Most life cycle impact assessment (LCIA) approaches in life cycle assessment (LCA) are developed for western countries. Their LCIA approaches and characterization methodologies for different impact categories may not be necessarily relevant to African environmental conditions and particularly not for the timber sector in Ghana. This study reviews the relevance of existing impact categories and LCIA approaches, and uses the most relevant for the timber sector of Ghana.
Materials and methods
The study reviewed 23 life cycle inventories (LCIs) and LCAs on forestry, timber, and wood products for relevant impact categories and LCIA approaches for their relevance to the specific conditions in Ghana. This study uses an earlier LCI study of the timber industry as a starting point for an additional LCIA. We next performed a correlation and regression analysis to learn whether wood wastes may function as a reasonable single indicator for land use as proxy for biodiversity loss and the other impact categories.
Results and discussion
The literature review shows that no LCI or LCA studies were developed for Africa or the tropics. The LCIA approaches in the reviewed LCAs are indeed shown to take their basis in the environmental problems in western countries and characterization methodologies relating to how these problems manifest themselves in the western world. Characterization methodologies for different impact categories in CML-2000 and other LCIA approaches may not be necessarily relevant to African tropical environmental conditions and particularly not for the timber sector in Ghana. This situation hampers the reliability of our LCIA and points to a serious research gap in LCIA development in general.
We applied the scientifically well-recognized CML 2000 to the earlier LCI results and characterized the preliminary selected impact categories of global warming, acidification, eutrophication, photochemical oxidant formation, and human toxicity. The correlation analysis indicated that wood waste is indeed strongly correlated with land use as proxy for biodiversity loss and also positively correlated with the other five potential impact results. It can be concluded that wood waste production is a major driving force for biodiversity loss and a sufficiently good single indicator for all other environmental performance indicators in the timber sector of Ghana.
Conclusions
This study and the previous LCI paper are pioneering a field not yet explored, since the correct environmental performance indicators are not yet developed or adapted to tropical conditions. The development of LCIA approaches in the tropics may be the start of a never-ending journey in LCA research in Africa, particularly Ghana.
1 Introduction
Eshun et al. (2010) compiled a comprehensive life cycle inventory (LCI) for the timber sector of Ghana. This LCI quantified the use of land, material, and energy resources as well as emissions and wastes for five major products (i.e., air-dried lumber, kiln-dried lumber, plywood, veneer, and furniture parts). Their results indicated that land-use change for timber production from 2000 to 2007 in Ghana is 34.0 × 103 ha per year. At this rate, Ghana will be completely deforested by 2025. The total energy consumed by the timber sector was estimated at 1.9 × 109 MJ per year with a related CO2 emission of 0.7 million tons per year, dominating overall greenhouse gas emissions of CO2, CH4, and N2O. The timber industry generates 0.8 million m3 wood waste per year, which constituted 62% of the initial wood input to the timber industry, and contributed enormously to the rapid depletion of the country’s timber resources (Eshun et al. 2010).
The five products in the LCI of Eshun et al. (2010) were further compared for three different functional units (cubic meters, kilograms, or Euros). The usual functional unit of 1 m3 of product produced was expected to insufficiently express the different services provided by the five products. We therefore selected two additional functional units. One defined as 1 kg of product produced and the other as 1 € of product produced. The chosen functional unit shows to influence on the inventory results and therewith plays a crucial role in the environmental comparison of production lines in Ghana’s timber sector. The money-based functional unit, which also seems most appropriate as a measure for the function of the different timber products considered, favors the value-added products. Value-added products with strict forestry management practice hold a promising future for the sustainability of this sector (Eshun et al. 2010).
Anzeige
Only the interactions between economic processes and the environment were quantified by Eshun et al. (2010), but they did not yet estimate environmental performance indicators. This can be done by a formal LCIA that interprets the earlier LCI results in terms of potential impacts. Applying an LCIA to LCI results, i.e., performing a complete life cycle assessment (LCA), will help the industry to prioritize areas for environmental action and, at the same time, get the best return on their investments by reducing their operational environmental impact (Berkhout 1995; Daniel and Pappis 2008).
Most LCIA approaches in LCA are developed for western countries. Their specific environmental problems have become the “standard list” of impact categories included in most LCAs. Also, the methodologies for characterizing those potential impacts are based on how these problems manifest themselves in the western world (SETAC 1994; Alsema 2000; Tukker 2000; Brentrup et al. 2004; Pennington et al. 2004a). The “standard problem list” and the characterization methodologies for different impact categories may not be necessarily relevant to African environmental conditions and particularly not for the timber sector in Ghana. An evaluation of the relevance of existing LCIA approaches in LCA for the Ghanaian timber sector is urgently needed.
