2004 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel
An Evolutionary Approach
verfasst von : Dr. Zbigniew Michalewicz, Dr. David B. Fogel
Erschienen in: How to Solve It: Modern Heuristics
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Enthalten in: Professional Book Archive
Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.
Wählen Sie Textabschnitte aus um mit Künstlicher Intelligenz passenden Patente zu finden. powered by
Markieren Sie Textabschnitte, um KI-gestützt weitere passende Inhalte zu finden. powered by
In the previous three chapters we discussed various classic problem-solving methods, including dynamic programming, branch and bound, and local search algorithms, as well as some modern heuristic methods like simulated annealing and tabu search. Some of these techniques were seen to be deterministic. Essentially you “turn the crank” and out pops the answer. For these methods, given a search space and an evaluation function, some would always return the same solution (e.g., dynamic programming), while others could generate different solutions based on the initial configuration or starting point (e.g., a greedy algorithm or the hill-climbing technique). Still other methods were probabilistic, incorporating random variation into the search for optimal solutions. These methods (e.g., simulated annealing) could return different final solutions even when given the same initial configuration. No two trials with these algorithms could be expected to take exactly the same course. Each trial is much like a person’s fingerprint: although there are broad similarities across fingerprints, no two are exactly alike.