Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Gaussian Process-Based Feedback Linearization Control for Quad-Tiltrotor Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2023 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

A Review of Reasoning Techniques for Onboard Maintenance System

verfasst von : Zhiyu She, Cunbao Ma, Yihan Guo

Erschienen in: The Proceedings of the 2021 Asia-Pacific International Symposium on Aerospace Technology (APISAT 2021), Volume 2

Verlag: Springer Nature Singapore

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

With the improvement of automation, the complexity of aircraft systems is increasing, resulting in the difficulty of finding out the real cause for a multitude of fault symptoms originating from different aircraft systems. Once a failure arises during system operation, it may cause great economic losses and even catastrophic consequences. A critical effort to maintain aircraft systems and enhance aircraft safety is the development of Onboard Maintenance System (OMS). As vital parts of the OMS, reasoning techniques play a crucial part in realizing real-time and more accurate fault diagnosis. Therefore, the research on reasoning techniques for OMS is of great significance. This paper is focused on the reasoning techniques, which belong to the field of Artificial Intelligence, and their applications in OMS. First, reasoning strategies are described. Second, a comprehensive review of different reasoning methods, such as knowledge-based reasoning, model-based reasoning, data-driven reasoning and hybrid reasoning, is given. A number of practical issues in applying these methods in the field of aerospace are explored, respectively. Besides, the advantages and the disadvantages of each method are discussed. Third, some architectures for reasoning are presented. Then, the reasoning approach applied in OMS of Boeing 777 is outlined. Lastly, a summary of this review is given, the recommendations for further research on development of reasoning techniques used in OMS are made.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Modeling Low Level Flight Patterns of Manned Aircraft from Actual Flight Tracking Data
Nächstes Kapitel Attitude Control of a Spaceplane Based on Dynamic Inversion Theory with Quaternion Error Calculation
Literatur
1.
Ezhilarasu CM, Skaf Z, Jennions IK (2021) A generalised methodology for the diagnosis of aircraft systems. IEEE Access 9:11437–11454CrossRef
2.
Ezhilarasu CM (2018) An integrated reasoning framework for vehicle level diagnosis of aircraft subsystem faults. In: Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the Prognostics and Health Management Society PHM, p 2
3.
Wu H, Liu Y, Ding Y, Liu J (2004) Methods to reduce direct maintenance costs for commercial aircraft. Aircr Eng Aerosp Technol 76:15–18CrossRef
4.
Ezhilarasu CM, Skaf Z, Jennions IK (2019) Progress towards a framework for aerospace vehicle reasoning (FAVER). Proc Annu Conf Progn Heal Manag Soc PHM 11:23–26
5.
Wang X, Liu M, Peng Y (2020) Complex equipment diagnostic reasoning based on neural network algorithm. In: Proceedings of the 2020 11th International Conference on Prognostics and System Health Management PHM-Jinan 2020, pp 296–300
6.
Jing D, Ping Z, Xingshan L, Jinsong Y (2007) A review on reasoning techniques implementing integrated health management. In: Proceedings of the 2007 8th International Conference on Electronic Measurement and Instruments, ICEMI, pp 3695–3698
7.
Esperon-Miguez M, John P, Jennions IK (2013) A review of integrated vehicle health management tools for legacy platforms: challenges and opportunities. Prog Aerosp Sci 56:19–34CrossRef
8.
Ramohalli G (1992) The Honeywell on-board diagnostic and maintenance system for the Boeing 777. In: AIAA/IEEE IEEE/AIAA 11th Digital Avionics Systems Conference–Proceedings 1992-October, pp 485–490
9.
MacK DLC, Biswas G, Koutsoukos XD, Mylaraswamy D (2017) Learning bayesian network structures to augment aircraft diagnostic reference models. IEEE Trans Autom Sci Eng 14:358–369CrossRef
10.
Ezhilarasu CM, Skaf Z, Jennions IK (2019) The application of reasoning to aerospace integrated vehicle health management (IVHM): challenges and opportunities. Prog Aerosp Sci 105:60–73CrossRef
