Skip to main content

2017 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

A Dialogue Interaction Module for a Decision Support System Based on Argumentation Schemes to Public Project Portfolio

verfasst von : Laura Cruz-Reyes, César Medina-Trejo, María Lucila Morales-Rodríguez, Claudia Guadalupe Gómez-Santillan, Teodoro Eduardo Macias-Escobar, César Alejandro Guerrero-Nava, Mercedes Pérez-Villafuerte

Erschienen in: Nature-Inspired Design of Hybrid Intelligent Systems

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Organizations are facing the problem of having more projects than resources to implement them. In this paper, we present a dialogue interaction module of a framework for a Decision Support System (DSS) to aid in the selection of public project portfolios. The Interaction module of this DSS is based on multiple argumentation schemes and dialogue games that not only allow the system to generate and justify a recommendation. This module is also able to obtain new information during the dialogue that allows changing the recommendation according to the Decision Maker’s preferences. Researchers have commonly addressed the public portfolio selection problem with multicriteria algorithms. However, in the real life the final selection of the solution depends on the decision maker (DM). We modeled the reasoning of DM by a Dialogue Corpus. This corpus is a database, supported by an argument tree that validates the system’s recommendations with the preferences of the DM.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Mousseau, V., & Stewart, T.: Progressive methods in multiple criteria decision analysis (Doctoral dissertation, PhD Thesis, Université Du Luxemburg) (2007). Mousseau, V., & Stewart, T.: Progressive methods in multiple criteria decision analysis (Doctoral dissertation, PhD Thesis, Université Du Luxemburg) (2007).
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Resnick, P., & Varian, H. R.: Recommender systems. Communications of the ACM, 40(3), 56-58 (1997). Resnick, P., & Varian, H. R.: Recommender systems. Communications of the ACM, 40(3), 56-58 (1997).
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Ouerdane, W.: Multiple criteria decision aiding: a dialectical perspective (Doctoral dissertation, Université Paris-Dauphine) (2009). Ouerdane, W.: Multiple criteria decision aiding: a dialectical perspective (Doctoral dissertation, Université Paris-Dauphine) (2009).
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Walton, D.: Argumentation methods for artificial intelligence in law. Springer Science & Business Media (2005). Walton, D.: Argumentation methods for artificial intelligence in law. Springer Science & Business Media (2005).
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Walton, D.: Argumentation schemes for Presumptive Reasoning. Mahwah, N. J., Erlbaum (1996). Walton, D.: Argumentation schemes for Presumptive Reasoning. Mahwah, N. J., Erlbaum (1996).
7.
Zurück zum Zitat T. Gordon, H. Prakken, and D. Walton.: The Carneades model of argument and burden of proof. Artificial Intelligence, 171(4):875–896 (2007). T. Gordon, H. Prakken, and D. Walton.: The Carneades model of argument and burden of proof. Artificial Intelligence, 171(4):875–896 (2007).
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Prakken,H.: Relating protocols for dynamic dispute with logics for defeasible argumentation. Synthese, 127:187–219 (2001). Prakken,H.: Relating protocols for dynamic dispute with logics for defeasible argumentation. Synthese, 127:187–219 (2001).
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Parsons S., Sierra C., Jennings, N.: Agents that reason and negotiate by arguing. Journal of Logic and Computation, 8(3):261–292 (1998). Parsons S., Sierra C., Jennings, N.: Agents that reason and negotiate by arguing. Journal of Logic and Computation, 8(3):261–292 (1998).
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Amgoud L., Parsons S., Maudet N.: Arguments, dialogue, and negotiation. In W. Horn, editor, Proceedings of the European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI’00), pages 338–342. IOS Press. (2000) Amgoud L., Parsons S., Maudet N.: Arguments, dialogue, and negotiation. In W. Horn, editor, Proceedings of the European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI’00), pages 338–342. IOS Press. (2000)
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Dung, P. M.: On the Acceptability of Arguments and its Fundamental Role in Nonmonotonic Reasoning, Logic Programming and n-person games. Artificial Intelligence, 77(2):321–358 (1995). Dung, P. M.: On the Acceptability of Arguments and its Fundamental Role in Nonmonotonic Reasoning, Logic Programming and n-person games. Artificial Intelligence, 77(2):321–358 (1995).
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Walton, D., Reed, C., & Macagno, F.: Argumentation Schemes. Cambridge University Press (2008). Walton, D., Reed, C., & Macagno, F.: Argumentation Schemes. Cambridge University Press (2008).
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Botley, S. P., & Hakim, F. (2014). ARGUMENT STRUCTURE IN LEARNER WRITING: A CORPUS-BASED ANALYSIS USING ARGUMENT MAPPING. Kajian Malaysia, 32(1), 45 (2014). Botley, S. P., & Hakim, F. (2014). ARGUMENT STRUCTURE IN LEARNER WRITING: A CORPUS-BASED ANALYSIS USING ARGUMENT MAPPING. Kajian Malaysia, 32(1), 45 (2014).
Metadaten
Titel
A Dialogue Interaction Module for a Decision Support System Based on Argumentation Schemes to Public Project Portfolio
verfasst von
Laura Cruz-Reyes
César Medina-Trejo
María Lucila Morales-Rodríguez
Claudia Guadalupe Gómez-Santillan
Teodoro Eduardo Macias-Escobar
César Alejandro Guerrero-Nava
Mercedes Pérez-Villafuerte
Copyright-Jahr
2017
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47054-2_49