Skip to main content
Disciplines
Automotive Business IT + Informatics Construction + Real Estate Electrical Engineering + Electronics Energy + Sustainability Insurance + Risk Finance + Banking Management + Leadership Marketing + Sales Mechanical Engineering + Materials
Events
DE
EN
Books
Journals
Topic Page
Marketing
Start single access now
Access for companies
EXTENDED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Published in:
Simulating Free-Surface FSI and Fatigue Damage in Wind-Turbine Structural Systems Read chapter Read first chapter

2018 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

Recent Advances in ALE-VMS and ST-VMS Computational Aerodynamic and FSI Analysis of Wind Turbines

Authors : Artem Korobenko, Yuri Bazilevs, Kenji Takizawa, Tayfun E. Tezduyar

Published in: Frontiers in Computational Fluid-Structure Interaction and Flow Simulation

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

We describe the recent advances made by our teams in ALE-VMS and ST-VMS computational aerodynamic and fluid–structure interaction (FSI) analysis of wind turbines. The ALE-VMS method is the variational multiscale version of the Arbitrary Lagrangian–Eulerian method. The VMS components are from the residual-based VMS method. The ST-VMS method is the VMS version of the Deforming-Spatial-Domain/Stabilized Space–Time method. The ALE-VMS and ST-VMS serve as the core methods in the computations. They are complemented by special methods that include the ALE-VMS versions for stratified flows, sliding interfaces and weak enforcement of Dirichlet boundary conditions, ST Slip Interface (ST-SI) method, NURBS-based isogeometric analysis, ST/NURBS Mesh Update Method (STNMUM), Kirchhoff–Love shell modeling of wind-turbine structures, and full FSI coupling. The VMS feature of the ALE-VMS and ST-VMS addresses the computational challenges associated with the multiscale nature of the unsteady flow, and the moving-mesh feature of the ALE and ST frameworks enables high-resolution computation near the rotor surface. The ST framework, in a general context, provides higher-order accuracy. The ALE-VMS version for sliding interfaces and the ST-SI enable moving-mesh computation of the spinning rotor. The mesh covering the rotor spins with it, and the sliding interface or the SI between the spinning mesh and the rest of the mesh accurately connects the two sides of the solution. The ST-SI also enables prescribing the fluid velocity at the turbine rotor surface as weakly-enforced Dirichlet boundary condition. The STNMUM enables exact representation of the mesh rotation. The analysis cases reported include both the horizontal-axis and vertical-axis wind turbines, stratified and unstratified flows, standalone wind turbines, wind turbines with tower or support columns, aerodynamic interaction between two wind turbines, and the FSI between the aerodynamics and structural dynamics of wind turbines. Comparisons with experimental data are also included where applicable. The reported cases demonstrate the effectiveness of the ALE-VMS and ST-VMS computational analysis in wind-turbine aerodynamics and FSI.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now
previous chapter A Numerical Analysis of Rheology of Capsule Suspensions Using a GPU-Accelerated Boundary Element Method
next chapter Space–Time Computational Analysis of Tire Aerodynamics with Actual Geometry, Road Contact, and Tire Deformation
Literature
1.
2.
3.
4.
“Levelized cost of electricity renewable energy technologies”, Study, FRAUNHOFER INSTITUT FOR SOLAR ENERGY SYSTEMS ISE, November 2013.
5.
N.N. Sørensen, J.A. Michelsen, and S. Schreck, “Navier–Stokes predictions of the NREL Phase VI rotor in the NASA Ames 80 ft × 120 ft wind tunnel”, Wind Energy, 5 (2002) 151–169.CrossRef
6.
A.L. Pape and J. Lecanu, “3D Navier–Stokes computations of a stall-regulated wind turbine”, Wind Energy, 7 (2004) 309–324.CrossRef
7.
F. Zahle, N.N. Sørensen, and J. Johansen, “Wind turbine rotor-tower interaction using an incompressible overset grid method”, Wind Energy, 12 (2009) 594–619.CrossRef
8.
Y. Bazilevs, M.-C. Hsu, I. Akkerman, S. Wright, K. Takizawa, B. Henicke, T. Spielman, and T.E. Tezduyar, “3D simulation of wind turbine rotors at full scale. Part I: Geometry modeling and aerodynamics”, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 65 (2011) 207–235, https://​doi.​org/​10.​1002/​fld.​2400.MATHCrossRef
9.
