Top

Management Review Quarterly

Published in:

01-06-2019 | Original Paper

The relationship between leader–member exchange and employee outcomes: review of past themes and future potential

Authors: Sana Mumtaz, Chris Rowley

Published in: Management Review Quarterly | Issue 1/2020

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

Research on leader–member exchange (LMX) has gained momentum with a large number of studies investigating its impact on multiple levels. This article systematically reviews the literature between 2010 and 2016 on the link between LMX and its impacts on employee perceptual, attitudinal and behavioral outcomes. Our review identifies performance, job satisfaction, organization citizenship behavior, turnover intention, creativity, organizational commitment and affective commitment as the most significant outcomes of LMX. This article also identifies potential areas for future LMX research and identifies different ways for enhancing its theoretical and empirical contributions in future.

previous article Revisiting the effectiveness of the German accounting enforcement reforms: a replication study

Agarwal UA, Datta S, Blake-Beard S, Bhargava S (2012) Linking LMX, innovative work behaviour and turnover intentions: the mediating role of work engagement. Career Development International 17(3):208–230CrossRef

Ahmed I, Ismail KW, Khairuzzaman Wan Ismail W, Mohamad Amin S, Musarrat Nawaz M (2013) A social exchange perspective of the individual Guanxi network: evidence from Malaysian-Chinese employees. Chin Manag Stud 7(1):127–140CrossRef

Ahmed A, Ahmed A, Arshad MA, Arshad MA, Mahmood A, Mahmood A, Akhtar S (2017) Neglecting human resource development in OBOR, a case of the China–Pakistan economic corridor (CPEC). J Chin Econ Foreign Trade Stud 10(2):130–142CrossRef

Anand S, Vidyarthi PR, Liden RC, Rousseau DM (2010) Good citizens in poor-quality relationships: idiosyncratic deals as a substitute for relationship quality. Acad Manag J 53(5):970–988CrossRef

Antonakis J (2017) On doing better science: from thrill of discovery to policy implications. Leadersh Q 28(1):5–21CrossRef

Bai Y, Li PP, Xi Y (2012) The distinctive effects of dual-level leadership behaviors on employees’ trust in leadership: an empirical study from China. Asia Pac J Manag 29(2):213–237CrossRef

Ballinger GA, Lehman DW, Schoorman FD (2010) Leader–member exchange and turnover before and after succession events. Organi Behav Hum Decis Process 113(1):25–36CrossRef

Bang H (2015) Volunteer age, job satisfaction, and intention to stay: a case of nonprofit sport organizations. Leadersh Organ Dev J 36(2):161–176CrossRef

Bernerth JB, Walker HJ, Harris SG (2016) Rethinking the benefits and pitfalls of leader–member exchange: a reciprocity versus self-protection perspective. Hum Relat 69(3):661–684CrossRef

Bettis R, Gambardella A, Helfat C, Mitchell W (2014) Quantitative empirical analysis in strategic management. Strateg Manag J 35(7):949–953CrossRef

Bhal KT, Dadhich A (2011) Impact of ethical leadership and leader–member exchange on whistle blowing: the moderating impact of the moral intensity of the issue. J Bus Ethics 103(3):485–496CrossRef

Boer D, Deinert A, Homan AC, Voelpel SC (2016) Revisiting the mediating role of leader–member exchange in transformational leadership: the differential impact model. Eur J Work Organ Psychol 25(6):883–899CrossRef

Breevaart K, Bakker AB, Demerouti E, van den Heuvel M (2015) leader–member exchange, work engagement, and job performance. J Manag Psychol 30(7):754–770CrossRef

Casimir G, Ngee Keith NK, Yuan Wang K, Ooi G (2014) The relationships amongst leader–member exchange, perceived organizational support, affective commitment, and in-role performance: a social-exchange perspective. Leadersh Organ Dev J 35(5):366–385CrossRef

Chan SC, Mak WM (2012) Benevolent leadership and follower performance: the mediating role of leader–member exchange (LMX). Asia Pac J Manag 29(2):285–301CrossRef

Chen G, Kirkman BL, Kanfer R, Allen D, Rosen B (2007) A multilevel study of leadership, empowerment, and performance in teams. J Appl Psychol 92(2):331CrossRef

