Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Science Education and Technology 2-3/2015

01-04-2015

Sandboxes for Model-Based Inquiry

Authors: Corey Brady, Nathan Holbert, Firat Soylu, Michael Novak, Uri Wilensky

Published in: Journal of Science Education and Technology | Issue 2-3/2015

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

In this article, we introduce a class of constructionist learning environments that we call Emergent Systems Sandboxes (ESSs), which have served as a centerpiece of our recent work in developing curriculum to support scalable model-based learning in classroom settings. ESSs are a carefully specified form of virtual construction environment that support students in creating, exploring, and sharing computational models of dynamic systems that exhibit emergent phenomena. They provide learners with “entity”-level construction primitives that reflect an underlying scientific model. These primitives can be directly “painted” into a sandbox space, where they can then be combined, arranged, and manipulated to construct complex systems and explore the emergent properties of those systems. We argue that ESSs offer a means of addressing some of the key barriers to adopting rich, constructionist model-based inquiry approaches in science classrooms at scale. Situating the ESS in a large-scale science modeling curriculum we are implementing across the USA, we describe how the unique “entity-level” primitive design of an ESS facilitates knowledge system refinement at both an individual and social level, we describe how it supports flexible modeling practices by providing both continuous and discrete modes of executability, and we illustrate how it offers students a variety of opportunities for validating their qualitative understandings of emergent systems as they develop.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
go back to reference Abrahamson D, Wilensky U (2004) ProbLab: a computer-supported unit in probability and statistics. In: Proceedings of the 28th annual meeting of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education. Bergen, Norway Abrahamson D, Wilensky U (2004) ProbLab: a computer-supported unit in probability and statistics. In: Proceedings of the 28th annual meeting of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education. Bergen, Norway
go back to reference Blikstein P, Wilensky U (2004) MaterialSim: an agent-based simulation toolkit for learning materials science. In: International conference on engineering education. Gainsville, Florida Blikstein P, Wilensky U (2004) MaterialSim: an agent-based simulation toolkit for learning materials science. In: International conference on engineering education. Gainsville, Florida
go back to reference Blikstein P, Wilensky U (2009) An atom is known by the company it keeps: a constructionist learning environment for materials science using agent-based modeling. Int J Comput Math Learn 14:81–119CrossRef Blikstein P, Wilensky U (2009) An atom is known by the company it keeps: a constructionist learning environment for materials science using agent-based modeling. Int J Comput Math Learn 14:81–119CrossRef
go back to reference Brady C, White T, Davis S, Hegedus S (2013) SimCalc and the networked classroom. In: Hegedus S, Roschelle J (eds) The SimCalc vision and contributions: democratizing access to important mathematics. Springer, New York, NY, pp 99–121CrossRef Brady C, White T, Davis S, Hegedus S (2013) SimCalc and the networked classroom. In: Hegedus S, Roschelle J (eds) The SimCalc vision and contributions: democratizing access to important mathematics. Springer, New York, NY, pp 99–121CrossRef
go back to reference Buckley BC, Gobert JD, Kindfield A, Horwitz P, Tinker R, Gerlits B, Willett J (2004) Model-based teaching and learning with BioLogica: what do they learn? how do they learn? how do we know? J Sci Educ Technol 13:23–41CrossRef Buckley BC, Gobert JD, Kindfield A, Horwitz P, Tinker R, Gerlits B, Willett J (2004) Model-based teaching and learning with BioLogica: what do they learn? how do they learn? how do we know? J Sci Educ Technol 13:23–41CrossRef
