Top

International Journal of Technology and Design Education

Published in:

29-05-2020

Format effects in the understanding of motion from kinematic diagrams in engineering education

Authors: Olga Kasatkina, Cédric Masclet, Jean-François Boujut, Erica de Vries

Published in: International Journal of Technology and Design Education | Issue 5/2021

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

Understanding and constructing domain-specific external representations, such as kinematic diagrams, is an important goal of engineering education. International standards (ISO 3952-1) prescribe their format in terms of graphical elements in black and white and two dimensions. However, during training, the canonical format is often modified under the assumption that it facilitates learning and comprehension of motion. The question arises as to whether understanding movement from kinematic diagrams shows format effects (Colour code and Projection), i.e. facilitation of colour and 3D projection, at different levels of engineering education. In the present study, we investigated understanding of movement from kinematic diagrams used as static graphical representations of a mechanism. 132 graduate and undergraduate students of French engineering schools took part in the experiment. According to the expectations of the multimedia model, we found a main effect of Projection and Colour code on understanding movement from kinematic diagrams. Higher understanding was found for polychrome diagrams using three-dimensional projection. Furthermore, an interaction between Colour code and Level of study indicated fading of format effect regarding colour with recent training and practice. Following this finding, the role of level of study and recentness of using rule-based graphical representations are discussed. The study showed the importance of format and student characteristics for understanding graphical representations in engineering education.

previous article Differences in perception, understanding, and responsiveness of product design between experts and students: an early event-related potentials study

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Ainsworth, S. (2006). DeFT: A conceptual framework for considering learning with multiple representations. Learning and Instruction, 16(3), 183–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.03.001.CrossRef

Ainsworth, S. (2008). The educational value of multiple-representations when learning complex scientific concepts. In J. K. Gilbert, M. Reiner, & M. Nakhleh (Eds.), Visualization : Theory and practice in science education (pp. 191–208). Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-1-4020-5267-5_9.

Airey, J., & Linder, C. (2009). A disciplinary discourse perspective on university science learning: Achieving fluency in a critical constellation of modes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(1), 27–49. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20265.CrossRef

Andreucci, C., Froment, J.-P., & Verillon, P. (1996). Contribution à l’analyse des situations d’enseignement/apprentissage d’instruments sémiotiques de communication technique [Graphic tools for technical communication: Analyzing how they are taught and learned]. Aster, 23, 181–211. https://doi.org/10.4267/2042/8663.CrossRef

Bertin, J. (1983). Semiology of graphics: Diagrams, networks, maps. Madison, WI: The University of Wisconsin Press Ltd.

Bétrancourt, M. (2005). The animation and interactivity principles in multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 287–296). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef

Boujut, J.-F., & Hisarciklilar, O. (2012). Using a semiotic classification to characterise objects involved in collaborative design. Journal of Design Research, 10(3), 155–169.CrossRef

Buckley, J., Seery, N., & Canty, D. (2019). Investigating the use of spatial reasoning strategies in geometric problem solving. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 29(2), 341–362. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-018-9446-3.CrossRef

Cartonnet, Y., & Poitou, J.-P. (1996). Compréhension des relations spatiales et cinématiques dans les dessins techniques: Influence du mode graphique et de l’expérience [Reading spatial and kinematic relationships in technical drawings: Effects of graphic rendering and of vocational experience]. Le Travail Humain, 59(2), 113–135.

Cook, M., Carter, G., & Wiebe, E. N. (2008). The interpretation of cellular transport graphics by students with low and high prior knowledge. International Journal of Science Education, 30(2), 239–261. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690601187168.CrossRef

de Vries, E., & Masclet, C. (2013). A framework for the study of external representations in collaborative design settings. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 71(1), 46–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2012.07.005.CrossRef

diSessa, A. A. (2004). Metarepresentation: Native competence and targets for instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 22(3), 293–331. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci2203_2.CrossRef

Duval, R. (2006). A cognitive analysis of problems of comprehension in a learning of mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 61(1–2), 103–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-006-0400-z.CrossRef

Ekstrom, R. B., French, J. W., Harman, H. H., & Dermen, D. (1976). Kit of factor-referenced cognitive tests. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Fiore, S. M., & Wiltshire, T. J. (2016). Technology as teammate: Examining the role of external cognition in support of team cognitive processes. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 15–31. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01531.CrossRef

Gilbert, J. K. (Ed.). (2005). Visualization in science education. Dordrecht: Springer.

Gooding, D. C. (2010). Visualizing scientific inference. Topics in Cognitive Science, 2(1), 15–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2009.01048.x.CrossRef

Goodman, N. (1976). Languages of art. An approach to a theory of symbols (2nd ed.). Indianapolis: Hackett.

Head, G., & Dakers, J. (2005). Vérillon’s Trio and Wenger’s community: Learning in technology education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 15(1), 33–45.CrossRef

Hilton, A., & Nichols, K. (2011). Representational classroom practices that contribute to students’ conceptual and representational understanding of chemical bonding. International Journal of Science Education, 33(16), 2215–2246. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2010.543438.CrossRef

Hisarciklilar, O., & Boujut, J. F. (2008). Symbolic vs. Iconic: How to support argumentative design discourse with 3D product representations. In IDMME-Virtual Concept 2008 (Vol. 3, pp. 1–8). Springer.

