Skip to main content
Top
Published in: The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 10/2016

08-04-2016 | POLICIES AND SUPPORT IN RELATION TO LCA

Perceptions on LCA implementation: evidence from a survey on adopters and nonadopters in Italy

Authors: Francesco Testa, Benedetta Nucci, Sara Tessitore, Fabio Iraldo, Tiberio Daddi

Published in: The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment | Issue 10/2016

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Purpose

This paper introduces the results of an Italian survey on the implementation of life cycle assessment (LCA). Both LCA adopters and nonadopters were involved, in order to understand the main benefits and barriers to the adoption of LCA and how the experiences of LCA adopters differ from the expectations of nonadopters.

Methods

Approximately 2000 Italian companies were contacted and 122 companies participated in the online survey, which represent the 6.5 % of the statistical population of our study. To define the statistical population, firms that had implemented an LCA or an environmental initiative according to an official international standard were only considered. Statistically significant differences in answers between LCA adopters and nonadopters were tested by performing the Mann–Whitney test.

Results and discussion

Companies recognize that LCA can provide useful information to drive strategic decisions and product design, and it is perceived as an opportunity to improve the current monitoring systems. In addition, companies recognize the potential of LCA in marketing, making the communication of green attributes more substantial and robust. Focusing on the barriers experienced by LCA adopters, data collection can be cited. Communication issues also pose a barrier to the further implementation of LCA. The analysis of the results and the comparison of the results for the two groups of respondents highlight that on average, the difficulties are considered as more important than the benefits and that nonadopters tend to overestimate the difficulties and underestimate the benefits connected to the implementation of LCA.