10.
Y. Li and P.M.C. Kim-Jong Paik, T. Xing, “Dynamic overset CFD simulations of wind turbine aerodynamics”, Renewable Energy, 37 (2012) 285–298.CrossRef
11.
E. Guttierez, S. Primi, F. Taucer, P. Caperan, D. Tirelli, J. Mieres, I. Calvo, J. Rodriguez, F. Vallano, G. Galiotis, and D. Mouzakis, “A wind turbine tower design based on fibre-reinforced composites”, Technical report, Joint Research Centre - Ispra, European Laboratory for Structural Assessment (ELSA), Institute For Protection and Security of the Citizen (IPSC), European Commission, 2003.
12.
C. Kong, J. Bang, and Y. Sugiyama, “Structural investigation of composite wind turbine blade considering various load cases and fatigue life”, Energy, 30 (2005) 2101–2114.CrossRef
13.
M.O.L. Hansen, J.N. Sørensen, S. Voutsinas, N. Sørensen, and H.A. Madsen, “State of the art in wind turbine aerodynamics and aeroelasticity”, Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 42 (2006) 285–330.CrossRef
14.
F.M. Jensen, B.G. Falzon, J. Ankersen, and H. Stang, “Structural testing and numerical simulation of a 34 m composite wind turbine blade”, Composite Structures, 76 (2006) 52–61.CrossRef
15.
J. Kiendl, Y. Bazilevs, M.-C. Hsu, R. Wüchner, and K.-U. Bletzinger, “The bending strip method for isogeometric analysis of Kirchhoff–Love shell structures comprised of multiple patches”, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 199 (2010) 2403–2416.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
16.
Y. Bazilevs, M.-C. Hsu, J. Kiendl, and D.J. Benson, “A computational procedure for pre-bending of wind turbine blades”, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 89 (2012) 323–336.MATHCrossRef
17.
Y. Bazilevs, M.-C. Hsu, J. Kiendl, R. Wüchner, and K.-U. Bletzinger, “3D simulation of wind turbine rotors at full scale. Part II: Fluid–structure interaction modeling with composite blades”, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 65 (2011) 236–253.MATHCrossRef
18.
S. Schreck, J. Lundquist, and W.Shaw, “U.s. department of energy workshop report: Research needs for wind resource characterization”, Technical Report NREL/TP-500-43521, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, 2008.
19.
R. Barthelmie1, S. Frandsen, O. Rathmann, K. Hansen, E. Politis, J. Prospathopoulos, J. Schepers, K. Rados, D. Cabezn, W. Schlez, A. Neubert, and M. Heath, “Flow and wakes in large wind farms: Final report for upwind wp8”, Technical Report Report number Ris-R-1765(EN), Danmarks Tekniske Universitet, Ris Nationallaboratoriet for Bredygtig Energ, 2011.
20.
21.
T.J.R. Hughes, J.A. Cottrell, and Y. Bazilevs, “Isogeometric analysis: CAD, finite elements, NURBS, exact geometry, and mesh refinement”, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 194 (2005) 4135–4195.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
22.
J.A. Cottrell, A. Reali, Y. Bazilevs, and T.J.R. Hughes, “Isogeometric analysis of structural vibrations”, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 195 (2006) 5257–5297.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
23.
Y. Bazilevs, L.B. da Veiga, J.A. Cottrell, T.J.R. Hughes, and G. Sangalli, “Isogeometric analysis: Approximation, stability and error estimates for h-refined meshes”, Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences, 16 (2006) 1031–1090.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
24.
J.A. Cottrell, T.J.R. Hughes, and A. Reali, “Studies of refinement and continuity in isogeometric structural analysis”, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 196 (2007) 4160–4183.MATHCrossRef
25.
W.A. Wall, M.A. Frenzel, and C. Cyron, “Isogeometric structural shape optimization”, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 197 (2008) 2976–2988.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
26.
J.A. Cottrell, T.J.R. Hughes, and Y. Bazilevs, Isogeometric Analysis: Toward Integration of CAD and FEA. Wiley, Chichester, 2009.MATHCrossRef
27.
