Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Sustainable Water Resources Management 4/2018

06.10.2017 | Original Article

Calibration and validation of SWAT model using stream flow and sediment load for Mojo watershed, Ethiopia

verfasst von: Zelalem Biru, Devendra Kumar

Erschienen in: Sustainable Water Resources Management | Ausgabe 4/2018

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The main aim of this study was to setup and evaluate the applicability of physically based soil and water assessment tool (SWAT) model with ArcGIS version 9.3 in assessing the runoff and sediment load from Mojo watershed having a total area of 2017.21 km2 situated in central Oromia Regional state, Ethiopia. In this study for stream flow simulation parameters involving surface runoff (CN2.mgt) and ground water (ALPHA_BNK.rte) are found the most sensitive parameter and the parameters representing channel process (SPCON.bsn, SPEXP.bsn &ADJ_PKP.bsn), geomorphology (SLSUBBSN.hru) and surface runoff (CN2.mgt, & HRU_SLP.hru), were found more sensitive for sediment load simulation. There are a good agreement between the observed and simulated discharge, which was verified using both graphical technique and quantitative statistics. The value of R 2 = 0.75, NSE = 0.76, RSR = 0.49 and PBIAS = 10.9 obtained during calibration and R 2 value 0.71, NSE value 0.70, RSR value 0.59 and PBIAS 9.5 obtained during validation as well as the uniformly scatter points along the 1:1 line during calibration and validation justify that the model is good in simulating runoff from Mojo watershed. For sediment load the computed statistical indicators R 2 = 0.77, NSE = 0.76, RSR = 0.49 and PBIAS = 48.70 were obtained during calibration and during validation the computed statistical indicators were found 0.67 for R 2, 0.65 for NSE, 0.59 for RSR and 50.5 for PBIAS. From the calibration and validation result, it can be concluded that the calibrated parameter values of SWAT model can be used for hydrologic simulation of the un-gauged watershed that is having the similar agro-climatic condition.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Arnold JG, Fohrer N (2005) SWAT2000 current capabilities and research opportunities in applied watershed modeling. Hydrol Process 19:563–572CrossRef Arnold JG, Fohrer N (2005) SWAT2000 current capabilities and research opportunities in applied watershed modeling. Hydrol Process 19:563–572CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Arnold JG, Srinivasan R, Muttiah RS, Williams JR (1998) Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment. J Am Water Resour Assoc 34(1):73–89CrossRef Arnold JG, Srinivasan R, Muttiah RS, Williams JR (1998) Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment. J Am Water Resour Assoc 34(1):73–89CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Arnold JG, Moriasi DN, Gassman PW, Abbaspour KC, White MJ, Srinivasan R, Santhi C, Harmel RD, van Griensven A, Van Liew MW, Kannan N, Jha MK (2012) SWAT model use, calibration, and validation. Trans ASABE 55(4):1491–1508CrossRef Arnold JG, Moriasi DN, Gassman PW, Abbaspour KC, White MJ, Srinivasan R, Santhi C, Harmel RD, van Griensven A, Van Liew MW, Kannan N, Jha MK (2012) SWAT model use, calibration, and validation. Trans ASABE 55(4):1491–1508CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Coffey AE, Workman SR, Taraba JL, Fogle AW (2004) Statistical procedures for evaluating daily and monthly hydrologic model predictions. Trans ASAE 47(1):59–68CrossRef Coffey AE, Workman SR, Taraba JL, Fogle AW (2004) Statistical procedures for evaluating daily and monthly hydrologic model predictions. Trans ASAE 47(1):59–68CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat FAO (1998) World reference base for soil resources, world soils report no. 84, Rome FAO (1998) World reference base for soil resources, world soils report no. 84, Rome
Zurück zum Zitat Fontaine TA, Cruickshank TS, Arnold JG, Hotchkiss RH (2002) Development of a snowfall–snowmelt routine for mountainous terrain for the soil and water assessment tool. J Hydrol 262(1–4):209–223CrossRef Fontaine TA, Cruickshank TS, Arnold JG, Hotchkiss RH (2002) Development of a snowfall–snowmelt routine for mountainous terrain for the soil and water assessment tool. J Hydrol 262(1–4):209–223CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Griensven A, Meixner T, Grunwald S, Bishop T, Diluzio M, Srinivasan R (2006) A global sensitivity analysis tool for the parameters of multi-variable catchment models. J Hydrol 324:10–23CrossRef Griensven A, Meixner T, Grunwald S, Bishop T, Diluzio M, Srinivasan R (2006) A global sensitivity analysis tool for the parameters of multi-variable catchment models. J Hydrol 