go back to reference Caperton IH (2010) Toward a theory of game-media literacy: playing and building as reading and writing. Int J Gaming Comput Mediat Simul 2(1):1–16 Caperton IH (2010) Toward a theory of game-media literacy: playing and building as reading and writing. Int J Gaming Comput Mediat Simul 2(1):1–16
go back to reference Carey S (1988) Reorganization of knowledge in the course of acquisition. In: Ontogeny, phylogeny, and historical development. Ablex, Norwood, NJ, pp 1–27 Carey S (1988) Reorganization of knowledge in the course of acquisition. In: Ontogeny, phylogeny, and historical development. Ablex, Norwood, NJ, pp 1–27
go back to reference Clement J (1982) Students’ preconceptions in introductory mechanics. Am J Phys 50:66–70CrossRef Clement J (1982) Students’ preconceptions in introductory mechanics. Am J Phys 50:66–70CrossRef
go back to reference Committee for the Workshops on Computational Thinking (2010) Report of a workshop on the scope and nature of computational thinking. National Research Council, Washington, DC Committee for the Workshops on Computational Thinking (2010) Report of a workshop on the scope and nature of computational thinking. National Research Council, Washington, DC
go back to reference Committee for the Workshops on Computational Thinking (2011) Report of a workshop on the pedagogical aspects of computational thinking. National Research Council, Washington, DC Committee for the Workshops on Computational Thinking (2011) Report of a workshop on the pedagogical aspects of computational thinking. National Research Council, Washington, DC
go back to reference Davis SM (2010) Generative activities: making sense of 1098 functions. In: Lesh R, Galbraith PL, Haines CR, Hurford A (eds) Modeling students’ mathematical modeling competencies. Springer, New York, NY, pp 189–198CrossRef Davis SM (2010) Generative activities: making sense of 1098 functions. In: Lesh R, Galbraith PL, Haines CR, Hurford A (eds) Modeling students’ mathematical modeling competencies. Springer, New York, NY, pp 189–198CrossRef
go back to reference diSessa AA (1988) Knowledge in pieces. In: Constructivism in the computer age. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 49–70 diSessa AA (1988) Knowledge in pieces. In: Constructivism in the computer age. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 49–70
go back to reference diSessa AA (1993) Toward an epistemology of physics. Cogn Instr 10:105–225CrossRef diSessa AA (1993) Toward an epistemology of physics. Cogn Instr 10:105–225CrossRef
go back to reference diSessa AA (1996) What do “just plain folk” know about physics? In: The handbook of education and human development: new models of learning, teaching, and schooling. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 709–730 diSessa AA (1996) What do “just plain folk” know about physics? In: The handbook of education and human development: new models of learning, teaching, and schooling. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 709–730
go back to reference diSessa AA (2000) Changing minds: computers, learning and literacy. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA diSessa AA (2000) Changing minds: computers, learning and literacy. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
go back to reference diSessa AA, Sherin B (1998) What changes in conceptual change? Int J Sci Educ 20:1155–1191CrossRef diSessa AA, Sherin B (1998) What changes in conceptual change? Int J Sci Educ 20:1155–1191CrossRef
go back to reference Driver R, Squires A, Rushworth P, Wood-Robinson V (1994) Making sense of secondary science: research into children’s ideas. Routledge, New York, NY Driver R, Squires A, Rushworth P, Wood-Robinson V (1994) Making sense of secondary science: research into children’s ideas. Routledge, New York, NY
go back to reference Finzer W, Erickson T, Binker J (2002) Fathom dynamic statistics software. Key Curriculum Press Technologies, Emeryville, CA Finzer W, Erickson T, Binker J (2002) Fathom dynamic statistics software. Key Curriculum Press Technologies, Emeryville, CA
go back to reference Glaser R, Chi MTH (1988) Overview. In: The nature of expertise. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Hillsdale, NJ, pp xv–xxvii Glaser R, Chi MTH (1988) Overview. In: The nature of expertise. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Hillsdale, NJ, pp xv–xxvii
