Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Empirical Economics 4/2018

12.10.2017

An attempt to restore Wagner’s law of increasing state activity

verfasst von: László Kónya, Bekzod Abdullaev

Erschienen in: Empirical Economics | Ausgabe 4/2018

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

According to Adolph Wagner’s “Law of Increasing State Activity” economic development is accompanied by an increasing role of state activities and functions. Unfortunately, this view has never been stated explicitly by Wagner and the lack of a precise mathematical formulation led researchers to use various and sometimes incomparable specifications. Moreover, in previous empirical studies state activity was almost always replaced by public spending, and hence Wagner’s Law was effectively narrowed down to the “Law of Increasing State Spending”. This paper is an attempt to restore Wagner’s Law. Contrary to previous studies, it examines whether Wagner’s Law in its original form held in Australia in the 1901–2008 period by studying the relationship between real per capita income and a composite variable of state activity that takes both financial and legislative activities of the federal government into account. Although this composite variable still falls short of capturing all levels and sorts of state or government activities, it is a far more comprehensive measure than any of its components used individually in earlier studies. The results based on this composite measure provide no empirical evidence in favour of Wagner’s Law in Australia.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Fußnoten
1
An interesting account of this subject is provided by Tarschys (1975).
 
2
As regards cross-sectional studies, they have been rightfully criticised by Bird (1971) on the ground that Wagner’s Law asserts that state activities expand by economic development in any particular country, but not necessarily across countries.
 
3
Even recent studies which make reference to Biehl (1998), like, e.g. Mohammadi et al. (2008), Durevall and Henrekson (2011) and Richter and Dimitrios (2012), appear to miss or disregard his warning.
 
4
The most recent study that offers a thorough review of both the theoretical considerations underlying Wagner’s Law and the related empirical evidence is Peacock and Scott (2000).
 
5
As mentioned above, Kirchner (2012) tries to establish the order of integration by performing the ADF tests on the levels and first differences of the variables. Apart from the fact that this test has relatively low power, and hence it is better to supplement it by some alternative unit-root/stationarity tests, it is also questionable why to run the ADF test in two versions, with a constant only and with a constant and linear time trend, on both the levels and first differences of trending variables. Since the level variables appear to be trending, some of these specifications are clearly unreasonable and contradictory and this indecisiveness unnecessarily blurs the picture.
 
6
An alternative approach would be to consider each measure of state activity individually but simultaneously. Although this approach has some merit compared to our approach based on principal components analysis, it would make the VAR system unnecessarily complicated since Wagner’s Law is not about particular state activities, but about overall state activity.
 
7
We use each variable in per capita terms, in accordance with equation (1).
 
8
The consistency of data between Butlin (1977) and ABS (2011) was cross-checked for the 1960–1974 period, and all series reported in Butlin have been adjusted by a constant factor difference revealed by this comparison.
 
9
All calculations were performed with EViews 7.2 and WinRATS Pro 7.30.
 
10
We have also considered the weighted average of all four principal components (using the proportions of the total variance accounted for by these principal components as weights), but since it follows a similar time path to the first principal component, we do not report the details.
 
11
LNPRC is a linear combination of the logarithms of the original four variables, so it is equal to the logarithm of the product of the variables raised to the power of their loadings.
 
12
About unit-root tests see e.g. Maddala and Kim (1998, Part II) and Glynn et al. (2007).
 
13
Since both variables appear to be stationary and hence, by definition, they are not cointegrated, it is not necessary to estimate a vector error correction (VEC) model.
 
14
We have also estimated a VAR model with one more pair of dummy variables for 1977, but they were insignificant. In addition, similarly to Kirchner (2012), in order to account for the possible disruptive effect of general elections on federal legislative activity, we have also experimented with a dummy variable defined as being one in calendar years that include federal elections. This variable too proved to be insignificant, so we have dropped it.
 
