nach oben

Erschienen in:

2019 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Classical Algorithms for Reasoning and Explanation in Description Logics

verfasst von : Birte Glimm, Yevgeny Kazakov

Erschienen in: Reasoning Web. Explainable Artificial Intelligence

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Description Logics (DLs) are a family of languages designed to represent conceptual knowledge in a formal way as a set of ontological axioms. DLs provide a formal foundation of the ontology language OWL, which is a W3C standardized language to represent information in Web applications. The main computational problem in DLs is finding relevant consequences of the information stored in ontologies, e.g., to answer user queries. Unlike related techniques based on keyword search or machine learning, the notion of a consequence is well-defined using a formal logic-based semantics. This course provides an in-depth description and analysis of the main reasoning and explanation methods for ontologies: tableau procedures and axiom pinpointing algorithms.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Nächstes Kapitel Explanation-Friendly Query Answering Under Uncertainty

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

https://schema.org/.

https://developers.google.com/knowledge-graph/.

https://www.wikidata.org.

\(n!=n\cdot (n-1)\cdot (n-2)\cdots 2\cdot 1\), there are n possibilities to choose the first element, \(n-1\) to choose the second element from the remaining ones, \(n-2\) to choose the third one, etc.

The conjuncts for \(J_{ij}\) in F consist of two negated propositional variables, the conjunct for \(R_1\) and \(R_2\) in F consist of n propositional variables.

http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~ezolin/dl/.

Arif, M.F., Mencía, C., Marques-Silva, J.: Efficient MUS enumeration of horn formulae with applications to axiom pinpointing. CoRR abs/1505.04365 (2015)

Baader, F.: Description logics. In: Tessaris, S., et al. (eds.) Reasoning Web 2009. LNCS, vol. 5689, pp. 1–39. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03754-2_1CrossRef

Baader, F., Brandt, S., Lutz, C.: Pushing the \(\cal{EL}\) envelope. In: Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 2005), pp. 364–369 (2005)

Baader, F., Calvanese, D., McGuinness, D., Nardi, D., Patel-Schneider, P. (eds.): The Description Logic Handbook: Theory, Implementation, and Applications, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2007)MATH

Baader, F., Franconi, E., Hollunder, B., Nebel, B., Profitlich, H.J.: An empirical analysis of optimization techniques for terminological representation systems. Appl. Intell. 4(2), 109–132 (1994)CrossRef

Baader, F., Horrocks, I., Lutz, C., Sattler, U.: An Introduction to Description Logic. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2017)CrossRef

Bate, A., Motik, B., Grau, B.C., Cucala, D.T., Simancik, F., Horrocks, I.: Consequence-based reasoning for description logics with disjunctions and number restrictions. J. Artif. Intell. Res. 63, 625–690 (2018)MathSciNetCrossRef

Baumgartner, P., Furbach, U., Niemelä, I.: Hyper tableaux. In: Alferes, J.J., Pereira, L.M., Orlowska, E. (eds.) JELIA 1996. LNCS, vol. 1126, pp. 1–17. Springer, Heidelberg (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-61630-6_1CrossRef

Bienvenu, M., Bourgaux, C.: Inconsistency-tolerant querying of description logic knowledge bases. In: Pan, J.Z., et al. (eds.) Reasoning Web 2016. LNCS, vol. 9885, pp. 156–202. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49493-7_5CrossRefMATH

10.

Bienvenu, M., Ortiz, M.: Ontology-mediated query answering with data-tractable description logics. In: Faber, W., Paschke, A. (eds.) Reasoning Web 2015. LNCS, vol. 9203, pp. 218–307. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21768-0_9CrossRef

11.

Bonatti, P.A., Faella, M., Petrova, I.M., Sauro, L.: A new semantics for overriding in description logics. Artif. Intell. 222, 1–48 (2015)MathSciNetCrossRef

12.

