Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Social Justice Research 4/2008

01-12-2008

Is a Refrigerator Good or Evil? The Moral Evaluation of Everyday Objects

Authors: Izzat Jarudi, Tamar Kreps, Paul Bloom

Published in: Social Justice Research | Issue 4/2008

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Certain objects such as family heirlooms are often treated as if they have intrinsic moral qualities, including sacredness and infinite value. Other objects such as instruments of torture are often seen as inherently repellent. Do people also evaluate more mundane objects such as refrigerators as morally good or bad? Here we explore the nature and scope of moral object evaluation through two experiments that asked participants to rate how morally good or bad a large set of familiar objects were. We find that (a) everyday objects tend to be seen as morally positive and (b) unlike mere liking, the moral evaluation of objects is positively linked to the age and political conservatism of the participants. These findings are discussed in relation to research on automatic evaluation, mere exposure effects, and the relationship between affective states and moral judgments.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
go back to reference Bargh, J., & Chaiken, S. (1992). The generality of the automatic attitude activation effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 893–912.PubMedCrossRef Bargh, J., & Chaiken, S. (1992). The generality of the automatic attitude activation effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 893–912.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Bargh, J., & Chartrand, T. (1999). The unbearable automaticity of being. American Psychologist, 54, 462–479.CrossRef Bargh, J., & Chartrand, T. (1999). The unbearable automaticity of being. American Psychologist, 54, 462–479.CrossRef
go back to reference Baron, J., & Spranca, M. (1997). Protected values. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 70, 1–16.CrossRef Baron, J., & Spranca, M. (1997). Protected values. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 70, 1–16.CrossRef
go back to reference Bartels, D. M., & Medin, D. L. (2007). Are morally-motivated decision makers insensitive to the consequences of their choices? Psychological Science, 18, 24–28.PubMedCrossRef Bartels, D. M., & Medin, D. L. (2007). Are morally-motivated decision makers insensitive to the consequences of their choices? Psychological Science, 18, 24–28.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Bornstein, R. (1989). Exposure and affect: Overview and meta-analysis of research, 1968–1987. Psychological Bulletin, 106, 265–289.CrossRef Bornstein, R. (1989). Exposure and affect: Overview and meta-analysis of research, 1968–1987. Psychological Bulletin, 106, 265–289.CrossRef
go back to reference Duckworth, K., Bargh, J., Garcia, M., & Chaiken, S. (2002). The automatic evaluation of novel stimuli. Psychological Science, 13, 513–519.PubMedCrossRef Duckworth, K., Bargh, J., Garcia, M., & Chaiken, S. (2002). The automatic evaluation of novel stimuli. Psychological Science, 13, 513–519.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Eliade, M. (1957). The sacred and the profane. New York: Harcourt, Brace, and Company. Eliade, M. (1957). The sacred and the profane. New York: Harcourt, Brace, and Company.
go back to reference Farwell, L., & Weiner, B. (2000). Bleeding hearts and the heartless: Popular perceptions of liberal and conservative ideologies. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 845–852.CrossRef Farwell, L., & Weiner, B. (2000). Bleeding hearts and the heartless: Popular perceptions of liberal and conservative ideologies. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 845–852.CrossRef
go back to reference Ferguson, M. J. (2006). The automaticity of evaluation. In J. Bargh (Ed.), Social psychology and the unconscious: The automaticity of higher mental processes. Psychology Press. Ferguson, M. J. (2006). The automaticity of evaluation. In J. Bargh (Ed.), Social psychology and the unconscious: The automaticity of higher mental processes. Psychology Press.
go back to reference Greene, J., Sommerville, R., Nystrom, L., Darley, J., & Cohen, J. (2001). An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment. Science, 293, 2105–2108.PubMedCrossRef Greene, J., Sommerville, R., Nystrom, L., Darley, J., & Cohen, J. (2001). An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment. Science, 293, 2105–2108.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108, 814–834.PubMedCrossRef Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108, 814–834.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Haidt, J., & Graham, J. (2007). When morality opposes justice: Conservatives have moral intuitions that liberals may not recognize. Social Justice Research, 20, 98–116.CrossRef Haidt, J., & Graham, J. (2007). When morality opposes justice: Conservatives have moral intuitions that liberals may not recognize. Social Justice Research, 20, 98–116.CrossRef
go back to reference Jost, J. T., Blount, S., Pfeffer, J., & Hunyady, G. (2003a). Fair market ideology: Its cognitive-motivational underpinnings. Research in Organizational Behavior, 25, 53–91.CrossRef Jost, J. T., Blount, S., Pfeffer, J., & Hunyady, G. (2003a). Fair market ideology: Its cognitive-motivational underpinnings. Research in Organizational Behavior, 25, 53–91.CrossRef
