Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Neural Computing and Applications 7-8/2014

01-12-2014 | Original Article

River flow forecasting through nonlinear local approximation in a fuzzy model

Authors: P. C. Nayak, K. P. Sudheer, S. K. Jain

Published in: Neural Computing and Applications | Issue 7-8/2014

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This study investigates the potential of nonlinear local function approximation in a Takagi–Sugeno (TS) fuzzy model for river flow forecasting. Generally, in a TS framework, the local approximation is performed by a linear model, while in this approach, linear function approximation is substituted using a nonlinear function approximation. The primary hypothesis herein is that the process being modeled (rainfall–runoff in this study) is highly nonlinear, and a linear approximation at the local domain might still leave a lot of unexplained variance by the model. In this study, subtractive clustering technique is used for domain partition, and neural network is used for function approximation. The modeling approach has been tested on two case studies: Kolar basin in India and Kentucky basin in USA. The results of fuzzy nonlinear local approximation (FNLLA) model are highly promising. The performance of the FNLLA is compared with that of a pure fuzzy inference system (FIS), and it is observed that both the models perform similar at 1-step-ahead forecasts. However, the FNLLA performs much better than FIS at higher lead times. It is also observed that FNLLA forecasts the river flow with lesser error compared to FIS. In the case of Kolar River, more than 40 % of the total data are forecasted with <2 % error by FNLLA at 1 h ahead, while the corresponding value for FIS is only 20 %. In the case of 3-h-ahead forecasts, these values are 25 % for FNLLA and 15 % for FIS. Performance of FNLLA in the case of Kentucky River basin was also better compared to FIS. It is also found that FNLLA simulates the peak flow better than FIS, which is certainly an improvement over the existing models.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
1.
go back to reference Abrahart RJ, Anctil F, Coulibaly P, Dawson CW, Mount NJ, See LM, Shamseldin AY, Solomatine DP, Toth E, Wilby RL (2012) Two decades of anarchy? Emerging themes and outstanding challenges for neural network modelling of surface hydrology. Prog Phys Geogr 36:480–513CrossRef Abrahart RJ, Anctil F, Coulibaly P, Dawson CW, Mount NJ, See LM, Shamseldin AY, Solomatine DP, Toth E, Wilby RL (2012) Two decades of anarchy? Emerging themes and outstanding challenges for neural network modelling of surface hydrology. Prog Phys Geogr 36:480–513CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Amorocho J, Brandstetter A (1971) A critique of current methods of hydrologic systems investigations. EOS Trans AGU 45:307–321CrossRef Amorocho J, Brandstetter A (1971) A critique of current methods of hydrologic systems investigations. EOS Trans AGU 45:307–321CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Anders U, Korn O (1999) Model selection in neural networks. Neural Netw 12:309–323 Anders U, Korn O (1999) Model selection in neural networks. Neural Netw 12:309–323
4.
go back to reference Beven KJ (2001) Rainfall–runoff modelling—the primer. Wiley, Chichester Beven KJ (2001) Rainfall–runoff modelling—the primer. Wiley, Chichester
5.
go back to reference Chang F-J, Hu H-F, Chen Y-C (2001) Counterpropagation fuzzy-neural network for streamflow reconstruction. Hydrol Process 15:219–232CrossRef Chang F-J, Hu H-F, Chen Y-C (2001) Counterpropagation fuzzy-neural network for streamflow reconstruction. Hydrol Process 15:219–232CrossRef
6.
7.