J.A. Evans, Y. Bazilevs, I. Babus̆ka, and T.J.R. Hughes, “n-Widths, sup-infs, and optimality ratios for the k-version of the isogeometric finite element method”, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 198 (2009) 1726–1741.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
28.
M.R. D\(\ddot {\text{o}}\)rfel, B. J\(\ddot {\text{u}}\)ttler, and B. Simeon, “Adaptive isogeometric analysis by local h-refinement with T-splines”, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 199 (2010) 264–275.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
29.
Y. Bazilevs, V.M. Calo, J.A. Cottrell, J.A. Evans, T.J.R. Hughes, S. Lipton, M.A. Scott, and T.W. Sederberg, “Isogeometric analysis using T-splines”, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 199 (2010) 229–263.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
30.
F. Auricchio, L. Beir\(\tilde {\text{a}}\)o da Veiga, C. Lovadina, and A. Reali, “The importance of the exact satisfaction of the incompressibility constraint in nonlinear elasticity: Mixed FEMs versus NURBS-based approximations”, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 199 (2010) 314–323.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
31.
W. Wang and Y. Zhang, “Wavelets-based NURBS simplification and fairing”, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 199 (2010) 290–300.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
32.
E. Cohen, T. Martin, R.M. Kirby, T. Lyche, and R.F. Riesenfeld, “Analysis-aware modeling: Understanding quality considerations in modeling for isogeometric analysis”, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 199 (2010) 334–356.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
33.
V. Srinivasan, S. Radhakrishnan, and G. Subbarayan, “Coordinated synthesis of hierarchical engineering systems”, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 199 (2010) 392–404.MATHCrossRef
34.
Y. Bazilevs, V.M. Calo, J.A. Cottrell, T.J.R. Hughes, A. Reali, and G. Scovazzi, “Variational multiscale residual-based turbulence modeling for large eddy simulation of incompressible flows”, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 197 (2007) 173–201.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
35.
Y. Bazilevs, C. Michler, V.M. Calo, and T.J.R. Hughes, “Weak Dirichlet boundary conditions for wall-bounded turbulent flows”, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 196 (2007) 4853–4862.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
36.
Y. Bazilevs, C. Michler, V.M. Calo, and T.J.R. Hughes, “Isogeometric variational multiscale modeling of wall-bounded turbulent flows with weakly enforced boundary conditions on unstretched meshes”, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 199 (2010) 780–790.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
37.
I. Akkerman, Y. Bazilevs, V.M. Calo, T.J.R. Hughes, and S. Hulshoff, “The role of continuity in residual-based variational multiscale modeling of turbulence”, Computational Mechanics, 41 (2008) 371–378.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
38.
39.
Y. Bazilevs and I. Akkerman, “Large eddy simulation of turbulent Taylor–Couette flow using isogeometric analysis and the residual–based variational multiscale method”, Journal of Computational Physics, 229 (2010) 3402–3414.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
40.
T. Elguedj, Y. Bazilevs, V.M. Calo, and T.J.R. Hughes, “B-bar and F-bar projection methods for nearly incompressible linear and nonlinear elasticity and plasticity using higher-order nurbs elements”, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 197 (2008) 2732–2762.MATHCrossRef
41.
S. Lipton, J.A. Evans, Y. Bazilevs, T. Elguedj, and T.J.R. Hughes, “Robustness of isogeometric structural discretizations under severe mesh distortion”, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 199 (2010) 357–373.MATHCrossRef
42.
D.J. Benson, Y. Bazilevs, E. De Luycker, M.-C. Hsu, M. Scott, T.J.R. Hughes, and T. Belytschko, “A generalized finite element formulation for arbitrary basis functions: from isogeometric analysis to XFEM”, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 83 (2010) 765–785.MathSciNetMATH
43.
D.J. Benson, Y. Bazilevs, M.-C. Hsu, and T.J.R. Hughes, “Isogeometric shell analysis: The Reissner–Mindlin shell”, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 199 (2010) 276–289.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
44.
J. Kiendl, K.-U. Bletzinger, J. Linhard, and R. Wüchner, “Isogeometric shell analysis with Kirchhoff–Love elements”, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 198 (2009) 3902–3914.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
45.
Y. Zhang, Y. Bazilevs, S. Goswami, C. Bajaj, and T.J.R. Hughes, “Patient-specific vascular nurbs modeling for isogeometric analysis of blood flow”, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 196 (2007) 2943–2959.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
46.
