Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Computational Mechanics
Erschienen in: Computational Mechanics 6/2015

01.06.2015 | Original Paper

Experimental and numerical FSI study of compliant hydrofoils

verfasst von: B. Augier, J. Yan, A. Korobenko, J. Czarnowski, G. Ketterman, Y. Bazilevs

Erschienen in: Computational Mechanics | Ausgabe 6/2015

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

A propulsion system based on tandem hydrofoils is studied experimentally and numerically. An experimental measurement system is developed to extract hydrodynamic loads on the foils and capture their twisting deformation during operation. The measured data allowed us to assess the efficiency of the propulsion system as a function of travel speed and stroke frequency. The numerical simulation of the propulsion system is also presented and involves 3D, full-scale fluid–structure interaction (FSI) computation of a single (forward) foil. The foil is modeled as a combination of the isogeometric rotation-free Kirchhoff–Love shell and bending-stabilized cable, while the hydrodynamics makes use of the finite-element-based arbitrary Lagrangian–Eulerian variational multiscale formulation. The large added mass is handled through a quasi-direct FSI coupling technique. The measurement data collected is used in the validation of the FSI simulation, and excellent agreement is achieved between the predicted and measured hydrodynamic loads and foil twisting motion.
Vorheriger Artikel Vibration of structures containing compressible liquids with surface tension and sloshing effects. Reduced-order model
Nächster Artikel A unified monolithic approach for multi-fluid flows and fluid–structure interaction using the Particle Finite Element Method with fixed mesh

