Top

Published in:

2020 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

Cellulose Nanostructures Extracted from Pineapple Fibres

Authors : Karen S. Prado, Asaph A. Jacinto, Márcia A. S. Spinacé

Published in: Pineapple Leaf Fibers

Publisher: Springer Singapore

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

The fibres from pineapple plant leaves and pineapple crown leaves are unprocessed wastes with high cellulose content (74–83 wt%) that are environmentally and economically interesting as source to extract cellulose nanostructures (CNs). CNs are materials with unique and remarkable properties that can be used in several high value-added applications. This chapter covers the main topics related to the isolation of CN from pineapple fibres. The main types of CN (cellulose nanocrystals, cellulose nanofibres, amorphous nanocellulose, hairy nanocrystalline cellulose and cellulose nanoyarn) are presented. The advantages of using pineapple fibre wastes to produce CN are addressed. The hierarchical structure and chemical composition of the lignocellulosic fibres are described, as well as the existing pretreatment and treatment methods (chemical, enzymatic and mechanical) for extracting CN from pineapple fibres. This chapter also covers the characterization, modification and potential applications of CN isolated from pineapple fibres, such as in the production of biomedical devices and biodegradable bio-nanocomposites.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

previous chapter Physicochemical Properties of Nanocellulose Extracted from Pineapple Leaf Fibres and Its Composites

next chapter Tensile Behaviour of Centrally Holed Pineapple Fibre Reinforced Vinyl Ester Composites

Abraham E, Deepa B, Pothan LA et al (2011) Extraction of nanocellulose fibrils from lignocellulosic fibres: a novel approach. Carbohydr Polym 86:1468–1475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.06.034CrossRef

Alemdar A, Sain M (2008) Isolation and characterization of nanofibers from agricultural residues—wheat straw and soy hulls. Bioresour Technol 99:1664–1671. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2007.04.029CrossRef

Alvira P, Tomás-Pejó E, Ballesteros M et al (2010) Pretreatment technologies for an efficient bioethanol production process based on enzymatic hydrolysis: a review. Bioresour Technol 101:4851–4861. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2009.11.093CrossRef

Amalia B, Imawan C, Listyarini A (2018) Effect of nanofibril cellulose isolated from pineapple leaf on the mechanical properties of chitosan film. AIP Conf Proc 2023:020034/1–020034/6. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5064031

Araki J, Kuga S (2001) Effect of trace electrolyte on liquid crystal type of cellulose microcrystals. Langmuir 17:4493–4496. https://doi.org/10.1021/la0102455CrossRef

Arib RMN, Sapuan SM, Ahmad MMHM et al (2006) Mechanical properties of pineapple leaf fibre reinforced polypropylene composites. Mater Des 27:391–396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2004.11.009CrossRef

Arrieta MP, Fortunati E, Burgos N et al (2016) Nanocellulose-based polymeric blends for food packaging applications. In: Puglia D, Fortunati E, Kenny JM (eds) Multifunctional polymeric nanocomposites based on cellulosic reinforcements. William Andrew Applied Science Publishers, p 394. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-323-44248-0.00007-9

Asim M, Abdan K, Jawaid M et al (2015) A review on pineapple leaves fibre and its composites. Int J Polym Sci 2015:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/950567CrossRef

Asri LATW, Rahmatika A, Fahreza MZ et al (2018) Preparation and release behavior of carboxylated cellulose nanocrystals-alginate nanocomposite loaded with rutin. Mater Res Express 5:095303.1–095303.10. https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/aad5d3

10.

Atalla RH, Hackney JM, Uhlin I et al (1993) Hemicelluloses as structure regulators in the aggregation of native cellulose. Int J Biol Macromol 15:109–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/0141-8130(93)90007-9CrossRef

11.

Azizi Samir MA, Alloin F, Dufresne A (2005) Review of recent research into cellulosic whiskers, their properties and their application in nanocomposite field. Biomacromolecules 6:612–626. https://doi.org/10.1021/bm0493685CrossRef

12.

Bach Q-V, Chen W-H (2017) Pyrolysis characteristics and kinetics of microalgae via thermogravimetric analysis (TGA): a state-of-the-art review. Bioresour Technol 246:88–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.06.087CrossRef

13.

Balakrishnan P, Sreekala MS, Kunaver M et al (2017) Morphology, transport characteristics and viscoelastic polymer chain confinement in nanocomposites based on thermoplastic potato starch and cellulose nanofibers from pineapple leaf. Carbohyd Polym 169:176–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.04.017CrossRef

14.

Balakrishnan P, Gopi S, Geethamma VG et al (2018a) Cellulose nanofiber vs nanocrystals from pineapple leaf fiber: a comparative study on reinforcing efficiency on starch nanocomposites. Macromol Symp 380:1800102–1800109. https://doi.org/10.1002/masy.201800102

15.

Balakrishnan P, Gopi S, Sreekala MS et al (2018b) UV resistant transparent bionanocomposite films based on potato starch/cellulose for sustainable packaging. Starch 70:1700139.1–1700139.13. https://doi.org/10.1002/star.201700139

16.

Beck-Candanedo S, Roman M, Gray DG (2005) Effect of reaction conditions on the properties and behavior of wood cellulose nanocrystal suspensions. Biomacromolecules 6:1048–1054. https://doi.org/10.1021/bm049300pCrossRef

17.

Berglund L, Noël M, Aitomäki Y et al (2016) Production potential of cellulose nanofibers from industrial residues: efficiency and nanofiber characteristics. Ind Crops Prod 92:84–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.08.003CrossRef

18.