Botoeva, E., Konev, B., Lutz, C., Ryzhikov, V., Wolter, F., Zakharyaschev, M.: Inseparability and conservative extensions of description logic ontologies: a survey. In: Pan, J.Z., et al. (eds.) Reasoning Web 2016. LNCS, vol. 9885, pp. 27–89. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49493-7_2CrossRefMATH

13.

Brandt, S.: Polynomial time reasoning in a description logic with existential restrictions, GCI axioms, and - what else? In: de Mántaras, R.L., Saitta, L. (eds.) Proceedings of the 16th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI 2004), pp. 298–302. IOS Press (2004)

14.

Casini, G., Straccia, U.: Defeasible inheritance-based description logics. J. Artif. Intell. Res. 48, 415–473 (2013)MathSciNetCrossRef

15.

Cucala, D.T., Grau, B.C., Horrocks, I.: Consequence-based reasoning for description logics with disjunction, inverse roles, number restrictions, and nominals. In: Lang, J. (ed.) Proceedings of the 27th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 2018), pp. 1970–1976. ijcai.org (2018)

16.

Cuenca Grau, B., Horrocks, I., Kazakov, Y., Sattler, U.: Modular reuse of ontologies: theory and practice. J. Artif. Intell. Res. 31, 273–318 (2008)MathSciNetCrossRef

17.

Feld, M., Müller, C.: The automotive ontology: managing knowledge inside the vehicle and sharing it between cars. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, AutomotiveUI 2011, pp. 79–86. ACM, New York (2011). http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2381416.2381429

18.

Giordano, L., Gliozzi, V., Olivetti, N., Pozzato, G.L.: A non-monotonic description logic for reasoning about typicality. Artif. Intell. 195, 165–202 (2013)MathSciNetCrossRef

19.

Glimm, B., Horrocks, I., Motik, B.: Optimized description logic reasoning via core blocking. In: Giesl, J., Hähnle, R. (eds.) IJCAR 2010. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 6173, pp. 457–471. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14203-1_39CrossRefMATH

20.

Glimm, B., Horrocks, I., Motik, B., Shearer, R., Stoilos, G.: A novel approach to ontology classification. J. Web Semant. 14, 84–101 (2012)CrossRef

21.

Golbreich, C., Zhang, S., Bodenreider, O.: The foundational model of anatomy in OWL: experience and perspectives. J. Web Semant. 4(3), 181–195 (2006)CrossRef

22.

Greiner, R., Smith, B.A., Wilkerson, R.W.: A correction to the algorithm in Reiter’s theory of diagnosis. In: Readings in Model-Based Diagnosis, pp. 49–53. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc. (1992)

23.

Group, T.W.W. (ed.): SPARQL 1.1 Overview. W3C Recommendation, 21 March 2013. http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-overview/

24.

Haarslev, V., Möller, R., Turhan, A.-Y.: Exploiting pseudo models for TBox and ABox reasoning in expressive description logics. In: Goré, R., Leitsch, A., Nipkow, T. (eds.) IJCAR 2001. LNCS, vol. 2083, pp. 61–75. Springer, Heidelberg (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45744-5_6CrossRefMATH

25.

Hoehndorf, R., Dumontier, M., Gkoutos, G.V.: Evaluation of research in biomedical ontologies. Briefings Bioinform. 14(6), 696–712 (2012)CrossRef

26.

Horridge, M.: Justification based explanation in ontologies. Ph.D. thesis, University of Manchester, UK (2011)

27.

Horridge, M., Parsia, B., Sattler, U.: Laconic and precise justifications in OWL. In: Sheth, A., et al. (eds.) ISWC 2008. LNCS, vol. 5318, pp. 323–338. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-88564-1_21CrossRef

28.

Horridge, M., Parsia, B., Sattler, U.: Justification oriented proofs in OWL. In: Patel-Schneider, P.F., et al. (eds.) ISWC 2010. LNCS, vol. 6496, pp. 354–369. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-17746-0_23CrossRef

29.

