nach oben

Erschienen in:

2019 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

9. Carbon Capture and Storage: Most Efficient Technologies for Greenhouse Emissions Abatement

verfasst von : Pasquale Cavaliere

Erschienen in: Clean Ironmaking and Steelmaking Processes

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Steel production is a very energy-intensive process, and it requires large amounts of natural resources. In fact, energy costs account for up to 40% of the total cost in some countries. Therefore, optimizing process efficiency is one of the most effective ways to reduce energy consumption and lower costs, with the added benefit of reducing the steel industry’s impact on the environment. Iron and steel industry is the main CO₂ emitter among the most CO₂-intensive industrial sectors. The iron and steel industry accounts for about 19% of final energy use and about a quarter of direct CO₂ emissions from the industry sector. The CO₂ relevance is high due to a large share of coal in the energy mix. Unlike power plants, where CO₂ is emitted from a single source, an integrated steel mill has multiple sources of CO₂. The emissions are located at several stacks and occur from start to end of the iron and steel production. CCS is one of the most open fields for the reduction of greenhouse emissions in primary steelmaking. It is necessary for continuing to use fossil fuels. In the iron and steel industry, CCS faces many uncertainties regarding cost, efficiency, and technology choice. Obviously many solutions are under investigation to capture CO₂ and to store it avoiding its emission in the atmosphere. Selection of capture equipment will depend on factors including CO₂ capture rate, possible requirements for secondary gas treatment, energy consumption, reliability, and operational and capital costs. In the present chapter, the most innovative solutions related to energetic issues and off-gases type are described. The gas utilization depending on the plant section source and composition is underlined. The CO₂ abatement potential and the various solutions costs are indicated.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel Direct Reduced Iron: Most Efficient Technologies for Greenhouse Emissions Abatement

Nächstes Kapitel Electrolysis of Iron Ores: Most Efficient Technologies for Greenhouse Emissions Abatement

Adanez J, Abad A, Garcia-Labiano F, Gayan P, De Diego LF (2012) Progress in chemical-looping combustion and reforming technologies. Prog Energy Combust Sci 38(2):215–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2011.09.001CrossRef

Air Products (2011) BF Plus offers steelmakers the complete package … lower costs, improved iron-making productivity and a cleaner environment. Available from: www.airproducts.com/blastfurnace Allentown, PA, USA

Arasto A, Tsupare E, Karki J, Pisila E, Sorsamaki L (2013) Post-combustion capture of CO₂ at an integrated steel mill – part I: technical concept analysis. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 16:271–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2012.08.018CrossRef

Arasto A, Tsupari E, Karki J, Lilja J, Sihvonen M (2014) Oxygen blast furnace with CO₂ capture and storage at an integrated steel mill—part I: technical concept analysis. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 30:140–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2014.09.004CrossRef

Ariyama T, Takahashi K, Kawashiri Y, Nouchi T (2019) Diversification of the ironmaking process toward the long-term global goal for carbon dioxide mitigation. J Sustain Metall. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40831-019-00219-9

Arnaiz del Pozo C, Cloete S, Cloete JH, Alvaro AJ, Amini S (2019) The potential of chemical looping combustion using the gas switching concept to eliminate the energy penalty of CO2 capture. Int J Greenhous gas Contrl 83:265–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2019.01.018CrossRef

Azimi B, Tahmasebpoor M, Sanchez-Jimenez PE, Perejon A, Valverde JM (2019) Multicycle CO₂ capture activity and fluidizability of Al-based synthesized CaO sorbents. Chem Eng J 358:679–690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2018.10.061CrossRef

Bains P, Psarras P, Wilcox J (2017) CO₂ capture from the industry sector. Prog Energy Combust Sci 63:146–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2017.07.001CrossRef

Bermudez JM, Arenillas A, Luque R, Menendez JA (2013) An overview of novel technologies to valorise coke oven gas surplus. Fuel Precess Technol 110:150–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2012.12.007CrossRef

Birat J-P (2010a) Steel sectoral report. Contribution to the UNIDO roadmap on CCS—fifth draft

Birat J-P (2010b) Carbon dioxide (CO₂) capture and storage technology in the iron and steel industry. In: Developments and innovation in carbon dioxide (CO₂) capture and storage technology, vol 1: carbon dioxide (CO₂) capture, transport and industrial applications. Woodhead Publishing Ltd, Cambridge, UK

