Skip to main content
Disciplines
Automotive Business IT + Informatics Construction + Real Estate Electrical Engineering + Electronics Energy + Sustainability Insurance + Risk Finance + Banking Management + Leadership Marketing + Sales Mechanical Engineering + Materials
Events
DE
EN
Books
Journals
Topic Page
Marketing
Start single access now
Access for companies
EXTENDED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Educational Research for Policy and Practice
Published in: Educational Research for Policy and Practice 3/2020

18-03-2020 | Original Article

Does the Asian catch-up model of world-class universities work? Revisiting the zero-sum game of global university rankings and government policies

Authors: Jaekyung Lee, Keqiao Liu, Yin Wu

Published in: Educational Research for Policy and Practice | Issue 3/2020

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This study examines international brain race for world-class universities as measured by the QS World University Rankings (QS) and the Academic Ranking of World Universities, particularly in the context of Asian nations’ institutional competition and benchmarking against American counterparts. Applying mixed methods with statistical analysis of time-series data from 59 nations and case study of four selected nations, the study examines the cross-national trends of global university rankings and the roles of government policies during the era of performance-driven accountability in higher education. Tracking the zero-sum game of global university rankings over the past decade, the study accounts for key driving factors that produced divergent trajectories among the nations: how and why the USA as established leader and Japan as early catch-up leader become losers, whereas China and Korea as fast followers become winners? Although the Asian catch-up model of world-class university development, high-stakes institutional competitions and targeted funding with STEM priorities contributed to their rapid growth of research productivity and rankings, it reveals major limitations and problems. Drawing cross-national lessons and implications, we discuss new directions of higher education policies and global university ranking measures.
previous article Understandings and attitudes regarding skill-based and competency-based cultures for learning: a comparative study of Norwegian and New Zealand teacher educators
next article Enhancing intercultural effectiveness in international virtual student teams: an exploratory study