Horrocks, I., Kutz, O., Sattler, U.: The even more irresistible \(\cal{SROIQ}\). In: Doherty, P., Mylopoulos, J., Welty, C.A. (eds.) Proceedings 10th International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR 2006), pp. 57–67. AAAI Press (2006)

30.

Hudek, A.K., Weddell, G.E.: Binary absorption in tableaux-based reasoning for description logics. In: Proceedings of the 19th International Workshop on Description Logics (DL 2006), vol. 189. CEUR (2006)

31.

Kazakov, Y.: \(\cal{RIQ}\) and \(\cal{SROIQ}\) are harder than \(\cal{SHOIQ}\). In: Brewka, G., Lang, J. (eds.) Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR 2008), pp. 274–284. AAAI Press (2008)

32.

Kazakov, Y.: Consequence-driven reasoning for Horn \(\cal{SHIQ}\) ontologies. In: Proceedings of the 21st International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 2009), pp. 2040–2045. IJCAI (2009)

33.

Kazakov, Y., Klinov, P.: Goal-directed tracing of inferences in EL ontologies. In: Mika, P., et al. (eds.) ISWC 2014. LNCS, vol. 8797, pp. 196–211. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11915-1_13CrossRef

34.

Kazakov, Y., Krötzsch, M., Simančík, F.: ELK: a reasoner for OWL EL ontologies. System description, University of Oxford (2012)

35.

Kharlamov, E., et al.: Ontology based data access in statoil. Web Semant. Sci. Serv. Agents World Wide Web 44, 3–36 (2017)CrossRef

36.

Kontchakov, R., Zakharyaschev, M.: An introduction to description logics and query rewriting. In: Koubarakis, M., et al. (eds.) Reasoning Web 2014. LNCS, vol. 8714, pp. 195–244. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10587-1_5CrossRef

37.

Krötzsch, M., Marx, M., Ozaki, A., Thost, V.: Attributed description logics: reasoning on knowledge graphs. In: Lang, J. (ed.) Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI 2018, Stockholm, Sweden, 13–19 July 2018. pp. 5309–5313. ijcai.org (2018). https://doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2018/743

38.

Maier, A., Schnurr, H.-P., Sure, Y.: Ontology-based information integration in the automotive industry. In: Fensel, D., Sycara, K., Mylopoulos, J. (eds.) ISWC 2003. LNCS, vol. 2870, pp. 897–912. Springer, Heidelberg (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-39718-2_57CrossRef

39.

Manthey, N., Peñaloza, R., Rudolph, S.: Efficient axiom pinpointing in \(\cal{EL}\) using SAT technology. In: Lenzerini, M., Peñaloza, R. (eds.) Proceedings of the 29th International Workshop on Description Logics (DL 2016). CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 1577. CEUR-WS.org (2016). http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1577/paper_33.pdf

40.

Motik, B.: Representing and querying validity time in RDF and OWL: a logic-based approach. J. Web Semant. 12, 3–21 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.websem.2011.11.004CrossRef

41.

Motik, B., Cuenca Grau, B., Horrocks, I., Wu, Z., Fokoue, A., Lutz, C. (eds.): OWL 2 Web Ontology Language: Profiles. W3C Recommendation, 27 October 2009. http://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-profiles/

42.

Motik, B., Shearer, R., Horrocks, I.: Hypertableau reasoning for description logics. J. Artif. Intell. Res. 36, 165–228 (2009)MathSciNetCrossRef

43.

Ortiz, M., Šimkus, M.: Reasoning and query answering in description logics. In: Eiter, T., Krennwallner, T. (eds.) Reasoning Web 2012. LNCS, vol. 7487, pp. 1–53. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33158-9_1CrossRefMATH

44.

OWL Working Group, W.: OWL 2 Web Ontology Language: Document Overview. W3C Recommendation, 27 October 2009. http://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-overview/

45.

