Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Evaluating and Influencing the Performance of a Collaborative Business Ecosystem – A Simulation Study Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2020 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Adoption of Digital Collaborative Networking Platforms in Companies: A Study of Twitter Usage in Finland

verfasst von : Heli Hallikainen, Lili Aunimo

Erschienen in: Boosting Collaborative Networks 4.0

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Digital collaborative networking platforms have become increasingly important for companies. They are widely used for communication and co-creation with customers, suppliers and other actors in companies’ value chains. This study takes one social media platform, Twitter, as an example of a digital collaboration platform and analyses patterns of Twitter usage among Finnish companies. The empirical part of the study is based on survey data (n = 554 companies) and Twitter usage data of 107 of the same companies. The research data is analyzed to explore the extent to which companies have adopted Twitter and for what purposes it is being used. The results of the study show that surprisingly few companies have a Twitter account and most commonly companies use Twitter to communicate about news and events to the large public. Hence, plenty of opportunities remain for taking social media platforms more efficiently in use for collaborative networking and co-creation.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel For a Dynamic Web Services Discovery Model for Open Ecosystems of Software Providers
Nächstes Kapitel From Digital Platforms to Ecosystems: A Review of Horizon 2020 Platform Projects
Literatur
1.
2.
Ferron, M., Massa, P., Odella, P.: Analyzing collaborative networks emerging in Enterprise 2.0: the Taolin Platform. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 10, 68–78 (2011)CrossRef
3.
Mourtzis, D.: Internet based collaboration in the manufacturing supply chain. CIRP J. Manufact. Sci. Technol. 4(3), 296–304 (2016)CrossRef
4.
Alves, H., Fernandes, C., Raposo, M.: Social media marketing: a literature review and implications. Psychol. Mark. 33(12), 1029–1038 (2016)CrossRef
5.
Culnan, M.J., McHugh, P.J., Zubillaga, J.I.: How large US companies can use Twitter and other social media to gain business value. MIS Q. Executive 9(4), 243–259 (2010)
6.
7.
Prokofieva, M.: Twitter-based dissemination of corporate disclosure and the intervening effects of firms’ visibility: evidence from australian-listed companies. J. Inf. Syst. 29(2), 107–136 (2015)
8.
Roper, S., de Carvalho, L.V., Guzman, F., Sivertzen, A.M., Nilsen, E.R., Olafsen, A.H.: Employer branding: employer attractiveness and the use of social media. J. Prod. Brand Manag. 22(7), 473–483 (2013)CrossRef
9.
El Ouirdi, M., El Ouirdi, A., Segers, J., Pais, I.: Technology adoption in employee recruitment: the case of social media in Central and Eastern Europe. Comput. Hum. Behav. 57, 240–249 (2016)CrossRef
10.
Martin-Domingo, L., Martín, J.C., Mandsberg, G.: Social media as a resource for sentiment analysis of airport service quality (ASQ). J. Air Transp. Manag. 78, 106–115 (2019)CrossRef
11.
Stieglitz, S., Mirbabaie, M., Ross, B., Neuberger, C.: Social media analytics – challenges in topic discovery, data collection, and data preparation. Int. J. Inf. Manage. 39, 156–168 (2018)CrossRef
12.
Tufekci, Z.: Big questions for social media big data: representativeness, validity and other methodological pitfalls. In: Eighth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (2014)
13.
Koski, H., Pajarinen, M., Rouvinen, P.: What company characteristics are associated with the adoption of social media? Ind. Innov. 26(8), 880–897 (2019)CrossRef
14.
Melville, N., Kraemer, K., Gurbaxani, V.: Information technology and organizational performance: an integrative model of IT business value. MIS Q. 28(2), 283–322 (2004)CrossRef
