Skip to main content
main-content
Top

Hint

Swipe to navigate through the articles of this issue

Published in: Journal of Business and Psychology 4/2021

05-06-2020 | Original Paper

Should We Agree to Disagree? The Multilevel Moderated Relationship Between Safety Climate Strength And Individual Safety Motivation

Authors: Huw Flatau-Harrison, Mark A. Griffin, Marylene Gagne

Published in: Journal of Business and Psychology | Issue 4/2021

Login to get access
share
SHARE

Abstract

Organisational research investigating climate perceptions often use constructs reflecting dispersion and disagreement, termed ‘climate strength’, to investigate situational pressures on behaviour expression. Within safety-specific contexts, research has tended to emphasise the prediction of climate strength rather than an examination of its effects on behaviour. The present paper investigates the important first pathway in the prediction of safety behaviour by investigating the influence of safety climate strength on the relationship between safety climate perceptions and individual safety motivation in a safety critical context using multilevel analyses. Contrary to expectations, results initially indicated that safety climate strength negatively influenced the relationship between safety climate perceptions and safety motivation, such that greater variability was associated with greater motivation. Post hoc analysis re-grouping responses into broader functional levels found support for an interaction, suggesting a difference in the scope of influence for safety climate strength between the two levels of analysis. These findings are discussed in light of self-determination theory, and suggestions for future research and practice made.

