Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics
Erschienen in: International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics 9/2018

28.03.2017 | Original Article

A hybrid-based method for Chinese domain lightweight ontology construction

verfasst von: Jing Qiu, Lin Qi, Jianliang Wang, Guanghua Zhang

Erschienen in: International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics | Ausgabe 9/2018

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This paper proposes a framework to automatically construct lightweight ontology from a corpus of Chinese domain Web documents. A hybrid-based method was used for domain lightweight ontology learning. Rule-based method, statistics-based method and cluster-based method were combined to complete two sub-tasks: concept extraction and taxonomic relationships extraction. Firstly, multiword terms were identified based on a set of rules as well as a Named Entity Module. Three statistic methods were employed jointly to rank the order of domain concepts. Secondly, clustering and subsumption methods were joined to construct taxonomy. Concepts were clustered into several groups through clustering method. Three similarity measures were defined to compute similarities between concepts, which aims at capturing semantic, spatial, and co-occurrence information. Subsumption method was adopted to construct taxonomic structure for each concept group, since taxonomic relations only existed between similar concepts. Thirdly, the definitions of the concepts extracted in the first step are collected from online Chinese Encyclopedia. On this collection of concept definitions, the rule-based method and a set of lexico-syntactic patterns were applied to extract taxonomic relationships and refine the taxonomy. Finally, we evaluate our method using gold-standard evaluation on domain of football games. In our evaluation, we compare our method with several classical algorithms. The experimental results show the effectiveness of our method.
Vorheriger Artikel Hesitant fuzzy linguistic multi-criteria decision making based on possibility theory
Nächster Artikel Adaptive neural control for nonstrict-feedback time-delay systems with input and output constraints

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Weitere Produktempfehlungen anzeigen
Fußnoten
1
LTP is provided by Research Center for Social Computing and Information Retrieval, Harbin Institute of Technology.
 
