Top

Journal of Science Education and Technology

Published in:

09-01-2021

Research Trends in Technology-Enhanced Chemistry Learning: A Review of Comparative Research from 2010 to 2019

Authors: Shu-Hao Wu, Chiu-Lin Lai, Gwo-Jen Hwang, Chin-Chung Tsai

Published in: Journal of Science Education and Technology | Issue 4/2021

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

Chemistry is a subject which involves a number of abstract concepts, making it a difficult and frustrating learning process for many students. Educators and researchers believe that technology could provide an opportunity to address this problem. However, it is challenging to find a model for appropriately and successfully integrating technology into chemistry education. Therefore, in this study, a review was conducted on the technology-enhanced chemistry learning studies published in Social Science Citation Index (SSCI) journals from 2010 to 2019. This study searched the target articles from the Web of Science (WOS) database and excluded those studies that did not adopt a comparative research design. Finally, 60 studies were included in this research trend analysis. A coding scheme was developed for the types of technology, the types of learning tools, the roles of technology in chemistry learning, learning topics, learning environments, participants, research designs, and the learning outcomes the researchers evaluated. From the analysis results, it was found that (1) inorganic chemistry and physical chemistry courses were the main learning topics, while the formal classroom was most often referred to as the research setting. The most frequently discussed issue was students’ learning achievement. (2) Regarding technology integration, offering students learning content through personal computers was the main activity mode. The technology was used for lower-level implementation, that is, providing supplementary materials for students. (3) Finally, using keyword analysis, it is possible to extract the recent concerns of the researchers, and from the results of the study, it is clear that the researchers are placing increasing emphasis on learners’ experience and skill development in the learning process. Accordingly, this study highlights the features of the research trends and then provides suggestions for researchers in the technology-enhanced chemistry learning field.

previous article Investigation of the Relationship Between Middle School Students’ Computational Thinking Skills and their STEM Career Interest and Attitudes Toward Inquiry

next article Modeling Secondary Students’ Genetics Learning in a Game-Based Environment: Integrating the Expectancy-Value Theory of Achievement Motivation and Flow Theory

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Abell, T. N., & Bretz, S. L. (2019). Macroscopic observations of dissolving, insolubility, and precipitation: general chemistry and physical chemistry students’ ideas about entropy changes and spontaneity. Journal of Chemical Education, 96(3), 469–478.CrossRef

Akaygun, S., & Jones, L. L. (2013). Research-based design and development of a simulation of liquid–vapor equilibrium. Chemical Education Research and Practice, 14, 324–344.CrossRef

Alegre, F., Moliner, L., Maroto, A., & Lorenzo-Valentin, G. (2019). Peer tutoring in mathematics in primary education: a systematic review. Educational Review, 71(6), 767–791.CrossRef

Bakan, U., & Bakan, U. (2018). Game-based learning studies in education journals: a systematic review of recent trends. Actualidades Pedagógicas, 72(72), 119–145.CrossRef

Barak, M. (2007). Transition from traditional to ICT-enhanced learning environments in undergraduate chemistry courses. Computers & Education, 48(1), 30–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2004.11.004.CrossRef

Barrett, R., Gandhi, H. A., Naganathan, A., Daniels, D., Zhang, Y., Onwunaka, C., et al. (2018). Social and tactile mixed reality increases student engagement in undergraduate lab activities. Journal of Chemical Education, 95(10), 1755–1762.CrossRef

Baye, A., Inns, A., Lake, C., & Slavin, R. E. (2019). A synthesis of quantitative research on reading programs for secondary students. Reading Research Quarterly, 54(2), 133–166.CrossRef

Becker, N., & Towns, M. (2012). Students’ understanding of mathematical expressions in physical chemistry contexts: an analysis using Sherin’s symbolic forms. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 13(3), 209–220.CrossRef

Bergmann, J., & Smith, E. S. C. (2017). Flipped Learning 3.0: The Operating System for the Future of Talent Development. FL: Global Publishing.

