Skip to main content

2017 | Buch

A Study of Professional Skepticism

insite
SUCHEN

Über dieses Buch

This book describes how auditors exercise different levels of professional skepticism and how they are exposed to different types of affective information on clients’ behavior. Based on the author’s empirical study of 56 auditors, it shows that auditors’ skepticism and affective reactions towards a client interact to influence their appraisal of valuation problems. It also suggests that the effects of auditors’ affective reactions on their skeptical judgments depend on the level of risk in the audit engagement.

Inhaltsverzeichnis

Frontmatter
Chapter 1. Auditors’ Professional Skepticism
Abstract
The International Standard on Auditing (IFAC, International Federation of Accountants (2009) in International Standard on Auditing 200 (ISA 200) Overall objectives of the independent auditor and the conduct of an audit in accordance with international standards on auditing. International Federation of Accountant (IFAC), NY, 2009, ISA No. 200) defines professional skepticism as a multifaceted mindset reflected in auditors’ attitude. The professional skepticism multifaceted mindset is reflected in auditors’ attitude and includes a questioning mind, alertness to circumstances that may imply misstatements due to error or fraud, and a critical evaluation of audit evidence (IFAC, International Federation of Accountants (2009) in International Standard on Auditing 200 (ISA 200) Overall objectives of the independent auditor and the conduct of an audit in accordance with international standards on auditing. International Federation of Accountant (IFAC), NY, 2009, ISA No. 200). In this chapter explains what professional skepticism is more in depth, why it is important to study professional skepticism and then discusses the challenges encountered by accounting researchers, professionals and regulators with respect to professional skepticism in accounting. Because an experimental study of professional skepticism is conducted in Norway, the chapter also presents the institutional settings in Norway. Finally, the chapter describes Two-System theory and affect which are used in the experimental study in the Chap. 2.
Carmen Olsen
Chapter 2. Experimental Study
Abstract
In this chapter follows the structure of a classical article in order to present an experimental study on auditors’ professional skepticism. The title of the experimental study is “The Effects of Situational Professional Skepticism and Affect on Auditors’ Skeptical Judgments: A Two-System Theory Perspective”. This study is coauthored with Professor Iris, Stuart at the Norwegian School of Economics. In this study, professional skepticism is seen as a “black box” because the cognitive processes behind it are unknown. We experimentally investigate whether and how the interaction between professional skepticism and interpersonal affect influences auditors’ skeptical judgments through a Two-System theory perspective. We use a two (high client risk versus low client risk) by two (positive versus negative affect) experimental design. We find a significant interaction between risk and affect. Our findings suggest that the influence of affective cues on auditors’ skeptical judgments, will depend on the level of risk in the client engagement. Our study identifies affective reactions as important components of setting the level of professional skepticism and argues that the key in applying the right level of professional skepticism is in switching to the deliberate System 2 cognitive decision process under high risk conditions.
Carmen Olsen
Chapter 3. The Experimental Instrument
Abstract
In this chapter provides a description of the experimental instrument (or questionnaire) used in the study in Chap. 2 with auditors as respondents. This chapter describes briefly the different parts in the experimental instrument as they appear in the questionnaire provided to the auditors to enable the reader to reconstruct the questionnaire if he or she wish to do so. The design in the experimental instrument manipulates the risk of material misstatement at two levels (low and high) and to manipulate affect at two levels (positive and negative). The manipulations are randomly assigned to the auditors. The experimental instrument consists of the experimental audit case that describes an ABC company, a hypothetical audit client that sells designer maternity clothing to small specialty clothing shops. The questionnaire asks the participating auditors to audit the ABC company inventory account according to the international accounting standards (IAS). The audit case in the questionnaire is based on an inventory valuation issue in ABC.
Carmen Olsen
Metadaten
Titel
A Study of Professional Skepticism
verfasst von
Carmen Olsen
Copyright-Jahr
2017
Electronic ISBN
978-3-319-49896-6
Print ISBN
978-3-319-49895-9
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49896-6