Conclusions

The findings shed light on LCA-related issues both for companies and public servants. The misconception of LCA by nonadopters suggests that an increased awareness is the key to the success of LCA and to its more widespread adoption by companies. It is essential to create and disseminate know-how and sensitize companies to the real barriers and benefits of adopting an LCA. The awareness of potential LCA adopters can be raised by training and education initiatives, as well as by increased possibilities to experiment with these kinds of tools (public programs for financial support, fiscal incentives). On the other hand, market and communication research would contribute to better understand how the environmental impacts of products can be more effectively communicated to clients and consumers.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
go back to reference Armstrong JS, Overton TS (1977) Estimating nonresponse bias in mail survey. J Mark Res 14:396–402CrossRef Armstrong JS, Overton TS (1977) Estimating nonresponse bias in mail survey. J Mark Res 14:396–402CrossRef
go back to reference Ayres RU (1995) Life cycle analysis: a critique. Resour Conserv Recycl 14:199–223CrossRef Ayres RU (1995) Life cycle analysis: a critique. Resour Conserv Recycl 14:199–223CrossRef
go back to reference Baden DA, Harwood IA, Woodward DG (2009) The effect of buyer pressure on suppliers in SMEs to demonstrate CSR practices: an added incentive or counter productive? Eur Manag J 27:429–441CrossRef Baden DA, Harwood IA, Woodward DG (2009) The effect of buyer pressure on suppliers in SMEs to demonstrate CSR practices: an added incentive or counter productive? Eur Manag J 27:429–441CrossRef
go back to reference Bauman H, Tillman AM (2004) The Hitch Hiker's Guide to LCA. Studentlitteratur AB Bauman H, Tillman AM (2004) The Hitch Hiker's Guide to LCA. Studentlitteratur AB
go back to reference Berlin J, Sonesson U, Tillman AM (2008) Product chain actors' potential for greening the product life cycle. The case of the swedish postfarm milk chain. J Ind Ecol 12:95–110CrossRef Berlin J, Sonesson U, Tillman AM (2008) Product chain actors' potential for greening the product life cycle. The case of the swedish postfarm milk chain. J Ind Ecol 12:95–110CrossRef
go back to reference Björklund AE (2002) Survey of approaches to improve reliability in LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 7:64–72CrossRef Björklund AE (2002) Survey of approaches to improve reliability in LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 7:64–72CrossRef
go back to reference Buysse K, Verbeke A (2003) Proactive environmental strategies: a stakeholder management perspective. Strateg Manag J 24:453–470CrossRef Buysse K, Verbeke A (2003) Proactive environmental strategies: a stakeholder management perspective. Strateg Manag J 24:453–470CrossRef
go back to reference Cannell C, Oksenberg L, Kalton G, Bischoping K, Fowler FJ (1989) New techniques for pretesting survey questions. Research Report. Ann Arbor, MI: Survey Research Center, University of Michigan Cannell C, Oksenberg L, Kalton G, Bischoping K, Fowler FJ (1989) New techniques for pretesting survey questions. Research Report. Ann Arbor, MI: Survey Research Center, University of Michigan
go back to reference Casadesus M, Marimon F, Heras I (2008) ISO 14001 diffusion after the success of the ISO 9001 model. J Clean Prod 16:1741–1754CrossRef Casadesus M, Marimon F, Heras I (2008) ISO 14001 diffusion after the success of the ISO 9001 model. J Clean Prod 16:1741–1754CrossRef
go back to reference Castka P, Prajogo D (2013) The effect of pressure from secondary stakeholders on the internalization of ISO 14001. J Clean Prod 47:245–252CrossRef Castka P, Prajogo D (2013) The effect of pressure from secondary stakeholders on the internalization of ISO 14001. J Clean Prod 47:245–252CrossRef
go back to reference Christmann P, Taylor G (2006) Firm self-regulation through international certifiable standards: determinants of symbolic versus substantive implementation. J Int Bus Stud 37:863–883CrossRef Christmann P, Taylor G (2006) Firm self-regulation through international certifiable standards: determinants of symbolic versus substantive implementation. J Int Bus Stud 37:863–883CrossRef
go back to reference Clark G, Leeuw B (1999) How to improve adoption of LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 4:184–187CrossRef Clark G, Leeuw B (1999) How to improve adoption of LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 4:184–187CrossRef
