Top

Continuum Mechanics and Thermodynamics

Published in:

24-08-2020 | Original Article

Explicit nonlinear finite element approach to the Lagrangian-based coupled phase field and elasticity equations for nanoscale thermal- and stress-induced martensitic transformations

Authors: Mahdi Javanbakht, Hossein Rahbar, Milad Ashourian

Published in: Continuum Mechanics and Thermodynamics | Issue 3/2023

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

In this paper, a nonlinear finite element procedure is developed to solve the coupled system of phase field and elasticity equations at large strains for martensitic phase transformations at the nanoscale. The transformation is defined based on an order parameter which varies between 0 for austenite to one for martensite. The phase field equation relates the rate of change of the order parameter to the Helmholtz free energy. Both the Helmholtz free energy and the transformational strain tensor depend on the order parameter, and the coupling between the phase field and elasticity equations occurs due to the presence of elastic energy in the Helmholtz free energy and the transformational strain in the total strain. The deformation gradient tensor is introduced as a multiplicative decomposition of elastic and transformational gradient tensors. A staggered strategy is used to solve the coupled system of equations so that first, the principle of virtual work is utilized to obtain the integral form of the Lagrangian equation of motion. It is then discretized and solved using the Newton–Raphson method which gives the displacements and consequently, the deformation gradient tensor. Next, since the order parameter is obtained from the phase field equation from the previous time step, the elastic deformation gradient tensor and the first Piola–Kirchhoff stress can be calculated and substituted in the phase field equation to find the order parameter for the current time step. The weighted residuals method is used to derive the finite element form of the phase field equation and the explicit method is used for its time discretization. The finite element procedure is well verified by comparing the obtained results with those from other simulations. Examples of thermal- and stress-induced phase transformations are presented, including austenite–martensite interface propagation and growth of preexisting martensitic regions. The developed algorithm and code can be advanced to solve kinetic problems coupled with mechanics at large strains for phase transformations and similar phenomena at the nanoscale.

previous article Buckling of tower buildings on elastic foundation under compressive tip forces and self-weight

next article Derivation of dual-horizon state-based peridynamics formulation based on Euler–Lagrange equation

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Available only for authorised users

Artemev, A., Jin, Y., Khachaturyan, A.: Three-dimensional phase field model of proper martensitic transformation. Acta Mater. 49(7), 1165–1177 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1016/s1359-6454(01)00021-0CrossRefADS

Chen, L.-Q.: Phase-field models for microstructure evolution. Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 32(1), 113–140 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.matsci.32.112001.132041CrossRef

Levitas, V.I., Lee, D.-W., Preston, D.L.: Interface propagation and microstructure evolution in phase field models of stress-induced martensitic phase transformations. Int. J. Plast. 26(3), 395–422 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2009.08.003CrossRefMATH

Levitas, V.I., Javanbakht, M.: Phase-field approach to martensitic phase transformations: effect of martensite–martensite interface energy. Int. J. Mater. Res. 102(6), 652–665 (2011). https://doi.org/10.3139/146.110529CrossRef

Seol, D.J., Hu, S.Y., Li, Y.L., Chen, L.Q., Oh, K.H.: Cubic to tetragonal martensitic transformation in a thin film elastically constrained by a substrate. Metals Mater. Int. 9(3), 221–226 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03027039CrossRef

Mamivand, M., Zaeem, M.A., Kadiri, H.E.: A review on phase field modeling of martensitic phase transformation. Comput. Mater. Sci. 77, 304–311 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2013.04.059CrossRef

Clayton, J., Knap, J.: A phase field model of deformation twinning: nonlinear theory and numerical simulations. Physica D 240(9–10), 841–858 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physd.2010.12.012MathSciNetCrossRefADSMATH

Tůma, K., Stupkiewicz, S.: Phase-field study of size-dependent morphology of austenite-twinned martensite interface in CuAlNi. Int. J. Solids Struct. 97–98, 89–100 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2016.07.040CrossRef

Slutsker, J., Thornton, K., Roytburd, A.L., Warren, J.A., Mcfadden, G.B.: Phase field modeling of solidification under stress. Phys. Rev. B 74 (1) (2006). https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.74.014103.

10.