Chen Z, Lam W, Zhong JA (2012) Effects of perceptions on LMX and work performance: effects of supervisors’ perception of subordinates’ emotional intelligence and subordinates’ perception of trust in the supervisor on LMX and consequently, performance. Asia Pac J Manag 29(3):597–616CrossRef

Chen Y, Yu E, Son J (2014) Beyond leader–member exchange (LMX) differentiation: an indigenous approach to leader–member relationship differentiation. Leadersh Q 25(3):611–627CrossRef

Chen Y, Wen Z, Peng J, Liu X (2016) Leader–follower congruence in loneliness, LMX and turnover intention. J Manag Psychol 31(4):864–879CrossRef

Cheng T, Huang GH, Lee C, Ren X (2012) Longitudinal effects of job insecurity on employee outcomes: the moderating role of emotional intelligence and the leader–member exchange. Asia Pac J Manag 29(3):709–728CrossRef

Chuang A, Hsu RS, Wang AC, Judge TA (2015) Does West “fit” with East? In search of a Chinese model of person–environment fit. Acad Manag J 58(2):480–510CrossRef

Citrome L (2007) Impact factor? Shmimpact factor!: the journal impact factor, modern day literature searching, and the publication process. Psychiatry (Edgmont) 4(5):54

Cobb AT, Lau RS (2015) Trouble at the next level: effects of differential leader–member exchange on group-level processes and justice climate. Hum Relat 68(9):1437–1459CrossRef

Cooper C, Booth A, Varley-Campbell J, Britten N, Garside R (2018) Defining the process to literature searching in systematic reviews: a literature review of guidance and supporting studies. BMC Med Res Methodol 18(1):85CrossRef

Creary SJ, Caza BB, Roberts LM (2015) Out of the box? How managing a subordinate’s multiple identities affects the quality of a manager-subordinate relationship. Acad Manag Rev 40(4):538–562CrossRef

Diebig M, Bormann KC, Rowold J (2016) A double-edged sword: relationship between full-range leadership behaviors and followers’ hair cortisol level. Leadersh Q 27(4):684–696CrossRef

Dulebohn JH, Bommer WH, Liden RC, Brouer RL, Ferris GR (2012) A meta-analysis of antecedents and consequences of leader–member exchange: integrating the past with an eye toward the future. J Manag 38(6):1715–1759

Farh JL, Tsui AS, Xin K, Cheng BS (1998) The influence of relational demography and Guanxi: the Chinese case. Organ Sci 9(4):471–488CrossRef

Fazio RH, Williams CJ (1986) Attitude accessibility as a moderator of the attitude–perception and attitude–behavior relations: an investigation of the 1984 presidential election. J Person Soc Psychol 51(3):505CrossRef

Fisk GM, Friesen JP (2012) Perceptions of leader emotion regulation and LMX as predictors of followers’ job satisfaction and organizational citizenship behaviors. Leadersh Q 23(1):1–12CrossRef

Fu PP, Tsui AS, Liu J, Li L (2010) Pursuit of whose happiness? Executive leaders’ transformational behaviors and personal values. Adm Sci Q 55(2):222–254CrossRef

Gkorezis P, Petridou E, Xanthiakos P (2014) Leader positive humor and organizational cynicism: LMX as a mediator. Leadersh Organ Dev J 35(4):305–315CrossRef

Gkorezis P, Bellou V, Skemperis N (2015) Nonverbal communication and relational identification with the supervisor: evidence from two countries. Manag Decis 53(5):1005–1022CrossRef

Glaso L, Einarsen S (2008) Emotion regulation in leader–follower relationships. Eur J Work Organ Psychol 17(4):482–500CrossRef

Graen GB, Uhl-Bien M (1995) Relationship-based approach to leadership: development of leader–member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. Leadersh Q 6(2):219–247CrossRef

Graves LM, Luciano MM (2013) Self-determination at work: understanding the role of leader–member exchange. Motiv Emot 37(3):518–536CrossRef

Gu Q, Tang TLP, Jiang W (2015) Does moral leadership enhance employee creativity? Employee identification with leader and leader–member exchange (LMX) in the Chinese context. J Bus Ethics 126(3):513–529CrossRef

Guide VDR, Ketokivi M (2015) Notes from the editors: redefining some methodological criteria for the journal. J Oper Manag 37:v–viiiCrossRef