go back to reference Chen YH, Chang FJ (2009) Evolutionary artificial neural networks for hydrological systems forecasting. J Hydrol 367:125–137CrossRef Chen YH, Chang FJ (2009) Evolutionary artificial neural networks for hydrological systems forecasting. J Hydrol 367:125–137CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Chiang YM, Hsu KL, Chang FJ, Hong Y, Sorooshian S (2007) Merging multiple precipitation sources for flash flood forecasting. J Hydrol 340:183–196CrossRef Chiang YM, Hsu KL, Chang FJ, Hong Y, Sorooshian S (2007) Merging multiple precipitation sources for flash flood forecasting. J Hydrol 340:183–196CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Chiu S (1994) Fuzzy model identification based on cluster estimation. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 2(3):267–278 Chiu S (1994) Fuzzy model identification based on cluster estimation. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 2(3):267–278
10.
go back to reference Cigizoglu HK, Kisi O (2006) Methods to improve the neural network performance in suspended sediment estimation. J Hydrol 317:221–238CrossRef Cigizoglu HK, Kisi O (2006) Methods to improve the neural network performance in suspended sediment estimation. J Hydrol 317:221–238CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Daniel TM (1991) Neural networks—applications in hydrology and water resources engineering. In: Proceedings on international hydrology and water resources symposium. Institution of Engineers, Perth, Australia Daniel TM (1991) Neural networks—applications in hydrology and water resources engineering. In: Proceedings on international hydrology and water resources symposium. Institution of Engineers, Perth, Australia
13.
go back to reference Hsu K, Gupta VH, Sorooshian S (1995) Artificial neural network modeling of the rainfall–runoff process. Water Resour Res 31(10):2517–2530CrossRef Hsu K, Gupta VH, Sorooshian S (1995) Artificial neural network modeling of the rainfall–runoff process. Water Resour Res 31(10):2517–2530CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Ikeda S, Ochiai M, Sawaragi Y (1976) Sequential GMDH algorithm and its applications to river flow prediction. IEEE Trans Syst Manag Cybern 6(7):473–479CrossRef Ikeda S, Ochiai M, Sawaragi Y (1976) Sequential GMDH algorithm and its applications to river flow prediction. IEEE Trans Syst Manag Cybern 6(7):473–479CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Imrie CE, Durucan S, Korre A (2000) River flow prediction using artificial neural networks: generalization beyond the calibration range. J Hydrol 233:138–153CrossRef Imrie CE, Durucan S, Korre A (2000) River flow prediction using artificial neural networks: generalization beyond the calibration range. J Hydrol 233:138–153CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Jain A, Srinivasulu S (2004) Development of effective and efficient rainfall–runoff models using integration of deterministic, real-coded genetic algorithms and artificial neural network techniques. Water Resour Res 40(4):W04302. doi:10.1029/2003WR002355 CrossRef Jain A, Srinivasulu S (2004) Development of effective and efficient rainfall–runoff models using integration of deterministic, real-coded genetic algorithms and artificial neural network techniques. Water Resour Res 40(4):W04302. doi:10.​1029/​2003WR002355 CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Jain A, Sudheer KP, Srinivasulu S (2004) Identification of physical processes inherent in artificial neural rainfall–runoff models. Hydrol Process 18(3):571–581CrossRef Jain A, Sudheer KP, Srinivasulu S (2004) Identification of physical processes inherent in artificial neural rainfall–runoff models. Hydrol Process 18(3):571–581CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Jain SK (2008) Development of integrated discharge and sediment rating relation using a compound neural network. J Hydrol Eng ASCE 13(3):124–131CrossRef Jain SK (2008) Development of integrated discharge and sediment rating relation using a compound neural network. J Hydrol Eng ASCE 13(3):124–131CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Jones LK (2000) Local greedy approximation for nonlinear regression and neural network training. Ann Stat 28(5):1379–1389CrossRefMATH Jones LK (2000) Local greedy approximation for nonlinear regression and neural network training. Ann Stat 28(5):1379–1389CrossRefMATH