Literatur
1.
2.
Berners-Lee T, Hendler J, Lassila O (2001) The semantic web: a new form of web content that is meaningful to computers will unleash a revolution of new possibilities. Sci Am 285(5):34–43CrossRef
3.
Bird S, Klein E, Loper E, Baldridge J (2008) Multi-disciplinary instruction with the natural language toolkit. In: Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Issues in Teaching Computational Linguistics (TeachCL’08), 2008, pp 62–70
4.
Blum A, Mitchell T (1998) Combining labeled and unlabeled data with co-training. In: Proceedings of the 11th annual conference on Computational learning theory, 1998, pp 92–100
5.
Bradesko L, Dali L, Fortuna B et al (2010) Contextualized question answering. In: ITI 2010, pp 73–78
6.
Brewster C, Jupp S, Luciano J et al (2009) Issues in learning an ontology from text. BMC Bioinform 10(5):S1CrossRef
7.
Buitelaar P, Magnini B (2005) Ontology learning from text: an overview. In: Buitelaar P, Cimiano P, Magnini B (eds) Ontology learning from text: methods, applications and evaluation. IOS Press, The Netherlands, pp 3–12.
8.
Bunescu RC, Mooney RJ (2005) A shortest path dependency kernels for relation extraction. In: Proceedings of EMNLP’2005, 2005, pp 724–731
9.
Che W, Li Z, Liu T (2010) LTP: a Chinese language technology platform. In: Coling, pp 13–16
10.
Ciaramita M, Gangemi A, Ratsch E, Saric J, Rojas I (2005) Unsupervised learning of semantic relations between concepts of a molecular biology ontology. In: Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2005, pp 659–664
11.
Cimiano P, Hotho A, Staab S (2005) Learning concept hierarchies from text corpora using formal concept analysis. J Artif Intell Res 24:305–339CrossRefMATH
12.
Cimiano P, Volker J (2005) Text2Onto: A framework for ontology learning and data-driven change discovery. In: NLDB, pp 227–238
13.
Colace F, Santo MD, Greco L et al (2014) Terminological ontology learning and population using latent Dirichlet allocation. J Visual Lang Comput 25:818–826CrossRef
14.
Curtis J, Matthews G, Baxter D (2005) On the effective use of Cyc in a question answering system. In: IJCAI Workshop on KRAQ’05, Edinburgh, Scotland, pp 61–71.
15.
Dietz EA, Vandic D, Frasincar F (2012) TaxoLearn: a semantic approach to domain taxonomy learning. In: Proceedings of IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology, 2012, pp 58–65
16.
Doing-Harris K, Livnat Y, Meystre S (2015) Automated concept and relationship extraction for the semi-automated ontology management (SEAM) system. J Biomed Semant 6(15):1–15
17.
Fallucchi F, Zanzotto F M (2011) Inductive probabilistic taxonomy learning using singular value decomposition. Nat Lang Eng 17(1):71–94CrossRef
18.
Faure D, Poibeau T (2000) First experiments of using semantic knowledge learned by ASIUM for information extraction task using INTEX. In ECAI Workshop on Ontology Learning, pp 7–12
19.
Ferreira V H, Lopes l, Vieira R, Finatto M J (2013) Automatic extraction of domain specific non-taxonomic relations from Portuguese Corpora. In: Proceedings of 12th IEEE/WIC/ACM International Joint Conferences on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology, 2013, pp 135–138
20.
Fortuna B, Lavrac N, Velardi P (2008) Advancing Topic Ontology Learning through Term Extraction. In: PRICAI, pp 626–635
21.
Gruber T (1993) A translation approach to portable ontology specifications. Knowl Acquis 5:199–220CrossRef
22.
Hearst MA (1992) Automatic acquisition of hyponyms from large text corpora. In: COLING, vol 2, pp 539–545
23.
Heflin J, Hendler J (2000) Dynamic ontologies on the Web. In: AAAI, pp 443–449
24.
Hippisley A, Cheng D, Ahmad K (2005) The head-modifier principle and multilingual term extraction. Nat Lang Eng 11(2):129–157CrossRef
25.
Kang Y, Haghigh PD, Burstein F (2016) TaxoFinder: a graph-based approach for taxonomy learning. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 28(2):524–536CrossRef
26.
Knijff JD, Frasincar F, Hogenboom F (2013) Domain taxonomy learning from text: the subsumption method versus hierarchical clustering. Data Knowl Eng 83(1):54–69CrossRef
27.
Kozareva Z, Hovy E (2010) A semi-supervised method to learn and construct taxonomies using the web. In: EMNLP, pp 1110–1118
28.
Kozareva Z, Hovy E, Riloff E (2009) Learning and evaluating the content and structure of a term taxonomy. In: AAAI, pp 50–57
29.
Li D, Kipper-Schuler K, Savova G (2008) Conditional random fields and support vector machines for disorder named entity recognition in clinical texts. In: Proceedings of the workshop on current trends in biomedical natural language processing, 2008, pp 94–95
30.
Li J, Luong T, Jurafsky D, and Hovy E (2015) When are tree structures necessary for deep learning of representations? In: Proceedings of the 2015 EMNLP, 2015, pp 2304–2314
31.
Liu X, Song Y, Liu S, Wang H (2012) Automatic taxonomy construction from keywords. In: ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 2012, pp 1433–1441
32.
Lv X, Guan Y, Deng B (2014) Learning based clinical concept extraction on data from multiple sources. J Biomed Inform 52:55–64CrossRef
33.
Maedche A, Staab S (2000) The text-to-onto ontology learning environment. In: Proceedings of SoftwareDemonstration at the 8th International Conference on Conceptual Structures, 2000, pp 14–18
34.
Meijer K, Frasincar F, Hogenboom F (2014) A semantic approach for extracting domain taxonomies from text. Decis Support Syst 62:78–93CrossRef
35.
Mikolov T, Chen K, Corrado G, Dean J (2013) Efficient estimation of word representations in vector space. In: ICLR Workshop, 2013
36.
Milano M, Agopito G, Guzzi PH, Cannataro M (2016) An experimental study of information content measurement of gene ontology terms. Int J Mach Learn Cybern. doi:10.​1007/​s13042-015-0482-y
37.
Navigli R, Velardi P (2004) Learning domain ontologies from document warehouses and dedicated web sites. Comput Linguist 30(2):151–179CrossRefMATH
38.
Nedellec C (2000) Corpus-based learning of semantic relations by the ILP system, Asium. In: Proceeding of Learning Language in Logic, 2000, pp 259–278
39.
Paukkeri MS, Garcia-Plaza AP, Fresno V et al (2012) Learning a taxonomy from a set of text documents. Appl Soft Comput 12:1138–1148CrossRef
40.
