Skip to main content
Erschienen in: The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 1/2012

01.01.2012 | LIFE CYCLE IMPACT ASSESSMENT (LCIA)

Characterisation framework development for the SIMPASS (Singapore IMPact ASSessment) methodology

verfasst von: Yin Tat Chan, Reginald B. H. Tan, Hsien Hui Khoo

Erschienen in: The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment | Ausgabe 1/2012

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Purpose

Life cycle assessment (LCA) practitioners in Singapore currently rely on foreign life cycle impact assessment (LCIA) methodologies when conducting studies, despite the fact that foreign methodologies may not be relevant, adaptable and sensitive to Singapore's circumstances. As a result, work has been undertaken to develop the Singapore IMPact ASSessment (SIMPASS) methodology by adapting and modifying existing LCIA methodologies to suit the Singaporean context. It is envisioned that the use of SIMPASS will improve the accuracy of LCA studies conducted for industries operating in Singapore.

Methods

The development is initiated by a compendious review of the available LCIA methodologies, in order to familiarise state-of-the-art developments and best available practice for LCIA in the world. Subsequently, five key design considerations are discussed. Firstly, six impact categories (climate change, acidification, eutrophication, fossil fuel depletion, water use and land use) are identified and prioritised for detailed analysis in this project, in view of their relevance and criticality to Singapore. Subsequently, user issues and the type of LCIA approach are considered. Following which, four areas of protection (namely Human Health, Natural Environment, Natural Resources and Man-made Environment) are selected for consideration in the SIMPASS methodology.

Results

With the development approach in mind, extensive research is conducted in the six selected impact categories to construct the characterisation framework for SIMPASS. The characterisation framework is strongly based on current best practices in LCIA characterisation, while the characterisation models are chosen based on their extent of comprehensiveness, scientific sophistication, as well as specificity to Singapore.