go back to reference Cooper JS, Fava JA (2006) Life-cycle assessment practitioner survey: summary of results. J Ind Ecol 10:12–14CrossRef Cooper JS, Fava JA (2006) Life-cycle assessment practitioner survey: summary of results. J Ind Ecol 10:12–14CrossRef
go back to reference Darnall N (2006) Why Firms Mandate ISO 14001 Certification. Bus Soc 45:354–381CrossRef Darnall N (2006) Why Firms Mandate ISO 14001 Certification. Bus Soc 45:354–381CrossRef
go back to reference Darnall N, Henriques I, Sadorsky P (2008) Do environmental management systems improve business performance in an international setting? J Int Manag 14:364–376CrossRef Darnall N, Henriques I, Sadorsky P (2008) Do environmental management systems improve business performance in an international setting? J Int Manag 14:364–376CrossRef
go back to reference Delmas M, Toffel MW (2004) Stakeholders and environmental management practices: an institutional framework. Bus Strateg Environ 13:209–222CrossRef Delmas M, Toffel MW (2004) Stakeholders and environmental management practices: an institutional framework. Bus Strateg Environ 13:209–222CrossRef
go back to reference Delmas M, Toffel MW (2008) Organizational responses to environmental demands: opening the black box. Strateg Manag J 29:1027–1055CrossRef Delmas M, Toffel MW (2008) Organizational responses to environmental demands: opening the black box. Strateg Manag J 29:1027–1055CrossRef
go back to reference Early C, Kidman T, Menvielle M, Geyer R, McMullan R (2009) Informing packaging design decisions at Toyota motor sales using life cycle assessment and costing. J Ind Ecol 13:592–606CrossRef Early C, Kidman T, Menvielle M, Geyer R, McMullan R (2009) Informing packaging design decisions at Toyota motor sales using life cycle assessment and costing. J Ind Ecol 13:592–606CrossRef
go back to reference Ehrenfeld JR (1997) The importance of LCAs-warts and all. J Ind Ecol 1:41–49CrossRef Ehrenfeld JR (1997) The importance of LCAs-warts and all. J Ind Ecol 1:41–49CrossRef
go back to reference European Commission (2003) Integrated Product Policy Communication. COM (2003) 302 final European Commission (2003) Integrated Product Policy Communication. COM (2003) 302 final
go back to reference European Commission (2013) Commission recommendation on the use of common methods to measure and communicate the life cycle environmental performance of products and organizations European Commission (2013) Commission recommendation on the use of common methods to measure and communicate the life cycle environmental performance of products and organizations
go back to reference Finnveden G (2000) On the limitations of life cycle assessment and environmental systems analysis tools in general. Int J Life Cycle Assess 5:229–238CrossRef Finnveden G (2000) On the limitations of life cycle assessment and environmental systems analysis tools in general. Int J Life Cycle Assess 5:229–238CrossRef
go back to reference Finnveden G, Moberg A (2005) Environmental systems analysis tools e an overview. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13:1165–1173 Finnveden G, Moberg A (2005) Environmental systems analysis tools e an overview. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13:1165–1173
go back to reference Finnveden G, Hauschild MZ, Ekvall T, Guiné J, Heijungs R, Hellweg S, Koehler A, Pennington D, Suh S (2009) Recent developments in life cycle assessment. J Environ Manag 91:1–21CrossRef Finnveden G, Hauschild MZ, Ekvall T, Guiné J, Heijungs R, Hellweg S, Koehler A, Pennington D, Suh S (2009) Recent developments in life cycle assessment. J Environ Manag 91:1–21CrossRef
go back to reference Franchetti M (2011) ISO 14001 and solid waste generation rates in US manufacturing organizations: an analysis of relationship. J Clean Prod 19:1104–1109CrossRef Franchetti M (2011) ISO 14001 and solid waste generation rates in US manufacturing organizations: an analysis of relationship. J Clean Prod 19:1104–1109CrossRef
go back to reference Frankl P, Rubik F (1999) Life-cycle assessment (LCA) in business an overview on drivers, applications, issues and future perspectives. Glob Nest: the Int J 1:185–194 Frankl P, Rubik F (1999) Life-cycle assessment (LCA) in business an overview on drivers, applications, issues and future perspectives. Glob Nest: the Int J 1:185–194
go back to reference Gamage GB, Boyle C, McLaren SJ, McLaren J (2008) Life cycle assessment of commercial furniture: a case study of Formway LIFE chair. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13:401–411CrossRef Gamage GB, Boyle C, McLaren SJ, McLaren J (2008) Life cycle assessment of commercial furniture: a case study of Formway LIFE chair. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13:401–411CrossRef