Wang, Y.U., Jin, Y.M., Khachaturyan, A.G.: Phase field microelasticity modeling of dislocation dynamics near free surface and in heteroepitaxial thin films. Acta Mater. 51(14), 4209–4223 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/s1359-6454(03)00238-6CrossRefADS

11.

Hu, S., Li, Y., Zheng, Y., Chen, L.: Effect of solutes on dislocation motion—a phase-field simulation. Int. J. Plast. 20(3), 403–425 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/s0749-6419(03)00094-9CrossRefMATH

12.

Rodney, D., Bouar, Y.L., Finel, A.: Phase field methods and dislocations. Acta Mater. 51(1), 17–30 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/s1359-6454(01)00379-2CrossRefADS

13.

Farrahi, G.H., Javanbakht, M., Jafarzadeh, H.: On the phase field modeling of crack growth and analytical treatment on the parameters. Contin. Mech. Thermodyn. 32, 589–606 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00161-018-0685-zMathSciNetCrossRefADSMATH

14.

Levitas, V.I., Jafarzadeh, H., Farrahi, G.H., Javanbakht, M.: Thermodynamically consistent and scale-dependent phase field approach for crack propagation allowing for surface stresses. Int. J. Plast. 111, 1–35 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2018.07.005CrossRef

15.

Jafarzadeh, H., Farrahi, G.H., Javanbakht, M.: Phase field modeling of crack growth with double-well potential including surface effects. Contin. Mech. Thermodyn. 32(3), 913–925 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00161-019-00775-1MathSciNetCrossRefADS

16.

Ren, H., Zhuang, X., Anitescu, C., Rabczuk, T.: An explicit phase field method for brittle dynamic fracture. Comput. Struct. 217, 45–56 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2019.03.005CrossRef

17.

Levitas, V.I., Preston, D.L.: Three-dimensional Landau theory for multivariant stress-induced martensitic phase transformations. II. Multivariant phase transformations and stress space analysis. Phys. Rev. B 1, 2 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.66.134207CrossRef

18.

Levitas, V.I., Preston, D.L., Lee, D.-W.: Three-dimensional Landau theory for multivariant stress-induced martensitic phase transformations. III. Alternative potentials, critical nuclei, kink solutions, and dislocation theory. Phys. Rev. B (2003). https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.68.134201CrossRef

19.

Levitas, V.I., Javanbakht, M.: Surface tension and energy in multivariant martensitic transformations: phase-field theory, simulations, and model of coherent interface. Phys. Rev. Lett. (2010). https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.105.165701CrossRef

20.

Levitas, V.I., Javanbakht, M.: Surface-induced phase transformations: multiple scale and mechanics effects and morphological transitions. Phys. Rev. Lett. (2011). https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.107.175701CrossRef

21.

Javanbakht, M., Barati, E.: Martensitic phase transformations in shape memory alloy: phase field modeling with surface tension effect. Comput. Mater. Sci. 115, 137–144 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2015.10.037CrossRef

22.

Wang, D., Liang, Q., Zhao, S., Zhao, P., Zhang, T., Cui, L., Wang, Y.: Phase field simulation of martensitic transformation in pre-strained nanocomposite shape memory alloys. Acta Mater. 164, 99–109 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2018.10.030CrossRefADS

23.

Ishiguro, Y., Tsukada, Y., Koyama, T.: Phase-field simulation of spinodal decomposition and its effect on stress-induced martensitic transformation in T–Nb–O alloys. Comput. Mater. Sci. 151, 222–230 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2018.05.003CrossRef

24.

Cui, S., Wan, J., Zuo, X., Chen, N., Zhang, J., Rong, Y.: Three-dimensional, non-isothermal phase-field modeling of thermally and stress-induced martensitic transformations in shape memory alloys. Int. J. Solids Struct. 109, 1–11 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2017.01.00CrossRef

25.

Dhote, R., Gomez, H., Melnik, R., Zu, J.: 3D coupled thermo-mechanical phase-field modeling of shape memory alloy dynamics via isogeometric analysis. Comput. Struct. 154, 48–58 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2015.02.017CrossRefADS

26.

Javanbakht, M., Adaei, M.: Investigating the effect of elastic anisotropy on martensitic phase transformations at the nanoscale. Comput. Mater. Sci. 167, 168–182 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2019.05.047CrossRef

27.