The objective of this paper is to review the relevance of different existing LCIA approaches, and to identify and apply the most relevant one to the LCI results of Eshun et al. (2010). We will thus use the most suitable approach to quantify major environmental performance indicators of the timber sector in Ghana. This study will provide a unique insight into the usefulness of different tools for evaluating environmental policies in Ghana and more generally in most of Africa.
2 Materials and methods
This study uses the LCI study of Eshun et al. (2010) as a starting point for an additional LCIA. LCIA is the third phase of an LCA study. LCIA aims at evaluating the significance of potential environmental impact of the results of inventory analysis (the second phase of an LCA), within the framework of the defined goal and scope of the study (first phase on an LCA; ISO - 14044 2006).
Anzeige
The LCIA phase consists of mandatory and optional steps. The mandatory steps of the LCIA approach are made up of the following: (1) the selection of impact categories, category indicators, and characterization methodology; (2) the assignment of LCI results to the selected impact categories (classification); and (3) the calculation of category indicator results (characterization). The additional optional steps of the LCIA approach consist of the following: (4) normalization, which expresses potential impacts in ways that can be compared; (5) grouping, i.e., sorting and possibly ranking of the impact categories; (6) weighting, i.e., converting and possibly aggregating indicator results across impact categories using numerical factors based on value-choices; and (7) data quality analysis, i.e., to better understand the reliability of the collection of indicator results and the LCIA profile.
The use of the optional steps depends on the goal and scope of the LCA studies because they are not allowed in comparative LCAs the results of which are to be disclosed to the public (ISO-14044 2006; ILCD 2010). The optional steps, and specifically the weighting step, have been criticized for their subjectivity. Goyal and Deshpande (2001) therefore argued, for example, to increase accuracy by defining clear and exhaustive criteria, based on experts’ opinions, to specify the precise weights. We avoid in this study the optional steps and focus only on the mandatory steps in the LCIA phase.
The calculation of category indicators (i.e., mandatory step 3) becomes relevant once impact categories and their characterization methodology have been selected (i.e., mandatory step 1), and individual inventory data are assigned to the selected impact categories (i.e., mandatory step 2). The characterization methodology typically uses characterization factors. Characterization factors represent the potential of a single emission or resource consumption to contribute to a given impact category (ISO-14044 2006). Results for category indicators or potential environmental impacts are usually calculated by accumulating the products of the individual inventory data multiplied with its characterization factors for the given impact category as shown in Eq. 1:
Where (II) stands for an individual inventory item. From the foregoing description of the LCIA phase, our study on Ghana’s timber sector was performed in four steps:
1.
Selection of relevant impact categories
An extensive literature search was carried out that yielded 23 life cycle studies on forestry, timber, and wood products in four journals (Table 1). For each of them, we identified the country where the study was performed, the content of the inventory analysis, whether an LCIA phase was included, and which impact categories then were used (see Table 1). This overview was used to arrive at the relevant selection of impact categories for extending the LCI of Eshun et al. (2010) with an LCIA into an LCA of the timber sector in Ghana.
2.
Selection of relevant LCIA approach
This second step evaluated in more detail the approaches used in the LCIA phase. This evaluation was to ascertain the optimal relevance of LCIA approach used and the characterization methodology applied to the environmental impact assessment of timber sector in Ghana.
3.
Application of selected LCIA approach to selected impact categories
The LCI results from Eshun et al. (2010) were then translated into potential environmental impacts with help of Eq. 1 for the selected relevant impact categories by using the selected LCIA approaches with its related characterization methodology (compliant with ISO-14044 (2006). LCIA results were calculated for the whole Ghanaian timber sector, as well as for the three functional units in Eshun et al. (2010; see Introduction).
4.
Correlation analysis between different potential environmental impacts
We performed a correlation and regression analysis to learn whether wood wastes may function as a reasonable single indicator for land use as proxy for biodiversity loss and the other impact categories as well. This would enormously simplify a follow-up study in which we intend to explore environmental improvement options for economic activities in the timber sector in Ghana.