Biesinger, K., & Crippen, K. (2010). The effects of feedback protocol on self-regulated learning in a web-based worked example learning environment. Computers & Education, 55(4), 1470–1482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.06.013.CrossRef

Blumenfeld, P. C., Soloway, E., Marx, R. W., Krajcik, J. S., Guzdial, M., & Palincsar, A. (1991). Motivating project-based learning - sustaining the doing, supporting the learning. Educational Psychologist, 26(3–4), 369–398.CrossRef

Bodily, R., Leary, H., & West, R. E. (2019). Research trends in instructional design and technology journals. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(1), 64–79.CrossRef

Brinson, J. R. (2015). Learning outcome achievement in non-traditional (virtual and remote) versus traditional (hands-on) laboratories: a review of the empirical research. Computers & Education, 87, 218–237.CrossRef

Brown, S. I., & Walter, M. I. (1983). The art of problem posing: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Chang, C. Y., Lai, C. L., & Hwang, G. J. (2018). Trends and research issues of mobile learning studies in nursing education: a review of academic publications from 1971 to 2016. Computers & Education, 116, 28–48.CrossRef

Chiu, J. L., & Linn, M. C. (2014). Supporting knowledge integration in chemistry with a visualization-enhanced inquiry unit. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23(1), 37–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-013-9449-5.CrossRef

Chu, S. K. W., Tse, S. K., & Chow, K. (2011). Using collaborative teaching and inquiry project-based learning to help primary school students develop information literacy and information skills. Library & Information Science Research, 33(2), 132–143.CrossRef

Chung, C. J., Hwang, G. J., & Lai, C. L. (2019). A review of experimental mobile learning research in 2010–2016 based on the activity theory framework. Computers & Education, 129, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.10.010.CrossRef

Chung, C. J., Lai, C. L., & Hwang, G. J. (2019). Roles and research trends of flipped classrooms in nursing education: a review of academic publications from 2010 to 2017. Interactive Learning Environments. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1619589.CrossRef

Cui, J., & Yu, S. (2019). Fostering deeper learning in a flipped classroom: effects of knowledge graphs versus concept maps. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(5), 2308–2328. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12841.CrossRef

Dohrn, S. W., & Dohn, N. B. (2018). The role of teacher questions in the chemistry classroom. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 19(1), 352–363.CrossRef

Duffy, P. L., Enneking, K. M., Gampp, T. W., Amir Hakim, K., Coleman, A. F., Laforest, K. V., et al. (2018). Form versus function: a comparison of Lewis Structure drawing tools and the extraneous cognitive load they induce. Journal of Chemical Education, 96(2), 238–247.CrossRef

Ewais, A., & De Troyer, O. (2019). A usability and acceptance evaluation of the use of augmented reality for learning atoms and molecules reaction by primary school female students in palestine. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 57(7), 1643–1670.CrossRef

Fidan, M., & Tuncel, M. (2019). Integrating augmented reality into problem based learning: the effects on learning achievement and attitude in physics education. Computers & Education, 142 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103635

Finlayson, K., & McCrudden, M. T. (2019). Teacher-implemented writing instruction for elementary students: a literature review. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 1–18 https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2019.1604278

Flynn, A. B. (2014). How do students work through organic synthesis learning activities? Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 15(4), 747–762.CrossRef

Frailich, M., Kesner, M., & Hofstein, A. (2009). Enhancing students’ understanding of the concept of chemical bonding by using activities provided on an interactive website. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(3), 289–310.CrossRef

Fu, Q. K., & Hwang, G. J. (2018). Trends in mobile technology-supported collaborative learning: a systematic review of journal publications from 2007 to 2016. Computers & Education, 119, 129–143.CrossRef

Gilboy, M. B., Heinerichs, S., & Pazzaglia, G. (2015). Enhancing student engagement using the flipped classroom. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 47(1), 109–114.CrossRef

Gliner, J. A., Morgan, G. A., & Leech, N. L. (2011). Research methods in applied settings: an integrated approach to design and analysis. Routledge.