Blamey J, Anthony EJ, Wang J, Fennell PS (2010) The calcium looping cycle for large-scale CO₂ capture. Prog Energy Combust Sci 36(2):260–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2009.10.001CrossRef

Bui M, Adjiman CS, Bardow A, Anthony EJ, Boston A, Brown S, Fennell PS, Fuss S, Galindo A, Hackett LA, Hallett JP, Herzog HJ, Jackson G, Kemper J, Krevor S, Maitland GC, Matuszewski M, Metcalfe IS, Petit C, Puxty G, Reimer J, Reiner DM, Rubin ES, Scott SA, Shah N, Smit B, Trusler JPM, Webley P, Wilcox J, Mac Dowell N (2018) Carbon capture and storage (CCS): the way forward. Energy Environ Sci 11(5):1062–1176. https://doi.org/10.1039/c7ee02342aCrossRef

Cavaliere P (2016) Ironmaking and steelmaking processes: greenhouse emissions, control, and reduction. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39529-6

Chen L, Yang B, Shen X, Xie Z, Sun F (2015) Thermodynamic optimization opportunities for the recovery and utilization of residual energy and heat in China's iron and steel industry: a case study. Appl Therm Eng 86:151–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2015.04.026CrossRef

Cheng H-H, Shen J-F, Tan C-S (2010) CO₂ capture from hot stove gas in steel making process. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 4(3):525–531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2009.12.006CrossRef

Chisalita D-A, Petrescu L, Cobden P, van Dijk HAJE, Cormos A-M, Cormos C-C (2019) Assessing the environmental impact of an integrated steel mill with post-combustion CO₂ capture and storage using the LCA methodology. J Clean Prod 211:1015–1025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.256CrossRef

Chowdhury JI, Hu Y, Haltas I, Balta-Ozkan N, Matthew G Jr, Varga L (2018) Reducing industrial energy demand in the UK: a review of energy efficiency technologies and energy saving potential in selected sectors. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 94:1153–1178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.06.040CrossRef

Cormos CC (2016) Evaluation of reactive absorption and adsorption systems for post-combustion CO₂ capture applied to iron and steel industry. Appl Therm Eng 105:56–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.05.149CrossRef

Danloy G, Berthelemot A, Grant M et al (2009) ULCOS - pilot testing of the low-CO2 blast furnace process at the experimental BF in Luleå. Revue de Metallurgie - Cahiers d’Informations Techniques 106(1):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1051/metal/2009008CrossRef

Davidson R M (2007) Post-combustion carbon capture from coal fired plants - solvent scrubbing. IEA Clean Coal Centre, CCC/125, London

Delasalle F (2019) Steel in the global value chain and in the circular economy. Steel and coal: a new perspective, Bruxelles, 28 Mar 2019

Dong K, Wang X (2019) CO₂ utilization in the ironmaking and steelmaking process. Metals 9:273. https://doi.org/10.3390/met9030273CrossRef

Ghanbari H, Helle M, Saxen H (2012) Process integration of steelmaking and methanol production for suppressing CO₂ emissions—a study of different auxiliary fuels. Chem Eng Process 61:58–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2012.06.008CrossRef

Gielen D (2003) CO₂ removal in the iron and steel industry. Energy Convers Manag 44:1027–1037. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0196-8904(02)00111-5CrossRef

Ho MT, Allinson GW, Wiley DE (2011) Comparison of MEA capture cost for low CO₂ emissions sources in Australia. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 5(1):49–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2010.06.004CrossRef

Ho MT, Bustamante A, Wiley DE (2013) Comparison of CO₂capture economics for iron and steel mills. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 19:145–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2013.08.003CrossRef

Holappa LEK (2017) Energy efficiency and sustainability in steel production. Minerals, metals and materials series 9783319510903, pp 401–410. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51091-0_39CrossRef

Holmes G, Keith DW (2016) An air–liquid contactor for large-scale capture of CO₂ from air. Philos Trans R Soc 370:4380–4403. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2012.0137CrossRef

Holmes G, Nold K, Walsh T, Heidel K, Henderson MA, Ritchie J, Klavins P, Singh H, Keith DW (2013) Outdoor prototype results for direct atmospheric capture of carbon dioxide. Energy Procedia 37:6079–6095. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2013.06.537CrossRef

IEA (2007) Tracking industrial energy efficiency and CO₂ emissions

Keith DW, Holmes G, St. Angelo D, Heidel K (2018) A process for capturing CO₂ from the atmosphere. Joule. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2018.05.006CrossRef