Impedovo, M. A., Andreucci, C., & Ginestié, J. (2017). Mediation of artefacts, tools and technical objects: An international and french perspective. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 27(1), 19–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-015-9335-y.CrossRef

Kalyuga, S. (2008). Relative effectiveness of animated and static diagrams: An effect of learner prior knowledge. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(3), 852–861.CrossRef

Kalyuga, S., Ayres, P., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (2003). The expertise reversal effect. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 23–31.CrossRef

Kalyuga, S., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1998). Levels of expertise and instructional design. Human Factors, 40(1), 1–17.CrossRef

Keller, T., Gerjets, P., Scheiter, K., & Garsoffky, B. (2006). Information visualizations for knowledge acquisition: The impact of dimensionality and color coding. Computers in Human Behavior, 22(1), 43–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2005.01.006.CrossRef

Kozhevnikov, M., Motes, M. A., & Hegarty, M. (2007). Spatial visualization in physics problem solving. Cognitive Science, 31(4), 549–579. https://doi.org/10.1080/15326900701399897.CrossRef

Kozma, R. (2003). The material features of multiple representations and their cognitive and social affordances for science understanding. Learning and Instruction, 13(2), 205–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(02)00021-X.CrossRef

Kozma, R., Chin, E., Russell, J., & Marx, N. (2000). The roles of representations and tools in the chemistry laboratory and their implications for chemistry learning. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9(2), 105–143.CrossRef

Laisney, P., & Brandt-Pomares, P. (2015). Role of graphics tools in the learning design process. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 25(1), 109–119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-014-9267-y.CrossRef

Larkin, J. H., & Simon, H. A. (1987). Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth ten thousand words. Cognitive Science, 11(1), 65–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6708.1987.tb00863.x.CrossRef

Lemke, J. L. (1998). Teaching all the languages of science: Words, symbols, images, and actions. Conference on Science Education in Barcelona. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/download/42884646/Barcelona-Languages-of-science.pdf.

Mayer, R. E. (2001). Multimedia learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef

Ministry of National Education and Youth. (2011). Bulletin Officiel spécial [Special Official Bulletin] (n° 3). Retrieved from https://www.education.gouv.fr/pid25173/special-n-3-du-17-mars-2011.html

Ozcelik, E., Karakus, T., Kursun, E., & Cagiltay, K. (2009). An eye-tracking study of how color coding affects multimedia learning. Computers & Education, 53(2), 445–453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.03.002.CrossRef

Postigo, Y., & Pozo, J. I. (2004). On the Road to Graphicacy: The learning of graphical representation systems. Educational Psychology, 24(5), 623–644. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144341042000262944.CrossRef

Prain, V., & Tytler, R. (2012). Learning through constructing representations in science: A framework of representational construction affordances. International Journal of Science Education, 34(17), 2751–2773. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.626462.CrossRef

Rabardel, P. (1995). Les hommes et les technologies; approche cognitive des instruments contemporains [Men and technologies—A cognitive approach to contemporary instruments]. Paris: Armand Colin.

Schnotz, W. (2001). Sign systems, technologies and the acquisition of knowledge. In J.-F. Rouet, J. Levonen, & A. Biardeau (Eds.), Multimedia learning: Cognitive and instructional issues (pp. 9–30). Oxford: Elsevier.

Schnotz, W., & Bannert, M. (2003). Construction and interference in learning from multiple representation. Learning and Instruction, 13(2), 141–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(02)00017-8.CrossRef

Shah, P., & Carpenter, P. A. (1995). Conceptual limitations in comprehending line graphs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124(1), 43.CrossRef

Shah, P., & Freedman, E. G. (2011). Bar and line graph comprehension: An interaction of top-down and bottom-up processes: topics in cognitive science. Topics in Cognitive Science, 3(3), 560–578. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2009.01066.x.CrossRef

Shah, P., & Hoeffner, J. (2002). Review of graph comprehension research: Implications for instruction. Educational Psychology Review, 14(1), 47–69.CrossRef

Tversky, B., Morrison, J., & Bétrancourt, M. (2002). Animation: Can it facilitate? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 57(4), 247–262. https://doi.org/10.1006/ijhc.2002.1017.CrossRef

van Gog, T. (2014). The Signaling (or Cueing) principle in multimedia learning. In R. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (2nd ed., pp. 263–278). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Van Someren, M., Reimann, P., Boshuizen, H., & de Jong, T. (Eds.). (1998). The role of multiple representations in learning and problem solving. Oxford: Elsevier Science.

Verillon, P., & Rabardel, P. (1995). Cognition and artifacts: A contribution to the study of thought in relation to instrumented activity. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 10(1), 77. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03172796.CrossRef

Ware, C. (2008). Visual thinking for design. Burlington: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.

Wu, H.-K., & Shah, P. (2004). Exploring visuospatial thinking in chemistry learning. Science Education, 88(3), 465–492. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10126.CrossRef

Zhang, J. (1997). The nature of external representations in problem solving. Cognitive Science, 21(2), 179–217.CrossRef

Zhang, J., & Norman, D. A. (1994). Representations in distributed cognitive tasks. Cognitive Science, 18(1), 87–122.CrossRef

Title: Format effects in the understanding of motion from kinematic diagrams in engineering education
Authors: Olga Kasatkina
Cédric Masclet
Jean-François Boujut
Erica de Vries
Publication date: 29-05-2020
Publisher: Springer Netherlands
Published in: International Journal of Technology and Design Education / Issue 5/2021
Print ISSN: 0957-7572
Electronic ISSN: 1573-1804
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-020-09591-0

Springer Professional

Abstract

Please log in to get access to your license.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Other articles of this Issue 5/2021

Age and gender differences between pupils’ preferences in teaching general and compulsory technology education in Croatia

Framing the constructive alignment of design within technology subjects in general education

Examining how technology is presented and understood in technology education: a pilot study in a preschool class

The use of gamification in higher technical education: perception of university students on innovative teaching materials

Spatial development program for middle school: teacher perceptions of effectiveness

Practice before theory? An approach for testing sequencing effects in pedagogical design

Premium Partner