Harris KJ, Wheeler AR, Kacmar KM (2011) The mediating role of organizational job embeddedness in the LMX–outcomes relationships. Leadersh Q 22(2):271–281CrossRef

Harris TB, Li N, Kirkman BL (2014) Leader–member exchange (LMX) in context: how LMX differentiation and LMX relational separation attenuate LMX’s influence on OCB and turnover intention. Leadersh Q 25(2):314–328CrossRef

Haynie JJ, Cullen KL, Lester HF, Winter J, Svyantek DJ (2014) Differentiated leader–member exchange, justice climate, and performance: main and interactive effects. Leadersh Q 25(5):912–922CrossRef

Herman HM, Ashkanasy NM, Dasborough MT (2012) Relative leader–member exchange, negative affectivity and social identification: a moderated-mediation examination. Leadersh Q 23(3):354–366CrossRef

Hill NS, Kang JH, Seo MG (2014) The interactive effect of leader–member exchange and electronic communication on employee psychological empowerment and work outcomes. Leadersh Q 25(4):772–783CrossRef

HM Tse H (2014) Linking leader–member exchange differentiation to work team performance. Leadersh Organ Dev J 35(8):710–724CrossRef

Ho VT, Tekleab AG (2016) A model of idiosyncratic deal-making and attitudinal outcomes. J Manag Psychol 31(3):642–656CrossRef

Hogg MA, van Knippenberg D, Rast DE III (2012) The social identity theory of leadership: theoretical origins, research findings, and conceptual developments. Eur Rev Soc Psychol 23(1):258–304CrossRef

Hornung S, Rousseau DM, Glaser J, Angerer P, Weigl M (2010) Beyond top-down and bottom-up work redesign: customizing job content through idiosyncratic deals. J Organ Behav 31(2–3):187–215CrossRef

Hsiung HH (2012) Authentic leadership and employee voice behavior: a multi-level psychological process. J Bus Ethics 107(3):349–361CrossRef

Huang L, Krasikova DV, Liu D (2016) I can do it, so can you: the role of leader creative self-efficacy in facilitating follower creativity. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 132:49–62CrossRef

Ioannidis J (2016) The mass production of redundant, misleading, and conflicted systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Milbank Q 94(3):485–514CrossRef

Joiner TA, Leveson L (2015) Effective delegation among Hong Kong Chinese male managers: the mediating effects of LMX. Leadersh Organ Dev J 36(6):728–743CrossRef

Jordan PJ, Troth A (2011) Emotional intelligence and leader member exchange: the relationship with employee turnover intentions and job satisfaction. Leadersh Organ Dev J 32(3):260–280CrossRef

Kafetsios K, Athanasiadou M, Dimou N (2014) Leaders’ and subordinates’ attachment orientations, emotion regulation capabilities and affect at work: a multilevel analysis. Leadersh Q 25(3):512–527CrossRef

Kang DS, Stewart J, Kim H (2011) The effects of perceived external prestige, ethical organizational climate, and leader–member exchange (LMX) quality on employees’ commitments and their subsequent attitudes. Pers Rev 40(6):761–784CrossRef

Kim SK, Jung DI, Lee JS (2013) Service employees’ deviant behaviors and leader–member exchange in contexts of dispositional envy and dispositional jealousy. Serv Bus 7(4):583–602CrossRef

Kim SL, Han S, Son SY, Yun S (2016) Exchange ideology in supervisor-subordinate dyads, LMX, and knowledge sharing: a social exchange perspective. Asia Pac J Manag 34:1–26

Kimura T (2013) The moderating effects of political skill and leader–member exchange on the relationship between organizational politics and affective commitment. J Bus Ethics 116(3):587–599CrossRef

Kuoppala J, Lamminpaa A, Liira J, Vainio H (2008) Leadership, job well-being, and health effects—a systematic review and a meta-analysis. J Occup Environ Med 50(8):904–915CrossRef

Kuvaas B, Buch R, Dysvik A, Haerem T (2012) Economic and social leader–member exchange relationships and follower performance. Leadersh Q 23(5):756–765CrossRef

Le Blanc PM, Gonzalez-Roma V (2012) A team level investigation of the relationship between leader–member exchange (LMX) differentiation, and commitment and performance. Leadersh Q 23(3):534–544CrossRef