Khallaghi N, Hanak DP, Manovic V (2019) Staged oxy-fuel natural gas combined cycle. Appl Therm Eng 153:761–767. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2019.03.033CrossRef

Koytsoumpa EI, Bergins C, Kakaras E (2018) The CO₂ economy: review of CO₂ capture and reuse technologies. J Supercrit Fluids 132:3–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.supflu.2017.07.029CrossRef

Kunzler C, Alves N, Pereira E, Nienczewski J, Ligabue R, Einloft S, Dullius J (2011) CO₂ storage with indirect carbonation using industrial waste. Energy Procedia 4:1010–1017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2011.01.149CrossRef

Kuramochi T, Ramírez A, Turkenburg W, Faaij A (2011) Techno-economic assessment and comparison of CO₂ capture technologies for industrial processes: preliminary results for the iron and steel sector. Energy Procedia 4:1981–1988. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2011.02.079CrossRef

Kuramochi T, Ramírez A, Turkenburg W, Faaij A (2013) Comparative assessment of CO₂ capture technologies for carbon-intensive industrial processes. Prog Energy Combust Sci 38:87–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2011.05.001CrossRef

Lampert K, Ziebik A (2007) Comparative analysis of energy requirements of CO₂ removal from metallurgical fuel gases. Energy 32:521–527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2006.08.003CrossRef

Lampert K, Ziebik A, Stanek W (2010) Thermoeconomical analysis of CO₂ removal from the Corex export gas and its integration with the blast-furnace assembly and metallurgical combined heat and power (CHP) plant. Energy (Oxford) 35(2):1188–1195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2009.05.010CrossRef

Lie JA, Vassbotn T, Hägg M-B, Grainger D, Kim T-J, Mejdell T (2007) Optimization of a membrane process for CO₂ capture in the steelmaking industry. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 1(3):309–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1750-5836(07)00069-2CrossRef

Lucas N, Rossetti di Valdalbero D (2018) Energy in future steelmaking, steel in the energy market applications, greening European steel. European steel, the wind of change, Bruxelles, 31 Jan 2018

Man Y, Yang S, Xiang D, Li X, Quian Y (2014) Environmental impact and techno-economic analysis of the coal gasification process with/without CO₂ capture. J Clean Prod 71:59–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.12.086CrossRef

Mandova H, Gale WF, Williams A, Heyes AL, Hodgson P, Miah KH (2018) Global assessment of biomass suitability for ironmaking – opportunities for co-location of sustainable biomass, iron and steel production and supportive policies. Sustain Energy Technol Assess 27:23–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2018.03.001CrossRef

Mandova H, Patrizio P, Leduc S, Kjärstad J, Wang C, Wetterlund E, Kraxner F, Gale W (2019) Achieving carbon-neutral iron and steelmaking in Europe through the deployment of bioenergy with carbon capture and storage. J Clean Prod 218:118–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.247CrossRef

Martínez I, Fernández JR, Abanades JC, Romano MC (2018) Integration of a fluidised bed ca–cu chemical looping process in a steel mill. Energy 163:570–584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.08.123CrossRef

Pérez-Fortes M, Moya MJA, Vatopoulos K, Tzimas E (2014) CO₂ capture and utilization in cement and iron and steel industries. Energy Procedia 63:6534–6543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.689CrossRef

Ramírez-Santos ÁA, Castel C, Favre E (2018) A review of gas separation technologies within emission reduction programs in the iron and steel sector: current application and development perspectives. Sep Purif Technol 194:425–442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2017.11.063CrossRef

Rhee CH, Kim JY, Han K, Ahn CK, Chun HD (2011) Process analysis for ammonia-based CO₂ capture in ironmaking industry. Energy Procedia 4:1486–1493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2011.02.015CrossRef

Richards V L, Peaslee K, Smith J D (2008) Geological sequestration of CO₂ by hydrous carbonate formation with reclaimed slag. Office of Scientific and Technical Information, TRP 9955, Oak Ridge, TN

Riley M F, Rosen L, Drnevich R (2009) Mitigating CO₂ emissions in the steel industry: a regional approach to a global need. In: AISTech 2009, proceedings of the iron and steel technology conference, St. Louis, MO, USA, 4–7 May 2009, vol 1. Association for Iron and Steel Technology (AIST), Warrendale, PA, pp 89–101

Rogala T (2019) European coal – technological and socio-economic challenges. Steel and coal: a new perspective, Bruxelles 28 Mar 2019