Bhaumik P, Dhepe PL (2015) Conversion of biomass into sugars. In: Murzin D, Simakova O (eds) Biomass sugars for non-fuel applications. Royal Society of Chemistry, p 265. https://doi.org/10.1039/9781782622079-00001

19.

Bondeson D, Mathew A, Oksman K (2006) Optimization of the isolation of nanocrystals from microcrystalline cellulose by acid hydrolysis. Cellulose 13:171–180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-006-9061-4CrossRef

20.

Bonn D, Eggers J, Indekeu J et al (2009) Wetting and spreading. Rev Mod Phys 81:739–805. https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.81.739CrossRef

21.

Bootz A, Vogel V, Schubert D et al (2004) Comparison of scanning electron microscopy, dynamic light scattering and analytical ultracentrifugation for the sizing of poly(butyl cyanoacrylate) nanoparticles. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 57:369–375. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0939-6411(03)00193-0CrossRef

22.

Börjesson M, Westman G (2015) Crystalline nanocellulose—preparation, modification, and properties. In: Poletto M, Junior HLO (eds) Cellulose—fundamental aspects and current trends. IntechOpen, p 282. https://doi.org/10.5772/61899

23.

Brandt A, Ray MJ, To TQ et al (2011) Ionic liquid pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass with ionic liquid-water mixtures. Green Chem 13:2489–2499. https://doi.org/10.1039/c1gc15374aCrossRef

24.

Brar SK, Verma M (2011) Measurement of nanoparticle by light-scattering techniques. TrAC-Trend Anal Chem 30:4–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2010.08.008CrossRef

25.

Browning BL (1967) Methods of wood chemistry, 1st edn. Interscience Publishers, New York

26.

Calixto JB (2000) Efficacy, safety, quality control, marketing and regulatory guidelines for herbal medicines (phytoterapeutic agents). Braz J Med Biol Res 33:79–89. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-879X2000000200004CrossRef

27.

Camacho M, Ureña YRC, Lopretti M et al (2017) Synthesis and characterization of nanocrystalline cellulose derived from pineapple peel residues. J Renew Mater 5:271–729. https://doi.org/10.7569/JRM.2017.634117CrossRef

28.

Cao Y (2018) Applications of cellulose nanomaterials in pharmaceutical science and pharmacology. Express Polym Lett 12:768–780. https://doi.org/10.3144/expresspolymlett.2018.66CrossRef

29.

Carrillo F, Colom X, Sunol JJ et al (2004) Structural FTIR analysis and thermal characterisation of lyocell and viscose-type fibres. Eur Polym J 40:2229–2234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2004.05.003CrossRef

30.

Chakraborty A, Sain M, Kortschot M (2005) Cellulose microfibrils: a novel method of preparation using high shear refining and cryocrushing. Holzforschung 59:102–107. https://doi.org/10.1515/HF.2005.016CrossRef

31.

Chattopadhyay DK, Webster DC (2009) Thermal stability and flame retardancy of polyurethanes. Prog Polym Sci 34:1068–1133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2009.06.002CrossRef

32.

Chen W-H, Peng J, Bi XT (2015) A state-of-the-art review of biomass torrefaction, densification and applications. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 44:847–866. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.12.039CrossRef

33.

Cherian BM, Leão AL, Souza SF et al (2010) Isolation of nanocellulose from pineapple leaf fibres by steam explosion. Carbohydr Polym 81:720–725. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.03.046CrossRef

34.

Cherian BM, Leão AL, Souza SF et al (2011) Cellulose nanocomposites with nanofibres isolated from pineapple leaf fibers for medical applications. Carbohydr Polym 86:1790–1798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.07.009CrossRef

35.

Cocinero EJ, Gamblin DP, Davis BG et al (2009) The building blocks of cellulose: the intrinsic conformational structures of cellobiose, its epimer, lactose, and their singly hydrated complexes. J Am Chem Soc 131:11117–11123. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja903322wCrossRef

36.

Corrales-Ureña YR, Villalobos-Bermudez C, Pereira R et al (2018) Biogenic silica-based microparticles obtained as a sub-product of the nanocellulose extraction process from pineapple peels. Sci Rep-UK 8:10417–10426. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-28444-4CrossRef

37.

Costa LMM, Olyveira GM, Cherian BM et al (2013) Bionanocomposites from electrospun PVA/pineapple nanofibers/Stryphnodendron adstringens bark extract for medical applications. Ind Crop Prod 41:198–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2012.04.025CrossRef

38.

Csoka L, Hoeger IC, Rojas OJ et al (2012) Piezoelectric effect of cellulose nanocrystals thin films. ACS Macro Lett 1:867–870. https://doi.org/10.1021/mz300234aCrossRef

39.

Dai H, Huang Y, Huang H (2018a) Enhanced performances of polyvinyl alcohol films by introducing tannic acid and pineapple peel-derived cellulose nanocrystals. Cellulose 25:4623–4637. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-018-1873-5

40.

Dai H, Ou S, Huang Y et al (2018b) Utilization of pineapple peel for production of nanocellulose and film application. Cellulose 25:1743–1756. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-018-1671-0

41.

De Figueiredo LP, Ferreira FF (2014) The Rietveld method as a tool to quantify the amorphous amount of microcrystalline cellulose. J Pharm Sci 103:1394–1399. https://doi.org/10.1002/jps.23909CrossRef

42.

Deepa B, Abrahan E, Cordeiro N et al (2015) Utilization of various lignocellulosic biomass for the production of nanocellulose: a comparative study. Cellulose 22:1075–1090. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-015-0554-xCrossRef

43.

De Jonge N, Ross FM (2011) Electron microscopy of specimens in liquid. Nat Nanotechnol 6:695–704. https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2011.161CrossRef

44.

