Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Introduction Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2017 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Advances in BCI: A Neural Bypass Technology to Reconnect the Brain to the Body

verfasst von : Gaurav Sharma, Nicholas Annetta, David A. Friedenberg, Marcia Bockbrader

Erschienen in: Brain-Computer Interface Research

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Millions of people worldwide suffer from diseases that lead to paralysis through disruption of signal pathways between the brain and the muscles. It has previously been shown that intracortically-recorded signals can be decoded to extract information related to movement, allowing non-human primates and paralyzed humans to control computers, wheelchairs and robotic arms through imagined movements. In non-human primates, these types of signals have also been used to drive activation of chemically paralyzed arm muscles. In an entirely novel application of brain computer interface (BCI) technology, we show that intracortically-recorded signals can be linked in real-time to muscle activation to restore functional wrist and finger movement in a paralyzed human. Our technology is designed to restore lost function and could be used to form an electronic ‘neural bypass’ to circumvent disconnected pathways in the nervous system.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Introduction
Nächstes Kapitel Precise and Reliable Activation of Cortex with Micro-coils
Literatur
1.
Aflalo T et al. (2015) Neurophysiology. Decoding motor imagery from the posterior parietal cortex of a tetraplegic human. Science 348(6237):906–910
2.
Bansal AK et al. (2012) Decoding 3D reach and grasp from hybrid signals in motor and premotor cortices: spikes, multiunit activity, and local field potentials. J Neurophysiol 107(5):1337–1355
3.
Chapin JK (1999) et al. Real-time control of a robot arm using simultaneously recorded neurons in the motor cortex. Nat Neurosci 2(7):664–670
4.
Hochberg LR et al. (2012) Reach and grasp by people with tetraplegia using a neurally controlled robotic arm. Nature 485(7398):372-U121
5.
Hochberg LR et al. (2006) Neuronal ensemble control of prosthetic devices by a human with tetraplegia. Nature 442(7099):164–171
6.
Kennedy PR, Bakay RAE (1998) Restoration of neural output from a paralyzed patient by a direct brain connection. Neuroreport 9(8):1707–1711
7.
Santhanam G et al. (2006) A high-performance brain-computer interface. Nature 442(7099):195–198
8.
Serruya MD et al. (2002) Instant neural control of a movement signal. Nature 416(6877):141–142
9.
Taylor DM, Tillery SI, Schwartz AB, (2002) Direct cortical control of 3D neuroprosthetic devices. Science 296(5574):1829–1832
10.
Velliste M et al. (2008) Cortical control of a prosthetic arm for self-feeding. Nature 453(7198):1098–1101
11.
Wessberg J et al. (2000) Real-time prediction of hand trajectory by ensembles of cortical neurons in primates. Nature 408(6810):361–365
12.
Ethier C et al. (2012) Restoration of grasp following paralysis through brain-controlled stimulation of muscles. Nature 485(7398):368–371
13.
Moritz CT, Perlmutter SI, Fetz EE (2008) Direct control of paralysed muscles by cortical neurons. Nature 456(7222):639-U63
14.
Bouton CE et al. (2016) Restoring cortical control of functional movement in a human with quadriplegia. Nature 533(7602):247–250
15.
Sharma G et al. (2016) Using an artificial neural bypass to restore cortical control of rhythmic movements in a human with quadriplegia. Sci Rep 6:33807
16.
Sharma G et al. (2015) Time stability of multi-unit, single-unit and LFP neuronal signals in chronically implanted brain electrodes. Bioelectronic Medicine (in press)
17.
Scholkopf B et al. (1997) Comparing support vector machines with Gaussian kernels to radial basis function classifiers. IEEE Trans. Signal Process 45:2758–2765
18.
Humber C, Ito K, Bouton C (2010) Nonsmooth formulation of the support vector machine for a neural decoding problem. arXiv
19.
Kalsi-Ryan S et al. (2012) Development of the Graded Redefined Assessment of Strength, Sensibility and Prehension (GRASSP): reviewing measurement specific to the upper limb in tetraplegia. J Neurosurg Spine 17(1 Suppl):65–76
20.
Mulcahey MJ, Hutchinson D, Kozin S (2007) Assessment of upper limb in tetraplegia: Considerations in evaluation and outcomes research. J. Rehabil Res Dev 44(1):91–102
21.
Sinnott KA et al. (2016) Measurement outcomes of upper limb reconstructive surgery for tetraplegia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 97(6 Suppl 2):S169–81
22.
Kalsi-Ryan S et al. (2016) Responsiveness, sensitivity, and minimally detectable difference of the graded and redefined assessment of strength, sensibility, and prehension, version 1.0. J Neurotrauma 33(3):307–314