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Literatur
1.
Augier B, Bot P, Hauville F, Durand M (2012) Experimental validation of unsteady models for fluid structure interaction: application to yacht sails and rigs. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 101:53–66CrossRef
2.
Augier B, Bot P, Hauville F, Durand M (2013) Dynamic behavior of a flexible yacht sail plan. Ocean Eng 66:32–43CrossRef
3.
Bazilevs Y, Calo VM, Hughes TJR, Zhang Y (2008) Isogeometric fluid–structure interaction: theory, algorithms, and computations. Comput Mech 43:3–37MATHMathSciNetCrossRef
4.
Bazilevs Y, Hsu M-C, Akkerman I, Wright S, Takizawa K, Henicke B, Spielman T, Tezduyar TE (2011) 3D simulation of wind turbine rotors at full scale. Part I: geometry modeling and aerodynamics. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 65:207–235MATHCrossRef
5.
Bazilevs Y, Hsu M-C, Benson D, Sankaran S, Marsden A (2009) Computational fluid–structure interaction: methods and application to a total cavopulmonary connection. Comput Mech 45:77–89MATHMathSciNetCrossRef
6.
Bazilevs Y, Hsu M-C, Kiendl J, Wüchner R, Bletzinger K-U (2011) 3D simulation of wind turbine rotors at full scale. Part II: fluid–structure interaction modeling with composite blades. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 65:236–253MATHCrossRef
7.
Bazilevs Y, Hsu M-C, Scott MA (2012) Isogeometric fluid–structure interaction analysis with emphasis on non-matching discretizations, and with application to wind turbines. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 249–252:28–41MathSciNetCrossRef
8.
Bazilevs Y, Hsu M-C, Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE (2012) ALE–VMS and ST-VMS methods for computer modeling of wind-turbine rotor aerodynamics and fluid–structure interaction. Math Models Methods Appl Sci 22(supp02):1230002CrossRef
9.
Bazilevs Y, Hsu M-C, Zhang Y, Wang W, Kvamsdal T, Hentschel S, Isaksen J (2010) Computational fluid–structure interaction: methods and application to cerebral aneurysms. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 9:481–498CrossRef
10.
Bazilevs Y, Hsu M-C, Zhang Y, Wang W, Liang X, Kvamsdal T, Brekken R, Isaksen J (2010) A fully-coupled fluid–structure interaction simulation of cerebral aneurysms. Comput Mech 46:3–16MATHMathSciNetCrossRef
11.
12.
Bazilevs Y, Hughes TJR (2008) NURBS-based isogeometric analysis for the computation of flows about rotating components. Comput Mech 43:143–150MATHMathSciNetCrossRef
13.
Bazilevs Y, Korobenko A, Deng X, Yan J, Kinzel M, Dabiri JO (2014) Fluid–structure interaction modeling of vertical-axis wind turbines. J Appl Mech 81(8):081006CrossRef
14.
Bazilevs Y, Michler C, Calo VM, Hughes TJR (2007) Weak Dirichlet boundary conditions for wall-bounded turbulent flows. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 196:4853–4862MATHMathSciNetCrossRef
15.
Bazilevs Y, Michler C, Calo VM, Hughes TJR (2010) Isogeometric variational multiscale modeling of wall-bounded turbulent flows with weakly enforced boundary conditions on unstretched meshes. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 199:780–790MATHMathSciNetCrossRef
16.
Bazilevs Y, Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE (2013) Challenges and directions in computational fluid–structure interaction. Math Models Methods Appl Sci 23:215–221MATHMathSciNetCrossRef
17.
Bazilevs Y, Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE (2013) Computational fluid–structure interaction: methods and applications. Wiley, New YorkCrossRef
18.
Belytschko T, Liu WK, Moran B (2000) Nonlinear finite elements for continua and structures. Wiley, ChichesterMATH
19.
Chung J, Hulbert GM (1993) A time integration algorithm for structural dynamics withimproved numerical dissipation: the generalized-\(\alpha \) method. J Appl Mech 60:371–375MATHMathSciNetCrossRef
20.
Combes SA, Daniel TL (2001) Shape, flapping and flexion: wing and fin design for forward flight. J Exp Biol 204(12):2073–2085
21.
Cottrell JA, Hughes TJR, Bazilevs Y (2009) Isogeometric analysis: toward integration of CAD and FEA. Wiley, ChichesterCrossRef
22.
Dabiri JO (2011) Potential order-of-magnitude enhancement of wind farm power density via counter-rotating vertical-axis wind turbine arrays. J Renew Sustain Energy 3:043104CrossRef
23.
Fish FE (1999) Performance constraints on the maneuverability of flexible and rigid biological systems. In: International symposium on unmanned unthethered submersible technology, University of New Hampshire-Marine Systems, 1999, pp 394–406
24.
Hsu M-C, Akkerman I, Bazilevs Y (2011) High-performance computing of wind turbine aerodynamics using isogeometric analysis. Comput Fluids 49:93–100MATHMathSciNetCrossRef
