Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Laboratory Investigations on Geotechnical Properties of Screened Bottom Ash from Two MSW Incineration Plants in Delhi Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2021 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

3-D Finite Element Study of Embankment Resting on Soft Soil Reinforced with Encased Stone Column

verfasst von : B. K. Pandey, S. Rajesh, S. Chandra

Erschienen in: Problematic Soils and Geoenvironmental Concerns

Verlag: Springer Singapore

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This paper presents the outcomes of a 3-D finite element analysis performed to study the time-dependent behavior of embankment resting on the geosynthetic-encased stone column (GESC). The numerical analysis is carried out on both fixed and floating GESC. The results of the study show the effect of encasement stiffness, encasement length and length of the geosynthetic encased stone column on time-dependent behavior of the system. The use of GESC has provided significant improvement in reducing the generation and dissipation of excess pore water pressure, settlement and lateral displacement of the column along its length. The study indicates that the higher stress concentration in the case of GESC results in better time-dependent behavior. Additionally, the results also confirm that there is an optimum value of encasement stiffness, encasement length and length of geosynthetic-encased column beyond which no substantial improvement is attained.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Probabilistic Performance Analysis of Prefabricated Vertical Drains on Soft Soils
Nächstes Kapitel Geotechnical and Physicochemical Properties of Untreated and Treated Hazardous Bauxite Residue Red Mud
Literatur
Alexiew D, Raithel M, Kuster V, Detert O (2012) 15 Years of experience with geotextile encased granular columns as foundation system. In: ISSMGE - TC 211 international symposium on ground improvement IS-GI, Brussels
Ali K, Shahu JT, Sharma KG (2012) Model tests on geosynthetic-reinforced stone columns: a comparative study. Geosynth Int 19(4):292–305CrossRef
Aljanabi QA, Chik Z, Kasa A (2013) Construction of a new highway embankment on the soft clay soil treatment by stone columns in Malaysia. J Eng Sci Technol 8:448–456
Almeida MSS, Riccio M, Hosseinpour I (2013) Performance of a geosynthetic-encased column (GEC) in soft ground: numerical and analytical studies. Geosynth Int 20:252–262CrossRef
Ayadat T, Hanna AM (2005) Encapsulated stone columns as a soil improvement technique for collapsible soil. Proc Inst Civ Eng Ground Improv 9:137–147
Barksdale RD, Bachus RC (1983) Design and construction of stone column, vol 1. U.S Department of Transportation, Report No—FHA FHWA/RD-83 (1983)
Brinkgreve RBJ, Engin E, Swolf WM (2013) Plaxis 3D 2013 manual. Plaxis Bv, The Netherlands
Castro J (2017) Groups of encased stone columns: influence of column length and arrangement. Geotext Geomembr 45:68–80CrossRef
Castro J, Sagaseta C (2011) Deformation and consolidation around encased stone columns. Geotext Geomembr 29:268–276
Chen J-F, Li L-Y, Xue J-F, Feng S-Z (2015) Failure mechanism of geosynthetic-encased stone columns in soft soils under embankment. Geotext Geomembr 43:424–431
Christoulas S, Bouckovalas G, Giannaros C (2000) An experimental study on model stone columns. Soil Found 40(6):11–22
Dash SK, Bora MC (2013) Improved performance of soft clay foundations using stone columns and geocell-sand mattress. Geotext Geomembr 41:26–35CrossRef
Debnath P, Dey AK (2017) Bearing capacity of geogrid reinforced sand over encased stone column in soft clay. Geotext Geomembr 45(6):653–664CrossRef
Elsawy MBD (2013) Behavior of soft ground improved by conventional and geogrid-encased stone columns, based on FEM study. Geosynth Int 20:276–285CrossRef
Elsawy M, Lesny K, Richwien W (2010) Performance of geogrid-encased stone columns as a reinforcement of soft ground. In: Benz T, Nordal S (eds) Numerical methods in geotechnical engineering. Taylor and Francis Group, London UK, pp 875–880