Table 1
Overview of 23 life cycle studies on forestry, timber, and wood products in identified country where the study was performed, the content of the inventory analysis, whether an LCIA phase was included, and which impact categories used (x)
GW global warming, OD ozone layer depletion, Ac acidification, Eu eutrophication, PO photochemical oxidant, Et ecotoxicity, HT human toxicity, EU energy use, BR biotic resource depletion use, AR abiotic resource depletion
3 Results
3.1 Selection of relevant impact categories
This section reviews the 23 life cycle studies found on forestry, timber, and wood products (see Table 1). Ten studies stopped, similar as Eshun et al. (2010), at the inventory analysis phase. We call these, in accordance with common ISO-14044 terminology, LCI studies. The other 13 studies performed an additional LCIA and therewith comply with the definition of an LCA in ISO-14044 (2006).
Most of the LCI studies aimed to quantify energy demands and energy-related emissions. Six out of these ten LCI studies were conducted in the USA and four in Europe. None of the LCI studies specified why an additional LCIA phase was excluded. This could relate to the skeptical attitude of some LCA practitioners toward the LCIA phase. Also, the mandatory steps contain, in their opinion, inherent subjective value judgements (e.g., Barnthouse et al. 1997).
Most LCA practitioners regard LCIA as an essential phase in LCA. An LCI study only quantifies interactions between processes and the environment but does not assess the subsequent potential environmental impacts of these interactions. The information from LCI results therefore does not allow concluding on whether and to what extent a single inventory parameter contributes to the environmental problems. This bears the danger of picking single aspects of the inventory results and draw unsupported conclusions. A subsequent LCIA phase provides additional information about how harmful emissions are to the environment. ISO-14044 (2006) clearly states that an LCA study without LCIA is not an LCA but just an LCI study.
Thirteen out of the 23 life cycle studies included an LCIA phase. Eleven of these LCA studies were conducted in Europe (see Table 1). Abiotic resources, biotic resources, and ecotoxicity impact categories were the least-studied categories in these studies. The most-studied impact categories were global warming, acidification, eutrophication, photochemical oxidant, and human toxicity. Interestingly, these impact categories coincide with the major Dutch and European environmental problems in the early days of LCA (NEPP 1989). The Dutch manual for LCA was the first that provided detailed guidance on LCA methodology (Guinée et al. 1993a, b). It defined the framework for all later methodological developments, including that for the LCIA phase. This is also recognizable in the impact assessment approaches used in the case studies in Table 1.
According to Pennington et al. (2004b), LCA practitioners often select impact categories based on the scope and goal definition of an LCA study. Unfortunately, the reviewed LCA studies did not argue why certain impact categories were selected and others were not. Moreover, none of the LCA studies discussed biodiversity loss and wood waste, which are major potential environmental impacts in Ghana’s timber sector (Awanyo 2007). Possible reasons for this omission might be that characterizing biodiversity loss is at an early developmental phase (Udo de Haes et al. 2002; Dubreuil et al. 2007; Michelsen 2008) whereas waste is often considered as the remaining part of the technosphere and then not as an impact category in itself.
The reviewed list of impact categories provides representative information for LCI and LCA studies in the timber sector in general. Table 1 shows that no LCA studies were done in Africa or the tropics. There is thus a need to decide on a list of impact categories relevant for our LCA study in Ghana. According to ISO-14044 (2006), the list of selected impact categories has to comply with internationally accepted practice. Based on this and Table 1, the following impact categories were preliminary selected: global warming, acidification, eutrophication, photochemical oxidant formation, and human toxicity. We omitted ozone depletion and biotic resource use but added wood waste and biodiversity loss to this list. We limited the impact category abiotic resource use to energy use (though this and wood waste are basically inventory items). These categories were taken as starting points to address the major environmental problems of Ghana’s timber sector.
3.2 Selection of relevant LCIA approach
This section continues with the 13 LCA and other studies not being strictly LCAs in Table 1 and closer looks into their LCIA phase. The LCA studies without any of the environmental impact categories express the environmental worries despite the reluctance towards impact assessment. Table 2 summarizes the overall LCIA approach used and the specific category indicator and characterization factors applied for separate impact categories.
