nach oben

Innovative Infrastructure Solutions

Erschienen in:

01.06.2021 | Technical paper

An evaluation of the advantages of friction TMD over conventional TMD

verfasst von: Mitra Salimi, Reza Kamgar, Heisam Heidarzadeh

Erschienen in: Innovative Infrastructure Solutions | Ausgabe 2/2021

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

The seismic performance of conventional tuned mass damper (TMD) has been often improved when more TMD mass ratio is utilized. One limitation in using higher TMD mass ratios for tall buildings is the challenges of designers from the practical point of view. So far, conventional TMD has been more uneconomical. The research on the seismic performance of friction tuned mass dampers (FTMD) is still going on. This paper aimed at evaluating the advantages of the optimal design of friction TMD over conventional TMD for tall structures. For this aim, an optimal design was developed based on a multi-objective cuckoo search optimization algorithm to find the optimal TMD and FTMD parameters, including mass, damping, frequency ratios, and the friction coefficient. Here, the seismic performances of a 40-storey tall building were evaluated and compared from structural responses and energy. Results showed that both dampers could significantly reduce the maximum floor displacement, drift, and acceleration. Furthermore, the FTMD system exhibited a better performance in reducing the roof displacement against the TMD system when the mass ratio was less than 0.03. These advantages are considered to be very important from a practical point of view.

Vorheriger Artikel Nondestructive volumetric quantification of irregular shaped soil samples using close-range photogrammetry

Nächster Artikel A simple approach for estimating contribution of vetiver roots in shear strength of a soil–root system

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Kamgar R, Shojaee S, Rahgozar R (2015) Rehabilitation of tall buildings by active control system subjected to critical seismic excitation. Asian J Civ Eng 16:819–833

Khatibinia M, Gholami H, Kamgar R (2018) Optimal design of tuned mass dampers subjected to continuous stationary critical excitation. Int J Dyn Control 6:1094–1104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40435-017-0386-7CrossRef

Fahimi Farzam M, Kaveh A (2020) Optimum design of tuned mass dampers using colliding bodies optimization in frequency domain. Iran J Sci Technol Trans Civ Eng 44:787–802. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-019-00296-6CrossRef

Kaveh A, Fahimi Farzam M, Hojat Jalali H, Maroofiazar R (2020) Robust optimum design of a tuned mass damper inerter. Acta Mech 231:3871–3896. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00707-020-02720-9CrossRef

Kaveh A, Farzam MF, Maroofiazar R (2020) Comparing H2 and H∞ algorithms for optimum design of tuned mass dampers under near-fault and far-fault earthquake motions. Periodica Polytech Civ Eng 64:828–844. https://doi.org/10.3311/PPci.16389CrossRef

De Domenico D, Ricciardi G (2018) Earthquake-resilient design of base isolated buildings with TMD at basement: application to a case study. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 113:503–521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.06.022CrossRef

Hoang N, Fujino Y, Warnitchai P (2008) Optimal tuned mass damper for seismic applications and practical design formulas. Eng Struct 30:707–715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.05.007CrossRef

Novo T, Varum H, Teixeira-Dias F, Rodrigues H, Silva MF, Costa AC, Guerreiro L (2014) Tuned liquid dampers simulation for earthquake response control of buildings. Bull Earthq Eng 12:1007–1024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-013-9528-2CrossRef

Frahm, H, Device for damping vibrations of bodies. 1911, Google Patents

10.

Den Hartog, JP (1985) Mechanical Vibrations. Courier Corporation

11.

Sadek F, Mohraz B, Taylor AW, Chung RM (1997) A method of estimating the parameters of tuned mass dampers for seismic applications. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 26:617–635. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199706)26:6%3c617::AID-EQE664%3e3.0.CO;2-ZCrossRef

12.

Marano GC, Greco R, Chiaia B (2010) A comparison between different optimization criteria for tuned mass dampers design. J Sound Vib 329:4880–4890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2010.05.015CrossRef

13.

Kamgar R, Gholami F, Zarif Sanayei HR, Heidarzadeh H (2020) Modified tuned liquid dampers for seismic protection of buildings considering soil–structure interaction effects. Iran J Sci Technol Trans Civ Eng 44:339–354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-019-00302-xCrossRef

14.

Kamgar R, Samea P, Khatibinia M (2018) Optimizing parameters of tuned mass damper subjected to critical earthquake. Struct Des Tall Special Build 27:e1460. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.1460CrossRef

15.

Etedali S, Seifi M, Akbari M (2018) A numerical study on optimal FTMD parameters considering soil-structure interaction effects. Geomech Eng 16:527–538. https://doi.org/10.12989/gae.2018.16.5.527CrossRef

16.

Pall AS, Marsh C (1982) Response of friction damped braced frames. J Struct Eng 108:1313–1323

17.

Ricciardelli F, Vickery BJ (1999) Tuned vibration absorbers with dry friction damping. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 28:707–723. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199907)28:7%3c707::AID-EQE836%3e3.0.CO;2-CCrossRef

18.

Lee J-H, Berger E, Kim JH (2005) Feasibility study of a tunable friction damper. J Sound Vib 283:707–722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2004.05.022CrossRef

19.

Gewei Z, Basu B (2011) A study on friction-tuned mass damper: harmonic solution and statistical linearization. J Vib Control 17:721–731. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077546309354967CrossRef

20.