Y. Bazilevs, V.M. Calo, Y. Zhang, and T.J.R. Hughes, “Isogeometric fluid–structure interaction analysis with applications to arterial blood flow”, Computational Mechanics, 38 (2006) 310–322.MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
47.
Y. Bazilevs, V.M. Calo, T.J.R. Hughes, and Y. Zhang, “Isogeometric fluid–structure interaction: theory, algorithms, and computations”, Computational Mechanics, 43 (2008) 3–37.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
48.
J.G. Isaksen, Y. Bazilevs, T. Kvamsdal, Y. Zhang, J.H. Kaspersen, K. Waterloo, B. Romner, and T. Ingebrigtsen, “Determination of wall tension in cerebral artery aneurysms by numerical simulation”, Stroke, 39 (2008) 3172–3178.CrossRef
49.
Y. Bazilevs and T.J.R. Hughes, “NURBS-based isogeometric analysis for the computation of flows about rotating components”, Computational Mechanics, 43 (2008) 143–150.MATHCrossRef
50.
F. Cirak, M. Ortiz, and P. Schr\(\ddot {\text{o}}\)der, “Subdivision surfaces: a new paradigm for thin shell analysis”, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 47 (2000) 2039–2072.
51.
F. Cirak and M. Ortiz, “Fully C1-conforming subdivision elements for finite deformation thin shell analysis”, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 51 (2001) 813–833.MATHCrossRef
52.
F. Cirak, M.J. Scott, E.K. Antonsson, M. Ortiz, and P. Schr\(\ddot {\text{o}}\)der, “Integrated modeling, finite-element analysis, and engineering design for thin-shell structures using subdivision”, Computer-Aided Design, 34 (2002) 137–148.CrossRef
53.
T.J.R. Hughes, W.K. Liu, and T.K. Zimmermann, “Lagrangian–Eulerian finite element formulation for incompressible viscous flows”, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 29 (1981) 329–349.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
54.
T.J.R. Hughes, “Multiscale phenomena: Green’s functions, the Dirichlet-to-Neumann formulation, subgrid scale models, bubbles, and the origins of stabilized methods”, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 127 (1995) 387–401.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
55.
T.J.R. Hughes, A.A. Oberai, and L. Mazzei, “Large eddy simulation of turbulent channel flows by the variational multiscale method”, Physics of Fluids, 13 (2001) 1784–1799.MATHCrossRef
56.
Y. Bazilevs and T.J.R. Hughes, “Weak imposition of Dirichlet boundary conditions in fluid mechanics”, Computers and Fluids, 36 (2007) 12–26.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
57.
J. Nitsche, “Uber ein variationsprinzip zur losung von Dirichlet-problemen bei verwendung von teilraumen, die keinen randbedingungen unterworfen sind”, Abh. Math. Univ. Hamburg, 36 (1971) 9–15.MATHCrossRef
58.
D.N. Arnold, F. Brezzi, B. Cockburn, and L.D. Marini, “Unified analysis of Discontinuous Galerkin methods for elliptic problems”, SIAM Journal of Numerical Analysis, 39 (2002) 1749–1779.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
59.
Y. Bazilevs, A. Korobenko, J. Yan, A. Pal, S. Gohari, and S. Sarkar, “ALE–VMS formulation for stratified turbulent incompressible flows with applications”, Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences, 25 (12) (2015) 2349–2375.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
60.
J. Yan, A. Korobenko, A. Tejada-Martinez, R. Golshan, and Y. Bazilevs, “A new variational multiscale formulation for stratified incompressible turbulent flows”, Computers & Fluids, 158 (2017) 150–156.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
61.
A. Korobenko, J. Yan, S. Gohari, S. Sarkar, and Y. Bazilevs, “FSI simulation of two back-to-back wind turbines in atmospheric boundary layer flow”, Computers & Fluids, 158 (2017) 167–175.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
62.
M.-C. Hsu, I. Akkerman, and Y. Bazilevs, “High-performance computing of wind turbine aerodynamics using isogeometric analysis”, Computers and Fluids, 49 (2011) 93–100.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
63.