Table 2
Evaluation of LCIA methods and characterization factors in LCA studies in the timber sector in Table 1
(Petersen and Solberg 2005; Nebel et al. 2006; Werner et al. 2007; Werner and Richter 2007; Gasol et al. 2008; Michelsen et al. 2008; González-García et al. 2009a; González-García et al. 2009c; Solli et al. 2009)
(Rivela et al. 2006b; Xu et al. 2008; González-García et al. 2009b)
Global warming
kg CO2 eq
kg CO2 eq
kg CO2 eq
DALY
Ozone layer depletion
kg CFC 11 eq
kg CFC 11 eq
kg CFC 11 eq
DALY
Acidification
kg SO2 eq
kg SO2 eq
kg SO2 eq
PAF m2 year
mole of H+ eq
Eutrophication
kg NO3 eq
kg PO4 eq
kg PO4 eq
PAF m2 year
Photochemical oxidant
kg C2H4 eq
kg C2H2 eq
kg C2H4 eq
kg C2H4 eq
Ecotoxicity
m3 in water
kg 1.4 DB eq
PAF m2 year
PAF m2 year
Human toxicity
m3 in air
kg 1.4 DB eq
Carcinogens
kg B (a) P
DALY
Respiratory organics/inorganics
DALY
DALY
Land use
PDF m2 year
Solid waste
kg
kg
Abiotic resources depletion
kg Sb eq
Energy resources
MJ LHV
MJ surplus
DALY disability adjusted life years, PDF potentially disappeared fraction, PAF potentially affected fraction, LHV lower heat value
Gasol et al. (2008) combined CML-2000 and Cumulative Energy Demand (CED) methods, Werner et al. (2007) combined Eco-indicator 95 and CED methods, and Solli et al. (2009) combined CML-2000 and characterization factors of Johansson et al. (2004), Hertwich et al. (2006)
Four LCIA approaches were identified: Environmental Design of Industrial Products-97 (EDIP-97), CML 2 baseline-2000 (CML-2000), Eco-indicator 95, and Eco-indicator 99. EDIP-97, CML-2000, and Eco-indicator 95 follow a mid-point approach in LCIA. Mid-point approaches places the category indicators for environmental impact categories relatively close to environmental interventions and are based on established knowledge. The amount of subjectivity and uncertainty involved in a mid-point approach is therefore considered limited. However, the main disadvantage of this approach is that the results are sometimes hard to interpret across indicators. Additional subjective information is needed to for that. Eco-indicator 99 has an end-point approach to environmental impact assessment. End-point approach places indictors relatively close to the end-points, i.e., safeguarding issues such as human health, ecosystem quality, and resources. The end-point approach allows decision makers to easily interpret results, but its main disadvantage is the high level of uncertainty (Guinée et al. 2001). For example, Gasol et al. (2008) used CML-2000 approach instead of Eco-indicator 99 to avoid subjectivity of potential environmental impact results. This study will use a mid-point approach since its effects can be calculated with more certainty than the end-point approach. As knowledge develops, the mid-point effects will move closer to the end of the cause–effect chain.
Three LCIA approaches (EDIP-97, CML-2000, and Eco-indicator 95) cover several impact categories for which characterization results are expressed in the same units. The documentation for those three approaches reveals that they basically use the same characterization methodology for global warming, ozone layer depletion, acidification, eutrophication, and photochemical oxidant. Characterization methodology for these impact categories follows a mid-point approach.
All four LCIA approaches differ for impact categories such as ecotoxicity and human toxicity (see Table 2). That is visible from the category indicators for ecotoxicity and human toxicity using different units across the different approaches. However, all models use a similar key-property approach in which the most important fate characteristics are included in a simple modular framework. This has the advantage that relatively few substance data for calculation of the characterization factors are required.
Some LCA studies from Table 2 combined characterization methodology in the followed LCIA approach with characterization methodology from other studies. That specifically applies to human toxicity where this combination of characterization methodologies enabled the study to determine toxicological impact results for substances covered in the additional characterization methodology used. Werner and Richter (2007), for example, combined CML-2000 and Eco-indicator 95, because CML-2000 does not include characterization factors for chemical components used in preserving materials in an adequate manner. Solli et al. (2009) in his LCA of wood-based heating systems in Norway employed CML-2000 approach for most selected impact categories. However, the characterization methodology for human toxicity combined Johansson et al. (2004) and Hertwich et al. (2006).
The land use impact category was only covered by Eco-indicator 99 (see Table 2). The other three LCIA approaches did not cover land use as an impact category. Land use is nowadays considered an inventory item contributing to the impact category biodiversity loss. There is no consensus yet on how to define its category indicator, i.e., how to characterize it (Udo de Haes et al. 2002; Michelsen 2008).
