2013 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel
8. Additional exercises for Part I
verfasst von : Francis Clarke
Erschienen in: Functional Analysis, Calculus of Variations and Optimal Control
Verlag: Springer London
Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.
Wählen Sie Textabschnitte aus um mit Künstlicher Intelligenz passenden Patente zu finden. powered by
Markieren Sie Textabschnitte, um KI-gestützt weitere passende Inhalte zu finden. powered by
Abstract
-
Give an example of a locally Lipschitz function \(f:X\to\,{\mathbb{R}}\) defined on a Hilbert space X which is not bounded below on the unit ball. Could such a function be convex?
-
Let A be a bounded subset of a normed space X. Prove that \({\text{co}}\,\big(\partial A\big)\,\supset\, { \text{cl}\,}\, A\,. \)
-
Let X be a normed space, and let A be an open subset having the property that each boundary point x of A admits a supporting hyperplane; that is, there exist 0 ≠ ζ x ∈ X ∗ and \(c_{x}\in\,{\mathbb{R}}\) such thatProve that A is convex. Prove that the result remains valid if the hypothesis “A is open” is replaced by “A is closed and has nonempty interior.”$$\langle \, \zeta_{\,x}\,, x\,\rangle \: = \:c_x\:,\;\; \langle \, \zeta_{\,x}\,, u\,\rangle \: \leqslant \:\, c_x~\; \forall \,u\in\, A\,. $$