Y. Bazilevs, M.-C. Hsu, and M.A. Scott, “Isogeometric fluid–structure interaction analysis with emphasis on non-matching discretizations, and with application to wind turbines”, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 249–252 (2012) 28–41.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
64.
M.-C. Hsu, I. Akkerman, and Y. Bazilevs, “Finite element simulation of wind turbine aerodynamics: Validation study using NREL Phase VI experiment”, Wind Energy, 17 (2014) 461–481.CrossRef
65.
A. Korobenko, M.-C. Hsu, I. Akkerman, J. Tippmann, and Y. Bazilevs, “Structural mechanics modeling and FSI simulation of wind turbines”, Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences, 23 (2013) 249–272.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
66.
67.
68.
69.
70.
J. Yan, A. Korobenko, X. Deng, and Y. Bazilevs, “Computational free-surface fluid–structure interaction with application to floating offshore wind turbines”, Computers and Fluids, 141 (2016) 155–174,MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
71.
72.
Y. Bazilevs, A. Korobenko, X. Deng, and J. Yan, “FSI modeling for fatigue-damage prediction in full-scale wind-turbine blades”, Journal of Applied Mechanics, 83 (6) (2016) 061010.CrossRef
73.
Y. Bazilevs, J.R. Gohean, T.J.R. Hughes, R.D. Moser, and Y. Zhang, “Patient-specific isogeometric fluid–structure interaction analysis of thoracic aortic blood flow due to implantation of the Jarvik 2000 left ventricular assist device”, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 198 (2009) 3534–3550.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
74.
Y. Bazilevs, M.-C. Hsu, D. Benson, S. Sankaran, and A. Marsden, “Computational fluid–structure interaction: Methods and application to a total cavopulmonary connection”, Computational Mechanics, 45 (2009) 77–89.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
75.
Y. Bazilevs, M.-C. Hsu, Y. Zhang, W. Wang, X. Liang, T. Kvamsdal, R. Brekken, and J. Isaksen, “A fully-coupled fluid–structure interaction simulation of cerebral aneurysms”, Computational Mechanics, 46 (2010) 3–16.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
76.
Y. Bazilevs, M.-C. Hsu, Y. Zhang, W. Wang, T. Kvamsdal, S. Hentschel, and J. Isaksen, “Computational fluid–structure interaction: Methods and application to cerebral aneurysms”, Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology, 9 (2010) 481–498.CrossRef
77.
M.-C. Hsu and Y. Bazilevs, “Blood vessel tissue prestress modeling for vascular fluid–structure interaction simulations”, Finite Elements in Analysis and Design, 47 (2011) 593–599.MathSciNetCrossRef
78.
79.
80.
81.
82.
M.-C. Hsu, D. Kamensky, F. Xu, J. Kiendl, C. Wang, M.C.H. Wu, J. Mineroff, A. Reali, Y. Bazilevs, and M.S. Sacks, “Dynamic and fluid–structure interaction simulations of bioprosthetic heart valves using parametric design with T-splines and Fung-type material models”, Computational Mechanics, 55 (2015) 1211–1225, https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s00466-015-1166-x.MATHCrossRef
83.
D. Kamensky, M.-C. Hsu, D. Schillinger, J.A. Evans, A. Aggarwal, Y. Bazilevs, M.S. Sacks, and T.J.R. Hughes, “An immersogeometric variational framework for fluid-structure interaction: Application to bioprosthetic heart valves”, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 284 (2015) 1005–1053.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
84.
I. Akkerman, Y. Bazilevs, D.J. Benson, M.W. Farthing, and C.E. Kees, “Free-surface flow and fluid–object interaction modeling with emphasis on ship hydrodynamics”, Journal of Applied Mechanics, 79 (2012) 010905.CrossRef
85.
I. Akkerman, J. Dunaway, J. Kvandal, J. Spinks, and Y. Bazilevs, “Toward free-surface modeling of planing vessels: simulation of the Fridsma hull using ALE-VMS”, Computational Mechanics, 50 (2012) 719–727.CrossRef
86.
87.
M.C.H. Wu, D. Kamensky, C. Wang, A.J. Herrema, F. Xu, M.S. Pigazzini, A. Verma, A.L. Marsden, Y. Bazilevs, and M.-C. Hsu, “Optimizing fluid–structure interaction systems with immersogeometric analysis and surrogate modeling: Application to a hydraulic arresting gear”, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, (2017), Published online. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​cma.​2016.​09.​032.MathSciNetCrossRef
88.