go back to reference Gobert J, Horwitz P, Tinker B, Buckley B, Wilensky U, Levy ST, Dede C (2003) Modeling across the curriculum: scaling up modeling using technology. In: Paper presented at the twenty-fifth annual meeting of the cognitive science society, Boston, MA Gobert J, Horwitz P, Tinker B, Buckley B, Wilensky U, Levy ST, Dede C (2003) Modeling across the curriculum: scaling up modeling using technology. In: Paper presented at the twenty-fifth annual meeting of the cognitive science society, Boston, MA
go back to reference Goody J (1977) The domestication of the savage mind. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA Goody J (1977) The domestication of the savage mind. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA
go back to reference Guzdial M (1994) Software-realized scaffolding to facilitate programming for science learning. Interact Learn Environ 4(1):001–044CrossRef Guzdial M (1994) Software-realized scaffolding to facilitate programming for science learning. Interact Learn Environ 4(1):001–044CrossRef
go back to reference Hammer D (1996) Misconceptions or p-prims: how may alternative perspectives of cognitive structure influence instructional perceptions and intentions? J Learn Sci 5:97–127CrossRef Hammer D (1996) Misconceptions or p-prims: how may alternative perspectives of cognitive structure influence instructional perceptions and intentions? J Learn Sci 5:97–127CrossRef
go back to reference Hammer D, Elby A, Scherr RE, Redish EF (2005) Resources, framing, and transfer. In: Transfer of learning from a modern multidisciplinary perspective. Information Age Publishing, Greenwich, CT, pp 89–120 Hammer D, Elby A, Scherr RE, Redish EF (2005) Resources, framing, and transfer. In: Transfer of learning from a modern multidisciplinary perspective. Information Age Publishing, Greenwich, CT, pp 89–120
go back to reference Hawkins D (1974) The informed vision: essays on learning and human nature. Algora Publishing, New York, NY Hawkins D (1974) The informed vision: essays on learning and human nature. Algora Publishing, New York, NY
go back to reference Jackiw N (1991) The geometer’s sketchpad [Software]. Key Curriculum Press Technologies, Emeryville, CA Jackiw N (1991) The geometer’s sketchpad [Software]. Key Curriculum Press Technologies, Emeryville, CA
go back to reference Jona K, Wilensky U, Trouille L, Horn MS, Orton K, Weintrop D, Beheshti E (2014) Embedding computational thinking in science, technology, engineering, and math (CT-STEM). In: Paper presented at the future directions in computer science education summit meeting, Orlando, FL Jona K, Wilensky U, Trouille L, Horn MS, Orton K, Weintrop D, Beheshti E (2014) Embedding computational thinking in science, technology, engineering, and math (CT-STEM). In: Paper presented at the future directions in computer science education summit meeting, Orlando, FL
go back to reference Kafai YB (1995) Minds in play: computer game design as a context for children’s learning. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ Kafai YB (1995) Minds in play: computer game design as a context for children’s learning. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ
go back to reference Kafai YB (2006) Constructionism. In: The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences. Cambridge University Press, New York Kafai YB (2006) Constructionism. In: The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences. Cambridge University Press, New York
go back to reference Kaput J, Roschelle J (1996) SimCalc MathWorlds. University of Massachusetts, Dartmouth, MA Kaput J, Roschelle J (1996) SimCalc MathWorlds. University of Massachusetts, Dartmouth, MA
go back to reference Konold C, Miller CD (2005) TinkerPlots: dynamic data exploration. Key Curriculum Press, Emeryville, CA Konold C, Miller CD (2005) TinkerPlots: dynamic data exploration. Key Curriculum Press, Emeryville, CA
go back to reference Kuhn TS (1970) The structure of scientific revolutions. University of Chicago Press, Chicago Kuhn TS (1970) The structure of scientific revolutions. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