20.
go back to reference Maier HR, Jain A, Dandy GC, Sudheer KP (2010) Methods used for the development of neural networks for the prediction of water resources variables in river systems: current status and future directions. Env Mod Softw 25:891–909. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2010.02.003 CrossRef Maier HR, Jain A, Dandy GC, Sudheer KP (2010) Methods used for the development of neural networks for the prediction of water resources variables in river systems: current status and future directions. Env Mod Softw 25:891–909. doi:10.​1016/​j.​envsoft.​2010.​02.​003 CrossRef
23.
24.
25.
go back to reference Nayak PC, Sudheer KP, Rangan DM, Ramasastri KS (2004) A neuro-fuzzy computing technique for modeling hydrological time series. J Hydrol 291(1–2):52–66CrossRef Nayak PC, Sudheer KP, Rangan DM, Ramasastri KS (2004) A neuro-fuzzy computing technique for modeling hydrological time series. J Hydrol 291(1–2):52–66CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Parasuraman K, Elshorbagy A, Carey SK (2006) Spiking modular neural networks: a neural network modeling approach for hydrological processes. Water Resour Res 42:W05412. doi:10.1029/2005WR004317 CrossRef Parasuraman K, Elshorbagy A, Carey SK (2006) Spiking modular neural networks: a neural network modeling approach for hydrological processes. Water Resour Res 42:W05412. doi:10.​1029/​2005WR004317 CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Sajikumar N, Thandaveswara BS (1999) A non-linear rainfall–runoff model using an artificial neural network. J Hydrol 216:32–35CrossRef Sajikumar N, Thandaveswara BS (1999) A non-linear rainfall–runoff model using an artificial neural network. J Hydrol 216:32–35CrossRef
28.
go back to reference See L, Openshaw S (1999) Applying soft computing approaches to river level forecasting. Hydrol Sci J 44(5):763–779CrossRef See L, Openshaw S (1999) Applying soft computing approaches to river level forecasting. Hydrol Sci J 44(5):763–779CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Shamseldin AY, Nasr AE, O’Connor KM (2002) Comparison of different forms of the multi-layer feed-forward neural network method used for river flow forecasting. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 6:671–684CrossRef Shamseldin AY, Nasr AE, O’Connor KM (2002) Comparison of different forms of the multi-layer feed-forward neural network method used for river flow forecasting. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 6:671–684CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Singer AC, Wornell G, Oppenheim A (1992) Codebook prediction: a nonlinear signal modeling paradigm. In: Proceedings of the international conference on acoustics, speech and signal processing, San Francisco, vol 5. IEEE, pp 325–328 Singer AC, Wornell G, Oppenheim A (1992) Codebook prediction: a nonlinear signal modeling paradigm. In: Proceedings of the international conference on acoustics, speech and signal processing, San Francisco, vol 5. IEEE, pp 325–328
31.
go back to reference Sudheer KP (2005) Knowledge extraction from trained neural network river flow models. J Hydrol Eng ASCE 10(4):264–269CrossRef Sudheer KP (2005) Knowledge extraction from trained neural network river flow models. J Hydrol Eng ASCE 10(4):264–269CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Sudheer KP, Gosain AK, Ramasastri KS (2002) A data-driven algorithm for constructing artificial neural network rainfall–runoff models. Hydrol Process 16:1325–1330CrossRef Sudheer KP, Gosain AK, Ramasastri KS (2002) A data-driven algorithm for constructing artificial neural network rainfall–runoff models. Hydrol Process 16:1325–1330CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Sudheer KP, Nayak PC, Ramasastri KS (2003) Improving peak flow estimates in artificial neural network river flow models. Hydrol Process 17(1):671–686 Sudheer KP, Nayak PC, Ramasastri KS (2003) Improving peak flow estimates in artificial neural network river flow models. Hydrol Process 17(1):671–686
34.