89.
90.
91.
92.
93.
94.
95.
96.
97.
98.
99.
100.
101.
102.
103.
A.N. Brooks and T.J.R. Hughes, “Streamline upwind/Petrov-Galerkin formulations for convection dominated flows with particular emphasis on the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations”, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 32 (1982) 199–259.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
104.
105.
Y. Bazilevs, K. Takizawa, and T.E. Tezduyar, Computational Fluid–Structure Interaction: Methods and Applications. Wiley, February 2013, ISBN:​ 978-0470978771.MATHCrossRef
106.
107.
108.
109.
110.
111.
112.
113.
114.
115.
116.
117.
118.
119.
120.
121.
122.
123.
124.
125.
126.
127.
128.
129.
K. Takizawa, T.E. Tezduyar, H. Uchikawa, T. Terahara, T. Sasaki, K. Shiozaki, A. Yoshida, K. Komiya, and G. Inoue, “Aorta flow analysis and heart valve flow and structure analysis”, to appear in a special volume to be published by Springer, 2018.
130.
131.
K. Takizawa, T.E. Tezduyar, T. Terahara, and T. Sasaki, “Heart valve flow computation with the Space–Time Slip Interface Topology Change (ST-SI-TC) method and Isogeometric Analysis (IGA)”, in P. Wriggers and T. Lenarz, editors, Biomedical Technology: Modeling, Experiments and Simulation, Lecture Notes in Applied and Computational Mechanics, 77–99, Springer, 2018, ISBN:​ 978-3-319-59547-4.
132.
133.
134.
135.
136.
137.
138.
Y. Otoguro, K. Takizawa, and T.E. Tezduyar, “A general-purpose NURBS mesh generation method for complex geometries”, to appear in a special volume to be published by Springer, 2018.
139.
140.
T. Kuraishi, K. Takizawa, and T.E. Tezduyar, “Space–time computational analysis of tire aerodynamics with actual geometry, road contact and tire deformation”, to appear in a special volume to be published by Springer, 2018.
141.
142.
143.
M.-C. Hsu and Y. Bazilevs, “Fluid–structure interaction modeling of wind turbines: simulating the full machine”, Computational Mechanics, 50 (2012) 821–833.MATHCrossRef
144.
145.
146.
147.
C. Johnson, Numerical solution of partial differential equations by the finite element method. Cambridge University Press, Sweden, 1987.MATH
148.
S.C. Brenner and L.R. Scott, The Mathematical Theory of Finite Element Methods, 2nd ed. Springer, 2002.
149.
150.
151.
152.
T.J.R. Hughes, L.P. Franca, and M. Balestra, “A new finite element formulation for computational fluid dynamics: V. Circumventing the Babuška–Brezzi condition: A stable Petrov–Galerkin formulation of the Stokes problem accommodating equal-order interpolations”, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 59 (1986) 85–99.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
153.
154.
T.J.R. Hughes, G.R. Feijóo, L. Mazzei, and J.-B. Quincy, “The variational multiscale method–A paradigm for computational mechanics”, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 166 (1998) 3–24.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
155.
T.J.R. Hughes and G. Sangalli, “Variational multiscale analysis: the fine-scale Green’s function, projection, optimization, localization, and stabilized methods”, SIAM Journal of Numerical Analysis, 45 (2007) 539–557.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
156.
F. Shakib, T.J.R. Hughes, and Z. Johan, “A multi-element group preconditionined GMRES algorithm for nonsymmetric systems arising in finite element analysis”, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 75 (1989) 415–456.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
157.
T.J.R. Hughes and M. Mallet, “A new finite element formulation for computational fluid dynamics: III. The generalized streamline operator for multidimensional advective-diffusive systems”, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 58 (1986) 305–328.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
158.
159.
B.E. Launder and D.B. Spalding, “The numerical computation of turbulent flows”, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 3 (1974) 269–289.MATHCrossRef
160.
D.C. Wilcox, Turbulence Modeling for CFD. DCW Industries, La Canada, CA, 1998.
161.