Solid waste impact category was only covered by EDIP-97 and Eco-indicator 95 (see Table 2). CML-2000 and Eco-indictor 99 do not cover solid waste as a separate impact category. This is because solid waste is, in these approaches, considered as a by-products entering a waste-treatment process or being recycled and therefore belonging to the technosphere (Klöpffer 2009).
EDIP-97, Eco-indicator 95, and Eco-indictor 99 approaches refrain from spatial differentiation (see Table 2). This implies that the studies did not consider the geographic variability of the potential impact assessed. The use of site generic characterization factors is only appropriate to evaluate potential environmental impacts for which the location of its perpetrator is unrelated. The relevance of the assessment of other potential environmental impacts may be affected by using site generic characterization methods because its occurrence is related to the location of the perpetrator. The use of a characterization methodology without spatial differentiation could lead to invalid results. The inclusion of geographical information in LCIA will increase the accordance between the potential impact predicted by LCA studies and the expected occurrence of actual potential impact (Potting and Hauschild 1997a; Potting and Hauschild 1997b). Potting et al. (1998) were the first to develop and calculate sophisticated characterization factors that establish the relation between the region of emission and its potential impact on the receiving environment. Recent LCIA approaches as EDIP2003 (Hauschild and Potting 2005) and CML-2000 (Guinée 2002) now include site-dependent characterization factors. Available sets of site-dependent factors unfortunately only cover Europe and North America (Potting and Hauschild 2006). Clearly, there is a need to elaborate practical models for the inclusion of spatial differentiation into LCIA for other continents, including Africa. Future research should focus on developing LCIAs geographically specific to continents, regional concerns, and those that are situation-dependent, to better reflect local variations for such potential impacts that are not global in nature. For the time being, Hauschild and Potting (2005) recommend using site-generic characterization factors for regions and continents not covered by site-dependent characterization factors.
Our review of LCIA approaches and characterization methods shows that CML-2000 is the most frequently used and also the most internationally accepted and recognized impact approach in LCAs of timber products. CML-2000 uses mid-point indicators that are relatively transparent in the underlying physical modeling. This study will therefore, as a starting-point, follow the CML-2000 approach for our environmental impact assessment of the timber sector in Ghana but seeks to combine it with other approaches where relevant.
3.3 Application of the relevant LCIA approach for LCA studies in the timber sector
This section applies CML-2000 to the LCI results of Eshun et al. (2010) for characterization of the impact categories of global warming, acidification, eutrophication, photochemical oxidant formation, and human toxicity. Table 3 provides the CML-2000 characterization factors used for each of these impact categories. Deviating from the recommendation of Hauschild and Potting (2005), we used the conventional characterization factors for acidification, i.e., alternative generic acidification potentials in Guinée (2002). This is because the site-generic factors in the baseline-approach are based on European data and considered not to adequately reflect the African situation. We therefore decided to use the conventional or alternative factors that quantify the maximum acidifying potential of the substances considered. Wood waste, which basically is an inventory item, is characterized by simply adding together the contributions to them. Characterization of biodiversity for the timber sector of Ghana is addressed at the end of this section.
Table 3
Selected impact categories, LCIA method, and characterization factors applied to the timber sector of Ghana
Impact category
Scale
Examples of LCI data (i.e., classification)
Characterization factor
Description of characterization factor
Reference
Global warming
Global
Carbon dioxide (CO2)
1 kg = 1 CO2 eq
Converts LCI data to carbon dioxide (CO2) equivalents
Figure 1 presents the overall LCIA results for the total timber sector in Ghana. These results are below discussed per impact category separately.
Fig. 1
Relative contribution by different wood production lines to the total environmental impact of the timber sector of Ghana
×
Figure 2 presents the overall LCIA results for each of the three functional units (volume (cubic meters), mass (kilograms), and money (Euros)). The results for each impact category show, obviously in accordance with Eshun et al. (2010), their sensitivity for the choice of functional unit. This indicates any policy choice for each impact category must consider a correct choice of functional units.
Fig. 2
Influence of functional unit on environmental impact results for five major production lines in Ghana’s timber sector to Volume (cubic meters), mass (kilograms), and money (Euros)
×
The total global warming impact from CO2, CH4, and N2O emissions amounted to approximately 765 kt CO2–equivalents per year (Table 4). Air-dried lumber contribute little (only 1%) because its reliance on natural air for drying. Kiln-dried lumber, plywood, and veneer production lines were then the main contributors with a score of 30% each (see Table 4). The over-dependence on wood waste for drying wood product in the timber sector thus threatens the sustainability of Ghana’s natural forest.
