nach oben

Forschung im Ingenieurwesen

Erschienen in:

24.11.2021 | Originalarbeiten/Originals

Inspection interval optimization for complex equipment in automotive manufacturing under dependent failures

verfasst von: Hamzeh Soltanali, Mehdi Khojastehpour, Esmaeil Rezaei, Abbas Rohani

Erschienen in: Forschung im Ingenieurwesen | Ausgabe 1/2022

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Inspection activities in automotive manufacturing play a crucial role in diagnosing and preventing unexpected failures by adopting the well-planned intervals. However, finding the optimal inspection intervals has been a major concern within manufacturing systems due to the failure dependency issue caused by the design complexity and integrated operations. Hence, this paper proposes a new framework for inspection interval optimization under failure dependency in three steps; firstly identifying all failure modes and potential dependent failures through Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA) method, secondly, adapting the statistical based approach for reliability and availability evaluation, as well as using the Bayesian theory for availability and total expected cost based inspection modeling under failure dependency and finally, performing some well-known Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) techniques for finding the optimal trade-off between main criteria e.g. total expected cost and reliability indices. The results of the proposed framework revealed that the failure dependency has a meaningful impact on inspection intervals. Besides, the cost-based model suggests shorter inspection intervals with that of the availability-based model in all dependent failure cases. As a consequence, the results could be useful for implementing the reliable maintenance programs to improve the operational performance of complex equipment in automotive manufacturing.

Vorheriger Artikel User-centered design of power tools: a generic process for evaluation of usability aspects

Nächster Artikel Optimization of contact stress for the high contact ratio spur gears achieved through novel hob cutter

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Soltanali H, Garmabaki AHS, Thaduri A, Parida A, Kumar U, Rohani A (2019) Sustainable production process: an application of reliability, availability, and maintainability methodologies in automotive manufacturing. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part O J Risk Reliab 233(4):682–697

Li W, Pham H (2005) An inspection-maintenance model for systems with multiple competing processes. IEEE Trans Reliab 54(2):318–327CrossRef

Ye Z, Cai Z, Zhou F, Zhao J, Zhang P (2019) Reliability analysis for series manufacturing system with imperfect inspection considering the interaction between quality and degradation. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 189:345–356CrossRef

Van Horenbeek A, Pintelon L, Muchiri P (2010) Maintenance optimization models and criteria. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag 1(3):189–200CrossRef

Bal A, Satoglu SI (2018) Mathematical optimization models for the maintenance policies in production systems. In: Handbook of research on applied optimization methodologies in manufacturing systems. IGI Global, , pp 252–268CrossRef

Rezaei E (2017) A new model for the optimization of periodic inspection intervals with failure interaction: a case study for a turbine rotor. Case Stud Eng Fail Anal 9:148–156CrossRef

Golmakani HR, Moakedi H (2012) Periodic inspection optimization model for a two-component repairable system with failure interaction. Comput Ind Eng 63(3):540–545CrossRef

Sheu SH, Chen YC, Wang WY, Shin NH (2003) Economic optimization of off-line inspection with inspection errors. J Oper Res Soc 54(8):888–895MATHCrossRef

Mathew S (2004) Optimal inspection frequency: a tool for maintenance planning/forecasting. Int J Qual Reliab Manag 21:763–771CrossRef

10.

Wang W (2009) An inspection model for a process with two types of inspections and repairs. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 94(2):526–533CrossRef

11.

Barker CT, Newby MJ (2009) Optimal non-periodic inspection for a multivariate degradation model. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 94(1):33–43CrossRef

12.

de Almeida AT (2012) Multicriteria model for selection of preventive maintenance intervals. Qual Reliab Eng Int 28(6):585–593CrossRef

13.

Ahmadi A, Kumar U (2011) Cost based risk analysis to identify inspection and restoration intervals of hidden failures subject to aging. IEEE Trans Reliab 60(1):197–209CrossRef

14.