25.
26.
Hsu M-C, Akkerman I, Bazilevs Y (2014) Finite element simulation of wind turbine aerodynamics: validation study using NREL Phase VI experiment. Wind Energy 17:461–481CrossRef
27.
Hsu M-C, Bazilevs Y (2011) Blood vessel tissue prestress modeling for vascular fluid–structure interaction simulations. Finite Elem Anal Des 47:593–599MathSciNetCrossRef
28.
Hsu M-C, Bazilevs Y (2012) Fluid–structure interaction modeling of wind turbines: simulating the full machine. Comput Mech 50:821–833MATHMathSciNetCrossRef
29.
Hughes TJR, Cottrell JA, Bazilevs Y (2005) Isogeometric analysis: CAD, finite elements, NURBS, exact geometry, and mesh refinement. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 194:4135–4195MATHMathSciNetCrossRef
30.
Hughes TJR, Liu WK, Zimmermann TK (1981) Lagrangian–Eulerian finite element formulation for incompressible viscous flows. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 29:329–349MATHMathSciNetCrossRef
31.
Jansen KE, Whiting CH, Hulbert GM (2000) A generalized-\(\alpha \) method for integrating the filtered Navier–Stokes equations with a stabilized finite element method. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 190:305–319MATHMathSciNetCrossRef
32.
Johnson AA, Tezduyar TE (1994) Mesh update strategies in parallel finite element computations of flow problems with moving boundaries and interfaces. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 119:73–94MATHCrossRef
33.
Karypis G, Kumar V (1999) A fast and high quality multilevel scheme for partitioning irregular graphs. SIAM J Sci Comput 20:359–392MATHMathSciNetCrossRef
34.
Kiendl J, Bazilevs Y, Hsu M-C, Wüchner R, Bletzinger K-U (2010) The bending strip method for isogeometric analysis of Kirchhoff–Love shell structures comprised of multiple patches. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 199:2403–2416MATHCrossRef
35.
Kiendl J, Bletzinger K-U, Linhard J, Wüchner R (2009) Isogeometric shell analysis with Kirchhoff–Love elements. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 198:3902–3914MATHCrossRef
36.
Koochesfahani MM (1989) Vortical patterns in the wake of an oscillating airfoil. AIAA J 27(9):1200–1205CrossRef
37.
Korobenko A, Hsu M-C, Akkerman I, Bazilevs Y (2013) Aerodynamic simulation of vertical-axis wind turbines. J Appl Mech 81(2):021011MathSciNetCrossRef
38.
Korobenko A, Hsu MC, Akkerman I, Tippmann J, Bazilevs Y (2013) Structural mechanics modeling and fsi simulation of wind turbines. Math Models Methods Appl Sci 23:249–272MATHMathSciNetCrossRef
39.
Lai SJC, Platzer MF (1999) Jet characteristics of a plunging airfoil. AIAA J 37(12):1529–1537CrossRef
40.
Leroyer A, Visonneau M (2005) Numerical methods for RANSE simulations of a self-propelled fish-like body. J Fluids Struct 20(7):975–991CrossRef
41.
Long CC, Esmaily-Moghadam M, Marsden AL, Bazilevs Y (2014) Computation of residence time in the simulation of pulsatile ventricular assist devices. Comput Mech 54:911–919MATHMathSciNetCrossRef
42.
Long CC, Hsu M-C, Bazilevs Y, Feinstein JA, Marsden AL (2012) Fluid–structure interaction simulations of the Fontan procedure using variable wall properties. Int J Numer Methods Biomed Eng 28:512–527MathSciNetCrossRef
43.
Long CC, Marsden AL, Bazilevs Y (2013) Fluid–structure interaction simulation of pulsatile ventricular assist devices. Comput Mech 52:971–981MATHCrossRef
44.
Long CC, Marsden AL, Bazilevs Y (2014) Shape optimization of pulsatile ventricular assist devices using FSI to minimize thrombotic risk. Comput Mech 54:921–932MATHMathSciNetCrossRef
45.
Mountcastle AM, Daniel TL (2009) Aerodynamic and functional consequences of wing compliance. Exp Fluid 46(5):873–882CrossRef
46.
Peters T (2010) Hobie kayak mirage drive tow tank testing. Report: Departement of Naval Architecture & Marine Engineering, University of Michigan 1:1–7
47.
Raknes SB, Deng X, Bazilevs Y, Benson DJ, Mathisen KM, Kvamsdal T (2013) Isogeometric rotation-free bending-stabilized cables: statics, dynamics, bending strips and coupling with shells. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 263:127–143MATHMathSciNetCrossRef
48.
Read DA, Hover FS, Triantafyllou MS (2003) Forces on oscillating foils for propulsion and maneuvering. J Fluids Struct 17(1):163–183CrossRef
49.
Schouveiler L, Hover FS, Triantafyllou MS (2005) Performance of flapping foil propulsion. J Fluids Struct 20(7):949–959CrossRef
50.
Shyy W, Aono H, Chimakurthi SK, Trizila P, Kang CK, Cesnik CES, Liu H (2010) Recent progress in flapping wing aerodynamics and aeroelasticity. Prog Aerosp Sci 46(7):284–327CrossRef
51.