Table 4
Overview of the total environmental impact contributions from the five production lines of the timber sector in Ghana
The total annual acidifying impact from SO2 and NOX amounted to 1,179 t SO2–equivalent per year (see Table 4). When the contributor of total acidifying impacts was considered, we found that kiln-dried lumber production contributed the largest proportion (i.e., 33%). This high value is as a result of the intensity of the drying processes. Plywood production was second with 28% while furniture contributed only 12% (see Fig. 1) because of its lower fuel usage.
The total eutrophying impact amounted to 169 t PO4–equivalent per year (see Table 4). Kiln-dried lumber was the largest contributor with a share of 35%. This is the result of the intensity of the kiln-drying processes. The least contributor is furniture production with a share of 11%. This low eutrophying impact relates to the many manual activities at its final production stage.
The total potential impact of tropospheric ozone precursor compounds in the timber sector of Ghana amounted to about 1 kt ethylene–equivalent per year (see Table 4). Kiln-dried lumber production had the highest tropospheric ozone precursor’s impact with a share of 34%. The second highest tropospheric ozone precursor’s impact was plywood production with a share of 31%. Air-dried lumber production was the least contributor (see Fig. 1).
The total potential impacts of human toxicity compounds in the Ghanaian timber sector amounted to about 58 t C6H4Cl2–equivalent per year (see Table 4). Kiln-dried lumber contributed the highest potential impact with a share of 35%. The second contributor to human toxicity impact was plywood production with a share of 26% (see Fig. 1).
The total wood wastes of the timber industry, as already quantified in Eshun et al. (2010), amount to 288 kt per year (see Table 4). This value does not include the amount generated at the forestry subsystem because of lack of appropriate data. The contributions to wood waste by the various production lines are illustrated in Fig. 1. Kiln-dried lumber contributed to the highest production of wood waste with a share of 35%. Veneer product is the least contributor to wood waste in the timber industry in Ghana with a share of 4%.
A comprehensive LCA is supposed to include all relevant environmental concerns. For the timber sector, biodiversity is a major concern because of the land degradation by deforestation and desertification. Unfortunately, biodiversity is one of the least mature impact categories in LCA approaches. There have been several attempts to develop biodiversity impact indicators based on biodiversity concepts such as species richness (Weidema and Lindeijer 2001), ecosystem dynamics (Wagendorp et al. 2006), threats to species (Hawthorne and Abu-Juam 1995; Müller-Wenk 1998), and habitat protection (Schenck 2001). All these indicators exhibit space-dependent and non-linear behavior, reflecting the spatial patterns of biodiversity. Developing biodiversity-loss indicators for LCA is still in its early stage (Lindeijer et al. 2002). We therefore decided to stick for this impact category to land use as quantified by Eshun et al. (2010). Eshun et al. quantified land use, which is basically an inventory item and not an impact category, as the area of tropical forest harvested.
3.4 Correlation analysis between different environmental impacts
The LCIA phase was initially introduced in LCA to facilitate interpretation of its results by reducing the large number of inventory items to a limited number of impact categories (Potting et al. 1998). Eshun et al. (2010) quantified nine inventory items, whereas our LCIA here covers seven impact categories. Our LCIA thus hardly facilitates interpretation by its number of impact categories that is roughly similar to the number of inventory items in Eshun et al. (2010).
The importance of LCIA gradually moved to enhancing the environmental relevance of LCA as a tool when characterization methodology evolved. The above LCIA results quantify the potential environmental impact of the timber sector activities to the environment. This LCIA results give insight on how harmful the timber sector activities affect the environment as compared with Eshun et al. (2010) which just quantify only interactions between processes and the environment.
From the results, the enormous amounts of wood waste are a direct result of an inefficient use of the forest resources and therewith form a major driver of biodiversity loss in the Ghana timber sector. In other words, we consider the amount of waste wood in the timber sector of Ghana to adequately reflect biodiversity loss in Ghana. The other impact categories in our LCIA are more indirectly related to wood wastes. We therefore performed a simple correlation and regression analysis to learn whether wood wastes may function as a reasonable single indicator for land use as proxy for biodiversity loss and the other impact categories as well. This would enormously simplify a follow-up study in which we intend to explore environmental improvement options for economic activities in the timber sector in Ghana.
