nach oben

KI - Künstliche Intelligenz

Erschienen in:

23.01.2016 | Technical Contribution

15 Years of Semantic Web: An Incomplete Survey

verfasst von: Birte Glimm, Heiner Stuckenschmidt

Erschienen in: KI - Künstliche Intelligenz | Ausgabe 2/2016

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

It has been 15 years since the first publications proposed the use of ontologies as a basis for defining information semantics on the Web starting what today is known as the Semantic Web Research Community. This work undoubtedly had a significant influence on AI as a field and in particular the knowledge representation and Reasoning Community that quickly identified new challenges and opportunities in using Description Logics in a practical setting. In this survey article, we will try to give an overview of the developments the field has gone through in these 15 years. We will look at three different aspects: the evolution of Semantic Web Language Standards, the evolution of central topics in the Semantic Web Community and the evolution of the research methodology.

Vorheriger Artikel Special Issue on Semantic Web

Nächster Artikel Semantic Web: State of the Art and Adoption in Corporations

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

KI - Künstliche Intelligenz

The Scientific journal "KI – Künstliche Intelligenz" is the official journal of the division for artificial intelligence within the "Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V." (GI) – the German Informatics Society - with constributions from troughout the field of artificial intelligence.

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

http://json.org/.

One can look-up typical prefixes at http://prefix.cc.

http://www.loa.istc.cnr.it/old/DOLCE.html.

Baader F, Brandt S, Lutz C (2008) Pushing the EL envelope further. In: Clark K, Patel-Schneider PF (eds) In: Proceedings of the OWLED 2008 DC workshop on OWL: experiences and directions

Beckett D, Berners-Lee T. Turtle—Terse RDF Triple Language. In: W3C Team submission. W3C, 14 Jan 2008. http://www.w3.org/TeamSubmission/turtle/

Beckett D, Broekstra J. SPARQL query results XML format. In: W3C recommendation. W3C, 15 Jan 2008. http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-XMLres/

Beckett D, McBride B. RDF/XML syntax specification. In: W3C recommendation. W3C, 10 Feb 2004. http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-syntax-grammar/

Berners-Lee T, Hendler J, Lassila O (2001) The semantic web. Sci Am 284(5):34–43CrossRef

Birbeck M, McCarron S: CURIE Syntax 1.0—a syntax for expressing compact URIs. In: W3C Working Group Note. W3C, 16 Dec 2010. http://www.w3.org/TR/curie

Biron PV, Malhotra A. XML schema part 2: datatypes second edition. In: W3C recommendation. W3C, 28 Oct 2004. http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-xmlschema-2-20041028/

Bizer C, Cyganiak R. RDF 1.1 TriG—RDF dataset language. In: Carothers G, Seaborne A (eds) W3C recommendation. W3C, 25 Feb 2014. http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/REC-trig-20140225/

Boley H, Hallmark G, Kifer M, Paschke A, Polleres A, Reynolds D. RIF core dialect (second edition). In: W3C recommendation. W3C, 5 Feb 2013. http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/REC-rif-core-20130205/

10.

Boley H, Kifer M. RIF basic logic dialect (second edition). In: W3C recommendation. W3C, 5 Feb 2013. http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/REC-rif-bld-20130205/

11.

Brickley D, Guha RV, McBride B. RDF vocabulary description language 1.0: RDF schema. In: W3C recommendation. W3C, 10 Feb 2004. http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-rdf-schema-20040210/

12.

Calvanese D, De Giacomo G, Lembo D, Lenzerini M, Rosati R (2007) Tractable reasoning and efficient query answering in description logics: the DL-lite family. J Autom Reason 39(3):385–429MathSciNetCrossRefMATH

13.

Carothers G. RDF 1.1 N-quads—a line-based syntax for RDF datasets. In: W3C recommendation. W3C, 25 Feb 2014. http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/REC-n-quads-20140225/

14.

Clark KG, Feigenbaum L, Torres E. SPARQL protocol for RDF. In: W3C recommendation. W3C, 15 Jan 2008. http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-protocol/

15.