Babishin V, Taghipour S (2016) Optimal maintenance policy for multicomponent systems with periodic and opportunistic inspections and preventive replacements. Appl Math Model 40(23–24):10480–10505MathSciNetMATHCrossRef

15.

Jafary B, Nagaraju V, Fiondella L (2017) Impact of correlated component failure on preventive maintenance policies. IEEE Trans Reliab 66(2):575–586CrossRef

16.

Garmabaki AHS, Ahmadi A, Ahmadi M (2016) Maintenance optimization using multi-attribute utility theory. In: Current trends in reliability, availability, maintainability and safety. Springer, Cham, pp 13–25CrossRef

17.

de Almeida AT, Bohoris GA (1996) Decision theory in maintenance strategy of standby system with gamma-distribution repair-time. IEEE Trans Reliab 45(2):216–219CrossRef

18.

Brito AJ, de Almeida AT (2009) Multi-attribute risk assessment for risk ranking of natural gas pipelines. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 94(2):187–198CrossRef

19.

de Almeida AT (2001) Multicriteria decision making on maintenance: spares and contracts planning. Eur J Oper Res 129(2):235–241MATHCrossRef

20.

Garmabaki AHS, Ahmadi A, Mahmood YA, Barabadi A (2016) Reliability modelling of multiple repairable units. Qual Reliab Eng Int 32(7):2505–2517CrossRef

21.

Bukhsh AZ, Stipanovic I, Klanker G, O’Connor A, Doree AG (2019) Network level bridges maintenance planning using Multi-Attribute Utility. Theor Struct Infrastructure Eng 15(7):872–885CrossRef

22.

Ahmadi A, Gupta S, Karim R, Kumar U (2010) Selection of maintenance strategy for aircraft systems using multi-criteria decision making methodologies. Int J Reliab Qual Saf Eng 17(03):223–243CrossRef

23.

Chakraborty S (2011) Applications of the MOORA method for decision making in manufacturing environment. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 54(9):1155–1166CrossRef

24.

Yang JH, Han MY, Zuo QW (2019) Research on optimizing model of single-unit system inspection interval based on RAMS and TOPSIS. In: 2019 International Conference on Quality, Reliability, Risk, Maintenance, and Safety Engineering (QR2MSE). IEEE, , pp 1088–1095CrossRef

25.

Soltanali H, Rohani A, Tabasizadeh M, Abbaspour-Fard MH, Parida A (2020) An improved fuzzy inference system-based risk analysis approach with application to automotive production line. Neural Comput Appl 32(14):10573–10591CrossRef

26.

Soltanali H, Rohani A, Abbaspour-Fard MH, Farinha JT (2021) A comparative study of statistical and soft computing techniques for reliability prediction of automotive manufacturing. Appl Soft Comput 98:106738CrossRef

27.

AGRAMKOW Co. (2014) Manual instructions of line-side Brake fluid filling equipment. Augustenborg Landevej 19DK-6400 Sønderborg, Denmark. https://www.agramkow.com. Accessed 11 Mar 2021

28.

Stamatelatos M, Dezfuli H, Apostolakis G, Everline C, Guarro S, Mathias D, Youngblood R (2011) Probabilistic risk assessment procedures guide for NASA managers and practitioners. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.18206.13122

29.

Louit DM, Pascual R, Jardine AK (2009) A practical procedure for the selection of time-to-failure models based on the assessment of trends in maintenance data. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 94(10):1618–1628CrossRef

30.

Barabady J, Kumar U (2008) Reliability analysis of mining equipment: a case study of a crushing plant at Jajarm bauxite mine in Iran. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 93(4):647–653CrossRef

31.

Kumar U, Klefsjö B (1992) Reliability analysis of hydraulic systems of LHD machines using the power law process model. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 35(3):217–224CrossRef

32.

Garmabaki AHS, Ahmadi A, Block J, Pham H, Kumar U (2016) A reliability decision framework for multiple repairable units. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 150:78–88CrossRef

33.

