Skip to main content

2018 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

4. Belief Revision in DeLP3E

verfasst von : Eric Nunes, Paulo Shakarian, Gerardo I. Simari, Andrew Ruef

Erschienen in: Artificial Intelligence Tools for Cyber Attribution

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Any artificial intelligence tool designed for cyber-attribution must deal with information coming from different sources that invariably leads to incompleteness, overspecification, or inherently uncertain content. The presence of these varying levels of uncertainty doesn’t mean that the information is worthless—rather, these are hurdles that the knowledge engineer must learn to work with. In this chapter, we continue developing the DeLP3E model introduced in the previous chapter, focusing now on the problem of belief revision in DeLP3E. We first propose a non-prioritized class of revision operators called AFO (Annotation Function-based Operators); then, we go on to argue that in some cases it may be desirable to define revision operators that take quantitative aspects into account (such as how the probabilities of certain literals or formulas of interest change after the revision takes place). As a result, we propose the QAFO (Quantitative Annotation Function-based Operators) class of operators, a subclass of AFO, and study the complexity of several problems related to their specification and application in revising knowledge bases. Finally, we present an algorithm for computing the probability that a literal is warranted in a DeLP3E knowledge base, and discuss how it could be applied towards implementing QAFO-style operators that compute approximations rather than exact operations.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Fußnoten
1
That is, af (x) = af(x) for all x ∈dom(af), and dom(af ) = dom(af) ∪{f}.
 
2
Note that this definition can easily be extended to deal with probability intervals as well (i.e., using both nec and poss); here, for simplicity of presentation, we adopt this definition in order to work with point probabilities.
 
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat M. Capobianco, C. I. Chesñevar, and G. R. Simari. Argumentation and the dynamics of warranted beliefs in changing environments. Journal on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, 11:127–151, Sept. 2005.CrossRef M. Capobianco, C. I. Chesñevar, and G. R. Simari. Argumentation and the dynamics of warranted beliefs in changing environments. Journal on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, 11:127–151, Sept. 2005.CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat L. A. Cecchi and G. R. Simari. El marcado de un árbol dialéctico en DeLP es PSPACE-completo. In Proceedings of Congreso Argentino de Ciencias de la Computación (CACIC), 2011. L. A. Cecchi and G. R. Simari. El marcado de un árbol dialéctico en DeLP es PSPACE-completo. In Proceedings of Congreso Argentino de Ciencias de la Computación (CACIC), 2011.
3.
Zurück zum Zitat V. Chvátal. Linear Programming. W.H.Freeman, New York, 1983.MATH V. Chvátal. Linear Programming. W.H.Freeman, New York, 1983.MATH
4.
Zurück zum Zitat R. Fagin, J. Y. Halpern, and N. Megiddo. A logic for reasoning about probabilities. Information and Computation, 87(1/2):78–128, 1990.MathSciNetCrossRefMATH R. Fagin, J. Y. Halpern, and N. Megiddo. A logic for reasoning about probabilities. Information and Computation, 87(1/2):78–128, 1990.MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
5.
Zurück zum Zitat M. A. Falappa, G. Kern-Isberner, M. Reis, and G. R. Simari. Prioritized and non-prioritized multiple change on belief bases. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 41(1):77–113, 2012.MathSciNetCrossRefMATH M. A. Falappa, G. Kern-Isberner, M. Reis, and G. R. Simari. Prioritized and non-prioritized multiple change on belief bases. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 41(1):77–113, 2012.MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
6.
Zurück zum Zitat A. J. García and G. R. Simari. Defeasible logic programming: An argumentative approach. Theory and Practice of Logic Programming, 4(1–2):95–138, 2004.MathSciNetCrossRefMATH A. J. García and G. R. Simari. Defeasible logic programming: An argumentative approach. Theory and Practice of Logic Programming, 4(1–2):95–138, 2004.MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
9.
Zurück zum Zitat P. Shakarian, G. I. Simari, G. Moores, S. Parsons, and M. A. Falappa. An argumentation-based framework to address the attribution problem in cyber-warfare. In Proceedings of the ASE International Conference on Cyber Security, 2014. P. Shakarian, G. I. Simari, G. Moores, S. Parsons, and M. A. Falappa. An argumentation-based framework to address the attribution problem in cyber-warfare. In Proceedings of the ASE International Conference on Cyber Security, 2014.
10.
Zurück zum Zitat P. Shakarian, G. I. Simari, G. Moores, D. Paulo, S. Parsons, M. A. Falappa, and A. Aleali. Belief revision in structured probabilistic argumentation: Model and application to cyber security. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence, 78(3–4):259–301, 2016.MathSciNetCrossRefMATH P. Shakarian, G. I. Simari, G. Moores, D. Paulo, S. Parsons, M. A. Falappa, and A. Aleali. Belief revision in structured probabilistic argumentation: Model and application to cyber security. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence, 78(3–4):259–301, 2016.MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
11.
Zurück zum Zitat G. I. Simari, P. Shakarian, and M. A. Falappa. A quantitative approach to belief revision in structured probabilistic argumentation. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence, 76(3–4):375–408, 2016.MathSciNetCrossRefMATH G. I. Simari, P. Shakarian, and M. A. Falappa. A quantitative approach to belief revision in structured probabilistic argumentation. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence, 76(3–4):375–408, 2016.MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
12.
Zurück zum Zitat S. Toda. On the computational power of PP and ⊕P. In Proc. of FOCS, pages 514–519, 1989. S. Toda. On the computational power of PP and ⊕P. In Proc. of FOCS, pages 514–519, 1989.
Metadaten
Titel
Belief Revision in DeLP3E
verfasst von
Eric Nunes
Paulo Shakarian
Gerardo I. Simari
Andrew Ruef
Copyright-Jahr
2018
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73788-1_4