Skip to main content
Disciplines
Automotive Business IT + Informatics Construction + Real Estate Electrical Engineering + Electronics Energy + Sustainability Insurance + Risk Finance + Banking Management + Leadership Marketing + Sales Mechanical Engineering + Materials
Events
DE
EN
Books
Journals
Topic Page
Marketing
Start single access now
Access for companies
EXTENDED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Production Engineering
Published in: Production Engineering 3/2020

18-03-2020 | Production Process

Hardware in the loop simulation for product driven control of a cyber-physical manufacturing system

Authors: B. Mihoubi, B. Bouzouia, K. Tebani, M. Gaham

Published in: Production Engineering | Issue 3/2020

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Cyber-physical system (CPS) is considered as a building block of industry 4.0. They are formulated as a network of interacting cyberspace and physical elements. Dealing with this new industrial context, distributed control systems (DCS) are increasingly involved because they permit meeting flexibility and adaptability requirements, which can give scope to CPS. The product driven control system (PDS) is considered as DCS in which the product plays a major role in decision-making. However, the PDS paradigm has not yet received sufficient attention within the CPS. Relying on multi-agents system as implementation framework, radio frequency identity as auto-identity technologies, and hardware in the loop simulation as a practical methodology, the paper proposes a validation and practical framework of PDS applied to the highly automated flexible robotized assembly system. An efficient CPS is developed for a discrete flexible manufacturing system.
previous article Reinforcement learning for an intelligent and autonomous production control of complex job-shops under time constraints
next article Analytic roughness prediction by deep rolling

