Skip to main content
Erschienen in: The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 7/2011

01.08.2011 | SOCIETAL LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT

Introducing the UNEP/SETAC methodological sheets for subcategories of social LCA

verfasst von: Catherine Benoît-Norris, Gina Vickery-Niederman, Sonia Valdivia, Juliane Franze, Marzia Traverso, Andreas Ciroth, Bernard Mazijn

Erschienen in: The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment | Ausgabe 7/2011

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Purpose

In May 2009, the Guidelines for Social Life Cycle Assessment of Products (the Guidelines) were launched at the occasion of the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 26000 (Social Responsibility) meeting in Quebec City, Canada. Developed by a United Nations Environment Programme/Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (“UNEP/SETAC”) Life Cycle Initiative project group on Social Life Cycle Assessment (S-LCA), the Guidelines provide a framework to assess social impacts across product life cycles. A year later, the Methodological Sheets for the Subcategories of Social LCA (“the Methodological Sheets”) are being made available to support practitioners engaging in the field. The Methodological Sheets provide practical guidance for conducting S-LCA case studies by offering consistent, yet flexible assistance.

Aim and scope

A Methodological Sheet was developed for each of the 31 subcategories of assessment outlined in the Guidelines. Each sheet includes a subcategory definition tailored to S-LCA, an explanation of how the subcategory relates to sustainable development, information on data assessment, including examples of inventory indicators, units of measurement, and data sources, along with a reference section that points the user to further information. The data assessment section is intended to provide adaptable guidance to LCA practitioners by offering examples and does not prescribe comprehensive procedures. The Methodological Sheets do not provide guidance on aggregating subcategory indicators or characterization models, nor do they discuss interpretation of results. The sheets are focused on the inventory analysis phase of S-LCA. This article will detail the development process of this unique resource, its content and future development, and how it compares to other types of documents, such as the GRI G3, ISO 26000 guidelines on Social Responsibility and the Global Social Compliance reference code.