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
Aghion, P., Dewatripont, M., Hoxby, C., Mas-Colell, A., & Sapir, A. (2010). The governance and performance of universities: Evidence from Europe and the US. Economic Policy, 25(61), 8–59.
Altbach, P. G. (2000). Asia’s economic aspirations: Some problems. International Higher Education, 19, 7–8.
Altbach, P. G. (2004). The costs and benefits of world-class universities. Academe, 90(1), 20–23.
Altbach, P. G., Reisberg, L., Yudkevich, M., Androushchak, G., & Pacheco, I. F. (Eds.). (2012). Paying the professoriate: A global comparison of compensation and contracts. New York: Routledge.
Barclay, P., & Stoller, B. (2014). Local competition sparks concerns for fairness in the ultimatum game. Biology Letters, 10(May), 1–4.
Brewer, D. J., Gates, S. M., & Goldman, C. A. (2002). In pursuit of prestige: Strategy and competition in US higher education. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Press.
Burke, J. C. (Ed.). (2005). Achieving accountability in higher education: Balancing public, academic and market demands. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Cameron, A. C., & Trivedi, P. K. (2013). Regression analysis of count data. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cantwell, B., & Taylor, B. J. (2013). Global status, inter-institutional stratification, and organizational segmentation: A time-dynamic Tobit analysis of ARWU position among US universities. Minerva, 51(2), 195–223.
Cheng, Y., & Liu, N. C. (2006). A first approach to the classification of the top 500 world universities by their disciplinary characteristics using scientometrics. Scientometrics, 68(1), 135–150.
Cole, J. R. (2010). The great american university: Its rise to preeminence, its indispensable national role, why it must be protected. New York, NY: Public Affairs.
Dougherty, K. J. & Reddy, V. (2011). The impacts of state performance funding systems on higher education institutions: Research literature review and policy recommendations. CCRC working paper.
Douglas, J. A. (2016). The evolution of flagship universities: From the traditional to the new. UC Berkeley Center for Studies in Higher Education Research & Occasional Paper Series: CSHE.11.16. http://​cshe.​berkeley.​edu. Retrieved 01 Sept 2018.
Eesley, C., Li, B., & Yang, D. (2016). Institutional change and high-tech entrepreneurship? Evidence from China’s Project 985. Organization Science, Articles in Advance, 27, 1–16.
Favero, N., & Rutherford, A. (2019). Will the tide lift all boats? Examining the equity effects of performance funding policies in U.S. higher education. Research in Higher Education, 61, 1–25.
Hammond, C. D. (2016). Internationalization, nationalism, and global competitiveness: a comparison of approaches to higher education in China and Japan. Asia Pacific Education Review, 17, 555–566.
Hammond, C. D. (2019). Dynamics of higher education research collaboration and regional integration in Northeast Asia: A study of the A3 Foresight Program. Higher Education, 78, 653–668.
Hazelkorn, E. (2015). Rankings and the reshaping of higher education: The battle for world-class excellence. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Horta, H., & Shen, W. (2019). Current and future challenges of the Chinese research system. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 20, 1–21.
Hvistendahl, M. (2013). China’s publication bazaar. Science, 342(6162), 1035–1039.
Kim, K. (2007). A great leap forward to excellence in research at Seoul National University, 1994–2006. Asia Pacific Education Review, 8(1), 1–11.
Kim, J. (2018). The functions and dysfunctions of college rankings: An analysis of institutional expenditure. Research in Higher Education, 59(1), 54–87.
Lee, J. (2016). The anatomy of achievement gaps: Why and how american education is losing (but can still win) the war on underachievement. New York: Oxford University Press.
Levy, G. D., & Ronco, S. L. (2012). How benchmarking and higher education came together. New Directions for Institutional Research, 156, 5–13.
Liu, N. C., & Cheng, Y. (2005). The academic ranking of world universities. Higher Education in Europe, 30(2), 127–136.
Lixu, L. (2004). China’s higher education reform 1998–2003: A summary. Asia Pacific Education Review, 5(1), 14–22.
Marginson, S. (2018). Higher education, economic inequality and social mobility: Implications for emerging East Asia. International Journal of Educational Development, 63, 4–11.
McCormack, J., Propper, C., & Smith, S. (2014). Herding cats? Management and university performance. Economic Journal, 124(578), 534–564.
Meegan, D. V. (2010). Zero-sum bias: Perceived competition despite unlimited resources. Frontiers in Psychology, 191, 1–7.
Moon, M., & Kim, K. (2001). A case of Korean higher education reform: The Brain Korea 21 Project. Asia Pacific Education Review, 2(2), 96–105.
National Research Council. (2012). Improving measurement of productivity in higher education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
Oba, J. (2008). Creating world-class universities in Japan: Policy and initiatives. Policy Futures in Education, 6(5), 629–640.
Osborne, D., & Gaebler, T. (1992). Reinventing government: How the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Paul, A. M., & Long, V. (2016). Human-capital strategies to build world-class research universities in Asia: Impact on global flows. In M. Chou, I. Kamola, & T. Pietsch (Eds.), The transnational politics of higher education (pp. 142–167). New York: Routledge.
Porter, M. E. (1998). The competitive advantage of nations. New York: Free Press, MacMillan.
Powell, B. A., Gilleland, D. S., & Pearson, L. C. (2012). Expenditures, efficiency, and effectiveness in U.S. undergraduate higher education: A national benchmark model. The Journal of Higher Education, 83(1), 102–127.
Qi, W. (2011). A discussion on the 985 Project from a comparative perspective. Chinese Education and Society, 55(5), 41–56.
Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Sadlak, J., & Cai, L. N. (Eds.). (2009). The world-class university as part of a new higher education paradigm: From institutional qualities to systemic excellence. Cluj-Napoca: UNESCO European Centre for Higher Education and Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Cluj University Press.
Safon, V. (2013). What do global university rankings really measure? The search for the X factor and the X entity. Scientometrics, 97, 223–244.
Seong, S., Popper, S. W., Goldman, C. A., & Evans, D. K. (2008). Brain Korea 21 phase II a new evaluation model. Santa Monica, CA: Rand.
Shimmi, Y., & Yonezawa, A. (2015). Japan’s “top global university” project. International Higher Education, 81, 27–28.
Shin, J. C. (2009). Building world-class research university: The Brain Korea 21 project. Higher Education, 58(5), 669–688.
Taylor, P., & Braddock, R. (2007). International university ranking systems and the idea of university excellence. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 29(3), 245–260.
Taylor, B. J., & Cantwell, B. (2014). Global competition, US research universities, and international doctoral education: Growth and consolidation of an organizational field. Research in Higher Education, 56(5), 411–441.
Um, M. (2013). Center of excellence as a tool for capacity building case study: Korea. OECD Programme on Innovation, Higher Education and Research for Development (IHERD) report. https://​www.​oecd.​org.
van Leeuwen, T., Moed, H., Tijssen, R., Visser, M., & van Raan, A. (2001). Language biases in the coverage of the science citation index and its consequences for international comparisons of national research performance. Scientometrics, 51, 335–346.
van Raan, A., van Leeuwen, T., & Visser, M. (2011). Severe language effect in university rankings: Particularly Germany and France are wronged in citation-based rankings. Scientometrics, 88, 495–498.
Volkwein, J. F., & Grunig, S. D. (2005). Reputation ratings in higher education: Double, double, toil and trouble. In J. Burke (Ed.), Achieving Accountability In Higher Education: Balancing Public, Academic, and Market Demands, Chapter 11 (pp. 246–274). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
von Neumann, J., & Morgenstern, O. (1944). Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Williams, R., de Rassenfosse, G., Jensen, P., & Marginson, S. (2013). The determinants of quality national higher education systems. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 35(6), 599–611.
Yang, R., & Welch, A. (2012). A world-class university in China? The case of Tsinghua. Higher Education: The International Journal of Higher Education and Educational Planning, 63(5), 645–666.
Ying, C. (2011). A reflection on the effects of the 985 Project. Chinese Education and Society, 44(5), 19–30.
Yonezawa, A. (2003). Making “world-class universities”: Japan’s experiment. Higher Education Management and Policy, 15(2), 9–23.
Yonezawa, A., & Shimmi, Y. (2016). Transformation of university governance through internationalization. In N. C. Liu, Y. Cheng, & Q. Wang (Eds.), Matching visibility and performance. Global perspectives on higher education. Rotterdam: SensePublishers.
Metadata
Title
Does the Asian catch-up model of world-class universities work? Revisiting the zero-sum game of global university rankings and government policies
Authors
Jaekyung Lee
Keqiao Liu
Yin Wu
Publication date
18-03-2020
Publisher
Springer Singapore
Published in
Educational Research for Policy and Practice / Issue 3/2020
Print ISSN: 1570-2081
Electronic ISSN: 1573-1723
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10671-020-09261-x

Other articles of this Issue 3/2020

Educational Research for Policy and Practice 3/2020 Go to the issue

Original Article

Enhancing intercultural effectiveness in international virtual student teams: an exploratory study

Book Review

Review of “Empowering teachers to build a better world: how six nations support teachers for 21st century education”

Original Article

Understandings and attitudes regarding skill-based and competency-based cultures for learning: a comparative study of Norwegian and New Zealand teacher educators

Original Article

A capabilities approach to female graduates’ post-secondary academic and career-related goal pursuit in Siem Reap Cambodia

Original Article

The impact of ethnicity on the sociocultural adjustment of international students in Thai higher education

Original Article

Implementing an RTI approach: a qualitative study of prerequisites and obstacles