Yeddu, H.K.: Phase field modeling of austenite grain size effect on martensitic transformation in stainless steels. Comput. Mater. Sci. 154, 75–83 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2018.07.04CrossRef

28.

Javanbakht, M., Adaei, M.: Formation of stress-and thermal-induced martensitic nanostructures in a single crystal with phase-dependent elastic propertie. J. Mater. Sci. 55(6), 2544–2563 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-019-04067-6CrossRefADS

29.

Xu, G., Wang, C., Beltran, J.I., LLOrca, J., Cui, Y.: Landau modeling of dynamical nucleation of martensite at grain boundaries under local stress. Comput. Mater. Sci. 118 103–111 (2016) . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2016.02.04

30.

Mamivand, M., Zaeem, M.A., Kadiri, H.E., Chen, L.-Q.: Phase field modeling of the tetragonal-to-monoclinic phase transformation in zirconia. Acta Mater. 61(14), 5223–5235 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2013.05.015CrossRefADS

31.

Mamivand, M., Zaeem, M.A., Kadiri, H.E.: Phase field modeling of stress-induced tetragonal-to-monoclinic transformation in zirconia and its effect on transformation toughening. Acta Mater. 64, 208–219 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2013.10.031CrossRefADS

32.

Levitas, V.I.: Phase field approach to martensitic phase transformations with large strains and interface stresses. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 70, 154–189 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2014.05.013MathSciNetCrossRefADSMATH

33.

Cui, S., Wan, J., Zuo, X., Chen, N., Rong, Y.: Interface stress evolution of martensitic transformation in MnCu alloys: a phase-field study. Mater. Design 109, 88–97 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2016.07.057CrossRef

34.

Levitas, V.I., Javanbakht, M.: Interaction between phase transformations and dislocations at the nanoscale. Part 1. General phase field approach. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 82, 287–319 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2015.05.005MathSciNetCrossRefADS

35.

Javanbakht, M., Levitas, V.I.: Interaction between phase transformations and dislocations at the nanoscale. Part 2: Phase field simulation examples. J. Mech. Phys. Solids. 82, 164–185 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2015.05.006MathSciNetCrossRefADS

36.

Javanbakht, M., Levitas, V.I.: Phase field simulations of plastic strain-induced phase transformations under high pressure and large shear. Phys. Rev. B (2016). https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.94.214104CrossRef

37.

Javanbakht, M., Ghaedi, M.S.: Thermal induced nanovoid evolution in the vicinity of an immobile austenite–martensite interface. Comput. Mater. Sci. 172, 109339 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2019.109339CrossRef

38.

Javanbakht, M., Levitas, V.I.: Nanoscale mechanisms for high-pressure mechanochemistry: a phase field study. J. Mater. Sci. 53(19), 13343–13363 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-018-2175-xCrossRefADS

39.

Varshney, D., Kaurav, N., Sharma, U.: Pressure induced B3–B1 structural phase transition and elastic properties of monopnictides InX(X\(=\) N, P, As). Phase Trans. 81(6), 525–535 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1080/01411590801886277CrossRef

40.

Schoof, E., Schneider, D., Streichhan, N., Mittnacht, T., Selzer, M., Nestler, B.: Multiphase-field modeling of martensitic phase transformation in a dual-phase microstructure. Int. J. Solids Struct. 134, 181–194 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2017.10.032CrossRef

41.

Yamanaka, A., Takaki, T., Tomita, Y.: Elastoplastic phase-field simulation of self- and plastic accommodations in Cubic\(\rightarrow \) tetragonal martensitic transformation. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 491(1–2), 378–384 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2008.02.03CrossRef

42.

Basak, A., Levitas, V.I.: Nanoscale multiphase phase field approach for stress- and temperature-induced martensitic phase transformations with interfacial stresses at finite strains. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 113, 162–196 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2018.01.014MathSciNetCrossRefADSMATH

43.

Liu, J.-Y., Lu, H., Chen, J.-M., Zhang, Z.: Finite element simulation of martensitic transition based on thermo-mechanical model. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 448(1–2), 20–209 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2006.10.053CrossRef

44.

Javanbakht, M., Rahbar, H., Ashourian, M.: Finite element implementation based on explicit, Galerkin and Crank–Nicolson methods to phase field theory for thermal- and surface-induced martensitic phase transformations. Contin. Mech. Thermodyn. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00161-019-00838-3CrossRef

45.