15
The moduli of the autoregressive characteristic roots are 0.7376, 0.7376, 0.2472 and 0.1744.
 
16
Non-normality is not a major issue at our large effective sample size (\(T = 106\)), and the approximate 95% confidence bands shown in Fig. 3 are based on Monte Carlo standard errors.
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Australian Bureau of Statistics (2011) Australian National Accounts: National Income, Expenditure and Product, Tables 1, 3 & 5; cat. no. 5206.0 Australian Bureau of Statistics (2011) Australian National Accounts: National Income, Expenditure and Product, Tables 1, 3 & 5; cat. no. 5206.0
Zurück zum Zitat Ahsan SM, Kwan ACC, Sahni BS (1996) Cointegration and Wagner’s hypothesis: time series evidence for Canada. Appl Econ 28:1055–1058CrossRef Ahsan SM, Kwan ACC, Sahni BS (1996) Cointegration and Wagner’s hypothesis: time series evidence for Canada. Appl Econ 28:1055–1058CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ansari MI, Gordon DV, Akuamoah C (1997) Keynes versus Wagner: public expenditure and national income for three African countries. Appl Econ 29:543–550CrossRef Ansari MI, Gordon DV, Akuamoah C (1997) Keynes versus Wagner: public expenditure and national income for three African countries. Appl Econ 29:543–550CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Baumol WJ (1967) Macroeconomics of unbalanced growth: the anatomy of urban crisis. Am Econ Rev 57:415–426 Baumol WJ (1967) Macroeconomics of unbalanced growth: the anatomy of urban crisis. Am Econ Rev 57:415–426
Zurück zum Zitat Beck M (1976) The expanding public sector: some contrary evidence. Natl Tax J 29:15–21 Beck M (1976) The expanding public sector: some contrary evidence. Natl Tax J 29:15–21
Zurück zum Zitat Berg C (2008) The growth of Australia’s regulatory state: ideology, accountability and the mega-regulators. Institute of Public Affairs, Melbourne Berg C (2008) The growth of Australia’s regulatory state: ideology, accountability and the mega-regulators. Institute of Public Affairs, Melbourne
Zurück zum Zitat Biehl D (1998) Wagner’s Law: an introduction to and a translation of the last version of Adolph Wagner’s text of 1911. Public Finance 53:102–11 Biehl D (1998) Wagner’s Law: an introduction to and a translation of the last version of Adolph Wagner’s text of 1911. Public Finance 53:102–11
Zurück zum Zitat Bird RM (1971) Wagner’s “Law” of expanding state activity. Public Finance 26:1–26 Bird RM (1971) Wagner’s “Law” of expanding state activity. Public Finance 26:1–26
Zurück zum Zitat Biswal B, Dhawan U, Lee H-Y (1999) Testing Wagner versus Keynes using disaggregated public expenditure data for Canada. Appl Econ 31:1283–91CrossRef Biswal B, Dhawan U, Lee H-Y (1999) Testing Wagner versus Keynes using disaggregated public expenditure data for Canada. Appl Econ 31:1283–91CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Butlin MW (1977) A preliminary annual database: 1900/01 to 1973/74. Reserve Bank of Australia Butlin MW (1977) A preliminary annual database: 1900/01 to 1973/74. Reserve Bank of Australia
Zurück zum Zitat Chang T, Liu W, Caudill SB (2004) A re-examination of Wagner’s law for ten countries based on cointegration and error-correction modelling techniques. Appl Financ Econ 14:577–89CrossRef Chang T, Liu W, Caudill SB (2004) A re-examination of Wagner’s law for ten countries based on cointegration and error-correction modelling techniques. Appl Financ Econ 14:577–89CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Dollery B, Singh S (2000) Explaining the real size of Government in Australia: an application of the ferris and west model. Econ Anal Policy 30:157–73CrossRef Dollery B, Singh S (2000) Explaining the real size of Government in Australia: an application of the ferris and west model. Econ Anal Policy 30:157–73CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Durevall D, Henrekson M (2011) The futile quest for a grand explanation of long-run government expenditure. In: Working papers in economics, No 428, University of Gothenburg, School of Business, Economics and LawCrossRef Durevall D, Henrekson M (2011) The futile quest for a grand explanation of long-run government expenditure. In: Working papers in economics, No 428, University of Gothenburg, School of Business, Economics and LawCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ferris JS, West EG (1996) Testing theories of real government size: US experience 1959–1989. South Econ J 62:537–53 Ferris JS, West EG (1996) Testing theories of real government size: US experience 1959–1989. South Econ J 62:537–53