The correlation analysis was performed by statistically verifying the correlation between wood wastes land use and the other five selected potential environmental impact results. The contributions of each of the five production lines to wood wastes were correlated with their contributions to each of the other impact categories to see if some relationship exists. The variance and the coefficient of determination R2 values were then calculated. This was to enable the researcher to understand the major contributor to the number of environmental problems in the timber sector of Ghana and to further carry out future improvement research if any.
Figure 3 presents the results of the correlation analysis. The results indicated that wood waste correlated positive between land use and the other five potential impacts results. The correlation between wood waste and land use were the strongest correlation with R2 value of 0.9. It can be concluded that wood waste production is major driving force for biodiversity loss and a sufficiently good single indicator for all other potential environmental impact in the timber sector of Ghana. This correlation will be very useful for preliminary screening of potential environmental impacts, waste minimization analysis, or an evaluation of emerging technologies at early stages of decision making in the timber sector of Ghana.
Fig. 3
Correlation analysis between the contributions of each of the five production lines to wood waste impact and land use as proxy for biodiversity loss and the other five environmental impacts such as global warming, acidification, eutrophication, photochemical oxidation formation, and human toxicity in the timber sector of Ghana
×
4 Discussion
Our LCIA for the timber sector in Ghana uses CML-2000 for the larger part of the selected impact categories. The impact categories in CML-2000 take their basis in the environmental problems in western countries. Also, the CML-2000 methodologies for characterizing those potential impacts are based on how these problems manifest themselves in the western world (SETAC 1994; Alsema 2000; Tukker 2000; Brentrup et al. 2004; Pennington et al. 2004a). In particular, the characterization methodologies for different impact categories in CML-2000 (and other LCIA approaches in Section 3.2) may not be necessarily relevant to African tropical environmental conditions, and particularly not for the timber sector in Ghana. This situation hampers the reliability of our LCIA and points to a serious research gap in LCIA development in general.
The integrated coverage of a broad range of impact categories in LCA studies is very important for, in particular, African tropical countries for several reasons. We consider the preliminary selection of impact categories in Section 3.2 as relevant for the African continent (but not exhaustive).
Firstly, Africa is a developing continent and its quest to catch up with the developed economies is likely to add up to an increasing energy use and related greenhouse gas emissions (IPCC 2007b). This development will enhance climate change. Climate change will leads to more increase forest fires, biodiversity loss, increased adverse health impacts from heat-related mortality, pollution, and shifts in infectious diseases. Africa is likely to be hardest hit by the global warming impact because of its vulnerability and adaptive capacity (IPCC 2007b).
Secondly, the timber sector in Africa, particularly Ghana, generates acidifying and eutrophying emissions through activities such as timber harvesting, transportation, and production processes. These emissions may be detrimental to human and aquatic life, since most people in Africa have limited access to portable drinking water and depend heavenly on untreated river water. Moreover, Africa, particularly, Ghana’s, current developmental agenda is likely to contribute to acidification, eutrophication, and photochemical oxidation problems in the future.
Thirdly, Africa has the highest deforestation and biodiversity loss rate of the world’s regions (FAO 2005). Ghana loses an estimated 340 km2 of its forests annually (Eshun et al. 2010). According to Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) and IPCC (2007a), future climate change is likely to have significant repercussion for biodiversity through existing threats like tropical deforestation and unstained timber harvesting. According to Dionco-Adetayo (2001), for 1 m3 of tree harvested in a tropical forest, about 0.8% goes to waste. These are in the form of damaged residuals (50%), abandoned logs (3.75%), tops and branches (33.75%), stumps (10%), and butt trimmings (2.5%). In Ghana’s tropical rain forest, wood waste is one of the most abundant, cost-effective, and environmentally friendly biomass resource, but this waste is either left in forests (for firewood) or landfills, or sent to boilers to generate heat and steam for drying wood products. This leads to air pollutants and other environmental problems. The environmental, economical, and social considerations for adding value to wood waste far outweigh the use of wood waste as firewood or fuel in drying wood (Rivela et al. 2006a). In order to sustainably manage Ghana’s timber sector, wood waste problems have to be addressed. In LCA, wood waste is generally not addressed as an impact category.
Fourthly, land degradation is also a serious issue in Africa (UNEP 2002). Erosion as a result of sand and gravel mining, excessive farming, and mining in forest reserves are common land degradation problems in Africa (UNEP 2007). Addressing the issue of land degradation through the use of LCA in Africa is a vital key to help Africa reduce poverty and achieve some of its targets as set out under the Millennium Development Goals.