Govindjee, S., Miehe, C.: A multi-variant martensitic phase transformation model: formulation and numerical implementation. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 191(3–5), 215–238 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1016/s0045-7825(01)00271-7CrossRefADSMATH

46.

Mirzakhani, S., Javanbakht, M.: Phase field-elasticity analysis of austenite-martensite phase transformation at the nanoscale: finite element modeling. Comput. Mater. Sci. 154, 41–52 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2018.07.034CrossRef

47.

Siqueira, T.M., Coda, H.B.: Total Lagrangian FEM formulation for nonlinear dynamics of sliding connections in viscoelastic plane structures and mechanisms. Finite Elem. Anal. Des. 129, 63–77 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.finel.2016.12.005MathSciNetCrossRef

48.

Smith, S., Stolle, D.: A comparison of Eulerian and updated Lagrangian finite element algorithms for simulating film casting. Finite Elem. Anal. Des. 38(5), 401–415 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/s0168-874x(01)00078-6CrossRefMATH

49.

Pascon, J., Coda, H.: Large deformation analysis of elastoplastic homogeneous materials via high order tetrahedral finite elements. Finite Elem. Anal. Des. 76, 21–38 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.finel.2013.08.006CrossRefMATH

50.

Bathe, K.-J., Ramm, E., Wilson, E.L.: Finite element formulations for large deformation dynamic analysis. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 9(2), 353–386 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.1620090207CrossRefMATH

51.

Vavourakis, V., Loukidis, D., Charmpis, D., Papanastasiou, P.: A robust finite element approach for large deformation elastoplastic plane-strain problems. Finite Elem. Anal. Des. 77, 1–15 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.finel.2013.08.003MathSciNetCrossRefMATH

52.

Yun, Y.M.: An explicit finite element formulation for very large deformations based on updated material reference frame. Finite Elem. Anal. Des. 13(2–3), 209–224 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-874x(93)90058-xCrossRefMATH

53.

Reddy, J.N.: An Introduction to Nonlinear Finite Element Analysis. Oxford University Press, New York (2004). https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198525295.001.0001CrossRefMATH

54.

Jafarzadeh, H., Levitas, V.I., Farrahi, G.H., Javanbakht, M.: Phase field approach for nanoscale interactions between crack propagation and phase transformation. Nanoscale 11(46), 22243–22247 (2019)CrossRef

55.

Javanbakht, M., Ghaedi, M.S.: Phase field approach for void dynamics with interface stresses at the nanoscale. Int. J. Eng. Sci. 154, 103279 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijengsci.2020.103279MathSciNetCrossRefMATH

56.

Javanbakht, M., Ghaedi, M.S.: Nanovoid induced martensitic growth under uniaxial stress: effect of misfit strain, temperature and nanovoid size on PT threshold stress and nanostructure in NiAl. Comput. Mater. Sci. 184, 109928 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2020.109928CrossRef

57.

Placidi, L., Rosi, G., Barchiesi, E.: Analytical solutions of 2-dimensional second gradient linear elasticity for continua with cubic-D4 microstructure. Adv. Struct. Mater. New Achiev. Contin. Mech. Thermodyn. 383–401, 26 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13307-8CrossRefMATH

58.

Alibert, J.-J., Seppecher, P., Dell’Isola, F.: Truss modular beams with deformation energy depending on higher displacement gradients. Math. Mech. Solids 8(1), 51–73 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1177/1081286503008001658MathSciNetCrossRefMATH

59.

Dell’Isola, F., Seppecher, P., Madeo, A.: How contactinteractions may depend on the shape of Cauchy cuts in Nth gradientcontinua: approach “à la D’Alembert”. Zeitschrift fürangewandte Mathematik und Physik. 63(6), 1119–1141 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00033-012-0197-9CrossRefADSMATH

60.

Rinaldi, A., Placidi, L.: A microscale second gradient approximation of the damage parameter of quasi-brittle heterogeneous lattices. ZAMM - Journal of Applied Mathematics and Mechanics / Zeitschrift für Angewandte Mathematik und Mechanik. 94(10), 862–877 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1002/zamm.201300028MathSciNetCrossRefADSMATH

61.