11.
Mylaraswamy D et al (2011) Methods systems and appratus for analyzing complex systems via prognostic reasoning
12.
Gentner D, Smith L (2012) Analogical reasoning. In: Encyclopedia of Human Behavior, 2nd edn. pp 130–136
13.
Chiu C, Chiu NH, Hsu CI (2004) Intelligent aircraft maintenance support system using genetic algorithms and case-based reasoning. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 24:440–446CrossRef
14.
15.
Chen Y, Chen YW, Bin XuX, Pan CC, Yang JB, Yang GK (2015) A data-driven approximate causal inference model using the evidential reasoning rule. Knowl Based Syst 88:264–272CrossRef
16.
17.
18.
Fudge M, Stagliano T, Tsiao S (2003) Non-Traditional Flight Safety Systems & Integrated Vehicle Health Management Systems Descriptions of Proposed & Existing Systems and Enabling Technologies & Verification Methods Final Report
19.
20.
Mackey R, Brownston L, Castle JP, Sweet A (2010) Getting diagnostic reasoning off the ground: maturing technology with TacSat-3. IEEE Intell Syst 25:27–35CrossRef
21.
Hamilton-Wright A, Stashuk DW (2006) Transparent decision support using statistical reasoning and fuzzy inference. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 18:1125–1137CrossRef
22.
Leonhardt S, Ayoubi M (1997) Methods of fault diagnosis. Control Eng Pract 5:683–692CrossRef
23.
24.
Buchanan BG, Shortliffe EH (1984) The context of the MYCIN experiments. Rule-Based Expert Syst MYCIN Exp Stanford Heuristic Program Proj MYCIN Exp Stanford Heuristic Program Proj 27:3–19
25.
Barua A, Khorasani K (2011) Hierarchical fault diagnosis and fuzzy rule-based reasoning for satellites formation flight. IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Syst 47:2435–2456CrossRef
26.
27.
Dou D, Jiang J, Wang Y, Zhang Y (2018) A rule-based classifier ensemble for fault diagnosis of rotating machinery. J Mech Sci Technol 32:2509–2515CrossRef
28.
29.
Liu B, Duan M, Zhao G (2011) An object frame knowledge representation approach for fault diagnosis expert system. In: Proceedings of the 2011 International Conference on Future Computer Sciences and Application (ICFCSA 2011), pp 74–77
30.
Georgeff MP, Lansky AL (1987) Reactive reasoning and planning. In: Proceedings of the Sixth National Artificial Intelligence, pp 677–682
31.
Lee J, Huber MJ, Durfee EH, Kenny PG (1994) UM-PRS: an implementation of the procedural reasoning system for multirobot applications
32.
Georgeff MP, Ingrand FF (1989) Monitoring and control of spacecraft systems using procedural reasoning. In: SOAR 1989 Proceedings of the 1989 USAF/NASA Space Operations-Automation and Robotics Workshop
33.
Aamodt A, Plaza E (1996) Case-based reasoning: foundational issues, methodological variations, and system approaches. Artif Intell Commun 7:39–59
34.
Olsson T, Gillblad D, Funk P, Xiong N (2014) Explaining probabilistic fault diagnosis and classification using case-based reasoning. In: Lamontagne L, Plaza E (eds) Case-Based Reasoning Research and Development. ICCBR 2014. LNCS, vol 8765. Springer, Cham. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​978-3-319-11209-1_​26
35.
Woskov SM, Grimaila MR, Mills RF, Haas MW (2011) Design considerations for a case-based reasoning engine for scenario-based cyber incident notification. In: IEEE SSCI 2011 Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Cyber Security (CICS), pp 84–91
36.
37.
Wu H, Liu Y, Ding Y, Qui Y (2004) Fault diagnosis expert system for modern commercial aircraft. Aircr Eng Aerosp Technol 76:398–403CrossRef
38.
Bonzano A (1998) ISAC: a case-based reasoning system for aircraft conflict resolution. Library (Lond)
39.
Gupta KM (1999) Case-Based Troubleshooting Knowledge Management. AAAI Technical report SS-99-04 82–87
40.
41.
Peischl B, Wotawa F (2003) Model-based diagnosis or reasoning from first principles. IEEE Intell Syst 18:32–37CrossRef
42.
Baig MF, Sayced N (1998) Model-based reasoning for fault diagnosis of twin-spool turbofans. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part G J Aerosp Eng 212:109–116CrossRef
43.
Saha B, Vachtsevanos G (2006) A model-based reasoning approach to system fault diagnosis. WSEAS Trans Syst 5:1997–2004
44.