Our review of LCIA approaches and characterization methods confirms that most LCIA in LCA take their basis in the environmental problems in western countries and their characterization methodologies relating to how these problems manifest themselves in the western world. Available sets of site-dependent factors unfortunately only cover Europe and North America (Potting and Hauschild 2006). The characterization methodologies for different impact categories may not be necessarily relevant to African environmental conditions, and particularly not for the timber sector in Ghana. This review shows that there is a need to elaborate practical models for the inclusion of spatial differentiation into LCIA for other continents, including Africa. According to the evaluation of LCIA approaches and characterization methods, CML-2000 is the most frequently used and also the most internationally accepted and recognized impact approach in LCAs of timber products. CML-2000 uses mid-point indicators that are relatively transparent in the underlying physical modeling. This study, therefore, as a starting-point, applies CML-2000 to the LCI results of Eshun et al. (2010) for characterization of the impact categories of global warming, acidification, eutrophication, photochemical oxidant formation, and human toxicity. We also performed a correlation and regression analysis to learn whether wood wastes may function as a reasonable single indicator for land use as proxy for biodiversity loss and the other five selected impact categories. The correlation analysis indicated that wood waste is indeed strongly correlated with land use as proxy for biodiversity loss, and also positively correlated with the other five potential impacts results. It can be concluded that wood waste production is major driving force for biodiversity loss and a sufficiently good single indicator for all other potential environmental impact in the timber sector of Ghana. This correlation will be very useful for preliminary screening of environmental impacts, waste minimization analysis, or an evaluation of emerging technologies at early stages of decision making in the timber sector of Ghana.
Finally, it is therefore critical that this study and the previous LCI paper, Eshun et al. (2010) are pioneering a field not yet explored, since the correct impact indicators are not yet developed or adapted to tropical conditions. The development of life cycle impact assessment approaches in the tropics may be the start of a never-ending journey in LCA research in Africa.
When a proper LCIA approach is available for Africa, the improved quality of LCA results may better serve as an investment baseline for understanding industrial and individual company changes. It will also serve as a comparison tool for industry improvement and a benchmark against competing products and materials. In addition, it will provide tools for the corrugated industry to use in performing consistent calculations irrespective of the country. Sustainability and LCIA approaches are strategic bridges to prioritizing and implementing sustainable initiatives projects that will create value for key stakeholders in the timber sector of Africa, particularly Ghana.
5 Conclusions
Most LCIA approaches are developed for western countries. We reviewed their relevance for the timber sector in Ghana and applied the most relevant on to the results of an earlier LCI from Eshun et al. 2010. Our study now provides preliminary LCIA results and primary data unique for tropical LCA research in Africa, particularly Ghana.
The LCIA results quantified global warming, acidification, eutrophication, photochemical oxidant formation, and human toxicity impacts from timber sector activities. From the study, the enormous amounts of wood waste generated are a direct result of an inefficient use of the forest resources, and therewith form a major driver of biodiversity loss in the Ghana timber sector. In other words, we consider the amount of waste wood in the timber sector of Ghana to adequately reflect biodiversity loss in Ghana. The other impact categories in our LCIA are more indirectly related to wood wastes. We performed a simple correlation and regression analysis to learn whether wood wastes may function as a reasonable single indicator for land use as proxy for biodiversity loss and the other five selected impact categories. The correlation analysis indicated that wood waste is indeed strongly correlated with land use as proxy for biodiversity loss and also positively correlated with the other five potential impacts results. It can be concluded that wood waste production is major driving force for biodiversity loss and a sufficiently good single indicator for all other potential environmental impact in the timber sector of Ghana. This correlation will be very useful for preliminary screening of potential environmental impacts, waste minimization analysis, or an evaluation of emerging technologies at early stages of decision making in the timber sector of Ghana.
The generic approach that was used in this study helped improve the basis for decision making in the timber sector of Ghana and clearly showed that LCA is a powerful tool for the assessment of environmental impacts of the timber sector in developing countries. However, there is an urgent need to include spatial differentiation into the LCIAs for developing continents, like Africa. Relevant impact categories, LCIA approaches, and characterization methods to achieve this have to be further developed to address regional concerns and situations and to better reflect local variations. If used, we can then make a strong contribution to sustainability goals in Ghana and Africa.
Open Access
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
Open AccessThis is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
