Med 66(5):1019–1033CrossRef

Manik Y, Leahy J, Halog A (2013) Social life cycle assessment of palm oil biodiesel: a case study in Jambi Province of Indonesia. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18(7):1386–1392CrossRef

Marimon R, Zilibotti F (2000) Employment and distributional effects of restricting working time. Eur Econ Rev 44:1291–1326CrossRef

Martínez-Blanco J, Lehmann A, Muñoz P, Antón A, Traverso M, Rieradevall J, Finkbeiner M (2014) Application challenges for the social Life Cycle Assessment of fertilizers within life cycle sustainability assessment. J Clean Prod 69:34–48CrossRef

Mathew AJ, Mukherjee A (2014) Intellectual property rights, southern innovation and foreign direct investment. Int Rev Econ Financ 31:128–137CrossRef

McAfee RP, Miller AD (2012) The tradeoff of the commons. J Public Econ 96(3–4):349–353CrossRef

Meadows D (1998) Indicators and information systems for sustainable development —A Report to the Balaton Group. Hartland Four Corners, The Sustainablility Institute

Mehta MN, Prabhu SV, Mistry HN (1985) Child labor in Bombay. Child Abuse Negl 9(1):107–111CrossRef

Menon N, van der Meulen Rodgers Y, Nguyen H (2014) Women’s land rights and children’s human capital in Vietnam. World Dev 54:18–31CrossRef

Milà i Canals L, Chenoweth J, Chapagain A, Orr S, Antón A, Clift R (2009) Assessing freshwater use impacts in LCA: part I—inventory modelling and characterisation factors for the main impact pathways. Int J Life Cycle Assess 14(1):28–42CrossRef

Miller TG, Spoolman SE (2013) Environmental science. Brooks/Cloe, Belmont

Musaazi MK, Mechtenberg AR, Nakibuule J, Sensenig R, Miyingo E, Makanda JV, Hakimian A, Eckelman MJ (2014) Quantification of social equity in life cycle assessment for increased sustainable production of sanitary products in Uganda. J Clean Prod. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.10.026

Nabe-Nielsen K, Kecklund G, Ingre M, Skotte J, Diderichsen F, Garde AH (2010) The importance of individual preferences when evaluating the associations between working hours and indicators of health and well-being. Appl Ergon 41(6):779–786CrossRef

Newcombe RG (2007) Working hours and ill-health - a more serious relationship than it appears? Int J Cardiol 114:284–285CrossRef

Niemeijer D, de Groot RS (2008) A conceptual framework for selecting environmental indicator sets. Ecol Indic 8(1):14–25CrossRef

Nieuwenhuys O (1996) The paradox of child labour and anthropology. Annu Rev Anthropol 25:237–251CrossRef

Noll H-H (2002) Towards a European system of social indicators: theoretical framework and system architecture. Soc Indic Res 58(1–3):47–87

Norris G (2006) Social impacts in product life cycles - towards life cycle attribute assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 11:97–104CrossRef

O’Brien M, Doig A, Clift R (1996) Social and environmental life cycle assessment (SELCA). Int J Life Cycle Assess 1(4):231–237CrossRef

Öncü E, Kurt AÖ, Esenay FI, Özer F (2013) Abuse of working children and influencing factors, Turkey. Child Abuse Negl 37(5):283–291CrossRef

Parent J, Cucuzzella C, Revéret J-P (2010) Impact assessment in SLCA: sorting the sLCIA methods according to their outcomes. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15(2):164–171CrossRef

Perrin RK (1999) Intellectual property rights and developing country agriculture. Agric Econ 21(3):221–229CrossRef

Rai V, Schultz K, Funkhouser E (2014) International low carbon technology transfer: do intellectual property regimes matter? Glob Environ Chang 24:60–74CrossRef

Rametsteiner E, Pülzl H, Alkan-Olsson J, Frederiksen P (2011) Sustainability indicator development—science or political negotiation? Ecol Indic 11(1):61–70CrossRef

Ranjan P (1999) An economic analysis of child labor. Econ Lett 64(1):99–105CrossRef

Raposo PS, van Ours JC (2010) How working time reduction affects jobs and wages. Econ Lett 106(1):61–63CrossRef

Rojas M, Vegas Z, Briceno L, Rodriguez L, Rojas M, Vegas Z, Briceno L, Rodriguez L (2010) Child labor and health: exploratory study from a public market in Valencia, Venezuela. Toxicol Lett 196(Suppl (0)):S69CrossRef

Rosenberg J, Weiss A (2012) Property rights and institutions in biblical society: the purchase of the Cave of the Patriarchs. Eur J Polit Econ 28(3):279–285CrossRef

Saint-Paul G (2004) Are intellectual property rights unfair? Labour Econ 11(1):129–144CrossRef

Sánchez R (2013) Do reductions of standard hours affect employment transitions? Evidence from Chile. Labour Econ 20:24–37CrossRef

Snir R, Harpaz I (2012) Beyond workaholism: towards a general model of heavy work investment. Hum Resour Manag Rev 22(3):232–243CrossRef

S-t L (2011) Strengthening intellectual property rights: experience from the 1986 Taiwanese patent reforms. Int J Ind Organ 29(5):524–536CrossRef

Unruh JD (2002) Poverty and property rights in the developing world: not as simple as we would like. Land Use Policy 19(4):275–276CrossRef

Valdivia S, Ugaya CL, Hildenbrand J, Traverso M, Mazijn B, Sonnemann G (2013) A UNEP/SETAC approach towards a life cycle sustainability assessment—our contribution to Rio+20. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18(9):1673–1685CrossRef

Voigt S, Gutmann J (2013) Turning cheap talk into economic growth: on the relationship between property rights and judicial independence. J Comp Econ 41(1):66–73CrossRef

von der Dunk FG, Back-Impallomeni E, Hobe S, Ramirez de Arellano RM (2004) Surreal estate: addressing the issue of ‘Immovable Property Rights on the Moon’. Space Policy 20(3):149–156CrossRef

Weidema B (2006) The integration of economic and social aspects in life cycle impact assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 11:89–96CrossRef

Weldegiorgis FS, Franks DM (2014) Social dimensions of energy supply alternatives in steelmaking: comparison of biomass and coal production scenarios in Australia. J Clean Prod. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.09.056

Wolff F-C, Maliki (2008) Evidence on the impact of child labor on child health in Indonesia, 1993–2000. Econ Hum Biol 6(1):143–169CrossRef

Wunder C, Heineck G (2013) Working time preferences, hours mismatch and well-being of couples: are there spillovers? Labour Econ 24:244–252CrossRef

Title: On the scientific justification of the use of working hours, child labour and property rights in social life cycle assessment: three topical reviews
Authors: Rickard Arvidsson
Henrikke Baumann
Jutta Hildenbrand
Publication date: 01-02-2015
Publisher: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in: The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment / Issue 2/2015
Print ISSN: 0948-3349
Electronic ISSN: 1614-7502
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-014-0821-3

Springer Professional

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results and discussion

Conclusions

Please log in to get access to your license.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Other articles of this Issue 2/2015

Land cover change from cotton to corn in the USA relieves freshwater ecotoxicity impact but may aggravate other regional environmental impacts

Method based on market changes for improvement of comparative attributional life cycle assessments

Uncertainty analysis in the environmental assessment of an integrated management system for restaurant and catering waste in Spain

Health effects of fine particulate matter in life cycle impact assessment: findings from the Basel Guidance Workshop

Marginal yield, technological advances, and emissions timing in corn ethanol’s carbon payback time

The USEtox story: a survey of model developer visions and user requirements