Zurück zum Zitat Gandhi VP (1971) Wagner’s law of public expenditure: do recent cross-section studies confirm it? Public Finance 26:44–56 Gandhi VP (1971) Wagner’s law of public expenditure: do recent cross-section studies confirm it? Public Finance 26:44–56
Zurück zum Zitat Glynn J, Perera N, Verma R (2007) Unit root tests and structural breaks: a survey with applications. Revista de Métodos Cuantitativos Para la Economía y la Empresa 3:63–79 Glynn J, Perera N, Verma R (2007) Unit root tests and structural breaks: a survey with applications. Revista de Métodos Cuantitativos Para la Economía y la Empresa 3:63–79
Zurück zum Zitat Gupta SP (1967) Public expenditure and economic growth: a time series analysis. Public Finance 22:423–61 Gupta SP (1967) Public expenditure and economic growth: a time series analysis. Public Finance 22:423–61
Zurück zum Zitat Harris IC (ed) (2005) House of representatives practice, 5th edition. Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia, Appendix 17, Canberra Harris IC (ed) (2005) House of representatives practice, 5th edition. Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia, Appendix 17, Canberra
Zurück zum Zitat Henrekson M (1993) Wagner’s law: a spurious relationship? Public Finance 48:406–15 Henrekson M (1993) Wagner’s law: a spurious relationship? Public Finance 48:406–15
Zurück zum Zitat Holmes JM, Hutton PA (1990) On the casual relationship between government expenditures and national income. Rev Econ Stat 72:87–95CrossRef Holmes JM, Hutton PA (1990) On the casual relationship between government expenditures and national income. Rev Econ Stat 72:87–95CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kapetanios G (2005) Unit-root testing against the alternative hypothesis of up to \(m\) structural breaks. J Time Ser Anal 26:123–133CrossRef Kapetanios G (2005) Unit-root testing against the alternative hypothesis of up to \(m\) structural breaks. J Time Ser Anal 26:123–133CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kau JB, Rubin PH (1981) The size of government. Public Choice 37:262–74CrossRef Kau JB, Rubin PH (1981) The size of government. Public Choice 37:262–74CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kirchner S (2012) Federal legislative activism in Australia: a new approach to testing Wagner’s law. Public Choice 153:375–92CrossRef Kirchner S (2012) Federal legislative activism in Australia: a new approach to testing Wagner’s law. Public Choice 153:375–92CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kolluri BR, Panik MJ, Wahab MS (2000) Government expenditure and economic growth: evidence from G7 countries. Appl Econ 32:1059–68CrossRef Kolluri BR, Panik MJ, Wahab MS (2000) Government expenditure and economic growth: evidence from G7 countries. Appl Econ 32:1059–68CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lall S (1969) A note on government expenditures in developing countries. Econ J 79:413–17CrossRef Lall S (1969) A note on government expenditures in developing countries. Econ J 79:413–17CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Maddala GS, Kim I-M (1998) Unit roots, cointegration, and structural change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Maddala GS, Kim I-M (1998) Unit roots, cointegration, and structural change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Zurück zum Zitat Magazzino C (2012) Wagner versus Keynes: public spending and national income in Italy. J Policy Model 34:890–905CrossRef Magazzino C (2012) Wagner versus Keynes: public spending and national income in Italy. J Policy Model 34:890–905CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Magazzino C, Giolli L, Mele M (2015) Wagner’s law and Peacock and Wiseman’s displacement effect in European Union Countries: a panel data study. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues 5:812–19 Magazzino C, Giolli L, Mele M (2015) Wagner’s law and Peacock and Wiseman’s displacement effect in European Union Countries: a panel data study. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues 5:812–19