go back to reference Guinée JB, Heijungs R, Huppes G, Zamagni A, Masoni P, Buonamici R, Ekvall T, Rydberg T (2011) Life cycle assessment: past, present, and future. Environ Sci Technol 45:90–96CrossRef Guinée JB, Heijungs R, Huppes G, Zamagni A, Masoni P, Buonamici R, Ekvall T, Rydberg T (2011) Life cycle assessment: past, present, and future. Environ Sci Technol 45:90–96CrossRef
go back to reference Hagelaar GJLF, Van der Vorst JGAJ (2002) Environmental supply chain management: using life cycle assessment to structure supply chain. Int Food Agribus Manag Rev 4:399–412CrossRef Hagelaar GJLF, Van der Vorst JGAJ (2002) Environmental supply chain management: using life cycle assessment to structure supply chain. Int Food Agribus Manag Rev 4:399–412CrossRef
go back to reference Hart SL (1995) A natural resource based view of the firm. Acad Manag Rev 20:986–1014 Hart SL (1995) A natural resource based view of the firm. Acad Manag Rev 20:986–1014
go back to reference Heras-Saizarbitoria I, Boiral O (2013) ISO 9001 and ISO 14001: towards a research agenda on management system standards. Int J Manag Rev 15:47–65CrossRef Heras-Saizarbitoria I, Boiral O (2013) ISO 9001 and ISO 14001: towards a research agenda on management system standards. Int J Manag Rev 15:47–65CrossRef
go back to reference Hochschorner E, Finnveden G (2006) Life cycle approach in the procurement process: the case of defence materiel. Int J Life Cycle Assess 11:200–208CrossRef Hochschorner E, Finnveden G (2006) Life cycle approach in the procurement process: the case of defence materiel. Int J Life Cycle Assess 11:200–208CrossRef
go back to reference Hunkeler D, Rebitzer G (2005) The future of life cycle assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 10:305–308CrossRef Hunkeler D, Rebitzer G (2005) The future of life cycle assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 10:305–308CrossRef
go back to reference Iraldo F, Testa F, Frey M (2009) Is an environmental management system able to influence environmental and competitive performance? The case of the eco-management and audit scheme EMAS in the European Union. J Clean Prod 1716:1444–1452CrossRef Iraldo F, Testa F, Frey M (2009) Is an environmental management system able to influence environmental and competitive performance? The case of the eco-management and audit scheme EMAS in the European Union. J Clean Prod 1716:1444–1452CrossRef
go back to reference ISO (2006) ISO 14040:2006(E) Environmental Management – Life Cycle Assessment – Principles and Framework ISO (2006) ISO 14040:2006(E) Environmental Management – Life Cycle Assessment – Principles and Framework
go back to reference King MF, Bruner GC (2000) Social desirability bias: a neclected aspect of validity testing. Psychol Mark 17:79–103 King MF, Bruner GC (2000) Social desirability bias: a neclected aspect of validity testing. Psychol Mark 17:79–103
go back to reference King AA, Lenox MJ, Terlaak A (2005) The strategic use of decentralized institutions: exploring certification with the ISO 14001 management standard. Acad Manag J 48:1091–1106CrossRef King AA, Lenox MJ, Terlaak A (2005) The strategic use of decentralized institutions: exploring certification with the ISO 14001 management standard. Acad Manag J 48:1091–1106CrossRef
go back to reference Lannelongue G, Gonzalez Benito J, Gonzalez Benito O (2015) Input, output, and environmental management productivity: effects on firm performance. Bus Strateg Environ 24:145–158CrossRef Lannelongue G, Gonzalez Benito J, Gonzalez Benito O (2015) Input, output, and environmental management productivity: effects on firm performance. Bus Strateg Environ 24:145–158CrossRef
go back to reference Le Pochat S, Bertoluci G, Froelich D (2007) Integrating ecodesign by conducting change in SMEs. J Clean Prod 15:671–680CrossRef Le Pochat S, Bertoluci G, Froelich D (2007) Integrating ecodesign by conducting change in SMEs. J Clean Prod 15:671–680CrossRef
go back to reference Marimon Viadiu F, Casadesús Fa M, Heras Saizarbitoria I (2006) ISO 9000 and ISO 14000 standards: an international diffusion model. Int J Oper Prod Manag 26:141–165CrossRef Marimon Viadiu F, Casadesús Fa M, Heras Saizarbitoria I (2006) ISO 9000 and ISO 14000 standards: an international diffusion model. Int J Oper Prod Manag 26:141–165CrossRef