Fattah MY, Majeed QG (2012) Finite element analysis of geogrid encased stone columns. Geotech Geol Eng J 30:713–726CrossRef
Gu M, Zhao M, Zhang L, Han J (2016) Effects of geogrid encasement on lateral and vertical deformations of stone columns in model tests. Geosynth Int 23:100–112CrossRef
Han J, Ye S-L (2001) Simplified method for consolidation rate of stone column reinforced foundations. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 127(7):240–248CrossRef
Hosseinpour I, Riccio M, Almeida MSS (2014) Numerical evaluation of a granular column reinforced by geosynthetics using encasement and laminated disks. Geotext Geomembr 42:363–373CrossRef
Hosseinpour I, Almeida MSS, Riccio M (2015) Full-scale load test and finite-element analysis of soft ground improved by geotextile-encased granular columns. Geosynth Int 22:428–438CrossRef
Huang J, Han J, Oztoprak S (2009) Coupled mechanical and hydraulic modeling of geosynthetic-reinforced column-supported embankments. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 135(8):1011–1021CrossRef
Khabbazian M, Kaliakin VN, Meehan CL (2010) Numerical study of the effect of geosynthetic encasement on the behaviour of granular columns. Geosynth Int 17:132–143CrossRef
Mahajan R, Korulla M, Rimoldi P (2016) Geotextile encased columns design and installation. In: Proceedings of the 6th Asian regional conference on geosynthetics-geosynthetics for infrastructure development, New Delhi, India, pp 188–194
Malarvizhi SN, Ilamparuthi K (2007) Comparative study on the behavior of encased stone column and conventional stone column. Soils Found 47(5):873–885CrossRef
Miranda M, Costa DA, Castro J, Sagaseta C (2017) Influence of geotextile encasement on the behaviour of stone columns: laboratory study. Geotext Geomembr 45:14–22CrossRef
Murugesan S, Rajagopal K (2006) Geosynthetic-encased stone columns: numerical evaluation. Geotext Geomembr 24:349–358CrossRef
Murugesan S, Rajagopal K (2007) Model tests on geosynthetic-encased stone columns. Geosynth Int 14(6):346–354CrossRef
Murugesan S, Rajagopal K (2010) Studies on the behavior of single and group of geosynthetic encased stone columns. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 136(1):129–139CrossRef
Najjar SS, Sadek S, Maakaroun T (2010) Effect of sand columns on the undrained load response of soft clays. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 136:1263–1277CrossRef
Raithel M, Küster V, Lindmark A (2004) Geotextile-encased columns—a foundation system for earth structures, illustrated by a Dyke project for works extension in Hamburg. In: Proceedings of the Nordic geotechnical meeting NGM, Ystad, Sweden, pp 1–10
Raithel M, Kirchner A, Schade C, Leusink E (2005) Foundation of construction on very soft soil with geotextile encased column—state of the art. In: Proceedings of geo-frontiers 2005, Austin, Texas, United States, pp 1–11
Rajesh S (2017) Time-dependent behaviour of fully and partially penetrated geosynthetic encased stone columns. Geosynth Int 24:60–71CrossRef
Rajesh S, Jain P (2015) Influence of permeability of soft clay on the efficiency of stone columns and geosynthetic encased stone columns—a numerical study. Int J Geotech Eng 9(5):483–493CrossRef
Yoo C (2010) Performance of geosynthetic-encased stone columns in embankment construction: numerical investigation. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 136:1148–1160CrossRef
Yoo C, Kim S-B (2009) Numerical modeling of geosynthetic-encased stone column-reinforced ground. Geosynth Int 16:116–126CrossRef
Zhang L, Zhao M (2014) Deformation analysis of geotextile-encased stone columns. Int J Geomech 15:1–10
Metadaten
Titel
3-D Finite Element Study of Embankment Resting on Soft Soil Reinforced with Encased Stone Column
verfasst von
B. K. Pandey
S. Rajesh
S. Chandra
Copyright-Jahr
2021
Verlag
Springer Singapore
Buch
Problematic Soils and Geoenvironmental Concerns

Print ISBN: 978-981-15-6236-5

Electronic ISBN: 978-981-15-6237-2

Copyright-Jahr: 2021

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-6237-2_38