Dell’Isola, F., Andreaus, U., Placidi, L.: At the origins and in the vanguard of peridynamics, non-local and higher-gradient continuum mechanics: an underestimated and still topical contribution of Gabrio Piola. Math. Mech. Solids 20(8), 887–928 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1177/1081286513509811MathSciNetCrossRefMATH

62.

Dell’Isola, F., Seppecher, P., Corte, A.D.: The postulations á la D’Alembert and á la Cauchy for higher gradient continuum theories are equivalent: a review of existing results. Proc. R. Soc. A: Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 471(2183), 20150415 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2015.0415MathSciNetCrossRefADSMATH

63.

Placidi, L.: A variational approach for a nonlinear 1-dimensional second gradient continuum damage model. Contin. Mech. Thermodyn. 27(4–5), 623–638 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00161-014-0338-9MathSciNetCrossRefADSMATH

64.

Dell’Isola, F., Corte, A.D., Giorgio, I.: Higher-gradient continua: the legacy of Piola, Mindlin, Sedov and Toupin and some future research perspectives. Math. Mech. Solids 22(4), 852–872 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1177/1081286515616034MathSciNetCrossRefMATH

65.

Placidi, L., Barchiesi, E.: Energy approach to brittle fracture in strain-gradient modelling. Proc. R. Soc. Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 474(2210), 20170878 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2017.0878MathSciNetCrossRefADSMATH

66.

Placidi, L., Misra, A., Barchiesi, E.: Two-dimensional strain gradient damage modeling: a variational approach. Zeitschrift für angewandte Mathematik und Physik (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00033-018-0947-4CrossRefMATH

67.

Chiaia, B., Barchiesi, E., Biagi, V.D., Placidi, L.: A novel structural resilience index: definition and applications to frame structures. Mech. Res. Commun. 99, 52–57 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechrescom.2019.03.007CrossRef

68.

Levin, V.A., Levitas, V.I., Zingerman, K.M., Freiman, E.I.: Phase-field simulation of stress-induced martensitic phase transformations at large strains. Int. J. Solids Struct. 50(19), 2914–2928 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2013.05.003CrossRef

69.

Levitas, V.I.: Phase-field theory for martensitic phase transformations at large strains. Int. J. Plast. 49, 85–118 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2013.03.002CrossRef

70.

Michael Lai, W., Rubin, D., Krempl, E.: Introduction to Continuum Mechanics. Elsevier, Burlington (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-7506-8560-3.X0001-1CrossRefMATH

71.

Martins, J., Neto, D., Alves, J., Oliveira, M., Laurent, H., Andrade-Campos, A., Menezes, L.: A new staggered algorithm for thermomechanical coupled problems. Int. J. Solids Struct. 122–123, 42–58 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2017.06.002CrossRef

72.

Segawa, M., Yamanaka, A., Nomoto, S.: Multi-phase-field simulation of cyclic phase transformation in Fe–C–Mn and Fe–C–Mn–Si alloys. Comput. Mater. Sci. 136, 67–75 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2017.04.014CrossRef

73.

Basak, A., Levitas, V.I.: Finite element procedure and simulations for a multiphase phase field approach to martensitic phase transformations at large strains and with interfacial stresses. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 343, 368–406 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2018.08.006mydoMathSciNetCrossRefADSMATH

Title: Explicit nonlinear finite element approach to the Lagrangian-based coupled phase field and elasticity equations for nanoscale thermal- and stress-induced martensitic transformations
Authors: Mahdi Javanbakht
Hossein Rahbar
Milad Ashourian
Publication date: 24-08-2020
Publisher: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in: Continuum Mechanics and Thermodynamics / Issue 3/2023
Print ISSN: 0935-1175
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0959
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00161-020-00912-1

Springer Professional

Abstract

Please log in to get access to your license.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Other articles of this Issue 3/2023

A peridynamic-based machine learning model for one-dimensional and two-dimensional structures

Experimental methods of living cells mechanical loading: review

Thermo-mechano-chemical modeling and computation of thermosetting polymers used in post-installed fastening systems in concrete structures

On some variational principles in micropolar theories of single-layer thin bodies

A criterion for dynamic ductile fracture initiation of tensile mode

Effective strain gradient continuum model of metamaterials and size effects analysis

Premium Partners