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now
Literature
1.
Liao Y, Deschamps F, Freitas Rocha Loures DE, Ramos LFP (2017) Past, present and future of Industry 4.0—a systematic literature review and research agenda proposal. Int J Prod Res 55(12):3609–3629CrossRef
2.
Verl A, Lechler A, Schlechtendahl J (2012) Glocalized cyber physical production systems. Prod Eng Res Dev 6(6):643–649CrossRef
3.
Bangemann T, Riedl M, Thron M, Diedrich C (2016) Integration of classical components into industrial cyber physical systems. Proc IEEE 104(5):947–959CrossRef
4.
Dalenogare LS, Benitez GB, Ayala NF, Frank AG (2018) The expected contribution of Industry 4.0 technologies for industrial performance. Int J Prod Econ 204:383–394CrossRef
5.
Leitao P, Karnouskos S, Ribeiro L, Lee J, Strasser T, Colombo AW (2016) Smart agents in industrial cyber–physical systems. Proc IEEE 104(5):1086–1101CrossRef
6.
Cardin O (2019) Classification of cyber-physical production systems applications: proposition of an analysis framework. Comput Ind 104:11–21CrossRef
7.
Wang Y, Ma HS, Yang JH, Wang KS (2017) Industry 4.0: a way from mass customization to mass personalization production. Adv Manuf 5(4):311–320CrossRef
8.
Monostori L, Kádár B, Bauernhansl T et al (2016) Cyber-physical systems in manufacturing. CIRP Ann 65(2):621–641CrossRef
9.
Lee J, Bagheri B, Kao HA (2015) A cyber-physical systems architecture for industry 4.0-based manufacturing systems. Manuf Lett 3:18–23CrossRef
10.
Zhang J, Ding G, Zou Y, Qin S, Fu J (2019) Review of job shop scheduling research and its new perspectives under Industry 4.0. J Intell Manuf 30(4):1809–1830CrossRef
11.
Shen W, Norrie DH (1999) Agent-based systems for intelligent manufacturing: a state-of-the-art survey. Knowl Inf Syst 1(2):129–156CrossRef
12.
Rey GZ, Bonte T, Prabhu V, Trentesaux D (2014) Reducing myopic behavior in FMS control: a semi-heterarchical simulation–optimization approach. Simul Model Pract Theory 46:53–75CrossRef
13.
Gaham M, Bouzouia B, Achour N (2014) An evolutionary simulation-optimization approach to product-driven manufacturing control. Springer, Berlin, pp 283–294
14.
Upasani K, Bakshi M, Pandhare V, Lad BK (2017) Distributed maintenance planning in manufacturing industries. Comput Ind Eng 108:1–14CrossRef
15.
16.
Xiang W, Lee HP (2008) Ant colony intelligence in multi-agent dynamic manufacturing scheduling. Eng Appl Artif Intell 21(1):73–85CrossRef
17.
Pannequin R, Morel G, Thomas A (2009) The performance of product-driven manufacturing control: an emulation-based benchmarking study. Comput Ind 60(3):195–203CrossRef
18.
El Haouzi H, Pétin JF, Thomas A (2009) Design and validation of a product-driven control system based on a six sigma methodology and discrete event simulation. Prod Plan Control 20(6):510–524CrossRef
19.
Porter ME, Heppelmann JE (2014) How smart, connected products are transforming competition. Harvard Bus Rev 92(11):64–88
20.
Mühlhäuser M (2007) Smart products: an introduction. Springer, Berlin, pp 158–164
21.
McFarlane D, Sarma S, Chirn JL, Wong C, Ashton K (2002) The intelligent product in manufacturing control and management. IFAC Proc Vol 35(1):49–54CrossRef
22.
Meyer GG, Främling K, Holmström J (2009) Intelligent products: a survey. Comput Ind 60(3):137–148CrossRef
23.
McFarlane D, Giannikas V, Wong AC, Harrison M (2013) Product intelligence in industrial control: theory and practice. Annu Rev Control 37(1):69–88CrossRef
24.
Leitão P, Rodrigues N, Barbosa J, Turrin C, Pagani A (2015) Intelligent products: the grace experience. Control Eng Pract 42:95–105CrossRef
25.
Zhang Y, Qian C, Lv J, Liu Y (2016) Agent and cyber-physical system based self-organizing and self-adaptive intelligent shopfloor. IEEE Trans Ind Inf 13(2):737–747CrossRef
26.
Basile F, Chiacchio P, Coppola J (2016) A cyber-physical view of automated warehouse systems. In: IEEE, pp 407–412
27.
McFarlane D, Sarma S, Chirn JL, Wong C, Ashton K (2003) Auto ID systems and intelligent manufacturing control. Eng Appl Artif Intell 16(4):365–376CrossRef
28.
Lu B, Bateman R, Cheng K (2006) RFID enabled manufacturing: fundamentals, methodology and applications. Int J Agile Syst Manag 1(1):73–92CrossRef
29.
Wang KS (2014) Intelligent and integrated RFID (II-RFID) system for improving traceability in manufacturing. Adv Manuf 2(2):106–120CrossRef
30.
Guo Z, Ngai E, Yang C, Liang X (2015) An RFID-based intelligent decision support system architecture for production monitoring and scheduling in a distributed manufacturing environment. Int J Prod Econ 159:16–28CrossRef
31.
Barbosa J, Leitão P, Teixeira J (2018) Empowering a cyber-physical system for a modular conveyor system with selforganization. Springer, Berlin, pp 157–170
32.
Gonzalez SR, Zambrano GM, Mondragon IF (2019) Semi-heterarchical architecture to AGV adjustable autonomy within FMSs. IFAC Pap OnLine 52(10):7–12CrossRef
33.