Cyganiak R, Wood D, Lanthaler M. RDF 1.1 concepts and abstract syntax. In: W3C recommendation. W3C, 25 Feb 2014. http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-concepts/

16.

Davis I, Steiner T, Le Hors AJ. RDF 1.1 JSON alternate serialization (RDF/JSON). In: W3C Working Group Note. W3C, 07 Nov 2013. http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-json/

17.

de Bruijn J. RIF RDF and OWL compatibility (second edition). In: W3C recommendation. W3C, 5 Feb 2013. http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/REC-rif-rdf-owl-20130205/

18.

de Sainte Marie C, Hallmark G, Paschke A. RIF production rule dialect (second edition). In: W3C recommendation. W3C, 5 Feb 2013. http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/REC-rif-prd-20130205/

19.

Feigenbaum L, Williams GT, Clark KG, Torres E. SPARQL 1.1 protocol. In: W3C recommendation. W3C, 21 Mar 2013. http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/REC-sparql11-protocol-20130321/

20.

Gearon P, Passant A, Polleres A. SPARQL 1.1 update. In: W3C recommendation. W3C, 21 Mar 2013. http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/REC-sparql11-update-20130321/

21.

Glimm B, Ogbuji C. SPARQL 1.1 entailment regimes. In: W3C recommendation. W3C, 21 Mar 2013. http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/REC-sparql11-entailment-20130321/

22.

Golbreich C, Wallace EK. OWL 2 web ontology language—new features and rationale (second edition). In: W3C recommendation. W3C, 11 Dec 2012. http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/REC-owl2-new-features-20121211/

23.

Grosof BN, Horrocks I, Volz R, Decker S. Description logic programs: combining logic programs with description logic. In: Proceedings of the 12th international conference on world wide web (WWW 2003). ACM Press and Addison Wesley, pp 48–57 (2003)

24.

Hawke S, Beckett D, Broekstra J. SPARQL query results XML format (second edition). In: W3C recommendation. W3C, 21 Mar 2013. http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/REC-rdf-sparql-XMLres-20130321/

25.

Horridge M, Patel-Schneider PF. OWL 2 web ontology language—Manchester syntax. In: W3C Working Group Note. W3C, 27 Oct 2009. http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/NOTE-owl2-manchester-syntax-20091027/

26.

Kifer M, Boley H. RIF overview (second edition). In: W3C Working Group Note. W3C, 5 Feb 2013. http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/NOTE-rif-overview-20130205/

27.

Klyne G, Carroll JJ. Resource description framework (RDF): concepts and abstract syntax. In: W3C recommendation. W3C, 10 Feb 2004. http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-concepts/

28.

Krötzsch M, Simancik F, Horrocks I. A description logic primer. CoRR arXiv:1201.4089 (2012)

29.

Malhotra A, Melton J, Walsh N. XQuery 1.0 and XPath 2.0 functions and operators. In: W3C recommendation. W3C, 23 Jan 2007. http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/REC-xpath-functions-20070123/

30.

Morgenstern L, Welty C, Boley H, Hallmark G. RIF primer (second edition). In: W3C Working Group Note. W3C, 5 Feb 2013. http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/NOTE-rif-primer-20130205/

31.

Motik B, Parsia B, Patel-Schneider PF. OWL 2 web ontology language—XML serialization. In: W3C recommendation. W3C, 27 Oct 2009. http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/REC-owl2-xml-serialization-20091027/

32.

Motik B, Patel-Schneider PF, Cuenca Grau B. OWL 2 web ontology language—direct semantics (second edition). In: W3C recommendation. W3C, 11 Dec 2012. http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/REC-owl2-direct-semantics-20121211/

33.

Motik B, Patel-Schneider PF, Parsia B. OWL 2 web ontology language: structural specification and functional-style syntax (second edition). In: W3C recommendation. W3C, 11 Dec 2012. http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/REC-owl2-syntax-20121211/

34.