go back to reference Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A., & Sulloway, F. (2003b). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 339–375.PubMedCrossRef Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A., & Sulloway, F. (2003b). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 339–375.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Jost, J. T., Nosek, B. A., & Gosling, S. D. (2008). Ideology: Its resurgence in social, personality, and political psychology. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 126–136. CrossRef Jost, J. T., Nosek, B. A., & Gosling, S. D. (2008). Ideology: Its resurgence in social, personality, and political psychology. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 126–136. CrossRef
go back to reference McGraw, A., Tetlock, P., & Kristel, O. (2003). The limits of fungibility: Relational schemata and the value of things. Journal of Consumer Research, 30, 219–229.CrossRef McGraw, A., Tetlock, P., & Kristel, O. (2003). The limits of fungibility: Relational schemata and the value of things. Journal of Consumer Research, 30, 219–229.CrossRef
go back to reference Monahan, J., Murphy, S., & Zajonc, R. (2000). Subliminal mere exposure: Specific, general, and diffuse effects. Psychological Science, 11, 462–466.PubMedCrossRef Monahan, J., Murphy, S., & Zajonc, R. (2000). Subliminal mere exposure: Specific, general, and diffuse effects. Psychological Science, 11, 462–466.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Nemeroff, C., & Rozin, P. (1994). The contagion concept in adult thinking in the United States: Transmission of germs and of interpersonal influence. Ethos, 22, 158–186.CrossRef Nemeroff, C., & Rozin, P. (1994). The contagion concept in adult thinking in the United States: Transmission of germs and of interpersonal influence. Ethos, 22, 158–186.CrossRef
go back to reference Skitka, L., & Tetlock, P. (1993). Providing public assistance: Cognitive and motivational processes underlying liberal and conservative policy preferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 1205–1223.CrossRef Skitka, L., & Tetlock, P. (1993). Providing public assistance: Cognitive and motivational processes underlying liberal and conservative policy preferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 1205–1223.CrossRef
go back to reference Tetlock, P. (2003). Thinking the unthinkable: Sacred values and taboo cognitions. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 320–324.PubMedCrossRef Tetlock, P. (2003). Thinking the unthinkable: Sacred values and taboo cognitions. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 320–324.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Tetlock, P., Kristel, O., Elson, S., Green, M., & Lerner, J. (2000). The psychology of the unthinkable: Taboo trade-offs, forbidden base rates, and heretical counterfactuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 853–870.PubMedCrossRef Tetlock, P., Kristel, O., Elson, S., Green, M., & Lerner, J. (2000). The psychology of the unthinkable: Taboo trade-offs, forbidden base rates, and heretical counterfactuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 853–870.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Valdesolo, P., & DeSteno, D. (2006). Manipulations of emotional context shape moral judgment. Psychological Science, 17, 476–477.PubMedCrossRef Valdesolo, P., & DeSteno, D. (2006). Manipulations of emotional context shape moral judgment. Psychological Science, 17, 476–477.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Weeks, W., Longenecker, J., McKinney, J., & Moore, C. (2005). The role of mere exposure effect on ethical tolerance. Journal of Business Ethics, 58, 281–294.CrossRef Weeks, W., Longenecker, J., McKinney, J., & Moore, C. (2005). The role of mere exposure effect on ethical tolerance. Journal of Business Ethics, 58, 281–294.CrossRef
go back to reference Wheatley, T., & Haidt, J. (2005). Hypnotic disgust makes moral judgments more severe. Psychological Science, 16, 780–784.PubMedCrossRef Wheatley, T., & Haidt, J. (2005). Hypnotic disgust makes moral judgments more severe. Psychological Science, 16, 780–784.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Zajonc, R. (1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9, 2.CrossRef Zajonc, R. (1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9, 2.CrossRef
go back to reference Zajonc, R. (2001). Mere exposure: A gateway to the subliminal. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10, 224–228.CrossRef Zajonc, R. (2001). Mere exposure: A gateway to the subliminal. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10, 224–228.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Is a Refrigerator Good or Evil? The Moral Evaluation of Everyday Objects
Authors
Izzat Jarudi
Tamar Kreps
Paul Bloom
Publication date
01-12-2008
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Social Justice Research / Issue 4/2008
Print ISSN: 0885-7466
Electronic ISSN: 1573-6725
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-008-0082-z

Other articles of this Issue 4/2008

Social Justice Research 4/2008 Go to the issue