go back to reference Laborde JM (1990) CABRI Geometry [Software]. Brooks-Cole Publishing Co, New York, NY Laborde JM (1990) CABRI Geometry [Software]. Brooks-Cole Publishing Co, New York, NY
go back to reference Lehrer R, Schauble L (2006) Cultivating model-based reasoning in science education. In: Cambridge handbook learning sciences, pp 371–388 Lehrer R, Schauble L (2006) Cultivating model-based reasoning in science education. In: Cambridge handbook learning sciences, pp 371–388
go back to reference Lesh R, Doerr H (2000) Symbolizing, communicating, and mathematizing: key components of models and modeling. In: Symbolizing and communicating in mathematics classrooms. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, pp 361–384 Lesh R, Doerr H (2000) Symbolizing, communicating, and mathematizing: key components of models and modeling. In: Symbolizing and communicating in mathematics classrooms. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, pp 361–384
go back to reference Lesh R, Doerr H (2003) Foundations of a models and modeling perspective on mathematics teaching, learning, and problem solving. In: Beyond constructivism: a models & modeling perspective on mathematics teaching, learning, and problem solving. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ Lesh R, Doerr H (2003) Foundations of a models and modeling perspective on mathematics teaching, learning, and problem solving. In: Beyond constructivism: a models & modeling perspective on mathematics teaching, learning, and problem solving. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ
go back to reference Lesh R, Doerr H (eds) (2003b) Beyond constructivism: a models & modeling perspective on mathematics teaching, learning, and problems solving. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ Lesh R, Doerr H (eds) (2003b) Beyond constructivism: a models & modeling perspective on mathematics teaching, learning, and problems solving. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ
go back to reference Lesh R, Doerr H (2012) Alternatives to trajectories and pathways to describe development in modeling and problem solving. In: Blum W, Ferri RB, Maaß K (eds) Mathematikunterricht im Kontext von Realität, Kultur und Lehrerprofessionalität. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, Germany, pp 138–147 Lesh R, Doerr H (2012) Alternatives to trajectories and pathways to describe development in modeling and problem solving. In: Blum W, Ferri RB, Maaß K (eds) Mathematikunterricht im Kontext von Realität, Kultur und Lehrerprofessionalität. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, Germany, pp 138–147
go back to reference Lesh R, Hoover M, Hole B, Kelly A, Post T (2000) Principles for developing thought-revealing activities for students and teachers. In: Kelly A, Lesh R (eds) Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, pp 591–646 Lesh R, Hoover M, Hole B, Kelly A, Post T (2000) Principles for developing thought-revealing activities for students and teachers. In: Kelly A, Lesh R (eds) Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, pp 591–646
go back to reference Lesh R, Hamilton E, Kaput J (eds) (2008) Models & modeling as foundations for the future in mathematics education. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ Lesh R, Hamilton E, Kaput J (eds) (2008) Models & modeling as foundations for the future in mathematics education. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ
go back to reference Levy ST, Wilensky U (2009a) Crossing levels and representations: the Connected Chemistry (CC1) curriculum. J Sci Educ Technol 18:224–242CrossRef Levy ST, Wilensky U (2009a) Crossing levels and representations: the Connected Chemistry (CC1) curriculum. J Sci Educ Technol 18:224–242CrossRef
go back to reference Levy ST, Wilensky U (2009b) Students’ learning with the Connected Chemistry (CC1) curriculum: navigating the complexities of the particulate world. J Sci Educ Technol 18:243–254CrossRef Levy ST, Wilensky U (2009b) Students’ learning with the Connected Chemistry (CC1) curriculum: navigating the complexities of the particulate world. J Sci Educ Technol 18:243–254CrossRef