Dong XM, Kimura T, Revol JF et al (1996) Effects of ionic strength on the isotropic–chiral nematic phase transition of suspensions of cellulose crystallites. Langmuir 12:2076–2082. https://doi.org/10.1021/la950133bCrossRef

45.

Dos Santos RM, Neto WP, Silverio HA et al (2013) Cellulose nanocrystals from pineapple leaf, a new approach for the reuse of this agro-waste. Ind Crop Prod 50:707–714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2013.08.049CrossRef

46.

Dufresne A (2013) Nanocellulose: a new ageless bionanomaterial. Mater Today 16:220–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mattod.2013.06.004CrossRef

47.

Dufresne A (2017) Cellulose nanomaterial reinforced polymer nanocomposites. Curr Opin Colloid Interface Sci 29:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cocis.2017.01.004CrossRef

48.

Edwards JV, Prevost NT, French AD et al (2015) Kinetic and structural analysis of fluorescent peptides on cotton cellulose nanocrystals as elastase sensors. Carbohydr Polym 116:278–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.04.067CrossRef

49.

Eichhorn SJ, Baillie CA, Zafeiropoulos N et al (2001) Review—current international research into cellulosic fibers and composites. J Mater Sci 36:19–26. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017512029696CrossRef

50.

Elazzouzi-Hafraoui S, Nishiyama Y, Putaux J-L et al (2008) The shape and size distribution of crystalline nanoparticles prepared by acid hydrolysis of native cellulose. Biomacromolecules 9:57–65. https://doi.org/10.1021/bm700769pCrossRef

51.

Fan M, Dai D, Huang B (2012) Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy for natural fibres. In: Salih SM (ed) Fourier transform-materials analysis. InTech. https://doi.org/10.5772/3582

52.

FAO—Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2019) Crops. http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC. Accessed 15 Jan 2019

53.

Fareez IM, Ibrahim NA, Yaacob WM et al (2018) Characteristics of cellulose extracted from Josapine pineapple leaf fibre after alkali treatment followed by extensive bleaching. Cellulose 25:4407–4421. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-018-1878-0CrossRef

54.

Ferreira FV, Mariano M, Rabelo SC, Gouveia RF, Lona LMF (2018) Isolation and surface modification of cellulose nanocrystals from sugarcane bagasse waste: from a micro- to a nano-scale view. Appl Surf Sci 436:1113–1122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.12.137CrossRef

55.

Ferrer A, Filpponen I, Rodríguez A et al (2012) Valorization of residual empty palm fruit bunch fibers (EPFBF) by microfluidization: production of nanofibrillated cellulose and EPFBF nanopaper. Bioresour Technol 125:249–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.08.108CrossRef

56.

Foster EJ, Moon RJ, Agarwal UP et al (2018) Current characterization methods for cellulose nanomaterials. Chem Soc Rev 47:2511–3006. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6cs00895jCrossRef

57.

Freitas C, Müller RH (1998) Effect of light and temperature on zeta potential and physical stability in solid lipid nanoparticle (SLN™) dispersions. Int J Pharm 168:221–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-5173(98)00092-1CrossRef

58.

French AD (2014) Idealized powder diffraction patterns for cellulose polymorphs. Cellulose 21:885–896. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-013-0030-4CrossRef

59.

Frey MW (2008) Electrospinning cellulose and cellulose derivatives. Polym Rev 48:378–391. https://doi.org/10.1080/15583720802022281CrossRef

60.

Fu T-K, Li J-H, Wei X-Y et al (2016a) Preparation and characterization of pineapple leaf nanocellulose by high pressure homogenization. In: Proceedings of the 2nd annual international conference on advanced material engineering, Wuhan, China, 2016. https://doi.org/10.2991/ame-16.2016.119

61.

Fu T-K, Wang Y-H, Li J-H et al (2016b) Effect of high pressure homogenization (HPH) on the rheological properties of pineapple leaf cellulose/[BMIM]Cl solution. DEStech Trans Eng Technol Res. https://doi.org/10.12783/dtetr/mdm2016/4922

62.

Fukuzumi H, Saito T, Iwata T et al (2009) Transparent and high gas barrier films of cellulose nanofibers prepared by TEMPO-mediated oxidation. Biomacromolecules 10:162–165. https://doi.org/10.1021/bm801065uCrossRef

63.

Gao TM, Huang MF, Li PW et al (2012) Preparation and characterization nano-cellulose and its surface modification by silane coupling agent. Appl Mech Mater 217–219:260–263. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.217-219.260CrossRef

64.

García A, Gandini A, Labidi J et al (2016) Industrial and crop wastes: a new source for nanocellulose biorefinery. Ind Crop Prod 93:26–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.06.004CrossRef

65.

García R, Pérez R (2002) Dynamic atomic force microscopy methods. Surf Sci Rep 47:197–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-5729(02)00077-8CrossRef

66.

Gardner DJ, Oporto GS, Mills R et al (2008) Adhesion and surface issues in cellulose and nanocellulose. J Adhes Sci Technol 22:545–567. https://doi.org/10.1163/156856108x295509CrossRef

67.

Garvey CJ, Parker IH, Simon GP (2005) On the interpretation of X-ray diffraction powder patterns in terms of the nanostructure of cellulose I fibres. Macromol Chem Phys 206:1568–1575. https://doi.org/10.1002/macp.200500008CrossRef

68.

Gassan J, Bledzki AK (1999) Alkali treatment of jute fibers: relationship between structure and mechanical properties. J Appl Polym Sci 71:623–629. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19990124)71:4%3c623:AID-APP14%3e3.0.CO;2-KCrossRef

69.