go back to reference Molina-Murillo SA, Smith TM (2009) Exploring the use and impact of LCA-based information in corporate communications. Int J Life Cycle Assess 14:184–194CrossRef Molina-Murillo SA, Smith TM (2009) Exploring the use and impact of LCA-based information in corporate communications. Int J Life Cycle Assess 14:184–194CrossRef
go back to reference Moss J, Lambert CG, Rennie AEW (2008) SME application of LCA-based carbon footprints. Int J Sustain Eng 1:132–141CrossRef Moss J, Lambert CG, Rennie AEW (2008) SME application of LCA-based carbon footprints. Int J Sustain Eng 1:132–141CrossRef
go back to reference Nakano K, Hirao M (2011) Collaborative activity with business partners for improvement of product environmental performance using LCA. J Clean Prod 19:1189–1197CrossRef Nakano K, Hirao M (2011) Collaborative activity with business partners for improvement of product environmental performance using LCA. J Clean Prod 19:1189–1197CrossRef
go back to reference Olinzock MA, Landis AE, Saunders CL, Collinge WO, Jones AK, Schaefer LA, Bilec MM (2015) Life cycle assessment use in the North American building community: summary of findings from a 2011/2012 survey. Int J Life Cycle Assess 20:318–331CrossRef Olinzock MA, Landis AE, Saunders CL, Collinge WO, Jones AK, Schaefer LA, Bilec MM (2015) Life cycle assessment use in the North American building community: summary of findings from a 2011/2012 survey. Int J Life Cycle Assess 20:318–331CrossRef
go back to reference Rebitzer G, Ekvall T, Frischknecht R, Hunkeler D, Norris G, Rydberg T, Schmidt WP, Suh S, Weidema BP, Pennington DW (2004) Life cycle assessment part 1: framework, goal and scope definition, inventory analysis, and applications. Environ Int 30:701–720CrossRef Rebitzer G, Ekvall T, Frischknecht R, Hunkeler D, Norris G, Rydberg T, Schmidt WP, Suh S, Weidema BP, Pennington DW (2004) Life cycle assessment part 1: framework, goal and scope definition, inventory analysis, and applications. Environ Int 30:701–720CrossRef
go back to reference Ruini LF, Marchelli L, Filareto A (2013) LCA methodology from analysis to actions: some Barilla's examples of improvement projects. LCM conference Ruini LF, Marchelli L, Filareto A (2013) LCA methodology from analysis to actions: some Barilla's examples of improvement projects. LCM conference
go back to reference Russo MV, Fouts PA (1997) A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability. Acad Manag J 40:534–559CrossRef Russo MV, Fouts PA (1997) A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability. Acad Manag J 40:534–559CrossRef
go back to reference Saunders CL, Landis AE, Mecca LP, Jones AK, Schaefer LA, Bilec MM (2013) Analyzing the practice of life cycle assessment - focus on the building sector. J Ind Ecol 5:777–788 Saunders CL, Landis AE, Mecca LP, Jones AK, Schaefer LA, Bilec MM (2013) Analyzing the practice of life cycle assessment - focus on the building sector. J Ind Ecol 5:777–788
go back to reference Schaefer A (2007) Contrasting institutional and performance accounts of environmental management systems: three case studies in the UK water & sewerage industry. J Manag Stud 44:506–535CrossRef Schaefer A (2007) Contrasting institutional and performance accounts of environmental management systems: three case studies in the UK water & sewerage industry. J Manag Stud 44:506–535CrossRef
go back to reference Scholl GU, Nisius S (1998) The environmental benefits to German companies through application of LCA. J Clean Prod 6:247–252CrossRef Scholl GU, Nisius S (1998) The environmental benefits to German companies through application of LCA. J Clean Prod 6:247–252CrossRef
go back to reference Sharma S, Vredenburg H (1998) Proactive corporate environmental strategy and the development of competitively valuable organizational capabilities. Strateg Manag J 19:729–753CrossRef Sharma S, Vredenburg H (1998) Proactive corporate environmental strategy and the development of competitively valuable organizational capabilities. Strateg Manag J 19:729–753CrossRef
go back to reference Siegenthaler CP, Margni M (2005) Dissemination, application and assessment of LCA in Industry 25th LCA Discussion Forum at ETH Zürich, Switzerland. Int J Life Cycle Assess 10:377–378CrossRef Siegenthaler CP, Margni M (2005) Dissemination, application and assessment of LCA in Industry 25th LCA Discussion Forum at ETH Zürich, Switzerland. Int J Life Cycle Assess 10:377–378CrossRef
go back to reference Suhaiza Hanim Mohamad Zailani Tarig K. Eltayeb Chin-Chun Hsu Keah Choon Tan (2012) The impact of external institutional drivers and internal strategy on environmental performance. Int J Oper Prod Manag 32:721–745 Suhaiza Hanim Mohamad Zailani Tarig K. Eltayeb Chin-Chun Hsu Keah Choon Tan (2012) The impact of external institutional drivers and internal strategy on environmental performance. Int J Oper Prod Manag 32:721–745