Literature
  1. Australian Transport Safety Bureau. (2012). Operational non-compliance - 17 km ENE of Melbourne airport, Victoria - 7 June 2011 - VH-VNG, Airbus A320–232. Australia.
  2. Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Engelwood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
  3. Beus, J. M., Bergman, M. E., & Payne, S. C. (2010). The influence of organizational tenure on safety climate strength: A first look. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 42(5), 1431–1437. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​aap.​2009.​06.​002.View Article
  4. Borgatti, S. P. (2005). Centrality and network flow. Social Networks, 27, 55–71.View Article
  5. Brouwers, M. C., & Sorrentino, R. M. (1993). Uncertainty orientation and protection motivation theory: The role of individual differences in health compliance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(1), 102–112.View Article
  6. Casey, T., Griffin, M. A., Flatau Harrison, H., & Neal, A. (2017). Safety climate and culture: Integrating psychological and systems perspectives. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22(3), 341–353. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1037/​ocp0000072.View ArticlePubMed
  7. Chan, D. (1998). Functional relations among constructs in the same content domain at different levels of analysis: A typology of composition models. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(2), 234–246. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1037/​0021-9010.​83.​2.​234.View Article
  8. Christian, M. S., Bradley, J. C., Wallace, J. C., & Burke, M. J. (2009). Workplace safety: A meta-analysis of the roles of person and situation factors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(5), 1103–1127. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1037/​a0016172.View ArticlePubMed
  9. Colquitt, J. A., Noe, R. A., & Jackson, C. L. (2002). Justice in teams: Antecedents and consequences of procedural justice climate. Personnel Psychology, 55(1), 83–109. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1111/​j.​1744-6570.​2002.​tb00104.​x.View Article
  10. Conchie, S. M. (2013). Transformational leadership, intrinsic motivation, and trust: A moderated-mediated model of workplace safety. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 18(2), 198–210.View ArticlePubMed
  11. Conway, J. M., & Lance, C. E. (2010). What reviewers should expect from authors regarding common method bias in organizational research. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25(3), 325–334.View Article
  12. Dawson, J. F., González-Romá, V., Davis, A., & West, M. A. (2008). Organizational climate and climate strength in UK hospitals. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 17(1), 89–111. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1080/​1359432060104666​4.View Article
  13. Deci, E. L., Eghrari, H., Patrick, B. C., & Leone, D. R. (1994). Facilitating internalization: The self-determination theory perspective. Journal of Personality, 62(1), 119–142. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1111/​j.​1467-6494.​1994.​tb00797.​x.View ArticlePubMed
  14. Dickson, M. W., Resick, C. J., & Hanges, P. J. (2006). When organizational climate is unambiguous, it is also strong. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(2), 351–364. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1037/​0021-9010.​91.​2.​351.View ArticlePubMed
  15. Enders, C. K., & Tofighi, D. (2007). Centering predictor variables in cross-sectional multilevel models: A new look at an old issue. Psychological Methods, 12(2), 121–138. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1037/​1082-989X.​12.​2.​121.View ArticlePubMed
  16. Flatau Harrison, H., Griffin, M. A., Gagne, M., & Andrei, D. (2018). Assessing shortened safety climate measures: Simulating a planned missing data design in a field setting. Safety Science, 104, 189–201. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​ssci.​2017.​11.​004.View Article
  17. Flatau-Harrison, H., Griffin, M. A., & Gagne, M. (2020). Trickling down: The impact of leaders on individual role clarity through safety climate strength across time. Safety Science, 121, 485–495. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​ssci.​2019.​09.​009.View Article
  18. Gagné, M., & Deci, E. L. (2005). Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(4), 331–362. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1002/​job.​322.View Article
  19. Gagné, M., Koestner, R., & Zuckerman, M. (2000). Facilitating acceptance of organizational change: The importance of self-determination. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30(9), 1843–1852. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1111/​j.​1559-1816.​2000.​tb02471.​x.View Article
  20. González-Romá, V., Peiró, J. M., & Tordera, N. (2002). An examination of the antecedents and moderator influences of climate strength. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(3), 465–473. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1037/​0021-9010.​87.​3.​465.View ArticlePubMed
  21. González-Romá, V., Fortes-Ferreira, L., & Peiró, J. M. (2009). Team climate, climate strength and team performance. A longitudinal study. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 82(3), 511–536. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1348/​096317908X370025​.View Article
  22. Griffin, M. A., & Neal, A. (2000). Perceptions of safety at work: A framework for linking safety climate to safety performance, knowledge, and motivation. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 5(3), 347–358.View ArticlePubMed
  23. He, Y., Wang, Y., & Payne, S. C. (2019). How is safety climate formed? A meta-analysis of the antecedents of safety climate. Organizational Psychology Review, 9(2–3), 124–156. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1177/​2041386619874870​.View Article
  24. Hedlund, A., Gummesson, K., Rydell, A., & Andersson, M. (2016). Safety motivation at work: Evaluation of changes from six interventions. Safety Science, 82, 155–163. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​ssci.​2015.​09.​006.View Article
  25. Hofmann, D. A., Morgeson, F. P., & Gerras, S. J. (2003). Climate as a moderator of the relationship between leader-member exchange and content specific citizenship: Safety climate as an exemplar. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(1), 170–178.View ArticlePubMed
  26. Howard, J., Gagné, M., Morin, A. J., & Van den Broeck, A. (2016). Motivation profiles at work: A self-determination theory approach. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 95, 74–89.View Article
  27. Jiang, L., & Tetrick, L. E. (2016). Mapping the nomological network of employee self-determined safety motivation: A preliminary measure in China. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 94, 1–7.View Article
  28. Kapp, E. A. (2012). The influence of supervisor leadership practices and perceived group safety climate on employee safety performance. Safety Science, 50(4), 1119–1124.View Article
  29. Katz-Navon, T. A. L., Naveh, E., & Stern, Z. (2005). Safety climate in health care organizations: A multidimensional approach. Academy of Management Journal, 48(6), 1075–1089.View Article
  30. Kerr, N. L., & Bruun, S. E. (1983). Dispensability of member effort and group motivation losses: Free-rider effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(1), 78–94. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1037/​0022-3514.​44.​1.​78.View Article
  31. Klein, K. J., & Kozlowski, S. W. (2000). From micro to meso: Critical steps in conceptualizing and conducting multilevel research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(3), 211–236. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1177/​109442810033001.View Article
