Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Why Philosophize; Why not Just Model? Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2015 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Capturing Variability in Adaptation Spaces: A Three-Peaks Approach

verfasst von : Konstantinos Angelopoulos, Vítor E. Silva Souza, John Mylopoulos

Erschienen in: Conceptual Modeling

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Variability is essential for adaptive software systems, because it captures the space of alternative adaptations a system is capable of when it needs to adapt. In this work, we propose to capture variability for an adaptation space in terms of a three dimensional model. The first dimension captures requirements through goals and reflects all possible ways of achieving these goals. The second dimension captures supported variations of a system’s architectural structure, modeled in terms of connectors and components. The third dimension describes supported system behaviors, by modeling possible sequences for goal fulfillment and task execution. Of course, the three dimensions of a variability model are inter-twined as choices made with respect to one dimension have impact on the other two. Therefore, we propose an incremental design methodology for variability models that keeps the three dimensions aligned and consistent. We illustrate our proposal with a case study involving the meeting scheduling system exemplar.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel A Working Model for Uncertain Data with Lineage
Nächstes Kapitel Taming Software Variability: Ontological Foundations of Variability Mechanisms
Fußnoten
1
Each component must be able to satisfy on its own the assigned goal.
 
Literatur
1.
Angelopoulos, K., Souza, V.E.S., Mylopoulos, J.: Dealing with multiple failures in zanshin: a control-theoretic approach. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Symposium on Software Engineering for Adaptive and Self-Managing Systems, SEAMS 2014, pp. 165–174. ACM, New York (2014)
2.
Baresi, L., Guinea, S., Pasquale, L.: Service-oriented dynamic software product lines. Computer 45(10), 42–48 (2012)CrossRef
3.
Baresi, L., Pasquale, L., Spoletini, P.: Fuzzy goals for requirements-driven adaptation. In: Proceedings of the 18th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference, pp. 125–134. IEEE (2010)
4.
Chen, B., Peng, X., Yu, Y., Nuseibeh, B., Zhao, W.: Self-adaptation through incremental generative model transformations at runtime. In: Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Software Engineering, ICSE 2014, pp. 676–687. ACM, New York (2014)
5.
Cheng, B.H.C., Sawyer, P., Bencomo, N., Whittle, J.: A goal-based modeling approach to develop requirements of an adaptive system with environmental uncertainty. In: Schürr, A., Selic, B. (eds.) MODELS 2009. LNCS, vol. 5795, pp. 468–483. Springer, Heidelberg (2009) CrossRef
6.
Chung, L., Supakkul, S., Subramanian, N., Garrido, J., Noguera, M., Hurtado, M., Rodríguez, M., Benghazi, K.: Goal-oriented software architecting. In: Avgeriou, P., Grundy, J., Hall, J.G., Lago, P., Mistrík, I. (eds.) Relating Software Requirements and Architectures, pp. 91–109. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRef
7.
Dalpiaz, F., Borgida, A., Horkoff, J., Mylopoulos, J.: Runtime goal models. In: Proceedings of the IEEE 7th International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science, pp. 1–11. IEEE (2013)
8.
Garlan, D., Cheng, S.-W., Huang, A.-C., Schmerl, B., Steenkiste, P.: Rainbow: architecture-based self-adaptation with reusable infrastructure. Computer 37(10), 46–54 (2004)CrossRef
9.
Ivers, J., Clements, P., Garlan, D., Nord, R., Schmerl, B., Silva, J.R.: Documenting component and connector views with uml 2.0. Technical report, DTIC Document (2004)
10.
Jureta, I., Mylopoulos, J., Faulkner, S.: Revisiting the core ontology and problem in requirements engineering. In: Proceedings of the 16th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference, pp. 71–80. IEEE (2008)
11.
Kramer, J., Magee, J.: Self-managed systems: an architectural challenge. In: Future of Software Engineering (FOSE 2007), pp. 259–268. IEEE (2007)
12.
Kramer, J., Magee, J.: A rigorous architectural approach to adaptive software engineering. J. Comput. Sci. Technol. 24(2), 183–188 (2009)CrossRef
13.
Lapouchnian, A., Yu, Y., Mylopoulos, J.: Requirements-driven design and configuration management of business processes. In: Alonso, G., Dadam, P., Rosemann, M. (eds.) BPM 2007. LNCS, vol. 4714, pp. 246–261. Springer, Heidelberg (2007) CrossRef
14.
Oreizy, P., et al.: An architecture-based approach to self-adaptive software. IEEE Intell. Syst. 14(3), 54–62 (1999)CrossRef
15.
Pimentel, J., Lucena, M., Castro, J., Silva, C., Santos, E., Alencar, F.: Deriving software architectural models from requirements models for adaptive systems: the stream-a approach. Requirements Eng. 17(4), 259–281 (2012)CrossRef
16.
Pimentel, J., Castro, J., Mylopoulos, J., Angelopoulos, K., Souza, V.E.S.: From requirements to statecharts via design refinement. In: Proceedings of the 29th Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, SAC 2014, pp. 995–1000. ACM, New York (2014)
17.
Souza, V.E.S.: Requirements-based software system adaptation. Ph.D. thesis, University of Trento, Italy (2012)
18.
Silva Souza, V.E., Lapouchnian, A., Mylopoulos, J.: System identification for adaptive software systems: a requirements engineering perspective. In: Jeusfeld, M., Delcambre, L., Ling, T.-W. (eds.) ER 2011. LNCS, vol. 6998, pp. 346–361. Springer, Heidelberg (2011) CrossRef
19.
Souza, V.E.S., Lapouchnian, A., Robinson, W.N., Mylopoulos, J.: Awareness requirements. In: de Lemos, R., Giese, H., Müller, H.A., Shaw, M. (eds.) Software Engineering for Self-Adaptive Systems. LNCS, vol. 7475, pp. 133–161. Springer, Heidelberg (2013) CrossRef
20.
van Lamsweerde, A.: Requirements Engineering: From System Goals to UML Models to Software Specifications. Wiley, Hoboken (2009)
21.
Whittle, J., Sawyer, P., Bencomo, N., Cheng, B.H.C., Bruel, J.-M.: Relax: incorporating uncertainty into the specification of self-adaptive systems. In: Proceedings of the 2009 17th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference, RE, RE 2009, pp. 79–88. IEEE Computer Society, Washington (2009)
22.
Yu, Y., Lapouchnian, A., Liaskos, S., Mylopoulos, J., Leite, J.C.S.P.: From goals to high-variability software design. In: An, A., Matwin, S., Raś, Z.W., Ślęzak, D. (eds.) Foundations of Intelligent Systems. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4994, pp. 1–16. Springer, Heidelberg (2008) CrossRef
23.
Metadaten
Titel
Capturing Variability in Adaptation Spaces: A Three-Peaks Approach
verfasst von
Konstantinos Angelopoulos
Vítor E. Silva Souza
John Mylopoulos
Copyright-Jahr
2015
Buch
Conceptual Modeling

Print ISBN: 978-3-319-25263-6

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-25264-3

Copyright-Jahr: 2015

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25264-3_28

Neuer Inhalt

    Bildnachweise