Feliciano Filho M, Liao Y, Loures ER, Junior OC (2017) Self-aware smart products: systematic literature review, conceptual design and prototype implementation. Proc Manuf 11:1471–1480
34.
Molesini A, Casadei M, Omicini A, Viroli M (2013) Simulation in agent-oriented software engineering: the SODA case study. Sci Comput Program 78(6):705–714CrossRef
35.
Madni AM, Sievers M (2018) Model-based systems engineering: motivation, current status, and research opportunities. Syst Eng 21(3):172–190CrossRef
36.
37.
Soylemezoglu A, Zawodniok MJ, Cha K et al (2006) A testbed architecture for auto-ID technologies. Assembly Autom 26(2):127–136CrossRef
38.
Millitzer J, Mayer D, Henke C et al (2019) Recent developments in hardware-in-the-loop testing. Springer, Berlin, pp 65–73
39.
Harrison WS, Tilbury DM, Yuan C (2011) From hardware-in-the-loop to hybrid process simulation: an ontology for the implementation phase of a manufacturing system. IEEE Trans Autom Sci Eng 9(1):96–109CrossRef
40.
Sarhadi P, Yousefpour S (2015) State of the art: hardware in the loop modeling and simulation with its applications in design, development and implementation of system and control software. Int J Dyn Control 3(4):470–479CrossRef
41.
Zhang H, Liu Q, Chen X, Zhang D, Leng J (2017) A digital twin-based approach for designing and multi-objective optimization of hollow glass production line. IEEE Access 5:26901–26911CrossRef
42.
Putman NM, Maturana F, Barton K, Tilbury DM (2017) Virtual fusion: a hybrid environment for improved commissioning in manufacturing systems. Int J Prod Res 55(21):6254–6265CrossRef
43.
44.
Browne J, Dubois D, Rathmill K, Sethi SP, Stecke KE et al (1984) Classification of flexible manufacturing systems. FMS Mag 2(2):114–117
45.
Bellifemine FL, Caire G, Greenwood D (2007) Developing multi-agent systems with JADE. 7. Wiley, New YorkCrossRef
46.
Burbank JL, Kasch W, Ward J (2011) An introduction to network modeling and simulation for the practicing engineer. Wiley, New YorkCrossRef
47.
Marijan D, Gotlieb A, Liaaen M (2019) A learning algorithm for optimizing continuous integration development and testing practice. Softw Pract Exp 49(2):192–213CrossRef
48.
Li Q, Yang Y, Li M, Wang Q, Boehm BW, Hu C (2012) Improving software testing process: feature prioritization to make winners of success-critical stakeholders. J Softw Evol Process 24(7):783–801CrossRef
49.
Trentesaux D, Pach C, Bekrar A et al (2013) Benchmarking flexible job-shop scheduling and control systems. Control Eng Pract 21(9):1204–1225CrossRef
50.
51.
Zambrano Rey G, Bekrar A, Prabhu V, Trentesaux D (2014) Coupling a genetic algorithm with the distributed arrival-time control for the JIT dynamic scheduling of flexible job-shops. Int J Prod Res 52(12):3688–3709CrossRef
52.
53.
Nasiri MM, Yazdanparast R, Jolai F (2017) A simulation optimisation approach for real-time scheduling in an open shop environment using a composite dispatching rule. Int J Comput Integr Manuf 30(12):1239–1252CrossRef
54.
Azadeh A, Shoja BM, Moghaddam M, Asadzadeh S, Akbari A (2013) A neural network meta-model for identification of optimal combination of priority dispatching rules and makespan in a deterministic job shop scheduling problem. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 67(5–8):1549–1561CrossRef
55.
Nordgren WB (2002) Flexsim simulation environment. In: Proceedings of the winter simulation conference, vol 1. IEEE, pp 250–252
56.
Röck S (2011) Hardware in the loop simulation of production systems dynamics. Prod Eng Res Dev 5(3):329–337CrossRef
57.
Mihoubi B, Gaham M, Bouzouia B, Bekrar A (2015) A rule-based harmony search simulation-optimization approach for intelligent control of a robotic assembly cell. In: IEEE, pp 1–6
58.
Sallez Y, Berger T, Trentesaux D (2009) A stigmergic approach for dynamic routing of active products in FMS. Comput Ind 60(3):204–216CrossRef
59.
Metadata
Title
Hardware in the loop simulation for product driven control of a cyber-physical manufacturing system
Authors
B. Mihoubi
B. Bouzouia
K. Tebani
M. Gaham
Publication date
18-03-2020
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Production Engineering / Issue 3/2020
Print ISSN: 0944-6524
Electronic ISSN: 1863-7353
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11740-020-00957-w

Other articles of this Issue 3/2020

Production Engineering 3/2020 Go to the issue

Production Process

Prediction and optimization of machining results and parameters in drilling by using Bayesian networks

Production Process

Data acquisition and control at the edge: a hardware/software-reconfigurable approach

Production Management

Quantifying disturbance risks on the process time for a robust, synchronized individual production

Tooling

Process stability of a novel roughing-finishing end mill

Production Process

A comparative analysis of ceramic and cemented carbide end mills

Production Process

Analytic roughness prediction by deep rolling

Premium Partners

    Image Credits