R. Golshan, A. Tejada-Martínez, M. Juha, and Y. Bazilevs, “Large-eddy simulation with near-wall modeling using weakly enforced no-slip boundary conditions”, Computers & Fluids, 118 (2015) 172–181.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
162.
163.
164.
165.
166.
167.
168.
169.
170.
171.
172.
173.
174.
175.
A. Corsini, C. Menichini, F. Rispoli, A. Santoriello, and T.E. Tezduyar, “A multiscale finite element formulation with discontinuity capturing for turbulence models with dominant reactionlike terms”, Journal of Applied Mechanics, 76 (2009) 021211, https://​doi.​org/​10.​1115/​1.​3062967.CrossRef
176.
177.
178.
179.
180.
181.
182.
183.
184.
K. Takizawa, T.E. Tezduyar, and Y. Otoguro, “Stabilization and discontinuity-capturing parameters for space–time flow computations with finite element and isogeometric discretizations”, Computational Mechanics, published online, https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s00466-018-1557-x, April 2018.
185.
M.-C. Hsu, I. Akkerman, and Y. Bazilevs, “Wind turbine aerodynamics using ALE-VMS: Validation and role of weakly enforced boundary conditions”, Computational Mechanics, 50 (2012) 499–511.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
186.
Y. Otoguro, K. Takizawa, T.E. Tezduyar, K. Nagaoka, and S. Mei, “Turbocharger turbine and exhaust manifold flow computation with the Space–Time Variational Multiscale Method and Isogeometric Analysis”, Computers & Fluids, submitted, 2018.
187.
S.B. Raknes, X. Deng, Y. Bazilevs, D.J. Benson, K.M. Mathisen, and T. Kvamsdal, “Isogeometric rotation-free bending-stabilized cables: Statics, dynamics, bending strips and coupling with shells”, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 263 (2013) 127–143.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
188.
L. Piegl and W. Tiller, The NURBS Book (Monographs in Visual Communication), 2nd ed. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1997.MATHCrossRef
189.
T. Belytschko, W.K. Liu, and B. Moran, Nonlinear Finite Elements for Continua and Structures. Wiley, 2000.MATH
190.
M. Bischoff, W.A. Wall, K.-U. Bletzinger, and E. Ramm, “Models and finite elements for thin-walled structures”, in E. Stein, R. de Borst, and T.J.R. Hughes, editors, Encyclopedia of Computational Mechanics, Vol. 2, Solids, Structures and Coupled Problems, Chapter 3, Wiley, 2004.
191.
J.N. Reddy, Mechanics of Laminated Composite Plates and Shells: Theory and Analysis, 2nd ed. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2004.CrossRef
192.
Y. Guo and M. Ruess, “Nitsche’s method for a coupling of isogeometric thin shells and blended shell structures”, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 284 (2015) 881–905.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
193.
J. Chung and G.M. Hulbert, “A time integration algorithm for structural dynamics with improved numerical dissipation: The generalized-α method”, Journal of Applied Mechanics, 60 (1993) 371–75.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
194.
H. Melbø and T. Kvamsdal, “Goal oriented error estimators for Stokes equations based on variationally consistent postprocessing”, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 192 (2003) 613–633.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
195.
E.H. van Brummelen, V.V. Garg, S. Prudhomme, and K.G. van der Zee, “Flux evaluation in primal and dual boundary-coupled problems”, Journal of Applied Mechanics, 79 (2011) 010904.CrossRef
196.
T.E. Tezduyar, M. Behr, S. Mittal, and A.A. Johnson, “Computation of unsteady incompressible flows with the finite element methods: Space–time formulations, iterative strategies and massively parallel implementations”, in New Methods in Transient Analysis, PVP-Vol.246/AMD-Vol.143, ASME, New York, (1992) 7–24.
197.
198.
199.
200.
T. Tezduyar, “Finite element interface-tracking and interface-capturing techniques for flows with moving boundaries and interfaces”, in Proceedings of the ASME Symposium on Fluid-Physics and Heat Transfer for Macro- and Micro-Scale Gas-Liquid and Phase-Change Flows (CD-ROM), ASME Paper IMECE2001/HTD-24206, ASME, New York, New York, (2001).
201.
202.
203.