Stein K, Tezduyar T, Benney R (2003) Mesh moving techniques for fluid–structure interactions with large displacements. J Appl Mech 70:58–63MATHCrossRef
52.
Suito H, Takizawa K, Huynh VQH, Sze D, Ueda T (2014) FSI analysis of the blood flow and geometrical characteristics in the thoracic aorta. Comput Mech 54:1035–1045MATHCrossRef
53.
54.
Takizawa K, Bazilevs Y, Tezduyar TE (2012) Space–time and ALE–VMS techniques for patient-specific cardiovascular fluid–structure interaction modeling. Arch Comput Methods Eng 19:171–225MathSciNetCrossRef
55.
Takizawa K, Bazilevs Y, Tezduyar TE, Long CC, Marsden AL, Schjodt K (2014) ST and ALE–VMS methods for patient-specific cardiovascular fluid mechanics modeling. Math Models Methods Appl Sci 24:2437–2486MATHMathSciNetCrossRef
56.
Takizawa K, Christopher J, Tezduyar TE, Sathe S (2010) Space–time finite element computation of arterial fluid–structure interactions with patient-specific data. Int J Numer Methods Biomed Eng 26:101–116MATHCrossRef
57.
Takizawa K, Henicke B, Puntel A, Kostov N, Tezduyar TE (2012) Space–time techniques for computational aerodynamics modeling of flapping wings of an actual locust. Comput Mech 50:743–760MATHCrossRef
58.
Takizawa K, Henicke B, Puntel A, Kostov N, Tezduyar TE (2013) Computer modeling techniques for flapping-wing aerodynamics of a locust. Comput Fluids 85:125–134MATHMathSciNetCrossRef
59.
Takizawa K, Kostov N, Puntel A, Henicke B, Tezduyar TE (2012) Space–time computational analysis of bio-inspired flapping-wing aerodynamics of a micro aerial vehicle. Comput Mech 50:761–778MATHCrossRef
60.
Takizawa K, Montes D, Fritze M, McIntyre S, Boben J, Tezduyar TE (2013) Methods for FSI modeling of spacecraft parachute dynamics and cover separation. Math Models Methods Appl Sci 23:307–338MATHMathSciNetCrossRef
61.
Takizawa K, Montes D, McIntyre S, Tezduyar TE (2013) Space–time VMS methods for modeling of incompressible flows at high Reynolds numbers. Math Models Methods Appl Sci 23:223–248MATHMathSciNetCrossRef
62.
Takizawa K, Moorman C, Wright S, Purdue J, McPhail T, Chen PR, Warren J, Tezduyar TE (2011) Patient-specific arterial fluid–structure interaction modeling of cerebral aneurysms. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 65:308–323MATHCrossRef
63.
Takizawa K, Schjodt K, Puntel A, Kostov N, Tezduyar TE (2013) Patient-specific computational analysis of the influence of a stent on the unsteady flow in cerebral aneurysms. Comput Mech 51:1061–1073MATHMathSciNetCrossRef
64.
Takizawa K, Spielman T, Tezduyar TE (2011) Space–time FSI modeling and dynamical analysis of spacecraft parachutes and parachute clusters. Comput Mech 48:345–364MATHCrossRef
65.
Takizawa K, Takagi H, Tezduyar TE, Torii R (2014) Estimation of element-based zero-stress state for arterial FSI computations. Comput Mech 54:895–910MATHMathSciNetCrossRef
66.
67.
Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE (2012) Computational methods for parachute fluid–structure interactions. Arch Comput Methods Eng 19:125–169MathSciNetCrossRef
68.
Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE (2012) Space–time fluid–structure interaction methods. Math Models Methods Appl Sci 22(supp02):1230001
69.
Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE, Boben J, Kostov N, Boswell C, Buscher A (2013) Fluid–structure interaction modeling of clusters of spacecraft parachutes with modified geometric porosity. Comput Mech 52:1351–1364MATHCrossRef
70.
Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE, Boswell C, Kolesar R, Montel K (2014) FSI modeling of the reefed stages and disreefing of the Orion spacecraft parachutes. Comput Mech 54:1203–1220MATHMathSciNetCrossRef
71.
Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE, Buscher A, Asada S (2014) Space–time fluid mechanics computation of heart valve models. Comput Mech 54:973–986MATHMathSciNetCrossRef
72.
Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE, Buscher A, Asada S (2014) Space–time interface-tracking with topology change (ST-TC). Comput Mech 54:955–971MATHMathSciNetCrossRef
73.
Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE, Kolesar R, Boswell C, Kanai T, Montel K (2014) Multiscale methods for gore curvature calculations from FSI modeling of spacecraft parachutes. Comput Mech, published online, doi:10.​1007/​s00466-014-1069-2
74.
Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE, Kostov N (2014) Sequentially-coupled space–time FSI analysis of bio-inspired flapping-wing aerodynamics of an MAV. Comput Mech 54:213–233MATHMathSciNetCrossRef
75.
Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE, McIntyre S, Kostov N, Kolesar R, Habluetzel C (2014) Space–time VMS computation of wind-turbine rotor and tower aerodynamics. Comput Mech 53:1–15MATHCrossRef