go back to reference Martin F, Hjalmarson M, Wankat P (2006) When the model is a program. In: Lesh R, Hamilton E, Kaput J (eds) Foundations for the future in mathematics education. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ Martin F, Hjalmarson M, Wankat P (2006) When the model is a program. In: Lesh R, Hamilton E, Kaput J (eds) Foundations for the future in mathematics education. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ
go back to reference McCloskey M (1984) Naive theories of motion. In: Mental models. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ McCloskey M (1984) Naive theories of motion. In: Mental models. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ
go back to reference McDermott LC (1983) Critical review of research in the domain of mechanics. In: First international workshop research on physics education. Paris, pp 139–182 McDermott LC (1983) Critical review of research in the domain of mechanics. In: First international workshop research on physics education. Paris, pp 139–182
go back to reference Minsky M (1986) The society of mind. Simon & Schuster, New York Minsky M (1986) The society of mind. Simon & Schuster, New York
go back to reference Moreno-Armella L, Sriraman B (2005) The articulation of symbol and mediation in mathematics education. ZDM Math Educ 37(6):476–486CrossRef Moreno-Armella L, Sriraman B (2005) The articulation of symbol and mediation in mathematics education. ZDM Math Educ 37(6):476–486CrossRef
go back to reference Newell A, Simon HA (1972) Human problem solving, vol 14. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ Newell A, Simon HA (1972) Human problem solving, vol 14. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
go back to reference NGSS Lead States (2013) Next generation science standards: for states, by states. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC NGSS Lead States (2013) Next generation science standards: for states, by states. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC
go back to reference Noss R, Hoyles C (1996) Windows on mathematical meanings: learning cultures and computers. Kluwer, DordrechtCrossRef Noss R, Hoyles C (1996) Windows on mathematical meanings: learning cultures and computers. Kluwer, DordrechtCrossRef
go back to reference Osborne R, Wittrock M (1985) The generative learning model and its implications for science education. Stud Sci Educ 12:59–87CrossRef Osborne R, Wittrock M (1985) The generative learning model and its implications for science education. Stud Sci Educ 12:59–87CrossRef
go back to reference Papert S (1980) Mindstorms. Basic Books, New York Papert S (1980) Mindstorms. Basic Books, New York
go back to reference Papert S, Harel I (1991) Situating constructionism. In: Constructionism. Ablex Publishing, New York Papert S, Harel I (1991) Situating constructionism. In: Constructionism. Ablex Publishing, New York
go back to reference Passmore CM, Svoboda J (2012) Exploring opportunities for argumentation in modelling classrooms. Int J Sci Educ 34(10):1535–1554CrossRef Passmore CM, Svoboda J (2012) Exploring opportunities for argumentation in modelling classrooms. Int J Sci Educ 34(10):1535–1554CrossRef
go back to reference Posner GJ, Strike KA, Hewson PW, Gertzog WA (1982) Accommodation of a scientific conception: toward a theory of conceptual change. Sci Educ 66(2):211–227. doi:10.1002/sce.3730660207 Posner GJ, Strike KA, Hewson PW, Gertzog WA (1982) Accommodation of a scientific conception: toward a theory of conceptual change. Sci Educ 66(2):211–227. doi:10.​1002/​sce.​3730660207
go back to reference Roth WM (1995) Affordances of computers in teacher–student interactions: the case of interactive physics™. J Res Sci Teach 32(4):329–347CrossRef Roth WM (1995) Affordances of computers in teacher–student interactions: the case of interactive physics™. J Res Sci Teach 32(4):329–347CrossRef
go back to reference Schwartz JL, Yerushalmy M (1987) The geometric supposer: an intellectual prosthesis for making conjectures. Coll Math J 18(1):58–65CrossRef Schwartz JL, Yerushalmy M (1987) The geometric supposer: an intellectual prosthesis for making conjectures. Coll Math J 18(1):58–65CrossRef