324:10–23CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Gupta HV, Sorooshian S, Yapo PO (1999) Status of automatic calibration for hydrologic models: comparison with multilevel expert calibration. J Hydrol Eng 4(2):135–143CrossRef Gupta HV, Sorooshian S, Yapo PO (1999) Status of automatic calibration for hydrologic models: comparison with multilevel expert calibration. J Hydrol Eng 4(2):135–143CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Jajarmizadeh M, Harun S, Abdullah R, Salarpour M (2012) Using soil and water assessment tool for flow simulation and assessment of sensitive parameters applying SUFI-2 algorithm. Casp J Appl Sci Res 2(1):37–44. http://www.cjasr.com. Accessed 20 June 2015 (ISSN: 2251-9114) Jajarmizadeh M, Harun S, Abdullah R, Salarpour M (2012) Using soil and water assessment tool for flow simulation and assessment of sensitive parameters applying SUFI-2 algorithm. Casp J Appl Sci Res 2(1):37–44. http://​www.​cjasr.​com. Accessed 20 June 2015 (ISSN: 2251-9114)
Zurück zum Zitat Knisel WG (1980) CREAMS, a field scale model for chemicals, runoff and erosion from agricultural management systems. USDA Conservation Research Rept. No. 26, Washington DC Knisel WG (1980) CREAMS, a field scale model for chemicals, runoff and erosion from agricultural management systems. USDA Conservation Research Rept. No. 26, Washington DC
Zurück zum Zitat Krause P, Boyle DP, Base F (2005) Comparison of different efficiency criteria for hydrological model assessment. Adv Geosci 5:89–97CrossRef Krause P, Boyle DP, Base F (2005) Comparison of different efficiency criteria for hydrological model assessment. Adv Geosci 5:89–97CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Leonard RA, Knisel WG, Still DA (1987) GLEAMS: groundwater loading effects of agricultural management systems. Trans ASAE 30:1403–1418CrossRef Leonard RA, Knisel WG, Still DA (1987) GLEAMS: groundwater loading effects of agricultural management systems. Trans ASAE 30:1403–1418CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Matamoros D, Guzman E, Bonini J, Vanrolleghem PA (2005) AGNPS and SWAT model calibration for hydrologic modeling of an Ecuadorian river basin under data scarcity. IWA Publishing, London Matamoros D, Guzman E, Bonini J, Vanrolleghem PA (2005) AGNPS and SWAT model calibration for hydrologic modeling of an Ecuadorian river basin under data scarcity. IWA Publishing, London
Zurück zum Zitat Mengistu D, Sorteberg A (2012) Sensitivity of SWAT simulated stream flow to climatic changes within the Eastern Nile River basin. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 16:391–407CrossRef Mengistu D, Sorteberg A (2012) Sensitivity of SWAT simulated stream flow to climatic changes within the Eastern Nile River basin. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 16:391–407CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Merritt WS, Letcher RA, Jakeman AJ (2003) A review of erosion and sediment transport models. Environ Model Softw 18:761–799CrossRef Merritt WS, Letcher RA, Jakeman AJ (2003) A review of erosion and sediment transport models. Environ Model Softw 18:761–799CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Migliaccio KW, Srivastava P (2007) Hydrologic components of watershed-scale models. Trans ASABE 50(5):1695–1703CrossRef Migliaccio KW, Srivastava P (2007) Hydrologic components of watershed-scale models. Trans ASABE 50(5):1695–1703CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Mishra A, Kar S, Pandey AC (2008) Comparison of SWAT with HSPF model in predicting hydrologic processes of a small multi-vegetated watershed. J Agric Eng 45(4):29–35 Mishra A, Kar S, Pandey AC (2008) Comparison of SWAT with HSPF model in predicting hydrologic processes of a small multi-vegetated watershed. J Agric Eng 45(4):29–35
Zurück zum Zitat Morgan RPC (1995) Soil erosion and conservation, 2nd edn. Longman Group Unlimited, London, p 198 Morgan RPC (1995) Soil erosion and conservation, 2nd edn. Longman Group Unlimited, London, p 198
Zurück zum Zitat Moriasi DN, Arnold JG, Van Liew MW, Bingner RL, Harmel RD, Veith TL (2007) Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations. Trans ASABE 50(3):885–900CrossRef Moriasi DN, Arnold JG, Van Liew MW, Bingner RL, Harmel RD, Veith TL (2007) Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations. Trans ASABE 50(3):885–900CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Neitsch SL, Arnold JG, Kiniry JR, Williams JR, King KW (2002) Soil and water assessment tool, theoretical documentation, Black land research center, grassland, soil and water research laboratory, agricultural research service, Temple, TX Neitsch SL, Arnold JG, Kiniry JR, Williams JR, King KW (2002) Soil and water assessment tool, theoretical documentation, Black land research center, grassland, soil and water research laboratory, agricultural research service, Temple, TX