Conclusions and recommendations

SIMPASS proposes an attractive and feasible LCIA methodology that is highly specific to Singapore. Feasible recommendations are drawn to further develop and operationalise the characterisation framework.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Bare JC, Gloria TP (2006) Critical analysis of the mathematical relationships and comprehensiveness of life cycle impact assessment approaches. Environ Sci Tech 40(4):1104–1113CrossRef Bare JC, Gloria TP (2006) Critical analysis of the mathematical relationships and comprehensiveness of life cycle impact assessment approaches. Environ Sci Tech 40(4):1104–1113CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bare JC, Hofstetter P, Pennington DW, Udo de Haes HA (2000) Life cycle impact assessment workshop summary. Midpoints versus endpoints: the sacrifices and benefits. Int J Life Cycle Assess 5(6):319–326CrossRef Bare JC, Hofstetter P, Pennington DW, Udo de Haes HA (2000) Life cycle impact assessment workshop summary. Midpoints versus endpoints: the sacrifices and benefits. Int J Life Cycle Assess 5(6):319–326CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bayart JB, Bulle C, Deschênes L, Margni M, Pfister S, Vince F, Koehler A (2010) A framework for assessing off-stream freshwater use in LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15(5):439–453CrossRef Bayart JB, Bulle C, Deschênes L, Margni M, Pfister S, Vince F, Koehler A (2010) A framework for assessing off-stream freshwater use in LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15(5):439–453CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Brent AC, Hietkamp S (2003) Comparative evaluation of life cycle impact assessment methods with a South African case study. Int J Life Cycle Assess 8(1):27–38 Brent AC, Hietkamp S (2003) Comparative evaluation of life cycle impact assessment methods with a South African case study. Int J Life Cycle Assess 8(1):27–38
Zurück zum Zitat CESR (2010) An overview of the WaterGAP model. Dialogue on Water and Climate (WATCLIM) 1(1):4 CESR (2010) An overview of the WaterGAP model. Dialogue on Water and Climate (WATCLIM) 1(1):4
Zurück zum Zitat Udo de Haes HA, Finnveden G, Goedkoop M (2002) Life cycle impact assessment: striving towards best practice vol 1. 1st edn. Society of Environmental Toxicology & Chemist Brussels Udo de Haes HA, Finnveden G, Goedkoop M (2002) Life cycle impact assessment: striving towards best practice vol 1. 1st edn. Society of Environmental Toxicology & Chemist Brussels
Zurück zum Zitat De Schryver AM, Brakkee KW, Goedkoop MJ, Huijbregts MAJ (2009) Characterization factors for global warming in life cycle assessment based on damages to humans and ecosystems. Environ Sci Technol 43(6):1689–1695CrossRef De Schryver AM, Brakkee KW, Goedkoop MJ, Huijbregts MAJ (2009) Characterization factors for global warming in life cycle assessment based on damages to humans and ecosystems. Environ Sci Technol 43(6):1689–1695CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Downing RJ, Ramankutty R, Shah JJ (1997) Rains-Asia: an assessment model for acid deposition in Asia. Directions in development, 1st edn. World Bank Publications, Washington, DC Downing RJ, Ramankutty R, Shah JJ (1997) Rains-Asia: an assessment model for acid deposition in Asia. Directions in development, 1st edn. World Bank Publications, Washington, DC
Zurück zum Zitat Guinee JB, Marieke G, Heijungs R (2001) Life cycle assessment: an operational guide to ISO standards. Life Cycle Assessment: An Operational Guide to ISO Standards 1(1):19 Guinee JB, Marieke G, Heijungs R (2001) Life cycle assessment: an operational guide to ISO standards. Life Cycle Assessment: An Operational Guide to ISO Standards 1(1):19
Zurück zum Zitat ILCD (2010) Framework and requirements for life cycle impact assessment models and indicators. In: Centre JR (ed) International reference life cycle data system handbook ILCD (2010) Framework and requirements for life cycle impact assessment models and indicators. In: Centre JR (ed) International reference life cycle data system handbook
Zurück zum Zitat IPCC (2007) IPCC fourth assessment report: climate change 2007 IPCC (2007) IPCC fourth assessment report: climate change 2007
Zurück zum Zitat Liu Y, Nie Z, Sun B, Wang Z, Gong X (2010) Development of Chinese characterization factors for land use in life cycle impact assessment. Sci China Technol Sci 53(6):1483–1488CrossRef Liu Y, Nie Z, Sun B, Wang Z, Gong X (2010) Development of Chinese characterization factors for land use in life cycle impact assessment. Sci China Technol Sci 53(6):1483–1488CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Pfister S, Koehler A, Hellweg S (2009) Assessing the environmental impacts of freshwater consumption in LCA. Environ Sci Technol 43(11):4098–4104CrossRef Pfister S, Koehler A, Hellweg S (2009) Assessing the environmental impacts of freshwater consumption in LCA. Environ Sci Technol 43(11):4098–4104CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Roper LD (1976) Depletion theory. Depletion Theory 1(1):6 Roper LD (1976) Depletion theory. Depletion Theory 1(1):6
Zurück zum Zitat Rosenbaum RK, Bachmann TM, Gold LS, Huijbregts MAJ, Jolliet O, Juraske R, Koehler A, Larsen HF, MacLeod M, Margni M, McKone TE, Payet J, Schuhmacher M, Van De Meent D, Hauschild MZ (2008) USEtox—The UNEP-SETAC toxicity model: recommended characterisation factors for human toxicity and freshwater ecotoxicity in life cycle impact assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13(7):532–546CrossRef Rosenbaum RK, Bachmann TM, Gold LS, Huijbregts MAJ, Jolliet O, Juraske R, Koehler A, Larsen HF, MacLeod M, Margni M, McKone TE, Payet J, Schuhmacher M, Van De Meent D, Hauschild MZ (2008) USEtox—The UNEP-SETAC toxicity model: recommended characterisation factors for human toxicity and freshwater ecotoxicity in life cycle impact assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13(7):532–546CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Tan BHR (ed) (2003) Life cycle assessment for green productivity: an Asian perspective, vol 1, 1st edn. Asian Productivity Organisation, Singapore Tan BHR (ed) (2003) Life cycle assessment for green productivity: an Asian perspective, vol 1, 1st edn. Asian Productivity Organisation, Singapore
Metadaten
Titel
Characterisation framework development for the SIMPASS (Singapore IMPact ASSessment) methodology
verfasst von
Yin Tat Chan
Reginald B. H. Tan
Hsien Hui Khoo
Publikationsdatum
01.01.2012
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment / Ausgabe 1/2012
Print ISSN: 0948-3349
Elektronische ISSN: 1614-7502
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-011-0333-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2012

The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 1/2012 Zur Ausgabe