go back to reference Schwarz CV, Reiser BJ, Davis EA, Kenyon L, Achér A, Fortus D, Krajcik J (2009) Developing a learning progression for scientific modeling: making scientific modeling accessible and meaningful for learners. J Res Sci Teach 46(6):632–654CrossRef Schwarz CV, Reiser BJ, Davis EA, Kenyon L, Achér A, Fortus D, Krajcik J (2009) Developing a learning progression for scientific modeling: making scientific modeling accessible and meaningful for learners. J Res Sci Teach 46(6):632–654CrossRef
go back to reference Sengupta P, Wilensky U (2005) NIELS: an emergent multi-agent based modeling environment for learning physics. In: Proceedings of the 4th international joint conference on autonomous agents and multi-agent systems (AAMAS). Utrecht, Netherlands Sengupta P, Wilensky U (2005) NIELS: an emergent multi-agent based modeling environment for learning physics. In: Proceedings of the 4th international joint conference on autonomous agents and multi-agent systems (AAMAS). Utrecht, Netherlands
go back to reference Sengupta P, Wilensky U (2009) Learning electricity with NIELS: thinking with electrons and thinking in levels. Int J Comput Math Learn 14:21–50 Sengupta P, Wilensky U (2009) Learning electricity with NIELS: thinking with electrons and thinking in levels. Int J Comput Math Learn 14:21–50
go back to reference Sengupta P, Farris AV, Wright M (2012) From agents to continuous change via aesthetics: learning mechanics with visual agent-based computational modeling. Technol Knowl Learn 17(1–2):23–42CrossRef Sengupta P, Farris AV, Wright M (2012) From agents to continuous change via aesthetics: learning mechanics with visual agent-based computational modeling. Technol Knowl Learn 17(1–2):23–42CrossRef
go back to reference Sengupta P, Kinnebrew JS, Basu S, Biswas G, Clark D (2013) Integrating computational thinking with K-12 science education using agent-based computation: a theoretical framework. Educ Inf Technol 18:351–380 Sengupta P, Kinnebrew JS, Basu S, Biswas G, Clark D (2013) Integrating computational thinking with K-12 science education using agent-based computation: a theoretical framework. Educ Inf Technol 18:351–380
go back to reference Sherin B (2006) Common sense clarified: the role of intuitive knowledge in physics problem solving. J Res Sci Teach 43:535–555CrossRef Sherin B (2006) Common sense clarified: the role of intuitive knowledge in physics problem solving. J Res Sci Teach 43:535–555CrossRef
go back to reference Sherin B, diSessa AA, Hammer D (1993) Dynaturtle revisited: learning physics through the collaborative design of a computer model. Interact Learn Environ 3:91–118CrossRef Sherin B, diSessa AA, Hammer D (1993) Dynaturtle revisited: learning physics through the collaborative design of a computer model. Interact Learn Environ 3:91–118CrossRef
go back to reference Simon HA, Chase WG (1973) Skill in chess: experiments with chess-playing tasks and computer simulation of skilled performance throw light on some human perceptual and memory processes. Am Sci 61(4):394–403 Simon HA, Chase WG (1973) Skill in chess: experiments with chess-playing tasks and computer simulation of skilled performance throw light on some human perceptual and memory processes. Am Sci 61(4):394–403
go back to reference Stewart J, Cartier JL, Passmore CM (2005) Developing understanding through model-based inquiry. In: How students learn: science in the classroom. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC, pp 515–565 Stewart J, Cartier JL, Passmore CM (2005) Developing understanding through model-based inquiry. In: How students learn: science in the classroom. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC, pp 515–565
go back to reference Stieff M, Wilensky U (2003) Connected chemistry—incorporating interactive simulations into the chemistry classroom. J Sci Educ Technol 12:285–302CrossRef Stieff M, Wilensky U (2003) Connected chemistry—incorporating interactive simulations into the chemistry classroom. J Sci Educ Technol 12:285–302CrossRef
go back to reference Stroup W, Wilensky U (2014) On the embedded complementarity of agent-based and aggregate reasoning in students' developing understanding of dynamic systems. Technol Knowl Learn 19(1–2):1–34 Stroup W, Wilensky U (2014) On the embedded complementarity of agent-based and aggregate reasoning in students' developing understanding of dynamic systems. Technol Knowl Learn 19(1–2):1–34