Lebel RD (2016) Overcoming the fear factor: how perceptions of supervisor openness lead employees to speak up when fearing external threat. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 135:10–21CrossRef

Li Y, Fu F, Sun JM, Yang B (2016) Leader–member exchange differentiation and team creativity: an investigation of nonlinearity. Hum Relat 69(5):1121–1138CrossRef

Liang SG (2017) Linking leader authentic personality to employee voice behaviour: a multilevel mediation model of authentic leadership development. Eur J Work Organ Psychol 26(3):434–443CrossRef

Liao H, Liu D, Loi R (2010) Looking at both sides of the social exchange coin: a social cognitive perspective on the joint effects of relationship quality and differentiation on creativity. Acad Manag J 53(5):1090–1109CrossRef

Liden RC, Sparrowe RT, Wayne SJ (1997) leader–member exchange theory: the past and potential for the future. Res Pers Hum Resour Manag 15:47–120

Liden RC, Erdogan B, Wayne SJ, Sparrowe RT (2006) leader–member exchange, differentiation, and task interdependence: implications for individual and group performance. J Organ Behav 27(6):723–746CrossRef

Lin CC, Kao YT, Chen YL, Lu SC (2016a) Fostering change-oriented behaviors: a broaden-and-build model. J Bus Psychol 31(3):399–414CrossRef

Lin W, Ma J, Zhang Q, Li JC, Jiang F (2016b) How is benevolent leadership linked to employee creativity? The mediating role of leader–member exchange and the moderating role of power distance orientation. J Bus Ethics 152:1–17

Lind EA, Tyler TR (1988) The social psychology of procedural justice. Springer, BerlinCrossRef

Little LM, Gooty J, Williams M (2016) The role of leader emotion management in leader–member exchange and follower outcomes. Leadersh Q 27(1):85–97CrossRef

Liu Z, Cai Z, Li J, Shi S, Fang Y (2013) Leadership style and employee turnover intentions: a social identity perspective. Career Dev Int 18(3):305–324CrossRef

Luu TT, Rowley C (2015) From value-based human resource practices to i-deals: software companies in Vietnam. Pers Rev 44(1):39–68CrossRef

Ma L, Qu Q (2010) Differentiation in leader–member exchange: a hierarchical linear modeling approach. Leadersh Q 21(5):733–744CrossRef

Markham SE, Yammarino FJ, Murry WD, Palanski ME (2010) Leader–member exchange, shared values, and performance: agreement and levels of analysis do matter. Leadersh Q 21(3):469–480CrossRef

Martin R, Guillaume Y, Thomas G, Lee A, Epitropaki O (2016) Leader–member exchange (LMX) and performance: a meta-analytic review. Pers Psychol 69(1):67–121CrossRef

Meyer B, Burtscher MJ, Jonas K, Feese S, Arnrich B, Troster G, Schermuly CC (2016) What good leaders actually do: micro-level leadership behaviour, leader evaluations, and team decision quality. Eur J Work Organ Psychol 25(6):773–789CrossRef

Morganson VJ, Major DA, Litano ML (2016) A multilevel examination of the relationship between leader–member exchange and work–family outcomes. J Bus Psychol 1:1–15

Munoz-Doyague MF, Nieto M (2012) Individual creativity performance and the quality of interpersonal relationships. Ind Manag Data Syst 112(1):125–145CrossRef

Naidoo LJ, Scherbaum CA, Goldstein HW, Graen GB (2011) A longitudinal examination of the effects of LMX, ability, and differentiation on team performance. J Bus Psychol 26(3):347–357CrossRef

Naseer S, Raja U, Syed F, Donia MB, Darr W (2016) Perils of being close to a bad leader in a bad environment: exploring the combined effects of despotic leadership, leader member exchange, and perceived organizational politics on behaviors. Leadersh Q 27(1):14–33CrossRef

Newman A, Schwarz G, Cooper B, Sendjaya S (2015) How servant leadership influences organizational citizenship behavior: the roles of LMX, empowerment, and proactive personality. J Bus Ethics 145:1–14

Nolzen N (2018) The concept of psychological capital: a comprehensive review. Manag Rev Q 68:1–41CrossRef

Oren L, Tziner A, Sharoni G, Amor I, Alon P (2012) Relations between leader–subordinate personality similarity and job attitudes. J Manag Psychol 27(5):479–496CrossRef