Pisal AY, Jangid RS (2014) Seismic response of multi-story structure with multiple tuned mass friction dampers. Int J Adv Struct Eng IJASE 6:46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40091-014-0046-5CrossRef

21.

Farshidianfar A, Soheili S (2013) Ant colony optimization of tuned mass dampers for earthquake oscillations of high-rise structures including soil–structure interaction. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 51:14–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2013.04.002CrossRef

22.

Chopra AK (2020) Dynamics of structures: theory and applications to earthquake engineering. Prentice-Hall Inc., USA

23.

Gholizadeh S, Salajegheh E (2010) Optimal seismic design of steel structures by an efficient soft computing based algorithm. J Constr Steel Res 66:85–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2009.07.006CrossRef

24.

Kamgar R, Khatibinia M, Khatibinia M (2019) Optimization criteria for design of tuned mass dampers including soil–structure interaction effect. Int J Optim Civ Eng 9:213–232

25.

Kaveh A, Mohammadi S, Hosseini OK, Keyhani A, Kalatjari V (2015) Optimum parameters of tuned mass dampers for seismic applications using charged system search. Iran J Sci Technol Trans Civ Eng 39:21–40. https://doi.org/10.22099/IJSTC.2015.2739CrossRef

26.

Yazdi H, Saberi H, Saberi H, Hatami F (2016) Designing optimal tuned mass dampers using improved harmony search algorithm. Adv Struct Eng 19:1620–1636. https://doi.org/10.1177/1369433216646018CrossRef

27.

Yang X-S, Deb S (2009) Cuckoo search via Lévy flights. 2009 World congress on nature & biologically inspired computing (NaBIC). Coimbatore, India, pp 210–214CrossRef

28.

Rajabioun R (2011) Cuckoo optimization algorithm. Appl Soft Comput 11:5508–5518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2011.05.008CrossRef

29.

Etedali S, Akbari M, Seifi M (2019) MOCS-based optimum design of TMD and FTMD for tall buildings under near-field earthquakes including SSI effects. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 119:36–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.12.027CrossRef

30.

Rakhshani H, Rahati A (2017) Snap-drift cuckoo search: a novel cuckoo search optimization algorithm. Appl Soft Comput 52:771–794. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2016.09.048CrossRef

31.

Rakhshani H, Rahati A (2017) Intelligent multiple search strategy cuckoo algorithm for numerical and engineering optimization problems. Arab J Sci Eng 42:567–593. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-016-2270-8CrossRef

32.

Rakhshani H, Dehghanian E, Rahati A (2016) Hierarchy cuckoo search algorithm for parameter estimation in biological systems. Chemom Intell Lab Syst 159:97–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemolab.2016.10.011CrossRef

33.

Rakhshani H, Rahati A, Dehghanian E (2015) Cuckoo search algorithm and its application for secondary protein structure prediction. In: 2nd international conference on knowledge-based engineering and innovation (KBEI), Tehran, Iran, 412–417

34.

Yang X-S, Deb S (2013) Multiobjective cuckoo search for design optimization. Comput Oper Res 40:1616–1624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2011.09.026CrossRef

35.

Yang X-S (2010) Engineering optimization: an introduction with metaheuristic applications. Wiley, Hoboken, New JerseyCrossRef

36.

Yang X-S, Deb S (2010) Engineering optimisation by cuckoo search. Int J Math Model Numer Optim 1:330–343

37.

Kamgar R, Rahgozar R (2015) Determination of critical excitation in seismic analysis of structures. Earthq Struct 9:875–891. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2015.9.4.875CrossRef

38.

FEMA-P695, Quantification of building seismic performance factors. 2009, Federal Emergency Management Agency: Washington D.C.

39.

Kanai K (1961) An empirical formula for the spectrum of strong earthquake motions. Bull Earthq Res Inst 39:85–95

40.

Mohebbi M, Shakeri K, Ghanbarpour Y, Majzoub H (2013) Designing optimal multiple tuned mass dampers using genetic algorithms (GAs) for mitigating the seismic response of structures. J Vib Control 19:605–625. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077546311434520CrossRef

41.

Tajimi H (1960) A statistical method of determining the maximum response of a building structure during an earthquake. In: 2nd World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, 781–797

42.

Wu J, Chen G, Lou M (1999) Seismic effectiveness of tuned mass dampers considering soil–structure interaction. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 28:1219–1233. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199911)28:11%3c1219::AID-EQE861%3e3.0.CO;2-GCrossRef

Titel: An evaluation of the advantages of friction TMD over conventional TMD
verfasst von: Mitra Salimi
Reza Kamgar
Heisam Heidarzadeh
Publikationsdatum: 01.06.2021
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in: Innovative Infrastructure Solutions / Ausgabe 2/2021
Print ISSN: 2364-4176
Elektronische ISSN: 2364-4184
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-021-00473-5

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2021

Hydro-morphological simulation for Blue beach, Gaza Strip, Palestine

Experimental investigation of Bambara nut shell ash in the production of concrete and mortar

Performance of rubberized concrete exposed to chloride solution and continuous wet–dry cycle

Fuzzy simulation of organizational adjustment processes management based on heat supply balanced scorecard

Development of pedestrian safety index models for safety of pedestrian flow at un-signalized junctions on urban roads under mixed traffic conditions using MLR

Failure assessment of dysfunctional flexible pavement drainage facility using fuzzy analytical hierarchical process