George J, Sabapathi SN (2015) Cellulose nanocrystals: synthesis, functional properties, and applications. Nanotechnol Sci Appl 8:45–54. https://doi.org/10.2147/NSA.S64386CrossRef

70.

Giessibl FJ (2003) Advances in atomic force microscopy. Rev Mod Phys 75:949–983. https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.75.949CrossRef

71.

Goddard JM, Hotchkiss JH (2007) Polymer surface modification for the attachment of bioactive compounds. Prog Polym Sci 32:698–725. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2007.04.002CrossRef

72.

Grønli MG, Várhegyi G, Di Blasi C (2002) Thermogravimetric analysis and devolatilization kinetics of wood. Ind Eng Chem Res 41:4201–4208. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie0201157CrossRef

73.

Habibi Y (2014) Key advances in the chemical modification of nanocelluloses. Chem Soc Rev 43:1519–1542. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3cs60204dCrossRef

74.

Habibi Y, Lucia LA, Rojas OJ (2010) Cellulose nanocrystals: chemistry, self-assembly, and applications. Chem Rev 110:3479–3500. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr900339wCrossRef

75.

Haigler CH, Betancur L, Stiff MR et al (2012) Cotton fiber: a powerful single-cell model for cell wall and cellulose research. Front Plant Sci 3:104. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2012.00104CrossRef

76.

Hamad WY (1997) Some microrheological aspects of wood-pulp fibres subjected to fatigue loading. Cellulose 4:51–56. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018463117874CrossRef

77.

Hariwongsanupab N, Thanawan S, Amornsakchai T et al (2017) Improving the mechanical properties of short pineapple leaf fiber reinforced natural rubber by blending with acrylonitrile butadiene rubber. Polym Test 57:94–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2016.11.019CrossRef

78.

Hermans PH, Weidinger A (1948) Quantitative X-ray investigations on the crystallinity of cellulose fibers. A background analysis. J Appl Phys 19:491–506. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1698162CrossRef

79.

Hoque MB, Hossain MS, Nahid AM et al (2018) Fabrication and characterization of pineapple fiber-reinforced polypropylene based composites. Nano Hybrids Compos 21:31–42. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/NHC.21.31CrossRef

80.

Hu Y, Abidi N (2016) Distinct chiral nematic self-assembling behavior caused by different size-unified cellulose nanocrystals via a multistage separation. Langmuir 32:9863–9872. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.6b02861CrossRef

81.

Hubbe MA, Rojas OJ, Lucia LA et al (2008) Cellulosic nanocomposites: a review. Bioresources 3:929–980

82.

Ioelovich M (2013) Nanoparticles of amorphous cellulose and their properties. Am J Nano Res Appl 1:41–45. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.nano.20130101.18CrossRef

83.

Ioelovich M (2014) Peculiarities of cellulose nanoparticles. TAPPI J 13:45–51CrossRef

84.

Ioelovich M (2015) Recent findings and the energetic potential of plant biomass as a renewable source of biofuels—a review. Bioresources 10:1879–1914

85.

Ioelovich M, Leykin A, Figovsky O (2010) Study of cellulose paracrystallinity. Bioresources 5:1393–1407

86.

Jaafar J, Siregar JP, Piah MBM et al (2018) Influence of selected treatment on tensile properties of short pineapple leaf fiber reinforced tapioca resin biopolymer composites. J Polym Environ 26:4271–4281. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-018-1296-2CrossRef

87.

Jahanbaani AR, Behzad T, Borhani S et al (2016) Electrospinning of cellulose nanofibers mat for laminated epoxy composite production. Fibers Polym 17:1438–1448. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12221-016-6424-9CrossRef

88.

Jacque N, Vanderghem C, Danthine S et al (2012) Influence of steam explosion on physicochemical properties and hydrolysis rate of pure cellulose fibers. Bioresour Technol 121:221–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.06.073CrossRef

89.

Jakubek ZJ, Chen M, Couillard M et al (2018) Characterization challenges for a cellulose nanocrystal reference material: dispersion and particle size distributions. J Nanopart Res 20(98):1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-018-4194-6CrossRef

90.

Jonoobi M, Oladi R, Davoudpour Y et al (2015) Different preparation methods and properties of nanostructured cellulose from various natural resources and residues: a review. Cellulose 22:935–969. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-015-0551-0CrossRef

91.

Kalia S, Boufi S, Celli A et al (2014) Nanofibrillated cellulose: surface modification and potential applications. Colloid Polym Sci 292:5–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00396-013-3112-9CrossRef

92.

Kalia S, Dufresne A, Cherian BM et al (2011) Cellulose-based bio- and nanocomposites: a review. Int J Polym Sci 35 pp. Article ID 837875. https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/837875

93.

Kallel F, Bettaieb F, Khiari R et al (2016) Isolation and structural characterization of cellulose nanocrystals extracted from garlic straw residues. Ind Crops Prod 87:287–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.04.060CrossRef

94.

Kamel S (2007) Nanotechnology and its applications in lignocellulosic composites, a mini review. Express Polym Lett 1:546–575. https://doi.org/10.3144/expresspolymlett.2007.78CrossRef

95.

Kargarzadeh H, Ahmad I, Thomas S et al (2017) Methods for extraction of nanocellulose from various sources. In: Kargarzadeh H, Ahamad I, Thomas S et al (eds) Handbook of nanocellulose and cellulose nanocomposites. Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co, p 849. https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527689972.ch1

96.

Khalil HPSA, Bhat AH, Yusra AFI (2012) Green composites from sustainable cellulose nanofibrils: a review. Carbohyd Polym 87:963–979. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.08.078CrossRef

97.