Hale-Hanes, C. (2015). Promoting student development of models and scientific inquiry skills in acid–base chemistry: an important skill development in preparation for AP chemistry. Journal of Chemical education, 92(8), 1320–1324.CrossRef

Halverson, L. R., Graham, C. R., Spring, K. J., Drysdale, J. S., & Henrie, C. R. (2014). A thematic analysis of the most highly cited scholarship in the first decade of blended learning research. Internet and Higher Education, 20, 20–34.CrossRef

Harmon, R. J., Morgan, G. A., Gliner, J. A., & HARMON, R. J. (1999). Definition, purposes, and dimensions of research. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 38(2), 217–219.CrossRef

Hinojo-Lucena, F. J., Aznar-Díaz, I., Cáceres-Reche, M. P., & Romero-Rodríguez, J. M. (2019). Artificial intelligence in higher education: a bibliometric study on its impact in the scientific literature. Education Sciences, 9(1), 51.CrossRef

Hong, H. Y., Ma, L., Lin, P. Y., & Lee, K. Y. H. (2020). Advancing third graders’ reading comprehension through collaborative Knowledge Building: a comparative study in Taiwan. Computers & Education, 157, 103962.CrossRef

Hsu, Y. C., Ho, H. N. J., Tsai, C. C., Hwang, G. J., Chu, H. C., Wang, C. Y., & Chen, N. S. (2012). Research trends in technology-based learning from 2000 to 2009: a content analysis of publications in selected journals. Educational Technology & Society, 15(2), 354–370.

Hwang, G. J. (2014). Definition, framework and research issues of smart learning environments-a context-aware ubiquitous learning perspective. Smart Learning Environments, 1(1), 4.CrossRef

Hwang, G. J., & Chen, C. H. (2017). Influences of an inquiry-based ubiquitous gaming design on students’ learning achievements, motivation, behavioral patterns, and tendency towards critical thinking and problem solving. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(4), 950–971.CrossRef

Hwang, G. J., Chu, H. C., & Lai, C. L. (2017). Prepare your own device and determination (PYOD): a successfully promoted mobile learning mode in Taiwan. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation, 11(2), 87–107.CrossRef

Hwang, G. J., Tsai, C. C., & Yang, S. J. (2008). Criteria, strategies and research issues of context-aware ubiquitous learning. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 11(2), 81–91.

Irby, S. M., Borda, E. J., & Haupt, J. (2018). Effects of implementing a hybrid wet lab and online module lab curriculum into a general chemistry course: impacts on student performance and engagement with the chemistry triplet. Journal of Chemical Education, 95(2), 224–232.CrossRef

Jonassen, D. H. (1996). Computers in the classroom: mindtools for critical thinking. Columbus OH: Merrill/Prentice-Hall.

Karacop, A., & Doymus, K. (2013). Effects of jigsaw cooperative learning and animation techniques on students’ understanding of chemical bonding and their conceptions of the particulate nature of matter. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 22(2), 186–203.CrossRef

Kao, G. Y. M., Chiang, C. H., & Sun, C. T. (2017). Customizing scaffolds for game-based learning in physics: impacts on knowledge acquisition and game design creativity. Computers & Education, 113, 294–312.CrossRef

Kiste, A. L., Scott, G. E., Bukenberger, J. P., Markmann, M., & Moore, J. (2017). An examination of student outcomes in studio chemistry. Chemical Education Research and Practice, 18, 233–249.CrossRef

Ku, H. Y. (2009). Twenty years of productivity in ETR&D by institutions and authors. Educational Technology Research and Development, 57(6), 801.CrossRef

Kuehl, R. O. (2000). Design of experiments: statistical principles of research design and analysis. CA: Duxbury Press.

