Top

Polymer Science, Series D

Published in:

01-12-2022

The Influence of Mixing Conditions on the Morphology of Poly-3-hydroxybutyrate and Nitrile-Butadiene Rubber Polymer Compositions

Authors: P. A. Povernov, L. S. Shibryaeva, L. R. Lyusova, S. V. Kotova, A. K. Zykova

Published in: Polymer Science, Series D | Issue 4/2022

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

A polymer composition made of biodegradable polyhyroxybutyrate and BNKS-28 AMN nitrile-butadiene rubber elastomeric material was developed and studied in this work. The influence of mixing technology and ultrasonic treatment on the morphology of the resulting composition was found.

previous article Properties of Polysulfide Sealants against the Action of Aggressive Environments

next article Thermal and Mesomorphic Properties of Aromatic Oligoesters Based on 4-Hydroxybenzoic Acid

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

A. Cieza, K. Causey, K. Kamenov, S. W. Hanson, S. Chatterji, and T. Vos, “Global estimates of the need for rehabilitation based on the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019,” Lancet 396, 2006–2017 (2020).CrossRef

Y. Krukhaug, G. Hallan, E. Dybvik, S. A. Lie, and O. N. Furnes, “Survivorship study of 838 total elbow replacements: A report from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register 1994–2016,” J. Shoulder Elbow Surg. 27, 260—269 (2018).CrossRef

P. J. Jenkins, A. C. Watts, T. Norwood, A. D. Duckworth, L. A. Rymaszewski, and J. E. McEachan, “Total elbow replacement: Outcome of 1,146 arthroplasties from the Scottish Arthroplasty Project,” Acta Orthopaedica 84, 119–123 (2013).CrossRef

J. Nestorson, H. Rahme, and L. Adolfsson, “Arthroplasty as primary treatment for distal humeral fractures produces reliable results with regards to revisions and adverse events: A registry-based study,” J. Shoulder Elbow Surg. 28, 104–110 (2019).CrossRef

H. C. Plaschke, T. M. Thillemann, S. Brorson, and B. S. Olsen, “Implant survival after total elbow arthroplasty: A retrospective study of 324 procedures performed from 1980 to 2008,” J. Shoulder Elbow Surg. 23, 829–836 (2014).CrossRef

E. T. Skyttä, A. Eskelinen, P. Paavolainen, M. Ikävalko, and V. Remes, “Total elbow arthroplasty in rheumatoid arthritis,” Acta Orthopaedica 80, 472–477 (2009).CrossRef

M. A. Zumstein, M. Pinedo, J. Old, and P. Boileau P, “Problems, complications, reoperations, and revisions in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: A systematic review,” J. Shoulder Elbow Surg. 20, 146–157 (2011).CrossRef

W. Aibinder, B. Schoch, M. Parsons, J. Watling, J. K. Ko, B. Gobbato, and C. Roche, “Risk factors for complications and revision surgery after anatomic and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty,” J. Shoulder Elbow Surg. 30, 689–701 (2021).CrossRef

E. Alentorn-Geli, N. J. Clark, A. T. Assenmacher, B. T. Samuelsen, J. Sánchez-Sotelo, R. H. Cofield, and J. W. Sperling, “What are the complications, survival, and outcomes after revision to reverse shoulder arthroplasty in patients older than 80 years?,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Res. 475, 2744–2751 (2017).CrossRef

10.

V. I. Gomzyak, V. A. Demina, E. V. Razuvaeva, N. G. Sedush, and S. N. Chvalun, “Biodegradable polymer materials for medicine: From an implant to an organ,” Tonkie Khim. Tekhnol. 12, 5–20 (2017).

11.

P. A. Povernov and L. S. Shibryaeva, “Mechanobiological Aspects of Healing of Bone Fractures with the Use of Biodegradable Osseointegrated Implants,” in Actual Problems of Science and Technology (2020), pp. 29–39 [in Russian].

12.