Khalil HPSA, Davoudpour Y, Islam M et al (2014) Production and modification of nanofibrillated cellulose using various mechanical processes: a review. Carbohydr Polym 99:649–665. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.08.069CrossRef

98.

Khazraji AC, Sylvain R (2013) Self-assembly and intermolecular forces when cellulose and water interact using molecular modeling. J Nanomater 2013:48. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/745979CrossRef

99.

Kim CW, Kim DS, Kang SY et al (2006) Structural studies of electrospun cellulose nanofibers. Polymer 47:5097–5107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2006.05.033CrossRef

100.

Kim DY, Nishiyama Y, Kuga S (2002) Surface acetylation of bacterial celulose. Cellulose 9:361–367. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021140726936CrossRef

101.

Kirby BJ, Hasselbrink EF Jr (2004) Zeta potential of microfluidic substrates: 1. Theory, experimental techniques, and effects on separations. Electrophoresis 25:187–202. https://doi.org/10.1002/elps.200305754CrossRef

102.

Klemm D, Kramer F, Moritz S et al (2011) Nanocelluloses: a new family of nature-based materials. Angew Chem Int Ed 50:5438–5466. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201001273CrossRef

103.

Kumar R, Ha SK, Verma K et al (2018) Recent progress in some selected bio-nanomaterials and their engineering applications: an overview. J Sci Adv Mater Devices 3:263–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsamd.2018.05.003CrossRef

104.

Kurokawa M, King P, Wu X, Joyce E, Mason T, Yamamoto K (2016) Effect of sonication frequency on the disruption of algae. Ultrason Sonochem 31:157–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2015.12.011CrossRef

105.

Kvien I, Tanem BS, Oksman K (2005) Characterization of cellulose whiskers and their nanocomposites by atomic force and electron microscopy. Biomacromolecules 6:3160–3165. https://doi.org/10.1021/bm050479tCrossRef

106.

Kwok DY, Neumann AW (1999) Contact angle measurement and contact angle interpretation. Adv Colloid Interface Sci 81:167–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-8686(98)00087-6CrossRef

107.

Lee HV, Hamid SB, Zain SK (2014) Conversion of lignocellulosic biomass to nanocellulose: structure and chemical process. Sci World J 20 pp. Article ID 631013. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/631013

108.

Leão AL, Souza SF, Cherian BM et al (2010) Agro-based biocomposites for industrial applications. Mol Cryst Liq Cryst 522:18/[318]–27/[327]. https://doi.org/10.1080/15421401003719852

109.

Li W, Yue J, Liu S (2012) Preparation of nanocrystalline cellulose via ultrasound and its reinforcement capability for poly(vinyl alcohol) composites. Ultrason Sonochem 19:479–485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2011.11.007CrossRef

110.

Li Y, Li G, Zou Y et al (2014) Preparation and characterization of cellulose nanofibers from partly mercerized cotton by mixed acid hydrolysis. Cellulose 21:301–309. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-013-0146-6CrossRef

111.

Lin N, Dufresne A (2014) Nanocellulose in biomedicine: current status and future prospect. Eur Polym J 59:302–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2014.07.025CrossRef

112.

Lin N, Huang J, Dufresne A (2012) Preparation, properties and applications of polysaccharide nanocrystals in advanced functional nanomaterials: a review. Nanoscale 4:3274–3294. https://doi.org/10.1039/c2nr30260hCrossRef

113.

Lin X, Wu Z, Zhang C, Liu S, Nie S (2018) Enzymatic pulping of lignocellulosic biomass. Ind Crops Prod 120:16–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2018.04.033CrossRef

114.

Liu H, Hsieh Y-L (2002) Ultrafine fibrous cellulose membranes from electrospinning of cellulose acetate. J Polym Sci Polym Phys 40:2119–2129. https://doi.org/10.1002/polb.10261CrossRef

115.

Lu P, Hsieh Y-L (2010) Preparation and properties of cellulose nanocrystals: rods, spheres, and network. Carbohydr Polym 82:329–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.04.073CrossRef

116.

Luo J, Fang Z, Smith RL Jr (2014) Ultrasound-enhanced conversion of biomass to biofuels. Prog Energy Combust Sci 41:56–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2013.11.001CrossRef

117.

Madsen B, Gamstedt EK (2013) Wood versus plant fibers: similarities and differences in composite applications. Adv Mater Sci Eng 14 pp. Article ID 564346. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/564346

118.

Mahardika M, Abral H, Kasim A et al (2018) Production of nanocellulose from pineapple leaf fibers via high-shear homogenization and ultrasonication. Fibers 6:28–40. https://doi.org/10.3390/fib6020028CrossRef

119.

Mahato DN, Mathur BK, Bhattacherjee S (2013) DSC and IR methods for determination of accessibility of cellulosic coir fibre and thermal degradation under mercerization. Indian J Fibre Text Res 38:96–100. http://nopr.niscair.res.in/handle/123456789/16380. Accessed 22 Jan 2019

120.

Milanez DH, Amaral RM, Faria LIL et al (2013) Assessing nanocellulose developments using science and technology indicators. Mater Res-Ibero-Am J 16:635–641. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-14392013005000033CrossRef

121.

Milanez DH, Amaral RM, Faria LIL et al (2014) Technological indicators of nanocellulose advances obtained from data and text mining applied to patent documents. Mater Res-Ibero-Am J 17:1513–1522. https://doi.org/10.1590/1516-1439.266314CrossRef

122.

Milanez DH, Noyons E, Faria LIL (2016) A delineating procedure to retrieve relevant publication data in research areas: the case of nanocellulose. Scientometrics 107:627–643. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-1922-5CrossRef

123.