Conclusions

The Methodological Sheets support the framework of S-LCA offered in the UNEP/SETAC Guidelines. They provide consistent guidance to assist LCA practitioners in case studies. At the same time, they have been designed to encourage context-specific application. Content of the Methodological Sheets will continue to evolve. Over time, and when relevant, characterization and interpretation models will be added to the Methodological Sheets. The Methodological Sheets are currently under public review and available on the Life Cycle Initiative website. A finalized version will be available in 2011, integrating comments from the review process.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Benoît C, Norris G, Valdivia S, Ciroth A et al (2010) The guidelines for social life cycle assessment of products: just in time! Int J Life Cycle Assess 15:156–163CrossRef Benoît C, Norris G, Valdivia S, Ciroth A et al (2010) The guidelines for social life cycle assessment of products: just in time! Int J Life Cycle Assess 15:156–163CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Burdge R (2004) The concepts, process and methods of SIA. The Social Ecology Press, Middleton, WI Burdge R (2004) The concepts, process and methods of SIA. The Social Ecology Press, Middleton, WI
Zurück zum Zitat Ciroth A, Franze J (2009) Social life cycle assessment of roses—a comparison of cut roses from Ecuador and the Netherlands. Life Cycle Assessment Conference Boston IX, September 29–October 2, Boston Ciroth A, Franze J (2009) Social life cycle assessment of roses—a comparison of cut roses from Ecuador and the Netherlands. Life Cycle Assessment Conference Boston IX, September 29–October 2, Boston
Zurück zum Zitat Ciroth A, Franze J (2011) LCA of an ecolabeled notebook: consideration of social and environmental impacts along the entire life cycle. GreenDeltaTC GmbH, Berlin Ciroth A, Franze J (2011) LCA of an ecolabeled notebook: consideration of social and environmental impacts along the entire life cycle. GreenDeltaTC GmbH, Berlin
Zurück zum Zitat Donaldson T, Preston L (1995) The stakeholder theory of the corporation: concepts, evidence, and implications. Acad Manag Rev 20(1):65–91 Donaldson T, Preston L (1995) The stakeholder theory of the corporation: concepts, evidence, and implications. Acad Manag Rev 20(1):65–91
Zurück zum Zitat Dreyer LC, Hauschild M, Schierbeck J (2010a) Characterisation of social impacts in LCA part 1: development of indicators for labour rights. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15:247–259CrossRef Dreyer LC, Hauschild M, Schierbeck J (2010a) Characterisation of social impacts in LCA part 1: development of indicators for labour rights. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15:247–259CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Dreyer LC, Hauschild M, Schierbeck J (2010b) Characterisation of social impacts in LCA part 2: implementation in six company case studies. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15:385–402CrossRef Dreyer LC, Hauschild M, Schierbeck J (2010b) Characterisation of social impacts in LCA part 2: implementation in six company case studies. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15:385–402CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Freeman R (1984) Strategic management: a stakeholder approach. Pitman, Boston, MA Freeman R (1984) Strategic management: a stakeholder approach. Pitman, Boston, MA
Zurück zum Zitat Grießhammer R, Benoît C, Dreyer LC et al (2006) Feasibility study: integration of social aspects into LCA. Oko-Institut, Freiburg Grießhammer R, Benoît C, Dreyer LC et al (2006) Feasibility study: integration of social aspects into LCA. Oko-Institut, Freiburg
Zurück zum Zitat Jones T, Wicks A, Freeman RE (2002) Stakeholder theory: the state of the art. In: Bowie N (ed) The Blackwell Guide to business ethics. Blackwell Publishing, U.K., pp 19–37 Jones T, Wicks A, Freeman RE (2002) Stakeholder theory: the state of the art. In: Bowie N (ed) The Blackwell Guide to business ethics. Blackwell Publishing, U.K., pp 19–37
Zurück zum Zitat Jørgensen A, Le Bocq A, Nazarkina L, Hauschild M (2007) Methodologies for social life cycle assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13(2):96–103CrossRef Jørgensen A, Le Bocq A, Nazarkina L, Hauschild M (2007) Methodologies for social life cycle assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13(2):96–103CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Jørgensen A, Lai L, Hauschild M (2010) Assessing the validity of impact pathways for child labour and well-being in social life cycle assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15:5–16CrossRef Jørgensen A, Lai L, Hauschild M (2010) Assessing the validity of impact pathways for child labour and well-being in social life cycle assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15:5–16CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Max-Neef M (1992) Development and human needs. In: Ekins P, Max-Neef M (eds) Real-life economics: understanding wealth creation. Routledge, New York Max-Neef M (1992) Development and human needs. In: Ekins P, Max-Neef M (eds) Real-life economics: understanding wealth creation. Routledge, New York
Zurück zum Zitat Millenium Ecosystem Assessment (2003) Ecosystems and human well-being: a framework for assessment. Island Press, Washington DC, USA Millenium Ecosystem Assessment (2003) Ecosystems and human well-being: a framework for assessment. Island Press, Washington DC, USA
Zurück zum Zitat Parent J, Cucuzzella C, Revéret J-P (2010) Impact assessment in SLCA: sorting the sLCIA methods according to their outcomes. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15:164–171CrossRef Parent J, Cucuzzella C, Revéret J-P (2010) Impact assessment in SLCA: sorting the sLCIA methods according to their outcomes. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15:164–171CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Remmen A, Jensen A, Frydendal J (2007) Life cycle management: a business guide to sustainability. United Nations Environment Programme Remmen A, Jensen A, Frydendal J (2007) Life cycle management: a business guide to sustainability. United Nations Environment Programme
Zurück zum Zitat Sen A (1993) Capability and well-being. In: Nussbaum (ed) The quality of life. Oxford scholarship online monographs, Oxford, pp 30–54 Sen A (1993) Capability and well-being. In: Nussbaum (ed) The quality of life. Oxford scholarship online monographs, Oxford, pp 30–54
Zurück zum Zitat Udo de Haes H, Jolliet O, Finnveden G, Hauschild M, Krewitt W, Müller-Wenk R (1999) Best available practice regarding impact categories and category indicators in life cycle impact assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 4(2):66–74CrossRef Udo de Haes H, Jolliet O, Finnveden G, Hauschild M, Krewitt W, Müller-Wenk R (1999) Best available practice regarding impact categories and category indicators in life cycle impact assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 4(2):66–74CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat UNEP/SETAC (2009) Guidelines for social life cycle assessment of products. United Nations Environment Programme, Paris UNEP/SETAC (2009) Guidelines for social life cycle assessment of products. United Nations Environment Programme, Paris
Zurück zum Zitat Weidema BP (2006) Social impact categories, indicators, characterisation and damage modelling. Presentation for the 29th Swiss LCA Discussion Forum Weidema BP (2006) Social impact categories, indicators, characterisation and damage modelling. Presentation for the 29th Swiss LCA Discussion Forum
Zurück zum Zitat World Bank (1997) Expanding the measures of wealth: indicators of environmentally sustainable development. Environmentally sustainable development studies and monographs series no. 17. The World Bank, Washington, USA World Bank (1997) Expanding the measures of wealth: indicators of environmentally sustainable development. Environmentally sustainable development studies and monographs series no. 17. The World Bank, Washington, USA
Metadaten
Titel
Introducing the UNEP/SETAC methodological sheets for subcategories of social LCA
verfasst von
Catherine Benoît-Norris
Gina Vickery-Niederman
Sonia Valdivia
Juliane Franze
Marzia Traverso
Andreas Ciroth
Bernard Mazijn
Publikationsdatum
01.08.2011
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment / Ausgabe 7/2011
Print ISSN: 0948-3349
Elektronische ISSN: 1614-7502
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-011-0301-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 7/2011

The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 7/2011 Zur Ausgabe