P. A. Povernov and L. S. Shibryaeva, “Requirements for Materials for Biodegradable Cell Matrices for Osseal Engineering,” in Basic and Applied Aspects of Modern Science (2020), pp. 5–11 [in Russian].

13.

I. T. Ozbolat, K. K. Moncal, and H. Gudapati, “Evaluation of bioprinter technologies,” Additive Manufacturing 13, 179–200 (2017).CrossRef

14.

S. Ji and M. Guvendiren, “Recent advances in bioink design for 3D bioprinting of tissues and organs,” Frontiers Bioeng. Biotechnol. 5, 1–8 (2017).CrossRef

15.

U. A. Gurkan, R. Assal, S. E. Yildiz, Y. Sung, A. J. Trachtenberg, W. P. Kuo, and U. Demirci, “Engineering anisotropic biomimetic fibrocartilage microenvironment by bioprinting mesenchymal stem cells in nanoliter gel droplets,” Molecular Pharmaceutics 11, 2151–2159 (2014).CrossRef

16.

U. A. Gurkan, V. Kishore, K. W. Condon, T. M. Bellido, and O. A. Akkus, “Scaffold-free multicellular three-dimensional in vitro model of osteogenesis,” Calcified Tissue International 88, 388–401 (2011).CrossRef

17.

P. A. Povernov and L. S. Shibryaeva, “Scientific Approaches to the Development of Materials on the Basis of Compositions of Poly-3-hydroxybutirate and Polyactide Osseointegrated Implants,” in Innovations in the Development of Materials and Methods for Modern Medicine (2020), pp. 173–179 [in Russian].

18.

D. Puppi, C. Mota, M. Gazzarri, et al., “Additive manufacturing of wet-spun polymeric scaffolds for bone tissue engineering,” Biomed Microdevices 14, 1115–1127 (2012).CrossRef

19.

D. Puppi, F. Chiellini, A. M. Piras, and E. Chiellini, “Polymeric materials for bone and cartilage repair,” Prog. Polym. Sci. 35, 403–440 (2010).CrossRef

20.

D. B. Kolesky, R. L. Truby, A. S. Gladman, T. A. Busbee, K. A. Homan, and J. A. Lewis, “3D bioprinting of vascularized, heterogeneous cell-laden tissue constructs,” Adv. Mater. 26, 3124–3130 (2014).CrossRef

21.

H. Cui, W. Zhu, B. Holmes, L. G. Zhang, “Biologically inspired smart release system based on 3D bioprinted perfused scaffold for vascularized tissue regeneration,” Adv. Sci. 3, 1–10 (2016).

22.

Tam Thi Nguen, S. A. Kedik, V. V. Suslov, E. A. Shnyak, E. V. Varfolomeeva, and E. V. Nakonorova, “Development of a technique for the production of polymer microspheres containing immobilized diclofenac, “Fine Chem. Technol. 10, 27–31 (2015).

Title: The Influence of Mixing Conditions on the Morphology of Poly-3-hydroxybutyrate and Nitrile-Butadiene Rubber Polymer Compositions
Authors: P. A. Povernov
L. S. Shibryaeva
L. R. Lyusova
S. V. Kotova
A. K. Zykova
Publication date: 01-12-2022
Publisher: Pleiades Publishing
Published in: Polymer Science, Series D / Issue 4/2022
Print ISSN: 1995-4212
Electronic ISSN: 1995-4220
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1995421222040220

Springer Professional

Abstract

Please log in to get access to your license.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Other articles of this Issue 4/2022

Extrusion Processing of Polypropylene/Ethylene–Octene Copolymer Recycled Composite Material

Urea–Melamine Formaldehyde Resin for the Manufacture of Water-Resistant Plywood

A Polyelectrolyte Sealant for Fuel Cells Based on Grafted Fluorcopolymers

Thermal-Recycling Technology of Waste from Small Wholesale Production of Multicomponent Materials and Adhesive Compositions

Properties of Polysulfide Sealants against the Action of Aggressive Environments

Development of a Fire-Resistant Polyvinyl-Chloride Coating for the Production of Fire Curtains

Premium Partners