Feldman A, Pietersma J, Van Gemund A (2006) All roads lead to fault diagnosis: model-based reasoning with LYDIA. In: Belgian/Netherlands Artificial Intelligence Conference
45.
Daigle M, Foygel M, Smelyanskiy V (2011) Model-based diagnostics for propellant loading systems. In: 2011 IEEE Aerospace Conference, pp 1–11
46.
Liu C, Sun J, Wang F, Ning S, Xu G (2020) Bayesian network method for fault diagnosis of civil aircraft environment control system. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part I J Syst Control Eng 234:662–674
47.
Mack DLC, Biswas G, Koutsoukos XD, Mylaraswamy D, Hadden G (2014) Deriving bayesian classifiers from flight data to enhance aircraft diagnosis models. In: Annual Conference of the PHM Society 2011 (PHM 2011), pp 175–189
48.
Mast TA, Reed AT, Yurkovich S, Ashby M, Adibhatla S (1999) Bayesian Belief Networks for fault identification in aircraft gas turbine engines. In: Proceedings of the 1999 IEEE International Conference on Control Applications, vol 1, pp 39–44
49.
Shen Y, Khorasani K (2020) Hybrid multi-mode machine learning-based fault diagnosis strategies with application to aircraft gas turbine engines. Neural Netw 130:126–142CrossRef
50.
Silva AA, Bazzi AM, Gupta S (2020) Fault diagnosis in electric drives using machine learning approaches. Geogr Inf Sci Technol Body Knowl 2020:722–726
51.
Li B, Zhao YP (2020) Group reduced kernel extreme learning machine for fault diagnosis of aircraft engine. Eng Appl Artif Intell 96:103968CrossRef
52.
Zhao YP, Wang JJ, Li XY, Peng GJ, Yang Z (2020) Extended least squares support vector machine with applications to fault diagnosis of aircraft engine. ISA Trans 97:189–201CrossRef
53.
Wang ZF, Zarader JL, Argentieri S (2012) Aircraft fault diagnosis and decision system based on improved artificial neural networks. In: 2012 IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics (AIM), pp 1123–1128
54.
Wang H, Peng MJ, Hines JW, Zheng GY, Liu YK, Upadhyaya BR (2019) A hybrid fault diagnosis methodology with support vector machine and improved particle swarm optimization for nuclear power plants. ISA Trans 95:358–371
55.
Yang S, Bian C, Li X, Tan L, Tang D (2018) Optimized fault diagnosis based on FMEA-style CBR and BN for embedded software system. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 94:3441–3453CrossRef
56.
Deng W, Wen B, Zhou J, Wang J, Chen Z (2014) The study of aircraft fault diagnosis method based on the integration of case and rule reasoning. In: Proceedings of the 2014 Prognostics and System Health Management Conference (PHM-2014 Hunan), pp 271–274
57.
Saxena A, Wu B, Vachtsevanos G (2006) A hybrid reasoning architecture for fleet vehicle maintenance, pp 29–36
58.
Féret MP, Glasgow JI (1997) Combining case-based and model-based reasoning for the diagnosis of complex devices. Appl Intell 7:57–78CrossRef
59.
Gaudette T, Alwardt AL (2006) The Boeing smart TPS application executive with MATLAB® as a diagnostic reasoner. In: AUTOTESTCON (Proceedings), pp 714–719
60.
Alphabetic I, Les O, Bloor G, Brotherton T (2001) An evolvable tri-reasoner IVHMl system. IEEE Aerosp Conf Proc 1073:3023–3037
61.
Wylie R (2013) Integrated Diagnostic System (IDS) for Aircraft Fleet Maintenance NRC Publications Archive Archives des publications du CNRC Integrated Diagnostic System (IDS) for Aircraft Fleet Maintenance
62.
Narasimhan S, Brownston L (2007) Hyde–a general framework for stochastic and hybrid model based diagnosis. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Workshop on Principles of the Diagnosis, pp 162–169
63.
Schumann J, Roychoudhury I, Kulkarni C (2015) Diagnostic reasoning using prognostic information for unmanned aerial systems. In: Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the Prognostics and Health Management Society PHM, pp 397–407
Metadaten
Titel
A Review of Reasoning Techniques for Onboard Maintenance System
verfasst von
Zhiyu She
Cunbao Ma
Yihan Guo
Copyright-Jahr
2023
Verlag
Springer Nature Singapore
Buch
The Proceedings of the 2021 Asia-Pacific International Symposium on Aerospace Technology (APISAT 2021), Volume 2

Print ISBN: 978-981-19-2634-1

Electronic ISBN: 978-981-19-2635-8

Copyright-Jahr: 2023

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-2635-8_26

    Premium Partner

    Bildnachweise