Mishra RK, Ha SK, Verma K et al (2018a) Recent progress in selected bio-nanomaterials and their engineering applications: an overview. J Sci Adv Mater Devices 3:263–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsamd.2018.05.003

124.

Mishra RK, Sabu A, Tiwari SK (2018b) Materials chemistry and the futurist eco-friendly applications of nanocellulose: status and prospect. J Saudi Chem Soc 22:949–978. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jscs.2018.02.005

125.

Moon RJ, Martini A, Nairn J et al (2011) Cellulose nanomaterials review: structure, properties and nanocomposites. Chem Soc Rev 40:3941–3994. https://doi.org/10.1039/c0cs00108bCrossRef

126.

Moreno G, Ramirez K, Esquivel M et al (2018) Isolation and characterization of nanocellulose obtained from industrial crop waste resources by using mild acid hydrolysis. J Renew Mater 6:362–369. https://doi.org/10.7569/jrm.2017.634167CrossRef

127.

Mukherjee A, Hackley VA (2018) Separation and characterization of cellulose nanocrystals by multi-detector asymmetric flow field-flow fractionation. Analyst 143:731–740. https://doi.org/10.1039/c7an01739aCrossRef

128.

Nachtkamp K, Krüger C, Engelhardt J et al (2018) Nanoparticles made of amorphous cellulose. US patent 8722092B2, 10 Oct 2007

129.

Nam S, French AD, Condon BD et al (2016) Segal crystallinity index revisited by the simulation of X-ray diffraction patterns of cotton cellulose Iβ and cellulose II. Carbohydr Polym 135:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.08.035CrossRef

130.

Nelson ML, O’Connor RT (1964a) Relation of certain infrared bands to cellulose crystallinity and crystal latticed type. Part I. Spectra of lattice types I, II, III and of amorphous cellulose. J Appl Polym Sci 8:1311–1324. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.1964.070080322

131.

Nelson ML, O’Connor RT (1964b) Relation of certain infrared bands to cellulose crystallinity and crystal lattice type. Part II. A new infrared ratio for estimation of crystallinity in celluloses I and II. J Appl Polym Sci 8:1325–1341. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.1964.070080323

132.

Nguyen HD, Mai TTT, Nguyen NB et al (2013) A novel method for preparing microfibrillated cellulose from bamboo fibers. Adv Nat Sci Nanosci Nanotechnol 4:015016. https://doi.org/10.1088/2043-6262/4/1/015016CrossRef

133.

Nikmatin S, Rudwiyanti JR, Prasetyo KW et al (2015) Mechanical and optical characterization of bio-nanocomposite from pineapple leaf fiber material for food packaging. In: Proceedings of the international seminar on photonics, optics, and its applications, Sanur, Indonesia, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2081112

134.

Oh SY, Yoo DI, Shin Y, Kim HC, Kim HY, Chung YS, Park WH, Youk JH (2005) Crystalline structure analysis of cellulose treated with sodium hydroxide and carbon dioxide by means of X-ray diffraction and FTIR spectroscopy. Carbohydr Res 340:2376–2391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carres.2005.08.007CrossRef

135.

Ounas A, Aboulkas A, El Harfi K et al (2011) Pyrolysis of olive residue and sugar cane bagasse: non-isothermal thermogravimetric kinetic analysis. Bioresour Technol 102:11234–11238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2011.09.010CrossRef

136.

Pakzad A, Simonsen J, Heiden PA et al (2012) Size effects on the nanomechanical properties of cellulose I nanocrystals. J Mater Res 27:528–536. https://doi.org/10.1557/jmr.2011.288CrossRef

137.

Park S, Baker JO, Himmel ME et al (2010) Cellulose crystallinity index: measurement techniques and their impact on interpreting cellulase performance. Biotechnol Biofuels 3:10. https://doi.org/10.1186/1754-6834-3-10CrossRef

138.

Pavia DL, Lampman GM, Kriz GS et al (2009) Introduction to spectroscopy, 4th edn. Cengage Learning, Belmont, pp 15–26

139.

Peng Y, Gardner DJ, Han Y et al (2013) Influence of drying method on the material properties of nanocellulose I: thermostability and crystallinity. Cellulose 20:2379–2392. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-013-0019-zCrossRef

140.

Pérez J, Munõz-Dorado J, de la Rubia T et al (2002) Biodegradation and biological treatments of cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin: an overview. Int Microbiol 5:53–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10123-002-0062-3CrossRef

141.

Phanthong P, Reubroycharoen P, Hao X et al (2018) Nanocellulose: extraction and application. Carbon Resour Convers 1:32–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crcon.2018.05.004CrossRef

142.

Poletto M, Zattera AJ, Santana RM (2012) Structural differences between wood species: evidence from chemical composition, FTIR spectroscopy, and thermogravimetric analysis. J Appl Polym Sci 126:E337–E344. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.36991CrossRef

143.

Prado KS, Gonzales D, Spinacé MAS (2019) Recycling of viscose yarn waste through one-step extraction of nanocellulose. Int J Biol Macromol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.06.124CrossRef

144.

Prado KS, Spinacé MA (2019) Isolation and characterization of cellulose nanocrystals from pineapple crown waste and their potential uses. Int J Biol Macromol 122:410–416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.10.187CrossRef

145.

Pu Y, Jiang N, Ragauskas AJ (2007) Ionic liquid as a green solvent for lignin. J Wood Chem Technol 27:23–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/02773810701282330CrossRef

146.

Quan SL, Kang SG, Chin IJ (2010) Characterization of cellulose fibers electrospun using ionic liquid. Cellulose 17:223–230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-009-9386-xCrossRef

147.

