nach oben

Erschienen in:

2016 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

An Ontology-Based Knowledge Representation of MCDA Methods

verfasst von : Jarosław Wątróbski, Jarosław Jankowski

Erschienen in: Intelligent Information and Database Systems

Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Multiple-criteria decision analysis methods are widely used as tools supporting a decision problem. The article presents the taxonomy of the methods, which takes into consideration the most essential characteristics. This taxonomy, in the conceptualization process, was written by means of description logic and then it was implemented in the OWL language in the form of ontology representing field knowledge in the scope of MCDA methods. The research also considers the ontology verification prepared with the use of competency questions.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel Argumentation Framework for Merging Stratified Belief Bases

Nächstes Kapitel Preliminary Evaluation of Multilevel Ontology Integration on the Concept Level

Greco, S.: A new PCCA method: IDRA. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 98(3), 587–601 (1997)CrossRefMATH

Matarazzo, B.: Multicriterion analysis of preferences by means of pairwise actions and criterion comparisons. Appl. Math. Comput. 18(2), 119–141 (1986)MathSciNetMATH

Matarazzo, B.: Preference ranking global frequencies in multicriterion analysis (Pragma). Eur. J. Oper. Res. 36(1), 36–49 (1988)MathSciNetCrossRefMATH

Giarlotta, A.: Passive and Active Compensability Multicriteria ANalysis (PACMAN). J. Multi-Criteria Decis. Anal. 7(4), 204–216 (1998)CrossRefMATH

De Keyser, W.S.M., Peeters, P.H.M.: ARGUS – a new multiple criteria method based on the general idea of outranking. In: Paruccini, M. (ed.) Applying Multiple Criteria Aid for Decision to Environmental Management, pp. 263–278. Kluwer, Dordrecht (1994)CrossRef

Paelinck, J.H.P.: Qualitative multiple criteria analysis, environmental protection and multiregional development. Pap. Reg. Sci. Assoc. 36(1), 59–74 (1976)CrossRef

Fishburn, P.C.: Exceptional paper-lexicographic orders, utilities and decision rules: a survey. Manage. Sci. 20(11), 1442–1471 (1974)MathSciNetCrossRefMATH

Vansnick, J.C.: On the problem of weights in multiple criteria decision making (the noncompensatory approach). Eur. J. Oper. Res. 24(2), 288–294 (1986)MathSciNetCrossRefMATH

Bana e Costa, C.A., Vansnick, J.C.: MACBETH — An interactive path towards the construction of cardinal value functions. Int. Trans. Oper. Res. 1(4), 489–500 (1994)CrossRefMATH

10.

Mikhailov, L., Tsvetinov, P.: Evaluation of services using a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. Appl. Soft Comput. 5(1), 23–33 (2004)CrossRef

11.

Saaty, T.L.: The Analytic Network Process. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh (2001)CrossRefMATH

12.

Promentilla, M.A.B., Furuichi, T., Ishii, K., Tanikawa, N.: A fuzzy analytic network process for multi-criteria evaluation of contaminated site remedial countermeasures. J. Env. Manag. 88(3), 479–495 (2008)CrossRef

13.

Wang, T.C., Chen, L.Y., Chen, Y.H.: applying fuzzy PROMETHEE method for evaluating IS outsourcing suppliers. In: Fifth International Conference on Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery, vol. 3, pp. 361 – 365 (2008)

14.

Munda, G.: Multicriteria Evaluation in a Fuzzy Environment. Theory and Applications in Ecological Economics. Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg (1995)CrossRefMATH

15.

Guitouni, A., Martel, J.M., Belanger, M., Hunter, C.: Managing a Decision Making Situation in the Context of the Canadian Airspace Protection. DOCUMENT DE TRAVAIL 1999-021 (1999)

16.

Chen, C.T., Lin, C.T., Huang, S.F.: A fuzzy approach for supplier evaluation and selection in supply chain management. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 102(2), 289–301 (2006)CrossRef

17.

Sałabun, W.: The characteristic objects method: a new distance-based approach to multicriteria decision-making problems. J. Multi-Criteria Decis. Anal. 22(1–2), 37–50 (2015)CrossRef

18.

Martel, J.M., Matarazzo, B.: Other outranking approaches. In: Figueira, J., Greco, S., Ehrgott, M. (eds.) Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys, pp. 197–262. Springer, Boston (2005)CrossRef

19.

Bana e Costa, C.A., Vincke, P.: Multiple criteria decision aid: an overview. In: Bana e Costa, C.A. (ed.) Readings in Multiple Criteria Decision Aid, pp. 3–14. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg (1990)CrossRef

20.