go back to reference Teixeira R, Pax S (2011) A survey of life cycle assessment practitioners with a focus on the agri-food sector. J Ind Ecol 15:817–820CrossRef Teixeira R, Pax S (2011) A survey of life cycle assessment practitioners with a focus on the agri-food sector. J Ind Ecol 15:817–820CrossRef
go back to reference Testa F, Rizzi F, Daddi T, Gusmerotti NM, Iraldo F, Frey M (2014) EMAS and ISO 14001: the differences in effectively improving environmental performance. J Clean Prod 68:165–173CrossRef Testa F, Rizzi F, Daddi T, Gusmerotti NM, Iraldo F, Frey M (2014) EMAS and ISO 14001: the differences in effectively improving environmental performance. J Clean Prod 68:165–173CrossRef
go back to reference Testa F, Iraldo F, Vaccari A, Ferrari E (2015a) Why eco-labels can be effective marketing tools: evidence from a study on Italian consumers. Bus Strateg Environ 24:252–265CrossRef Testa F, Iraldo F, Vaccari A, Ferrari E (2015a) Why eco-labels can be effective marketing tools: evidence from a study on Italian consumers. Bus Strateg Environ 24:252–265CrossRef
go back to reference Testa F, Gusmerotti NM, Corsini F, Passetti E, Iraldo F (2015b) Commitment to the environment by small firms: the role of institutional pressures, internal motivations and entrepreneurs’ attitudes. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag. doi:10.1002/csr.1382 Testa F, Gusmerotti NM, Corsini F, Passetti E, Iraldo F (2015b) Commitment to the environment by small firms: the role of institutional pressures, internal motivations and entrepreneurs’ attitudes. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag. doi:10.​1002/​csr.​1382
go back to reference Thorn MJ, Kraus JL, Parker DR (2011) Life cycle assessment as a sustainability management tool: strengths, weaknesses, and other considerations. Environ Qual Manag 20:1–10CrossRef Thorn MJ, Kraus JL, Parker DR (2011) Life cycle assessment as a sustainability management tool: strengths, weaknesses, and other considerations. Environ Qual Manag 20:1–10CrossRef
go back to reference Weiss NA, Weiss CA (2012) Introductory statistics. Pearson Education, London Weiss NA, Weiss CA (2012) Introductory statistics. Pearson Education, London
go back to reference Welch EW, Rana A, Mori Y (2003) The promises and pitfalls of ISO 14001 for competitiveness and sustainability. Greener Manag Int 44:58–73CrossRef Welch EW, Rana A, Mori Y (2003) The promises and pitfalls of ISO 14001 for competitiveness and sustainability. Greener Manag Int 44:58–73CrossRef
go back to reference White P (2012) From an issue to be managed to the heart of the business. P & G Inside Quarterly Newsletter White P (2012) From an issue to be managed to the heart of the business. P & G Inside Quarterly Newsletter
go back to reference Williamson D, Lynch-Wood G, Ramsay J (2006) Drivers of environmental behaviour in manufacturing SMEs and the implications for CSR. J Bus Ethics 67:317–330CrossRef Williamson D, Lynch-Wood G, Ramsay J (2006) Drivers of environmental behaviour in manufacturing SMEs and the implications for CSR. J Bus Ethics 67:317–330CrossRef
go back to reference Yin H, Schmeidler PJ (2009) Why do standardized ISO 14001 environmental management systems lead to heterogeneous environmental outcomes? Bus Strateg Environ 18:469–486CrossRef Yin H, Schmeidler PJ (2009) Why do standardized ISO 14001 environmental management systems lead to heterogeneous environmental outcomes? Bus Strateg Environ 18:469–486CrossRef
go back to reference Zhu Q, Sarkis J, Geng Y (2005) Green supply chain management in China: pressures, practices and performance. Int J Oper Prod Manag 25:449–468CrossRef Zhu Q, Sarkis J, Geng Y (2005) Green supply chain management in China: pressures, practices and performance. Int J Oper Prod Manag 25:449–468CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Perceptions on LCA implementation: evidence from a survey on adopters and nonadopters in Italy
Authors
Francesco Testa
Benedetta Nucci
Sara Tessitore
Fabio Iraldo
Tiberio Daddi
Publication date
08-04-2016
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment / Issue 10/2016
Print ISSN: 0948-3349
Electronic ISSN: 1614-7502
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-016-1106-9

Other articles of this Issue 10/2016

The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 10/2016 Go to the issue

LCA FOR ENERGY SYSTEMS AND FOOD PRODUCTS

Life cycle assessment of ocean energy technologies