15.
Oliveira, T., Martins, M.F.: Literature review of information technology adoption models at firm level. Electron. J. Inf. Syst. Eval. 14(1), 110–121 (2011)
16.
Siamagka, N.T., Christodoulides, G., Michaelidou, N., Valvi, A.: Determinants of social media adoption by B2B organizations. Ind. Mark. Manage. 51, 89–99 (2015)CrossRef
17.
Cheng, X., Fu, S., de Vreede, G.J.: Understanding trust influencing factors in social media communication: a qualitative study. Int. J. Inf. Manage. 37(2), 25–35 (2017)CrossRef
18.
Floreddu, P.B., Cabiddu, F.: Social media communication strategies. J. Serv. Mark. 30(5), 490–503 (2016)CrossRef
19.
20.
Albarrak, M.S., Elnahass, M., Papagiannidis, S., Salama, A.: The effect of Twitter dissemination on cost of equity: a big data approach. Int. J. Inf. Manage. 50, 1–16 (2020)CrossRef
21.
Grover, P., Kar, A.K., Ilavarasan, P.V.: Impact of corporate social responsibility on reputation – insights from tweets on sustainable development goals by CEOs. Int. J. Inf. Manage. 48, 39–52 (2019)CrossRef
22.
Ren, Y., Wang, R., Ji, D.: A topic-enhanced word embedding for Twitter sentiment classification. Inf. Sci. 369, 188–198 (2016)CrossRef
23.
Hino, A., Fahey, R.A.: Representing the Twittersphere: archiving a representative sample of Twitter data under resource constraints. Int. J. Inf. Manage. 48, 175–184 (2016)CrossRef
24.
25.
26.
Lin, J.S., Peña, J.: Are you following me? A content analysis of TV networks’ brand communication on Twitter. J. Interact. Advert. 12(1), 17–29 (2011)CrossRef
27.
28.
Vicient, C., Moreno, A.: Unsupervised topic discovery in micro-blogging networks. Expert Syst. Appl. 42(17–18), 6472–6485 (2015)CrossRef
29.
Ghiassi, M., Lee, S.: A domain transferable lexicon set for Twitter sentiment analysis using a supervised machine learning approach. Expert Syst. Appl. 106, 197–216 (2018)CrossRef
30.
31.
Chinnov, A., Kerschke, P., Meske, C., Stieglitz, S., Trautmann, H.: An overview of topic discovery in Twitter communication through social media analytics. In: Twenty-First Americas Conference on Information Systems (2015)
32.
Blei, D.M., Ng, A.Y., Jordan, M.I.: Latent Dirichlet allocation. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 3, 993–1022 (2003)MATH
33.
Berthold, M.R., et al.: KNIME – the Konstanz information miner: version 2.0 and beyond. ACM SIGKDD Explor. Newsl. 11(1), 26–31 (2009)CrossRef
34.
Newman, D., Asuncion, A., Smyth, P., Welling, M.: Distributed algorithms for topic models. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 10, 1801–1828 (2009)MathSciNetMATH
35.
Yao, L., Mimno, D., McCallum, A.: Efficient methods for topic model inference on streaming document collections. In: Proceedings of the 15th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 937–946 (2009)
36.
37.
38.
Lacka, E., Chong, A.: Usability perspective on social media sites’ adoption in the B2B context. Ind. Mark. Manag. 54, 80–91 (2016)CrossRef
39.
40.
Tromble, R., Storz, A., Stockmann, D.: We Don’t Know What We Don’t Know: When and How the Use of Twitter’s Public APIs Biases Scientific Inference. SSRN Scholarly Paper No. ID 3079927. Social Science Research Network, Rochester, NY (2017)
41.
Perez-Tellez, F., Pinto, D., Cardiff, J., Rosso, P.: On the difficulty of clustering company tweets. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Search and Mining User-Generated Contents, pp. 95–102 (2010)
Metadaten
Titel
Adoption of Digital Collaborative Networking Platforms in Companies: A Study of Twitter Usage in Finland
verfasst von
Heli Hallikainen
Lili Aunimo
Copyright-Jahr
2020
Buch
Boosting Collaborative Networks 4.0

Print ISBN: 978-3-030-62411-8

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-030-62412-5

Copyright-Jahr: 2020

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62412-5_8

Premium Partner

    Bildnachweise