Zurück zum Zitat Neitsch SL, Arnold JG, Kiniry JR, Williams JR, King KW (2011) Soil and water assessment tool. Theoretical documentation: version 2009. TWRI TR-406. Texas Water Resources Institute, College Station, TX, pp 647 Neitsch SL, Arnold JG, Kiniry JR, Williams JR, King KW (2011) Soil and water assessment tool. Theoretical documentation: version 2009. TWRI TR-406. Texas Water Resources Institute, College Station, TX, pp 647
Zurück zum Zitat Ogwo V, Ogbu KN, Okoye CJ, Okechukwu ME, Mbajiorgu CC (2012) Comparison of soil erosion models for application in the humid tropics. Spec Publ Niger Assoc Hydrol Sci 266–278 Ogwo V, Ogbu KN, Okoye CJ, Okechukwu ME, Mbajiorgu CC (2012) Comparison of soil erosion models for application in the humid tropics. Spec Publ Niger Assoc Hydrol Sci 266–278
Zurück zum Zitat Reungsang P, Kanwar RS, Jha M, Gassman PW, Ahmad K, Saleh A (2005) Calibration and validation of SWAT for the Upper Maquoketa River watershed. Center for Agricultural and Rural Development, Iowa State University. www.card.iastate.edu. Accessed 5 July 2015 Reungsang P, Kanwar RS, Jha M, Gassman PW, Ahmad K, Saleh A (2005) Calibration and validation of SWAT for the Upper Maquoketa River watershed. Center for Agricultural and Rural Development, Iowa State University. www.​card.​iastate.​edu. Accessed 5 July 2015
Zurück zum Zitat Santhi C, Arnold JG, Williams JR, Dugas WA, Srinivasan R, Hauck LM (2001) Validation of the SWAT model on a large river basin with point and nonpoint sources. J Am Water Resour Assoc 37(5):1169–1188CrossRef Santhi C, Arnold JG, Williams JR, Dugas WA, Srinivasan R, Hauck LM (2001) Validation of the SWAT model on a large river basin with point and nonpoint sources. J Am Water Resour Assoc 37(5):1169–1188CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Williams JR (1975) Sediment routing for agricultural watersheds. Water Resour Bull 11(5):965–974CrossRef Williams JR (1975) Sediment routing for agricultural watersheds. Water Resour Bull 11(5):965–974CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Williams JR, Jones CA, Dyke PT (1984) A modeling approach to determining the relationship between erosion and productivity. Trans Am Soc Agric Eng 27(1):129–144CrossRef Williams JR, Jones CA, Dyke PT (1984) A modeling approach to determining the relationship between erosion and productivity. Trans Am Soc Agric Eng 27(1):129–144CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wischmeier WH, Smith DD (1978) Predicting rainfall erosion losses: a guide to conservation planning. Agricultural Handbook No. 537 (USDA), Washington, DC Wischmeier WH, Smith DD (1978) Predicting rainfall erosion losses: a guide to conservation planning. Agricultural Handbook No. 537 (USDA), Washington, DC
Zurück zum Zitat Xie H, Longuevergne L, Ringler C, Scanlon BR (2012) Calibration and evaluation of a semi-distributed watershed model of Sub-Saharan Africa using GRACE data. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 16:3083–3099CrossRef Xie H, Longuevergne L, Ringler C, Scanlon BR (2012) Calibration and evaluation of a semi-distributed watershed model of Sub-Saharan Africa using GRACE data. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 16:3083–3099CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Yongwei G, Zhenyao S, Ruimin L, Xiujuan W, Chen T (2010) Effect of watershed subdivision on SWAT modeling with consideration of parameter uncertainty. J Hydrol Eng 2010(15):1070–1074 Yongwei G, Zhenyao S, Ruimin L, Xiujuan W, Chen T (2010) Effect of watershed subdivision on SWAT modeling with consideration of parameter uncertainty. J Hydrol Eng 2010(15):1070–1074
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang X, Srinivasan R, Boschc D (2009) Calibration and uncertainty analysis of the SWAT model using genetic algorithms and Bayesian model averaging. J Hydrol 374:307–317CrossRef Zhang X, Srinivasan R, Boschc D (2009) Calibration and uncertainty analysis of the SWAT model using genetic algorithms and Bayesian model averaging. J Hydrol 374:307–317CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Calibration and validation of SWAT model using stream flow and sediment load for Mojo watershed, Ethiopia
verfasst von
Zelalem Biru
Devendra Kumar
Publikationsdatum
06.10.2017
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Sustainable Water Resources Management / Ausgabe 4/2018
Print ISSN: 2363-5037
Elektronische ISSN: 2363-5045
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40899-017-0189-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2018

Sustainable Water Resources Management 4/2018 Zur Ausgabe