23.
Kahn J et al. (2013) SCI EDGE outcome measures for research, N.S. American Physical Therapy Association, Alexandria, VA
24.
Kahn J et al. (2013) Spinal Cord Injury EDGE Task Force Outcome Measures Recommendations, American Physical Therapy Association, Neurology Section
25.
Mille WC et al. (2013) Outcome measures. In: Eng JJ et al. (eds) Spinal cord injury rehabilitation evidence, version 4.0. Vancouver, CA, pp 28.1–28.366
26.
Hsieh JTC et al. (2011) Outcome Measures Toolkit: Implementation Steps, S. Project. London, ON, CA, p 1–58
27.
Organization WH, International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: ICF2001: World Health Organization
28.
Wuolle KS et al. (1994) Development of a quantitative hand grasp and release test for patients with tetraplegia using a hand neuroprosthesis. J Hand Surg 19(2):209–218
29.
Oleson CV, Marino RJ (2014) Responsiveness and concurrent validity of the revised capabilities of upper extremity-questionnaire (CUE-Q) in patients with acute tetraplegia. Spinal Cord 52(8):625–628
30.
Marino RJ et al. (2015) Reliability and validity of the capabilities of upper extremity test (CUE-T) in subjects with chronic spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med 38(4):498–504
31.
Spooren A et al. (2006) Measuring change in arm hand skilled performance in persons with a cervical spinal cord injury: responsiveness of the Van Lieshout Test. Spinal Cord 44(12):772–779
32.
Franke A et al. (2013) Arm hand skilled performance in persons with a cervical spinal cord injury—long-term follow-up. Spinal cord 51(2):161–164
33.
Yozbatiran N, Der-Yeghiaian L, Cramer SC (2008) A standardized approach to performing the action research arm test. Neurorehabilitation Neural Repair 22(1):78–90
34.
Land N et al. (2004) Tetraplegia Hand Activity Questionnaire (THAQ): the development, assessment of arm–hand function-related activities in tetraplegic patients with a spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 42(5):294–301
35.
Coates S et al. (2011) The AuSpinal: a test of hand function for people with tetraplegia. Spinal Cord 49(2):219–229
36.
Sollerman C, Ejeskär A (1995) Sollerman hand function test: a standardised method and its use in tetraplegic patients. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 29(2):167–176
37.
Kalsi-Ryan S et al. (2012) The graded redefined assessment of strength sensibility and prehension: reliability and validity. J Neurotrauma 29(5):905–914
38.
Kalsi-Ryan S et al. (2009) Assessment of the hand in tetraplegia using the Graded Redefined Assessment of Strength, Sensibility and Prehension (GRASSP) impairment versus function. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil 14(4):34–46
39.
Peckham PH et al. (2001) Efficacy of an implanted neuroprosthesis for restoring hand grasp in tetraplegia: a multicenter study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 82(10):1380–1388
40.
Smith B, Mulcahey M, Betz R (1996) Quantitative comparison of grasp and release abilities with and without functional neuromuscular stimulation in adolescents with tetraplegia. Spinal Cord 34(1):16–23
41.
Kilgore KL et al. (1997) An implanted upper-extremity neuroprosthesis. follow-up of five patients. J Bone Jt Surg Am 79(4):533–541
42.
Kilgore KL et al. (2008) An implanted upper-extremity neuroprosthesis using myoelectric control. J Hand Surg 33(4):539–550
43.
Mulcahey M et al. (1999) A prospective evaluation of upper extremity tendon transfers in children with cervical spinal cord injury. J Pediatr Orthop 19(3):319–328
44.
Mulcahey M, Smith B, Betz R (2003) Psychometric rigor of the Grasp and Release Test for measuring functional limitation of persons with tetraplegia: a preliminary analysis. J Spinal Cord Med 27(1):41–46
45.
Wodlinger B et al. (2015) Ten-dimensional anthropomorphic arm control in a human brain-machine interface: difficulties, solutions, and limitations. J Neural Eng 12(1):016011
46.
Collinger JL et al. (2013) High-performance neuroprosthetic control by an individual with tetraplegia. Lancet 381(9866):557–564
47.
Mathiowetz V et al. (1985) Adult norms for the box and block Test of manual dexterity. Am J Occup Ther 39(6):386–391
Metadaten
Titel
Advances in BCI: A Neural Bypass Technology to Reconnect the Brain to the Body
verfasst von
Gaurav Sharma
Nicholas Annetta
David A. Friedenberg
Marcia Bockbrader
Copyright-Jahr
2017
Buch
Brain-Computer Interface Research

Print ISBN: 978-3-319-64372-4

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-64373-1

Copyright-Jahr: 2017

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64373-1_2

Neuer Inhalt

    Bildnachweise