Querejeta-Fernández A, Kopera B, Prado KS et al (2015) Circular dichroism of chiral nematic films of cellulose nanocrystals loaded with plasmonic nanoparticles. ACS Nano 9:10377–10385. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.5b04552CrossRef

148.

Reddy N, Yang Y (2005) Biofibers from agricultural byproducts for industrial applications. Trends Biotechnol 23:22–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2004.11.002CrossRef

149.

Revol JF, Godbout L, Dong XM et al (1994) Chiral nematic suspensions of cellulose crystallites; phase separation and magnetic field orientation. Liq Cryst 16:127–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678299408036525CrossRef

150.

Rojas J, Bedoya M, Ciro Y (2015) Current trends in the production of cellulose nanoparticles and nanocomposites for biomedical applications. In: Poletto M, Junior HLO (eds) Cellulose—fundamental aspects and current trends. IntechOpen, p 282. https://doi.org/10.5772/61899

151.

Roman M, Winter WT (2004) Effect of sulfate groups from sulfuric acid hydrolysis on the thermal degradation behavior of bacterial cellulose. Biomacromolecules 5:1671–1677. https://doi.org/10.1021/bm034519+CrossRef

152.

Sacui IA, Nieuwendaal RC, Burnett DJ et al (2014) Comparison of the properties of cellulose nanocrystals and cellulose nanofibrils isolated from bacteria, tunicate, and wood processed using acid, enzymatic, mechanical, and oxidative methods. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 6:6127–6138. https://doi.org/10.1021/am500359fCrossRef

153.

Saito T, Kimura S, Nishiyama Y et al (2007) Cellulose nanofibers prepared by TEMPO-mediated oxidation of native cellulose. Biomacromolecules 8:2485–2491. https://doi.org/10.1021/bm0703970CrossRef

154.

Salas C, Nypelö T, Rodriguez-Abreu C et al (2014) Nanocellulose properties and applications in colloids and interfaces. Curr Opin Colloid Interface Sci 19:383–396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cocis.2014.10.003CrossRef

155.

Segal LG, Creely JJ, Martin AE Jr et al (1959) An empirical method for estimating the degree of crystallinity of native cellulose using the X-ray diffractometer. Text Res J 29:786–794. https://doi.org/10.1177/004051755902901003CrossRef

156.

Sena Neto AR, Araujo MAM, Souza FVD et al (2013) Characterization and comparative evaluation of thermal, structural, chemical, mechanical and morphological properties of six pineapple leaf fiber varieties for use in composites. Ind Crop Prod 43:529–537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2012.08.001CrossRef

157.

Sena Neto AR, Araujo MAM, Barboza RMP et al (2015) Comparative study of 12 pineapple leaf fiber varieties for use as mechanical reinforcement in polymer composites. Ind Crop Prod 64:68–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2014.10.042CrossRef

158.

Shak KP, Pang YL, Mah SK (2018) Nanocellulose: recent advances and its prospects in environmental remediation. Beilstein J Nanotechnol 9:2479–2498. https://doi.org/10.3762/bjnano.9.232CrossRef

159.

Shih Y-F, Chou M-Y, Chang W-C et al (2017) Completely biodegradable composites reinforced by the cellulose nanofibers of pineapple leaves modified by eco-friendly methods. J Polym Res 24:209–221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10965-017-1367-4CrossRef

160.

Shih Y-F, Chou M-Y, Lian H-Y et al (2018a) Highly transparent and impact-resistant PMMA nanocomposites reinforced by cellulose nanofibers of pineapple leaves modified by eco-friendly methods. Express Polym Lett 12:844–854. https://doi.org/10.3144/expresspolymlett.2018.72

161.

Shih Y-F, Tsou Z-G, Wang C-H et al (2018b) Eco-friendly modification for the cellulose nanofibers derived from pineapple leaves for high-performance nanocomposite. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci 171:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/171/1/012041

162.

Sing J, Suhag M, Dhaka A (2015) Augmented digestion of lignocellulose by steam explosion, acid and alkaline pretreatment methods: a review. Carbohydr Polym 117:624–631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.10.012CrossRef

163.

Siqueira G, Bras J, Dufresne A (2010) Cellulosic bionanocomposites: a review of preparation, properties and applications. Polymers 2:728–765. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym2040728CrossRef

164.

Siró I, Plackett D (2010) Microfibrillated cellulose and new nanocomposite materials: a review. Cellulose 17:459–494. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-010-9405-yCrossRef

165.

Smith CW (1995) Crop production: evolution, history, and technology. Wiley, United States, p 320

166.

Stylianopoulos T, Kokonou M, Michael S et al (2012) Tensile mechanical properties and hydraulic permeabilities of electrospun cellulose acetate fiber meshes. J Biomed Mater Res B 100:2222–2230. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.32791CrossRef

167.

Surip SN, Aziz FMA, Bonnia NN et al (2017) Process parameter and surface morphology of pineapple leaf electrospun nanofibers (PALF). AIP Conf Proc 1885:020269/1–020269/5. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5002463

168.

Surip SN, Aziz FMA, Bonnia NN et al (2018) Effect of pineapple leaf fibers (PALF) concentration on nanofibers formation by electrospinning. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng 290:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/290/1/012003CrossRef

169.

Sutkar VS, Gogate PR, Csoka L (2010) Theoretical prediction of cavitational activity distribution in sonochemical reactors. Chem Eng J 158:290–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2010.01.049CrossRef

170.

TAPPI WI 3021. Standard terms and their definition for cellulose nanomaterial. https://www.tappi.org/content/hide/draft3.pdf. Accessed 25/11/2019

171.