Kyza, E. A., & Georgiou, Y. (2019). Scaffolding augmented reality inquiry learning: the design and investigation of the TraceReaders location-based, augmented reality platform. Interactive Learning Environments, 27(2), 211–225.CrossRef

Lai, C. L. (2020). Trends of mobile learning: a review of the top 100 highly cited papers. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(3), 721–742. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12884.CrossRef

Lamb, R. L., & Annetta, L. (2013). The use of online modules and the effect on student outcomes in a high school chemistry class. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 22(5), 603–613.CrossRef

Lavi, R., Shwartz, G., & Dori, Y. J. (2019). Metacognition in chemistry education: a literature review. Israel Journal of Chemistry, 59(6–7), 583–597.

Lewis, A., & Smith, D. (1993). Defining higher order thinking. Theory into practice, 32(3), 131–137.CrossRef

Lim, C. P., & Chai, C. S. (2004). An activity-theoretical approach to research of ICT integration in Singapore schools: orienting activities and learner autonomy. Computers & Education, 43(3), 215–236.CrossRef

Lindquist, E. F. (1953). Design and analysis of experiments in psychology and education.

Limniou, M., Papadopoulos, N., & Whitehead, C. (2009). Integration of simulation into pre-laboratory chemical course: computer cluster versus WebCT. Computers & Education, 52(1), 45–52.CrossRef

Lin, H. C., Hwang, G. J. (2018) Research trends of flipped classroom studies for medical courses: A review of journal publications from 2008 to 2017 based on the technology-enhanced learning model. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–17 https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2018.1467462

Marson, G. A., & Torres, B. B. (2011). Fostering multirepresentational levels of chemical concepts: a framework to develop educational software. Journal of Chemical Education, 88(12), 1616–1622.CrossRef

McCollum, B. M., Regier, L., Leong, J., Simpson, S., & Sterner, S. (2014). The effects of using touch-screen devices on students’ molecular visualization and representational competence skills. Journal of Chemical Education, 91(11), 1810–1817.CrossRef

McMillanH, & Schumacher, S., J. (2010). Research in education: evidence-based inquiry. Pearson: MyEducationLab Series.

Merchant, Z., Goetz, E. T., Keeney-Kennicutt, W., Cifuentes, L., Kwok, O., & Davis, T. J. (2013). Exploring 3-D virtual reality technology for spatial ability and chemistry achievement. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(6), 579–590.CrossRef

Msonde, S. E., & Van Aalst, J. (2017). Designing for interaction, thinking and academic achievement in a Tanzanian undergraduate chemistry course. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(5), 1389–1413.CrossRef

Nature Index (2019). Nature Index 2019 Annual tables. from https://www.natureindex.com/faq#journals

Newmann, F. M. (1990). Higher order thinking in teaching social studies: a rationale for the assessment of classroom thoughtfulness. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 22(1), 41–56.CrossRef

Noce, A. M. (2018). Green chemistry and the grant challenges of sustainability. In M. A. Benvenuto & L. Kolopajlo (Eds.), Green Chemistry Education: Recent Developments (pp. 2–11). Berlin, Germeny: de Gruyter.

Partanen, L. (2020). How student-centred teaching in quantum chemistry affects students’ experiences of learning and motivation-a self-determination theory perspective. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 21(1), 79–94. https://doi.org/10.1039/c9rp00036d.CrossRef

Perez-Alvarez, L., Ruiz-Rubio, L., & Vilas-Vilela, J. L. (2018). Determining the deacetylation degree of chitosan: opportunities to learn instrumental techniques. Journal of Chemical Education, 95(6), 1022–1028.CrossRef

Plass, J. L., Milne, C., Homer, B. D., Schwartz, R. N., Hayward, E. O., Jordan, T., et al. (2012). Investigating the effectiveness of computer simulations for chemistry learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(3), 394–419.CrossRef

Rutten, N., van Joolingen, W. R., & van der Veen, J. T. (2012). The learning effects of computer simulations in science education. Computers & Education, 58(1), 136–153.CrossRef

Ryoo, K., Bedell, K., & Swearingen, A. (2018). Promoting linguistically diverse students’ short-term and long-term understanding of chemical phenomena using visualizations. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 27(6), 508–522. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-018-9739-z.CrossRef

Seery, M. K., & McDonnell, C. (2013). The application of technology to enhance chemistry education. Chemical Education Research and Practice, 14, 227–228.CrossRef

Seery, M. K. (2015). Flipped learning in higher education chemistry: emerging trends and potential directions. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 16, 758–768.CrossRef

Smetana, L. K., & Bell, R. L. (2014). Which setting to choose: comparison of whole-class vs. small-group computer simulation use. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23(4), 481–495.