Shimizu T, Hirama T, Hosoda H, Kitano K, Inagaki M, Tejima K (1999) A twin fluid-bed reactor for removal of CO₂ from combustion processes. Chem Eng Res Des 77(1):62–68. https://doi.org/10.1205/026387699525882CrossRef

Sun L, Smith R (2013) Rectisol wash process simulation and analysis. J Clean Prod 39:321–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.05.049CrossRef

Suopajarvi H, Kemppainen A, Haapakangas J, Fabritius T (2017) Extensive review of the opportunities to use biomass-based fuels in iron and steelmaking processes. J Clean Prod 148:709–734. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.029CrossRef

Tian S, Jiang J, Zhang Z, Manovic V (2018) Inherent potential of steelmaking to contribute to decarbonisation targets via industrial carbon capture and storage. Nat Commun 9(1):4422. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-06886-8CrossRef

Treadgold C (2015) Opportunities for adding value to Tata Steels works arising gases. Tata Steel, IJmuiden

Tsupari E, Karki J, Arasto A, Pisila E (2013) Post-combustion capture of CO₂ at an integrated steel mill – part II: economic feasibility. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 16:278–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2012.08.017CrossRef

Tsupari E, Karki J, Arasto A, Lilja J, Kinnunen K, Sihvonen M (2015) Oxygen blast furnace with CO₂ capture and storage at an integrated steel mill – part II: economic feasibility in comparison with conventional blast furnace highlighting sensitivities. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 32:189–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2014.11.007.CrossRef

Tzirakis F, Tsivintzelis I, Papadopoulos AI, Seferlis P (2019) Experimental measurement and assessment of equilibrium behaviour for phase change solvents used in CO 2 capture. Chem Eng Sci:20–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2018.12.045CrossRef

van der Stel J, Hirsch A, Janhsen U, Sert D, Grant M, Delebecque A, Diez-Brea P, Adam J, Ansseau O, Feiterna A, Lin R, Zagaria AM, Küttner W, Schott R, Eklund N, Pettersson M, Boden A, Sköld B-E, Sundqvist L, Simoes J-P, Edberg N, Lövgren J, Bürgler T, Feilmayr C, Sihvonen M, Kerkkonen O, Babich A, Born S (2014) ULCOS top gas recycling blast furnace process (ULCOS TGRBF). Research fund for coal and steel (EC), EUR 26414, Luxembourg

van Dijk HAJ, Cobden PD, Lundqvist M, Cormos CC, Watson MJ, Manzolini G, van der Veer S, Mancuso L, Johns J, Sundelin B (2017) Cost effective CO₂ reduction in the Iron & Steel Industry by means of the SEWGS technology: STEPWISE project. Energy Procedia 114:6256–6265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.1764CrossRef

Vlek M (2007) Feasibility study of CO₂ capture and storage at a power plant fired on production gas of the steel industry. Master thesis, Department of Technology Management, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven

Wiley DE, Ho MT, Bustamante A (2011) Assessment of opportunities for CO₂ capture at iron and steel mills: an Australian perspective. Energy Procedia 4:2654–2661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2011.02.165CrossRef

Yi W, Wu G-S, Gong M-H, Huang Y, Feng J, Hao Y-H, Li WY (2017) A feasibility study for CO₂ recycle assistance with coke oven gas to synthetic natural gas. Appl Energy 193:149–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.02.031CrossRef

Yildirim O, Nölker K, Büker K, Kleinschmidt R (2018) Chemical conversion of steel mill gases to urea: an analysis of plant capacity. Chemie-Ingenieur-Technik 90(10):1529–1535. https://doi.org/10.1002/cite.201800019CrossRef

Yoon Y, Nam S, Jung S, Kim Y (2011) K2CO3/hindered cyclic amine blend (SEFY-1) as a solvent for CO₂ capture from various industries. Energy Procedia 4:267–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2011.01.051CrossRef

Titel: Carbon Capture and Storage: Most Efficient Technologies for Greenhouse Emissions Abatement
verfasst von: Pasquale Cavaliere
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Buch: Clean Ironmaking and Steelmaking Processes
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-21208-7

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-030-21209-4

Copyright-Jahr: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21209-4_9

Premium Partner

Marktübersichten

Die im Laufe eines Jahres in der „adhäsion“ veröffentlichten Marktübersichten helfen Anwendern verschiedenster Branchen, sich einen gezielten Überblick über Lieferantenangebote zu verschaffen.

Zur Marktübersicht