Zurück zum Zitat Mann AJ (1980) Wagner’s law: an econometric test for Mexico, 1925–1970. Natl Tax J 33:189–201 Mann AJ (1980) Wagner’s law: an econometric test for Mexico, 1925–1970. Natl Tax J 33:189–201
Zurück zum Zitat Michas NA (1975) Wagner’s law of public expenditures: what is the appropriate measurement for a valid test? Public Finance 30:77–84 Michas NA (1975) Wagner’s law of public expenditures: what is the appropriate measurement for a valid test? Public Finance 30:77–84
Zurück zum Zitat Mohammadi H, Cak M, Cak D (2008) Wagner’s hypothesis: new evidence from Turkey using the bounds testing approach. Journal of Economic Studies 35:94–106CrossRef Mohammadi H, Cak M, Cak D (2008) Wagner’s hypothesis: new evidence from Turkey using the bounds testing approach. Journal of Economic Studies 35:94–106CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ng S, Perron P (1995) Unit root tests in ARMA models with data-dependent methods for the selection of the truncation lag. J Am Stat Assoc 90:268–81CrossRef Ng S, Perron P (1995) Unit root tests in ARMA models with data-dependent methods for the selection of the truncation lag. J Am Stat Assoc 90:268–81CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Oxley L (1994) Cointegration, causality and Wagner’s law: a test for Britain 1870–1913. Scott J Polit Econ 41:286–97CrossRef Oxley L (1994) Cointegration, causality and Wagner’s law: a test for Britain 1870–1913. Scott J Polit Econ 41:286–97CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Peacock A, Scott A (2000) The curious attraction of Wagner’s law. Public Choice 102:1–17CrossRef Peacock A, Scott A (2000) The curious attraction of Wagner’s law. Public Choice 102:1–17CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Pesaran MH, Shin Y, Smith RJ (2001) Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of long-run relationships. J Appl Econom 16:289–326CrossRef Pesaran MH, Shin Y, Smith RJ (2001) Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of long-run relationships. J Appl Econom 16:289–326CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Richter C, Paparas D (2012) The validity of Wagner’s law in the United Kingdom. In: Working Paper, No 2012.9, International Network for Economic Research Richter C, Paparas D (2012) The validity of Wagner’s law in the United Kingdom. In: Working Paper, No 2012.9, International Network for Economic Research
Zurück zum Zitat Samudram M, Nair M, Vaithilingam S (2009) Keynes and Wagner on government expenditures and economic development: the case of a developing economy. Empir Econ 36:697–712CrossRef Samudram M, Nair M, Vaithilingam S (2009) Keynes and Wagner on government expenditures and economic development: the case of a developing economy. Empir Econ 36:697–712CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Singh B, Sahni BS (1984) Causality between public expenditure and national income. Rev Econ Stat 66:630–44CrossRef Singh B, Sahni BS (1984) Causality between public expenditure and national income. Rev Econ Stat 66:630–44CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Tarschys D (1975) The growth of public expenditures: nine modes of explanation. Scand Polit Stud 10:9–31CrossRef Tarschys D (1975) The growth of public expenditures: nine modes of explanation. Scand Polit Stud 10:9–31CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Thornton J (1999) Cointegration, causality and Wagner’s law in 19th century Europe. Appl Econ Lett 6:413–416CrossRef Thornton J (1999) Cointegration, causality and Wagner’s law in 19th century Europe. Appl Econ Lett 6:413–416CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
An attempt to restore Wagner’s law of increasing state activity
verfasst von
László Kónya
Bekzod Abdullaev
Publikationsdatum
12.10.2017
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Empirical Economics / Ausgabe 4/2018
Print ISSN: 0377-7332
Elektronische ISSN: 1435-8921
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-017-1339-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2018

Empirical Economics 4/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Premium Partner