Thygesen A, Oddershede J, Lilholt H et al (2005) On the determination of crystallinity and cellulose content in plant fibres. Cellulose 12:563. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-005-9001-8CrossRef

172.

Trache D, Hussin MH, Haafiz MKM et al (2017) Recent progress in cellulose nanocrystals: sources and production. Nanoscale 9:1763–1786. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6nr09494eCrossRef

173.

Tran AV (2006) Chemical analysis and pulping study of pineapple crown leaves. Ind Crop Prod 24:66–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2006.03.003CrossRef

174.

Trindade WG, Hoareau W, Megiatto JD, Razera AT, Castellan A, Frollini E (2005) Thermoset phenolic matrices reinforced with unmodified and surface grafted furfuryl alcohol sugar cane bagasse and curaua fibers: properties of fibers and composites. Biomacromolecules 6:2485–2496. https://doi.org/10.1021/bm058006+CrossRef

175.

Van de Ven TG, Sheikhi A (2016) Hairy cellulose nanocrystalloids: a novel class of nanocellulose. Nanoscale 8:15101–15114. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6nr01570kCrossRef

176.

Van der Biest O, Vandeperre LJ (1999) Electrophoretic deposition of materials. Annu Rev Mater Sci 29:327–352. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.matsci.29.1.327CrossRef

177.

Vega-Baudrit JR, Camacho M, Ureña YRC et al (2018) Synthesis and characterization of nanocellulose obtained from pineapple peel wastes. In: Abstracts of the 255th national meeting & exposition of the American Chemical Society—division of cellulose & renewable materials, New Orleans, 18–22 Mar 2018

178.

Wada M, Chanzy H, Nishiyama Y et al (2004) Cellulose III_I crystal structure and hydrogen bonding by synchrotron X-ray and neutron fiber diffraction. Macromolecules 37:8548–8555. https://doi.org/10.1021/ma0485585CrossRef

179.

Wahyuningsih K, Iriani ES, Fahma F (2016) Utilization of cellulose from pineapple leaf fibers as nanofiller in polyvinyl alcohol-based film. Indones J Chem 16:181–189. https://doi.org/10.22146/ijc.1086CrossRef

180.

Wan Nadirah WO, Jawaid M, Al Masri AA, Khalil HPSA, Suhaily SS, Mohamed AR (2012) Cell wall morphology, chemical and thermal analysis of cultivated pineapple leaf fibres for industrial applications. J Polym Environ 20:404–411. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-011-0380-7CrossRef

181.

Wang T, Yang H, Kubicki JD et al (2016) Cellulose structural polymorphism in plant primary cell walls investigated by high-field 2D solid-state NMR spectroscopy and density functional theory calculations. Biomacromolecules 17:2210–2222. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.6b00441CrossRef

182.

Wang ZL (2000) Transmission electron microscopy of shape-controlled nanocrystals and their assemblies. J Phys Chem B 104:1153–1175. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp993593cCrossRef

183.

Whitmore RE, Atalla RH (1985) Factors influencing the regeneration of cellulose I from phosphoric acid. Int J Biol Macromol 7:182–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/0141-8130(85)90022-4CrossRef

184.

Xu X, Liu F, Jiang L et al (2013) Cellulose nanocrystals vs. cellulose nanofibrils: a comparative study on their microstructures and effects as polymer reinforcing agents. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 5:2999–3009. https://doi.org/10.1021/am302624tCrossRef

185.

Xue Y, Mou Z, Xiao H (2017) Nanocellulose as sustainable biomass material: structure, properties, present status and future prospects in biomedical applications. Nanoscale 9:14758–14781. https://doi.org/10.1039/c7nr04994cCrossRef

186.

Yang H, Yan R, Chen H et al (2006) In-depth investigation of biomass pyrolysis based on three major components: hemicellulose, cellulose and lignin. Energy Fuel 20:388–393. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef0580117CrossRef

187.

Yao F, Wu Q, Lei Y et al (2008) Thermal decomposition kinetics of natural fibers: activation energy with dynamic thermogravimetric analysis. Polym Degrad Stabil 93:90–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2007.10.012CrossRef

188.

Yoo CG, Pu Y, Ragauskas AJ (2017) Ionic liquids: promising green solvents for lignocellulosic biomass utilization. Curr Opin Green Sustain Chem 5:5–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsc.2017.03.003CrossRef

189.

Zamil MS, Geitmann A (2017) The middle lamella—more than a glue. Phys Biol 14:015004. https://doi.org/10.1088/1478-3975/aa5ba5

190.

Zhang Q, Benoit M, Vigier KO et al (2013) Pretreatment of microcrystalline cellulose by ultrasounds: effect of particle size in the heterogeneously-catalyzed hydrolysis of cellulose to glucose. Green Chem 15:963–969. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3gc36643jCrossRef

191.

Zhang YHP, Himmel ME, Mielenz JR (2006) Outlook for cellulase improvement: screening and selection strategies. Biotechnol Adv 24:452–481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2006.03.003CrossRef

192.

Zhou X, Wang H, Zhang J et al (2018) Lightweight biobased polyurethane nanocomposite foams reinforced with pineapple leaf nanofibers (PLNFs). J Renew Mater 6:68–74. https://doi.org/10.7569/JRM.2017.634150CrossRef

Title: Cellulose Nanostructures Extracted from Pineapple Fibres
Authors: Karen S. Prado
Asaph A. Jacinto
Márcia A. S. Spinacé
Publisher: Springer Singapore
Book: Pineapple Leaf Fibers
Print ISBN: 978-981-15-1415-9

Electronic ISBN: 978-981-15-1416-6

Copyright Year: 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1416-6_10

Springer Professional

Abstract

Please log in to get access to your license.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Premium Partners