Srisawasdi, N., & Panjaburee, P. (2019). Implementation of game-transformed inquiry-based learning to promote the understanding of and motivation to learn chemistry. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 28(2), 152–164. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-018-9754-0.CrossRef

Tang, K. Y., Chou, T. L., & Tsai, C. C. (2020). A content analysis of computational thinking research: an international publication trends and research typology. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 29(1), 9–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-019-00442-8.CrossRef

Taskin, V., & Bernholt, S. (2014). Students’ understanding of chemical formulae: a review of empirical research. International Journal of Science Education, 36(1), 157–185.CrossRef

Tsaparlis, G. (2016). The logical and psychological structure of physical chemistry and its relevance to graduate students’ opinions about the difficulties of the major areas of the subject. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 17(2), 320–336.CrossRef

Urhahne, D., Nick, S., & Schanze, S. (2009). The effect of three-dimensional simulations on the understanding of chemical structures and their properties. Research in Science Education, 39(4), 495–513.CrossRef

Wang, C.-Y., Wu, H.-K., Lee, S.W.-Y., Hwang, F.-K., Chang, H.-Y., Wu, Y.-T., & Tsai, C.-C. (2014). A review of research on technology-assisted school science laboratories. Educational Technology & Society, 17(2), 307–320.

Wood, J., & Donnelly-Hermosillo, D. F. (2019). Learning chemistry nomenclature: Comparing the use of an electronic game versus a study guide approach. Computers & Education, 141.

World Economic Forum. (2019). Global competitiveness report 2019: how to end a lost decade of productivity growth. from https://www.weforum.org/reports/how-to-end-a-decade-of-lost-productivity-growth

Xie, H., Chu, H. C., Hwang, G. J., & Wang, C. C. (2019). Trends and development in technology-enhanced adaptive/personalized learning: a systematic review of journal publications from 2007 to 2017. Computers & Education, 140, 103599.CrossRef

Zhang, Z. H., & Linn, M. C. (2011). Can generating representations enhance learning with dynamic visualizations? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(10), 1177–1198.CrossRef

Zydney, J. M., & Warner, Z. (2016). Mobile apps for science learning: Review of research. Computers & Education, 94, 1–17.CrossRef

Title: Research Trends in Technology-Enhanced Chemistry Learning: A Review of Comparative Research from 2010 to 2019
Authors: Shu-Hao Wu
Chiu-Lin Lai
Gwo-Jen Hwang
Chin-Chung Tsai
Publication date: 09-01-2021
Publisher: Springer Netherlands
Published in: Journal of Science Education and Technology / Issue 4/2021
Print ISSN: 1059-0145
Electronic ISSN: 1573-1839
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-020-09894-w

Springer Professional

Abstract

Please log in to get access to your license.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Other articles of this Issue 4/2021

Modeling Secondary Students’ Genetics Learning in a Game-Based Environment: Integrating the Expectancy-Value Theory of Achievement Motivation and Flow Theory

Rising to the Challenge: The Effect of Individual and Social Metacognitive Scaffolds on Students’ Expressions of Autonomy and Competence Throughout an Inquiry Process

Examining the Effectiveness of a Professional Development Program: Integration of Educational Robotics into Science and Mathematics Curricula

Teaching Chemistry with Arduino Experiments in a Mixed Virtual-Physical Learning Environment

Be Prepared! How Pre-lab Modules Affect Students’ Understanding of Gene Mapping

Elementary Pre-service Teachers’ Search, Evaluation, and Selection of Online Science Education Resources

Premium Partners