  32. Lee, S., & Dalal, R. S. (2016). Climate as situational strength: Safety climate strength as a cross-level moderator of the relationship between conscientiousness and safety behaviour. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 25(1), 120–132. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1080/​1359432X.​2014.​987231.View Article
  33. Li, X., Frenkel, S. J., & Sanders, K. (2011). Strategic HRM as process: How HR system and organizational climate strength influence Chinese employee attitudes. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22(9), 1825–1842. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1080/​09585192.​2011.​573965.View Article
  34. Lindell, M. K., & Brandt, C. J. (2000). Climate quality and climate consensus as mediators of the relationship between organizational antecedents and outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(3), 331–348. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1037/​0021-9010.​85.​3.​331.View ArticlePubMed
  35. Little, R. J. A., & Rubin, D. B. (2002). Statistical analysis with missing data (2nd ed.). Hoboken: Wiley.View Article
  36. Luria, G. (2008). Climate strength—how leaders form consensus. The Leadership Quarterly, 19(1), 42–53. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​leaqua.​2007.​12.​004.View Article
  37. McGregor, I., Nash, K., Mann, N., & Phills, C. E. (2010). Anxious uncertainty and reactive approach motivation (RAM). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(1), 133–147.View ArticlePubMed
  38. Meyer, R. D., Dalal, R. S., & Hermida, R. (2010). A review and synthesis of situational strength in the organizational sciences. Journal of Management, 36(1), 121–140. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1177/​0149206309349309​.View Article
  39. Mischel, W. (1973). Toward a cognitive social learning reconceptualization of personality. Psychological Review, 80, 252–283. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1037/​h0035002.View ArticlePubMed
  40. Neal, A., & Griffin, M. A. (2006). A study of the lagged relationships among safety climate, safety motivation, safety behavior, and accidents at the individual and group levels. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(4), 946–953.View ArticlePubMed
  41. Neal, A., Griffin, M. A., & Hart, P. M. (2000). The impact of organizational climate on safety climate and individual behavior. Safety Science, 34(1–3), 99–109. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​S0925-7535(00)00008-4.View Article
  42. Saffold, G. S. (1988). Culture traits, strength, and organizational performance: Moving beyond “strong” culture. Academy of Management Review, 13(4), 546–558. https://​doi.​org/​10.​5465/​AMR.​1988.​4307418.View Article
  43. Schneider, B., Salvaggio, A. N., & Subirats, M. (2002). Climate strength: A new direction for climate research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(2), 220–229. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1037/​0021-9010.​87.​2.​220.View ArticlePubMed
  44. Schulte, M., Ostroff, C., & Kinicki, A. J. (2006). Organizational climate systems and psychological climate perceptions: A cross-level study of climate-satisfaction relationships. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 79(4), 645–671. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1348/​096317905X72119.View Article
  45. Scott, N., Fleming, M., & Kelloway, E. K. (2014). Understanding why employees behave safely from a self-determination theory perspective. In M. Gagné (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of work engagement, motivation and self-determination theory (pp. 276–294). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  46. Shin, Y. (2012). CEO ethical leadership, ethical climate, climate strength, and collective organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 108(3), 299–312. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s10551-011-1091-7.View Article
  47. Shults, R. A., & Beck, L. F. (2012). Self-reported seatbelt use, United States, 2002–2010: Does prevalence vary by state and type of seatbelt law? Journal of Safety Research, 43(5–6), 417–420.View ArticlePubMedPubMed Central
  48. Sowinski, D. R., Fortmann, K. A., & Lezotte, D. V. (2008). Climate for service and the moderating effects of climate strength on customer satisfaction, voluntary turnover, and profitability. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 17(1), 73–88. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1080/​1359432070147306​5.View Article
  49. Vroom, V. H. (1964). Work and motivation. Oxford: Wiley.
  50. af Wåhlberg, A. E., Dorn, L., & Kline, T. (2010). The effect of social desirability on self reported and recorded road traffic accidents. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 13(2), 106–114.View Article
  51. Walumbwa, F. O., Wu, C., & Orwa, B. (2008). Contingent reward transactional leadership, work attitudes, and organizational citizenship behavior: The role of procedural justice climate perceptions and strength. The Leadership Quarterly, 19(3), 251–265. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​leaqua.​2008.​03.​00.View Article
  52. Zohar, D. (2000). A group-level model of safety climate: Testing the effect of group climate on microaccidents in manufacturing jobs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(4), 587–596.View ArticlePubMed
  53. Zohar, D. (2002). The effects of leadership dimensions, safety climate, and assigned priorities on minor injuries in work groups. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23(1), 75–92.
  54. Zohar, D., Huang, Y.-H., Lee, J., & Robertson, M. M. (2015). Testing extrinsic and intrinsic motivation as explanatory variables for the safety climate–safety performance relationship among long-haul truck drivers. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 30, 84–96. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​trf.​2015.​01.​014.View Article
  55. Zohar, D., & Luria, G. (2004). Climate as a social-cognitive construction of supervisory safety practices: Scripts as proxy of behavior patterns. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(2), 322–333. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1037/​0021-9010.​89.​2.​322.View ArticlePubMed
  56. Zohar, D., & Luria, G. (2005). A multilevel model of safety climate: Cross-level relationships between organization and group-level climates. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(4), 616–628. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1037/​0021-9010.​90.​4.​616.View ArticlePubMed
  57. Zohar, D., & Polachek, T. (2014). Discourse-based intervention for modifying supervisory communication as leverage for safety climate and performance improvement: A randomized field study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(1), 113–124.View ArticlePubMed
  58. Zohar, D., & Tenne-Gazit, O. (2008). Transformational leadership and group interaction as climate antecedents: A social network analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(4), 744–757.View ArticlePubMed
Metadata
Title
Should We Agree to Disagree? The Multilevel Moderated Relationship Between Safety Climate Strength And Individual Safety Motivation
Authors
Huw Flatau-Harrison
Mark A. Griffin
Marylene Gagne
Publication date
05-06-2020
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Business and Psychology / Issue 4/2021
Print ISSN: 0889-3268
Electronic ISSN: 1573-353X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-020-09696-2

Other articles of this Issue 4/2021

Journal of Business and Psychology 4/2021 Go to the issue

Premium Partner