Ogbuji C. SPARQL 1.1 graph store HTTP protocol. In: W3C recommendation. W3C, 21 Mar 2013. http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/REC-sparql11-http-rdf-update-20130321/

35.

Patel-Schneider PF, Motik B. OWL 2 web ontology language—mapping to RDF graphs (second edition). In: W3C recommendation. W3C, 11 Dec 2012. http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/REC-owl2-mapping-to-rdf-20121211/

36.

Polleres A, Boley H, Kifer M. RIF datatypes and built-ins 1.0 (second edition). In: W3C recommendation. W3C, 5 Feb 2013. http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/REC-rif-dtb-20130205/

37.

Prud’hommeaux E, Buil-Aranda C. SPARQL 1.1 federated query. In: W3C recommendation. W3C, 21 Mar 2013. http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/REC-sparql11-federated-query-20130321/

38.

Prud’hommeaux E, Seaborne A. SPARQL query language for RDF. In: W3C recommendation. W3C, 15 Jan 2008. http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-query/

39.

Schneider M. OWL 2 web ontology language—RDF-based semantics (second edition). In: W3C recommendation. W3C, 11 Dec 2012. http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/REC-owl2-rdf-based-semantics-20121211/

40.

Seaborne A. SPARQL 1.1 query results CSV and TSV formats. In: W3C recommendation. W3C, 21 Mar 2013. http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/REC-sparql11-esults-csv-tsv-20130321/

41.

Seaborne A. SPARQL 1.1 query results JSON format. In: W3C recommendation. W3C, 21 Mar 2013. http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/REC-sparql11-results-json-20130321/

42.

Sporny M, Longley D, Kellogg G, Lanthaler M, Lindstrm N. JSON-LD 1.0—a JSON-based serialization for linked data. In: Sporny M, Kellogg G, Lanthaler M (eds) W3C recommendation. W3C, 16 Jan 2014. http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/REC-json-ld-20140116/

43.

Stuckenschmidt H, Schuhmacher M, Knopp J, Meilicke C, Scherp A. On the status of experimental research on the semantic web. In: The semantic web—ISWC 2013: 12th international semantic web conference, lecture notes in computer science, vol 8218, pp 591–606 (2013)

44.

ter Horst HJ (2005) Completeness, decidability and complexity of entailment for RDF schema and a semantic extension involving the OWL vocabulary. J Web Semant 3(2–3):79–115. doi:10.1016/j.websem.2005.06.001 CrossRef

45.

The W3C SPARQL Working Group. SPARQL 1.1 overview. In: W3C recommendation. W3C, 21 Mar 2013. http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/REC-sparql11-overview-20130321/

46.

Tichy W, Lukowicz P, Prechelt L, Heinz E (1995) Experimental evaluation in computer science: a quantitative study. J Syst Softw 28(1):9–18CrossRef

47.

Williams GT. SPARQL 1.1 service description. In: W3C recommendation. W3C, 21 Mar 2013. http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/REC-sparql11-service-description-20130321/

48.

Wood D. Whats new in RDF 1.1. In: W3C recommendation. W3C, 25 Feb 2014. http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-new/

49.

Zimmermann A. RDF 1.1: on semantics of RDF datasets. In: W3C Working Group Note. W3C, 25 Feb 2014. http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/NOTE-rdf11-datasets-20140225/

Titel: 15 Years of Semantic Web: An Incomplete Survey
verfasst von: Birte Glimm
Heiner Stuckenschmidt
Publikationsdatum: 23.01.2016
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: KI - Künstliche Intelligenz / Ausgabe 2/2016
Print ISSN: 0933-1875
Elektronische ISSN: 1610-1987
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13218-016-0424-1

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

KI - Künstliche Intelligenz

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2016

Semantic Web Service Search: A Brief Survey

Interview with Prof. Dr. Ian Horrocks, Professor at the Department of Computer Science of the University of Oxford

Semantic Web Reloaded: An Update on the Progress of Semantic Web technologies

Special Issue on Semantic Web

Extracting Semantics from Unconstrained Navigation on Wikipedia

SR Workshop 2015: International Workshop on Stream Reasoning