go back to reference Stroup W, Ares N, Hurford A (2005) A dialectic analysis of generativity: issues of network-supported design in mathematics and science. Math Think Learn 7(3):181–206CrossRef Stroup W, Ares N, Hurford A (2005) A dialectic analysis of generativity: issues of network-supported design in mathematics and science. Math Think Learn 7(3):181–206CrossRef
go back to reference Stroup W, Ares N, Hurford A, Lesh RA (2007) Diversity by design: the what, why and how of generativity in next-generation classroom networks. In: Lesh RA, Kaput JJ (eds) Foundations of the future: twenty-first century models and modeling. Lawrence Erlbaum, New York, NY Stroup W, Ares N, Hurford A, Lesh RA (2007) Diversity by design: the what, why and how of generativity in next-generation classroom networks. In: Lesh RA, Kaput JJ (eds) Foundations of the future: twenty-first century models and modeling. Lawrence Erlbaum, New York, NY
go back to reference Tasar MH (2010) What part of the concept of acceleration is difficult to understand: the mathematics, the physics, or both? ZDM Math Educ 42:469–482CrossRef Tasar MH (2010) What part of the concept of acceleration is difficult to understand: the mathematics, the physics, or both? ZDM Math Educ 42:469–482CrossRef
go back to reference Tisue S, Wilensky U (2004) NetLogo: design and implementation of a multi-agent modeling environment. In: Proceedings of the agent 2004 conference on social dynamics: interaction, reflexivity and emergence, Chicago, IL Tisue S, Wilensky U (2004) NetLogo: design and implementation of a multi-agent modeling environment. In: Proceedings of the agent 2004 conference on social dynamics: interaction, reflexivity and emergence, Chicago, IL
go back to reference Trouille L, Beheshti E, Horn M, Jona K, Kalogera V, Weintrop D, Wilensky U (2013) Bringing computational thinking into the high school science and math classroom. In: American astronomical society meeting abstracts, vol 221 Trouille L, Beheshti E, Horn M, Jona K, Kalogera V, Weintrop D, Wilensky U (2013) Bringing computational thinking into the high school science and math classroom. In: American astronomical society meeting abstracts, vol 221
go back to reference Trowbridge DE, McDermott LC (1980) Investigation of student understanding of the concept of velocity in one dimension. Am J Phys 48:1020–1028CrossRef Trowbridge DE, McDermott LC (1980) Investigation of student understanding of the concept of velocity in one dimension. Am J Phys 48:1020–1028CrossRef
go back to reference Trowbridge DE, McDermott LC (1981) Investigation of student understanding of the concept of acceleration in one dimension. Am J Phys 49:242–253CrossRef Trowbridge DE, McDermott LC (1981) Investigation of student understanding of the concept of acceleration in one dimension. Am J Phys 49:242–253CrossRef
go back to reference Wieman CE, Adams WK, Perkins KK (2008) PhET: simulations that enhance learning. Science 322(5902):682–683CrossRef Wieman CE, Adams WK, Perkins KK (2008) PhET: simulations that enhance learning. Science 322(5902):682–683CrossRef
go back to reference Wilensky U (1996) Making sense of probability through paradox and programming: a case study in a connected mathematics framework. In: Constructionism in practice: designing, thinking, and learning in a digital world. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ Wilensky U (1996) Making sense of probability through paradox and programming: a case study in a connected mathematics framework. In: Constructionism in practice: designing, thinking, and learning in a digital world. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ
go back to reference Wilensky U (1999b) GasLab: an extensible modeling toolkit for exploring micro-and-macro- views of gases. In: Roberts N, Feurzeig W, Hunter B (eds) Computer modeling and simulation in science education. Springer, Berlin, pp 151–178CrossRef Wilensky U (1999b) GasLab: an extensible modeling toolkit for exploring micro-and-macro- views of gases. In: Roberts N, Feurzeig W, Hunter B (eds) Computer modeling and simulation in science education. Springer, Berlin, pp 151–178CrossRef