Soltanali H, Rohani A, Tabasizadeh M, Abbaspour-Fard MH, Parida A (2020) Operational reliability evaluation-based maintenance planning for automotive production line. Qual Technol Quant Manag 17(2):186–202CrossRef

34.

Tsarouhas PH (2015) Maintainability analysis in the yogurt industry. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag 6(2):119–128CrossRef

35.

Department of Defense (1981) Department of defense handbook reliability growth management. MIL-HDBK-189. Department of Defense, Washington DC

36.

Jardine AK, Tsang AH (2005) Maintenance, replacement, and reliability: theory and applications. CRC press, MATHCrossRef

37.

Blanchard BS, Fabrycky WJ, Fabrycky WJ (1990) Systems engineering and analysis vol 4. Prentice hall, Englewood Cliffs

38.

Kanoun K, de Bastos Martini MR, De Souza JM (1991) A method for software reliability analysis and prediction application to the TROPICO‑R switching system. IEEE Trans Softw Eng 17(4):334CrossRef

39.

Huang W, Dietrich DL (2005) An alternative degradation reliability modeling approach using maximum likelihood estimation. IEEE Trans Reliab 54(2):310–317CrossRef

40.

Ruschel E, Santos EAP, Loures EDFR (2020) Establishment of maintenance inspection intervals: an application of process mining techniques in manufacturing. J Intell Manuf 31(1):53–72CrossRef

41.

Kallen MJ, Van Noortwijk JM (2005) Optimal maintenance decisions under imperfect inspection. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 90(2–3):177–185CrossRef

42.

Flage R, Coit DW, Luxhøj JT, Aven T (2012) Safety constraints applied to an adaptive Bayesian condition-based maintenance optimization model. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 102:16–26CrossRef

43.

Yazdi M, Soltanali H (2019) Knowledge acquisition development in failure diagnosis analysis as an interactive approach. Int J Interact Des Manuf 13(1):193–210CrossRef

44.

Yazdi M, Daneshvar S, Setareh H (2017) An extension to fuzzy developed failure mode and effects analysis (FDFMEA) application for aircraft landing system. Saf Sci 98:113–123CrossRef

45.

Cahyapratama A, Sarno R (2018) Application of analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and simple additive weighting (SAW) methods in singer selection process. In: 2018 International Conference on Information and Communications Technology (ICOIACT). IEEE, , pp 234–239CrossRef

46.

Brauers WK, Zavadskas EK (2006) The MOORA method and its application to privatization in a transition economy. Control Cybern 35(2):445–469MathSciNetMATH

47.

Zavadskas EK, Kalibatas D, Kalibatiene D (2016) A multi-attribute assessment using WASPAS for choosing an optimal indoor environment. Arch Civ Mech Eng 16(1):76–85CrossRef

Titel: Inspection interval optimization for complex equipment in automotive manufacturing under dependent failures
verfasst von: Hamzeh Soltanali
Mehdi Khojastehpour
Esmaeil Rezaei
Abbas Rohani
Publikationsdatum: 24.11.2021
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: Forschung im Ingenieurwesen / Ausgabe 1/2022
Print ISSN: 0015-7899
Elektronische ISSN: 1434-0860
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10010-021-00568-6

Premium Partner

Marktübersichten

Die im Laufe eines Jahres in der „adhäsion“ veröffentlichten Marktübersichten helfen Anwendern verschiedenster Branchen, sich einen gezielten Überblick über Lieferantenangebote zu verschaffen.

Zur Marktübersicht

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2022

Koordination von Übernahmemanövern beim hochautomatisierten Fahren unter Berücksichtigung der Fahrerverfügbarkeit

Untersuchung und Klassifikation der Fahreraufmerksamkeit bei längerer partiell automatisierter Fahrt

Modeling driver-vehicle interaction in automated driving

Stand der Technik: Anschmierungen in Radial-Zylinderrollenlagern

On the determination of the bending fatigue strength in and above the very high cycle fatigue regime of shot-peened gears

Optimization of contact stress for the high contact ratio spur gears achieved through novel hob cutter

Premium Partner

Marktübersichten