go back to reference Takagi T, Sugeno M (1985) Fuzzy identification of systems and its application to modeling and control. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 15(1):116–132CrossRefMATH Takagi T, Sugeno M (1985) Fuzzy identification of systems and its application to modeling and control. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 15(1):116–132CrossRefMATH
35.
go back to reference Tayfur G (2006) Fuzzy, ANN, and regression models to predict longitudinal dispersion coefficient in natural streams. Nord Hydrol 37(2):143–164 Tayfur G (2006) Fuzzy, ANN, and regression models to predict longitudinal dispersion coefficient in natural streams. Nord Hydrol 37(2):143–164
36.
go back to reference Tayfur G, Singh VP (2006) ANN and fuzzy logic models for simulating event-based rainfall–runoff. J Hydraul Eng 132(12):1321–1330CrossRef Tayfur G, Singh VP (2006) ANN and fuzzy logic models for simulating event-based rainfall–runoff. J Hydraul Eng 132(12):1321–1330CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Tayfur G, Singh VP (2011) Predicting mean and bankfull discharge from channel cross-sectional area by expert and regression methods. Water Resour Manag 25(5):1253–1267CrossRef Tayfur G, Singh VP (2011) Predicting mean and bankfull discharge from channel cross-sectional area by expert and regression methods. Water Resour Manag 25(5):1253–1267CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Tokar AS, Markus M (2000) Precipitation-runoff modeling using artificial neural network and conceptual models. J Hydrol Eng Am Soc Civil Eng 5(2):156–161 Tokar AS, Markus M (2000) Precipitation-runoff modeling using artificial neural network and conceptual models. J Hydrol Eng Am Soc Civil Eng 5(2):156–161
39.
go back to reference Vernieuwe H, Georgieva O, De Baets B, Pauwels VRN, Verhoest NEC, De Troch FP (2005) Comparison of data-driven Takagi–Sugeno models of rainfall–discharge dynamics. J Hydrol 302(1–4):173–186CrossRef Vernieuwe H, Georgieva O, De Baets B, Pauwels VRN, Verhoest NEC, De Troch FP (2005) Comparison of data-driven Takagi–Sugeno models of rainfall–discharge dynamics. J Hydrol 302(1–4):173–186CrossRef
40.
go back to reference Wilby RL, Abrahart RJ, Dawson CW (2003) Detection of conceptual model rainfall–runoff processes inside an artificial neural network. Hydrol Sci J 48(2):163–181CrossRef Wilby RL, Abrahart RJ, Dawson CW (2003) Detection of conceptual model rainfall–runoff processes inside an artificial neural network. Hydrol Sci J 48(2):163–181CrossRef
41.
go back to reference Xiong LH, Shamseldin AY, O’Connor KM (2001) A nonlinear combination of the forecasts of rainfall–runoff models by the first order Takagi–Sugeno fuzzy system. J Hydrol 245(1–4):196–217CrossRef Xiong LH, Shamseldin AY, O’Connor KM (2001) A nonlinear combination of the forecasts of rainfall–runoff models by the first order Takagi–Sugeno fuzzy system. J Hydrol 245(1–4):196–217CrossRef
42.
go back to reference Yager R, Filev D (1994) Generation of fuzzy rules by Mountain clustering. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 2(3):209–219 Yager R, Filev D (1994) Generation of fuzzy rules by Mountain clustering. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 2(3):209–219
43.
go back to reference Zhang B, Govindaraju RS (2000) Prediction of watershed runoff using Bayesian concepts and modular neural networks. Water Resour Res 36(3):753–762CrossRef Zhang B, Govindaraju RS (2000) Prediction of watershed runoff using Bayesian concepts and modular neural networks. Water Resour Res 36(3):753–762CrossRef
Metadata
Title
River flow forecasting through nonlinear local approximation in a fuzzy model
Authors
P. C. Nayak
K. P. Sudheer
S. K. Jain
Publication date
01-12-2014
Publisher
Springer London
Published in
Neural Computing and Applications / Issue 7-8/2014
Print ISSN: 0941-0643
Electronic ISSN: 1433-3058
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-014-1684-z

Other articles of this Issue 7-8/2014

Neural Computing and Applications 7-8/2014 Go to the issue

Premium Partner