Pennacchiotti M, Pantel P (2006) A bootstrapping algorithm for automatically harvesting semantic relations. In: Proceedings of Inference in Computational Semantics, 2006, pp 87–96
41.
Ponzetto SP, Strube M (2011) Taxonomy induction based on a collaboratively built knowledge repository. Artif Intell 75(9–10):1737–1756MathSciNetCrossRef
42.
Rehurek R, Sojka P (2010) Software Framework for Topic Modelling with Large Corpora. In: Proceedings of the LREC 2010 Workshop on New Challenges for NLP Frameworks, 2010, pp 45–50
43.
Rios-Alvarado AB, Lopez-Arevalo I, Sosa-Sosa VJ (2013) Learning concept hierarchies from textual resources for ontologies construction. Expert Syst Appl 40(15):5907–5915CrossRef
44.
Ryu P M, Choi K S (2006) Taxonomy learning using term specificity and similarity. In: Proceedings Workshop on Ontology Learning and Population, 2006, pp 41–48
45.
Salton G, McGill MJ (1986) Introduction to modern information retrieval. In: McGraw-Hill Inc. New York, USA, pp 180–198
46.
Santos CD, Xiang B, Zhou B (2015) Classifying relations by ranking with convolutional neural networks. In: Proceedings of the 53rd ACL and the 7th IJCNLP, 2015, pp 626–634
47.
Schutz A, Buitelaar P (2005) RelExt: a tool for relation extraction from text in ontology extension. In: Proceedings of 4th International Semantic Web Conference, 2005, pp 593–606
48.
49.
Shamsfard M, Barforoush A (2004) Learning ontologies from natural language texts. Int J Hum Comput Stud 60(1):17–63CrossRef
50.
Snchez D, Moreno A (2005) Web-scale taxonomy learning. In: Proceedings of workshop on extending and learning lexical ontologies using machine learning, 2005, pp 53–60
51.
Snow R, Jurafsky D, Ng A Y (2006) Semantic taxonomy induction from heterogenous evidence, In: ACL, pp 801–808
52.
Specia L, Motta E (2006) A hybrid approach for extracting semantic relations from texts. In: Proceedings of 2nd Workshop on Ontology Learning and Population, 2006, pp 57–64
53.
Suchanek FM, Ifrim G, Weikum G (2006) Combining linguistic and statistical analysis to extract relations from web documents. In: Proceeding of 12th ACM SIGKDD Int. Conf. Knowl. Discovery Data Mining, 2006, pp 712–717
54.
Tai KS, Socher R, Manning CD (2015) Improved semantic representations from tree-structured long short-term memory networks. In: Proceedings of the 53rd ACL and the 7th IJCNLP, 2015, pp 1556–1566
55.
Thompson CA, Califf ME, Mooney RJ (1999) Active learning for natural language parsing and information extraction. In: Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Machine Learning, Morgan Kaufmann, 1999, pp 406–414
56.
Velardi P, Cucchiarelli A, Ptit M (2007) A taxonomy learning method and its application to characterize a scientific web community. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 19:180–191CrossRef
57.
Velardi P, Fabriani P, Missikoff M (2001) Using text processing techniques to automatically enrich a domain ontology. In: Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Formal Ontologies in Information Systems, 2001, pp 270–284
58.
Velardi P, Faralli S, Navigli R (2013) OntoLearn reloaded: a graph-based algorithm for taxonomy induction. Comput Linguist 39(3):665–707CrossRef
59.
Velardi P, Navigli R, Cucchiarelli A et al (2005) Evaluation of OntoLearn, a methodology for automatic learning of domain ontologies. In: Buitelaar P, Cimiano P, Magnini B (eds) Ontology learning from text: methods, applications and evaluation. IOS Press, Amsterdam, pp 92–106
60.
Wang W, Mamaani Barnaghi P, Bargiela A (2010) Probabilistic topic models for learning terminological ontologies. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 22(7):1028–1040CrossRef
61.
Wang Y, Patrick J (2009) Cascading classifiers for named entity recognition in clinical notes. In: Proceedings of the workshop on biomedical information extraction, 2009, pp 42–49
62.
Weichselbraun A, Wohlgenannt G, Scharl A (2010) Refining non-taxonomic relation labels with external structured data to support ontology learning. J Data Knowl Eng 69(8):763–778CrossRef
63.
Wong MK, Abidi SSR, Jonsen ID (2014) A multi-phase correlation search framework for mining non-taxonomic relations from unstructured text. J Knowl Inf Syst 38(3):641–667CrossRef
64.
Wong W, Liu W, Bennanoun M (2012) Ontology learning from text: a look back and into the future. ACM Comput Surv 44(4):20CrossRef
65.
Xu Y, Mou L, Li G, Chen Y, Peng H, Jin Z (2015) Classifying relations via long short term memory networks along shortest dependency paths. In: Proceedings of the 2015 EMNLP, 2015, pp 1785–1794
66.
Zelenko D, Aone C, Richardella A (2003) Kernel methods for relation extraction. J Mach Learn Res 3(3/1/2003):1083–1106MathSciNetMATH
67.
Zhang Z (2008) Mining relational data from text: from strictly supervised to weakly supervised learning. Inf Syst 33(3):300–314CrossRef
68.
Zhou G D, Su J, Zhang J, and Zhang M (2005) Exploring various knowledge in relation extraction. In: Proceedings of the ACL’2005, 2005, pp 419–444
Metadaten
Titel
A hybrid-based method for Chinese domain lightweight ontology construction
verfasst von
Jing Qiu
Lin Qi
Jianliang Wang
Guanghua Zhang
Publikationsdatum
28.03.2017
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics / Ausgabe 9/2018
Print ISSN: 1868-8071
Elektronische ISSN: 1868-808X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13042-017-0661-0

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 9/2018

International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics 9/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Original Article

DFTDT: distributed functional tangent decision tree for aqua status prediction in wireless sensor networks

Original Article

A new fuzzy twin support vector machine for pattern classification

Original Article

A learning framework for information block search based on probabilistic graphical models and Fisher Kernel

Original Article

A learning automata framework based on relevance feedback for content-based image retrieval

Original Article

Neural network observer-based leader-following consensus of heterogenous nonlinear uncertain systems

Original Article

A study on unstable cuts and its application to sample selection

Neuer Inhalt

    Bildnachweise