T.E. Tezduyar, S. Sathe, M. Senga, L. Aureli, K. Stein, and B. Griffin, “Finite element modeling of fluid–structure interactions with space–time and advanced mesh update techniques”, in Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Numerical Methods in Continuum Mechanics (CD-ROM), Zilina, Slovakia, (2005).
204.
T.J.R. Hughes and J. Winget, “Finite rotation effects in numerical integration of rate constitutive equations arising in large-deformation analysis”, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 15 (1980) 1862–1867.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
205.
O. Rodrigues, “Des lois geometriques qui regissent les deplacements dun systeme solide dans lespace, et de la variation des coordonnees provenant de ces deplacements consideres independamment des causes qui peuvent les produire”, Journal de Mathematiques, 5 (1840) 380–440.
206.
B. Gayen, S. Sarkar, and J.R. Taylor, “Large eddy simulation of a stratified boundary layer under an oscillatory current”, Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 643 (2010) 233–266.MATHCrossRef
207.
B. Gayen and S. Sarkar, “Direct and large-eddy simulations of internal tide generation at a near-critical slope.”, Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 681 (2011) 48–79.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
208.
R. Beare, M. Macvean, A. Holtslag, J. Cuxart, I. Esau, J.-C. Golaz, M. Jimenez, M. Khairoutdinov, B. Kosovic, D. Lewellen, T. Lund, J. Lundquist, A. Mccabe, A. Moene, Y. Noh, S. Raasch, and P. Sullivan, “An intercomparison of large-eddy simulations of the stable boundary layer”, Boundary-Layer Meteor., 118 (2006) 247–272.CrossRef
209.
D.T. Griffith and T.D. Ashwill, “The sandia 100-meter all-glass baseline wind turbine blade: Snl100-00”, SANDIA REPORT, SAND2011-3779, (2011).
210.
J. Jonkman, S. Butterfield, W. Musial, and G. Scott, “Definition of a 5-MW reference wind turbine for offshore system development”, Technical Report NREL/TP-500-38060, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, 2009.
211.
R. Bravo, S. Tullis, and S. Ziada, “Performance testing of a small vertical-axis wind turbine”, Proceedings of the 21st Canadian Congress of Applied Mechanics, (2007) 470–471.
212.
213.
J.O. Dabiri, “Potential order-of-magnitude enhancement of wind farm power density via counter-rotating vertical-axis wind turbine arrays”, Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy, 3 (2011) 043104.CrossRef
214.
215.
Y. Bazilevs, M.-C. Hsu, J. Kiendl, and D.J. Benson, “A computational procedure for prebending of wind turbine blades”, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 89 (2012) 323–336.MATHCrossRef
216.
217.
N. Hill, R. Dominy, G. Ingram, and J. Dominy, “Darrieus turbines: the physics of self-starting”, Proc. IMechE Part A: J. Power and Energy, 223(1) (2009) 21–29.CrossRef
218.
J.R. Baker, “Features to aid or enable self starting of pitched low solidity vertical axis wind turbines”, J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 15 (1983) 369–380.CrossRef
219.
Y. Osawa and T. Tezduyar, “A multi-domain method for 3D computation of wake flow behind a circular cylinder”, Computational Fluid Dynamics Journal, 8 (1999) 296–308.
220.
221.
222.
223.
M. Jalali, N. Rapaka, and S. Sarkar, “Tidal flow over topography: effect of excursion number on wave energetics and turbulence”, Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 750 (2014) 259–283.CrossRef
224.
S. Gohari and S. Sarkar, “Tidal flow over topography: effect of excursion number on wave energetics and turbulence”, Boundary-Layer Meteorology, (2016), Accepted for publication.
225.
Y. Bazilevs, A. Korobenko, X. Deng, and J. Yan, “Fluid–structure interaction modeling for fatigue-damage prediction in full-scale wind-turbine blades”, Journal of Applied Mechanics, 83 (6) (2016) 061010.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Recent Advances in ALE-VMS and ST-VMS Computational Aerodynamic and FSI Analysis of Wind Turbines
Authors
Artem Korobenko
Yuri Bazilevs
Kenji Takizawa
Tayfun E. Tezduyar
Copyright Year
2018
Book
Frontiers in Computational Fluid-Structure Interaction and Flow Simulation

Print ISBN: 978-3-319-96468-3

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-96469-0

Copyright Year: 2018

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96469-0_7

Premium Partners

    Image Credits