Bagheri Moghaddam, N., Nasiri, M., Mousavi, S.M.: An appropriate multiple criteria decision making method for solving electricity planning problems, addressing sustainability issue. Int. J. Env. Sci. Technol. 8(3), 605–620 (2011)CrossRef

21.

Guitouni, A., Martel, J.M.: Tentative guidelines to help choosing an appropriate MCDA method. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 109(2), 501–521 (1998)MathSciNetCrossRefMATH

22.

Roy, B.: Paradigms and challenges. In: Figueira, J., Greco, S., Ehrgott, M. (eds.) Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys, pp. 3–24. Springer, Boston (2005)CrossRef

23.

W3C Working Group, http://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-manchester-syntax/

24.

Hepp, M.: Ontologies: state of the art, business potential, and grand challenges. In: Hepp, M., de Leenheer, P., de Moor, A., Sure, Y. (eds.) Ontology Management. Semantic Web, Semantic Web Services, and Business Applications, pp. 2–23. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRef

25.

Wątróbski, J., Jankowski, J.: Knowledge management in MCDA domain. In: Proceedings of the Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems. Annals of Computer Science and Information Systems, vol. 5, pp. 1445–1450 (2015)

26.

Ziemba, P., Jankowski, J., Watróbski, J., Becker, J.: Knowledge management in website quality evaluation domain. In: Núñez, M., Nguyen, N.T., Camacho, D., Trawinski, B. (eds.) ICCCI 2015. LNCS, vol. 9330, pp. 75–85. Springer, Heidelberg (2015). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-24306-1_8 CrossRef

27.

Gruber, T.R.: A translation approach to portable ontology specifications. Knowl. Acquisition 5(2), 199–220 (1993)CrossRef

28.

http://protege.stanford.edu/

29.

Chai, J., Liu, J.N.K.: An ontology-driven framework for supporting complex decision process. In: World Automation Congress (WAC) (2010)

30.

Wątróbski, J., Jankowski, J., Piotrowski, Z.: The selection of multicriteria method based on unstructured decision problem description. In: Hwang, D., Jung, J.J., Nguyen, N.-T. (eds.) ICCCI 2014. LNCS, vol. 8733, pp. 454–465. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)

31.

Liao, X.Y., Rocha Loures, E., Canciglieri, O., Panetto, H.: A novel approach for ontological representation of analytic hierarchy process. Adv. Mater. Res. 988, 675–682 (2014)CrossRef

32.

Kornyshova, E., Deneckere, R.: Using an ontology for modeling decision-making knowledge. Front. Artif. Intell. Appl. 243, 1553–1562 (2012)

33.

Kornyshova, E., Deneckère, R.: Decision-Making ontology for information system engineering. In: Parsons, J., Saeki, M., Shoval, P., Woo, C., Wand, Y. (eds.) ER 2010. LNCS, vol. 6412, pp. 104–117. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRef

34.

Roy, B.: Multicriteria Methodology for Decision Aiding. Springer, Dordrecht (1996)CrossRefMATH

35.

Velasquez, M., Hester, P.T.: An analysis of multi-criteria decision making methods. Int. J. Oper. Res. 10(2), 56–66 (2013)MathSciNet

36.

Della Valle, E., Ceri, S.: Querying the semantic web: SPARQL. In: Domingue, J., Fensel, D., Hendler, J.A. (eds.) Handbook of Semantic Web Technologies, pp. 299–363. Springer, Berlin (2011)CrossRef

37.

http://tinyurl.com/ontoMCDAext

38.

http://tinyurl.com/ontoMCDAext-inferred

39.

Piegat, A., Sałabun, W.: Comparative analysis of MCDM methods for assessing the severity of chronic liver disease. In: Rutkowski, L., Korytkowski, M., Scherer, R., Tadeusiewicz, R., Zadeh, L.A., Zurada, J.M. (eds.). LNCS, vol. 9119, pp. 228–238Springer, Heidelberg (2015)CrossRef

40.

Ziemba, P., Jankowski, J., Wątróbski, J., Wolski, W., Becker, J.: Integration of domain ontologies in the repository of website evaluation methods. In: Proceedings of the Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems. Annals of Computer Science and Information Systems, vol. 5, pp. 1585–1595 (2015)

Titel: An Ontology-Based Knowledge Representation of MCDA Methods
verfasst von: Jarosław Wątróbski
Jarosław Jankowski
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Buch: Intelligent Information and Database Systems
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-49380-9

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-662-49381-6

Copyright-Jahr: 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-49381-6_6

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"