Pan SY, Lin KJ (2016) Who suffers when supervisors are unhappy? The roles of leader–member exchange and abusive supervision. J Bus Ethics 151:1–13

Peng JC, Lin J (2016) Linking supervisor feedback environment to contextual performances: the mediating effect of leader–member exchange. Leadersh Organ Dev J 37(6):802–820CrossRef

Poon HF, Rowley C (2007) Contemporary research on management and human resources in China: a comparative content analysis of two leading journals: research note. Asia Pac Bus Rev 13(1):133–153CrossRef

Redeker M, de Vries RE, Rouckhout D, Vermeren P, De Fruyt F (2014) Integrating leadership: the leadership circumplex. Eur J Work Organ Psychol 23(3):435–455CrossRef

Reeb D, Sakakibara M, Mahmood IP (2012) From the editors: endogeneity in international business research. J Int Bus Stud 43(3):211–218CrossRef

Rousseau DM (2005) I-deals, idiosyncratic deals employees bargain for themselves. ME Sharpe, New York

Rousseau DM, Manning J, Denyer D (2008) Evidence in management and organizational science: assembling the field’s full weight of scientific knowledge through syntheses. Acad Manag Ann 2(1):475–515CrossRef

Rowley C (1997) Conclusion: reassessing HRM’s convergence. Asia Pac Bus Rev 3(4):197–210CrossRef

Rowley C, Benson J (2002) Convergence and divergence in Asian human resource management. Calif Manag Rev 44(2):90–109CrossRef

Rowley C, Bae J, Horak S, Bacouel-Jentjens S (2017) Distinctiveness of human resource management in the Asia Pacific region: typologies and levels. Int J Hum Resour Manag 28(10):1393–1408CrossRef

Shapiro DL, Hom P, Shen W, Agarwal R (2016) How do leader departures affect subordinates’ organizational attachment? A 360-degree relational perspective. Acad Manag Rev 41(3):479–502CrossRef

Shih CT, Lin CCT (2014) From good friends to good soldiers: a psychological contract perspective. Asia Pac J Manag 31(1):309–326CrossRef

Sluss DM, Thompson BS (2012) Socializing the newcomer: the mediating role of leader–member exchange. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 119(1):114–125CrossRef

Soane E, Booth JE, Alfes K, Shantz A, Bailey C (2018) Deadly combinations: how leadership contexts undermine the activation and enactment of followers’ high core self-evaluations in performance. Eur J Work Organ Psychol 27:1–13CrossRef

Sparrowe RT, Liden RC (2005) Two routes to influence: integrating leader–member exchange and social network perspectives. Adm Sci Q 50(4):505–535CrossRef

Spitzmuller M, lies R (2010) Do they [all] see my true self? Leader’s relational authenticity and followers’ assessments of transformational leadership. Eur J Work Organ Psychol 19(3):304–332CrossRef

Stoffers M, Jol IJMVH, Notelaers G (2014) Towards a moderated mediation model of innovative work behavior enhancement. J Organ Change Manag 27(4):642–659CrossRef

Sun LY, Chow IHS, Chiu RK, Pan W (2013) Outcome favorability in the link between leader–member exchange and organizational citizenship behavior: procedural fairness climate matters. Leadersh Q 24(1):215–226CrossRef

Torka N, Schyns B, KeesLooise J (2010) Direct participation quality and organizational commitment: the role of leader–member exchange. Empl Relat 32(4):418–434CrossRef

Tranfield D, Denyer D, Smart P (2003) Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. Br J Manag 14(3):207–222CrossRef

Triaridis S, Kyrgidis A (2010) Peer review and journal impact factor: the two pillars of contemporary medical publishing. Hippokratia 14(Suppl 1):5

TrongLuu T, TrongLuu T, Rowley C, Rowley C (2016) The relationship between cultural intelligence and i-deals: trust as a mediator and HR localization as a moderator. Int J Organ Anal 24(5):908–931CrossRef

Tse HH, Troth AC (2013) Perceptions and emotional experiences in differential supervisor–subordinate relationships. Leadersh Organ Dev J 34(3):271–283CrossRef

Tu Y, Lu X (2016) Work-to-life spillover effect of leader–member exchange in groups: the moderating role of group power distance and employee political skill. J Happiness Stud 17(5):1873–1889CrossRef