go back to reference Wilensky U (2001) Modeling nature’s emergent patterns with multi-agent languages. In: Proceedings of EuroLogo 2001. Linz, Austria Wilensky U (2001) Modeling nature’s emergent patterns with multi-agent languages. In: Proceedings of EuroLogo 2001. Linz, Austria
go back to reference Wilensky U (2003) Statistical mechanics for secondary school: the GasLab modeling toolkit [special issue]. Int J Comput Math Learn 8(1): 1–4 Wilensky U (2003) Statistical mechanics for secondary school: the GasLab modeling toolkit [special issue]. Int J Comput Math Learn 8(1): 1–4
go back to reference Wilensky U, Papert S (2006) Restructurations: reformulations of knowledge disciplines through new representational forms. In: Annual meeting of the American educational research association, San Francisco Wilensky U, Papert S (2006) Restructurations: reformulations of knowledge disciplines through new representational forms. In: Annual meeting of the American educational research association, San Francisco
go back to reference Wilensky U, Papert S (2010) Restructurations: reformulations of knowledge disciplines through new representational forms. In: Proceedings of constructionism 2010 Paris, France Wilensky U, Papert S (2010) Restructurations: reformulations of knowledge disciplines through new representational forms. In: Proceedings of constructionism 2010 Paris, France
go back to reference Wilensky U, Reisman K (2006) Thinking like a wolf, a sheep, or a firefly: learning biology through constructing and testing computational theories—an embodied modeling approach. Cogn Instr 24:171–209CrossRef Wilensky U, Reisman K (2006) Thinking like a wolf, a sheep, or a firefly: learning biology through constructing and testing computational theories—an embodied modeling approach. Cogn Instr 24:171–209CrossRef
go back to reference Wilensky U, Stroup W (1999) Learning through participatory simulations: Network-based design for systems learning in classrooms. In: Proceedings of the 1999 conference on computer support for collaborative learning, CSCL ‘99 Palo Alto, CA Wilensky U, Stroup W (1999) Learning through participatory simulations: Network-based design for systems learning in classrooms. In: Proceedings of the 1999 conference on computer support for collaborative learning, CSCL ‘99 Palo Alto, CA
go back to reference Wilensky U, Brady C, Horn M (2014) Fostering computational literacy in science classrooms. Commun ACM 57(8):17–21 Wilensky U, Brady C, Horn M (2014) Fostering computational literacy in science classrooms. Commun ACM 57(8):17–21
go back to reference Wilkerson-Jerde MH, Wilensky U (2010) Restructuring change, interpreting changes: the deltatick modeling and analysis toolkit. In: Proceedings of constructionism 2010. Paris, France Wilkerson-Jerde MH, Wilensky U (2010) Restructuring change, interpreting changes: the deltatick modeling and analysis toolkit. In: Proceedings of constructionism 2010. Paris, France
go back to reference Windschitl M, Thompson J, Braaten M (2008) Beyond the scientific method: model-based inquiry as a new paradigm of preference for school science investigations. Sci Educ 92(5):941–967CrossRef Windschitl M, Thompson J, Braaten M (2008) Beyond the scientific method: model-based inquiry as a new paradigm of preference for school science investigations. Sci Educ 92(5):941–967CrossRef
go back to reference Wittrock M (1989) Generative processes of comprehension. Educ Psychol 24(4):345–376CrossRef Wittrock M (1989) Generative processes of comprehension. Educ Psychol 24(4):345–376CrossRef
go back to reference Wittrock M (1992) Generative learning processes of the brain. Educ Psychol 27(4):531–541CrossRef Wittrock M (1992) Generative learning processes of the brain. Educ Psychol 27(4):531–541CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Sandboxes for Model-Based Inquiry
Authors
Corey Brady
Nathan Holbert
Firat Soylu
Michael Novak
Uri Wilensky
Publication date
01-04-2015
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Journal of Science Education and Technology / Issue 2-3/2015
Print ISSN: 1059-0145
Electronic ISSN: 1573-1839
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-014-9506-8

Other articles of this Issue 2-3/2015

Journal of Science Education and Technology 2-3/2015 Go to the issue

Premium Partners