76.
Takizawa K, Torii R, Takagi H, Tezduyar TE, Xu XY (2014) Coronary arterial dynamics computation with medical-image-based time-dependent anatomical models and element-based zero-stress state estimates. Comput Mech 54:1047–1053MATHCrossRef
77.
Takizawa K, Wright S, Moorman C, Tezduyar TE (2011) Fluid–structure interaction modeling of parachute clusters. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 65:286–307MATHCrossRef
78.
Tezduyar T, Aliabadi S, Behr M, Johnson A, Mittal S (1993) Parallel finite-element computation of 3D flows. Computer 26(10):27–36CrossRef
79.
Tezduyar TE (2001) Finite element methods for flow problems with moving boundaries and interfaces. Arch Comput Methods Eng 8:83–130MATHCrossRef
80.
Tezduyar TE, Behr M, Mittal S, Johnson AA (1992) Computation of unsteady incompressible flows with the finite element methods - space–time formulations, iterative strategies and massively parallel implementations. In: New Methods in Transient Analysis, PVP-Vol. 246/AMD-Vol.143. ASME, New York, 1992, pp 7–24
81.
Tezduyar TE, Sathe S (2007) Modeling of fluid–structure interactions with the space–time finite elements: solution techniques. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 54:855–900MATHMathSciNetCrossRef
82.
Tezduyar TE, Sathe S, Keedy R, Stein K (2004) Space-time techniques for finite element computation of flows with moving boundaries and interfaces. In: Gallegos S, Herrera I, Botello S, Zarate F, Ayala G (eds) Proceedings of the III international congress on numerical methods in engineering and applied science. CD-ROM, Monterrey, Mexico
83.
Tezduyar TE, Sathe S, Keedy R, Stein K (2006) Space–time finite element techniques for computation of fluid–structure interactions. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 195:2002–2027MATHMathSciNetCrossRef
84.
Tezduyar TE, Sathe S, Pausewang J, Schwaab M, Christopher J, Crabtree J (2008) Interface projection techniques for fluid–structure interaction modeling with moving-mesh methods. Comput Mech 43:39–49MATHCrossRef
85.
Tezduyar TE, Sathe S, Stein K (2006) Solution techniques for the fully-discretized equations in computation of fluid–structure interactions with the space-time formulations. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 195:5743–5753MATHMathSciNetCrossRef
86.
Tezduyar TE, Schwaab M, Sathe S (2009) Sequentially-coupled arterial fluid–structure interaction (SCAFSI) technique. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 198:3524–3533MATHMathSciNetCrossRef
87.
Tezduyar TE, Takizawa K, Brummer T, Chen PR (2011) Space–time fluid–structure interaction modeling of patient-specific cerebral aneurysms. Int J Numer Methods Biomed Eng 27:1665–1710MATHMathSciNetCrossRef
88.
Tezduyar TE, Takizawa K, Moorman C, Wright S, Christopher J (2010) Multiscale sequentially-coupled arterial FSI technique. Comput Mech 46:17–29MATHMathSciNetCrossRef
89.
Tezduyar TE, Takizawa K, Moorman C, Wright S, Christopher J (2010) Space–time finite element computation of complex fluid–structure interactions. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 64:1201–1218MATHCrossRef
90.
Wakeling JM, Ellington CP (1997) Dragonfly flight. ii. velocities, accelerations and kinematics of flapping flight. J Exp Biol 200(3):557–582
91.
Wang ZJ, Russell D (2007) Effect of forewing and hindwing interactions on aerodynamic forces and power in hovering dragonfly flight. Phys Rev Lett 99(14):148101CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Experimental and numerical FSI study of compliant hydrofoils
verfasst von
B. Augier
J. Yan
A. Korobenko
J. Czarnowski
G. Ketterman
Y. Bazilevs
Publikationsdatum
01.06.2015
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Computational Mechanics / Ausgabe 6/2015
Print ISSN: 0178-7675
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-0924
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-014-1090-5

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2015

Computational Mechanics 6/2015 Zur Ausgabe

Original Paper

Space–time computational analysis of MAV flapping-wing aerodynamics with wing clapping

Editorial

Fluid–structure interaction

Original Paper

Interaction of complex fluids and solids: theory, algorithms and application to phase-change-driven implosion

Original Paper

FSI modeling of the Orion spacecraft drogue parachutes

Original Paper

Special methods for aerodynamic-moment calculations from parachute FSI modeling

OriginalPaper

Dynamic and fluid–structure interaction simulations of bioprosthetic heart valves using parametric design with T-splines and Fung-type material models

Neuer Inhalt

    Bildnachweise