Uhl-Bien M (2011) Relational leadership theory: exploring the social processes of leadership and organizing. In: Leadership, gender, and organization, Springer, Dordrecht, pp 75–108CrossRef

Van Knippenberg D, De Cremer D (2008) Leadership and fairness: taking stock and looking ahead. Eur J Work Organ Psychol 17(2):173–179CrossRef

Van Vugt M, De Cremer D (2003) Leader endorsement in social dilemmas: comparing the instrumental and relational perspectives. Eur Rev Soc Psychol 13(1):155–184CrossRef

Volmer J, Spurk D, Niessen C (2012) Leader–member exchange (LMX), job autonomy, and creative work involvement. Leadersh Q 23(3):456–465CrossRef

Walker E, Hernandez AV, Kattan MW (2008) Meta-analysis: its strengths and limitations. Clevel Clin J Med 75(6):431CrossRef

Walumbwa FO, Mayer DM, Wang P, Wang H, Workman K, Christensen AL (2011) Linking ethical leadership to employee performance: the roles of leader–member exchange, self-efficacy, and organizational identification. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 115(2):204–213CrossRef

Wang BX, Rowley C (2016) Business networks and the emergence of Guanxi capitalism in China: the role of the ‘Invisible Hand’. In: Business networks in East Asian capitalisms, p 93CrossRef

Wang CJ, Wang CJ (2016) Does leader–member exchange enhance performance in the hospitality industry? The mediating roles of task motivation and creativity. Int J Contemp Hosp Manag 28(5):969–987CrossRef

Wayne SJ, Green SA (1993) The effects of leader–member exchange on employee citizenship and impression management behavior. Hum Relat 46(12):1431–1440CrossRef

Wei LQ, Liu J, Chen YY, Wu LZ (2010) Political skill, supervisor–subordinate Guanxi and career prospects in Chinese firms. J Manag Stud 47(3):437–454CrossRef

Wu JB, Tsui AS, Kinicki AJ (2010) Consequences of differentiated leadership in groups. Acad Manag J 53(1):90–106CrossRef

Wu LZ, Kwan HK, Wei LQ, Liu J (2013) Ingratiation in the workplace: the role of subordinate and supervisor political skill. J Manag Stud 50(6):991–1017CrossRef

Xiaqi D, Kun T, Chongsen Y, Sufang G (2012) Abusive supervision and LMX: leaders’ emotional intelligence as antecedent variable and trust as consequence variable. Chin Manag Stud 6(2):257–270CrossRef

Xu AJ, Loi R, Lam LW (2015) The bad boss takes it all: how abusive supervision and leader–member exchange interact to influence employee silence. Leadersh Q 26(5):763–774CrossRef

Yuan L, Yuan L, Xiao S, Xiao S, Li J, Li J, Ning L (2016) leader–member exchange differentiation and team member performance: the moderating role of the perception of organizational politics. Int J Manpow 37(8):1347–1364CrossRef

Zhang MM, Fan D (2014) Expatriate skills training strategies of Chinese multinationals operating in Australia. Asia Pac J Hum Resourc 52(1):60–76CrossRef

Zhang L, Morand D (2014) The linkage between status-leveling symbols and work attitudes. J Manag Psychol 29(8):973–993CrossRef

Zhang XA, Li N, Harris TB (2015) Putting non-work ties to work: the case of Guanxi in supervisor–subordinate relationships. Leadersh Q 26(1):37–54CrossRef

Zhao H (2015) leader–member exchange differentiation and team creativity: a moderated mediation study. Leadersh Organ Dev J 36(7):798–815CrossRef

Title: The relationship between leader–member exchange and employee outcomes: review of past themes and future potential
Authors: Sana Mumtaz
Chris Rowley
Publication date: 01-06-2019
Publisher: Springer International Publishing
Published in: Management Review Quarterly / Issue 1/2020
Print ISSN: 2198-1620
Electronic ISSN: 2198-1639
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-019-00163-8

Springer Professional

Abstract

Please log in to get access to your license.

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

Deducing a state-of-the-art presentation of the Eclectic Paradigm from four decades of development: a systematic literature review

Revisiting the effectiveness of the German accounting enforcement reforms: a replication study

Drivers, barriers and success factors of academic spin-offs: a systematic literature review

Buyer–supplier relationships from the perspective of working environment and organisational performance: review and research agenda