Peñaloza, R.: Explaining axiom pinpointing. In: Lutz, C., Sattler, U., Tinelli, C., Turhan, A.-Y., Wolter, F. (eds.) Description Logic, Theory Combination, and All That. LNCS, vol. 11560, pp. 475–496. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22102-7_22CrossRef

46.

Reiter, R.: A theory of diagnosis from first principles. Artif. Intell. 32(1), 57–95 (1987)MathSciNetCrossRef

47.

Robinson, J.A.: Automatic deduction with hyper-resolution. Int. J. Comput. Math. 1(3), 227–234 (1965)MathSciNetMATH

48.

Armas Romero, A., Cuenca Grau, B., Horrocks, I.: MORe: modular combination of OWL reasoners for ontology classification. In: Cudré-Mauroux, P., et al. (eds.) ISWC 2012. LNCS, vol. 7649, pp. 1–16. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35176-1_1CrossRef

49.

Rudolph, S.: Foundations of description logics. In: Polleres, A., et al. (eds.) Reasoning Web 2011. LNCS, vol. 6848, pp. 76–136. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23032-5_2CrossRef

50.

Sattler, U.: Reasoning in description logics: basics, extensions, and relatives. In: Antoniou, G., et al. (eds.) Reasoning Web 2007. LNCS, vol. 4636, pp. 154–182. Springer, Heidelberg (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74615-7_2CrossRefMATH

51.

Schmidt-Schauß, M., Smolka, G.: Attributive concept descriptions with complements. J. Artif. Intell. 48, 1–26 (1991)MathSciNetCrossRef

52.

Schreiber, G., Raimond, Y. (eds.): RDF 1.1 Primer. W3C Working Group Note, 24 June 2014. http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-primer/

53.

Sebastiani, R., Vescovi, M.: Axiom pinpointing in lightweight description logics via horn-SAT encoding and conflict analysis. In: Schmidt, R.A. (ed.) CADE 2009. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5663, pp. 84–99. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02959-2_6CrossRef

54.

Simančík, F., Kazakov, Y., Horrocks, I.: Consequence-based reasoning beyond horn ontologies. In: Proceedings of the 22nd International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 2011), pp. 1093–1098. AAAI Press/IJCAI (2011)

55.

Sirin, E.: From wine to water: optimizing description logic reasoning for nominals. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR 2006), pp. 90–99. AAAI Press (2006)

56.

Sirin, E., Parsia, B., Grau, B.C., Kalyanpur, A., Katz, Y.: Pellet: a practical OWL-DL reasoner. J. Web Semant. 5(2), 51–53 (2007)CrossRef

57.

Steigmiller, A., Glimm, B., Liebig, T.: Optimised absorption for expressive description logics. In: Proceedings of the 27th International Workshop on Description Logics (DL 2014). CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 1193. CEUR-WS.org (2014). https://www.uni-ulm.de/fileadmin/website_uni_ulm/iui.inst.090/Publikationen/2014/StGL14b.pdf

58.

Steigmiller, A., Liebig, T., Glimm, B.: Konclude: system description. J. Web Semant. 27–28, 78–85 (2014)CrossRef

59.

Straccia, U.: All about fuzzy description logics and applications. In: Faber, W., Paschke, A. (eds.) Reasoning Web 2015. LNCS, vol. 9203, pp. 1–31. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21768-0_1CrossRef

60.

Tobies, S.: Complexity results and practical algorithms for logics in knowledge representation. Ph.D. thesis, RWTH Aachen, Germany (2001)

61.

Tsarkov, D., Horrocks, I.: Efficient reasoning with range and domain constraints. In: Proceedings of the 17th International Workshop on Description Logics (DL 2004), vol. 104. CEUR (2004)

62.

Tsarkov, D., Horrocks, I.: FaCT++ description logic reasoner: system description. In: Furbach, U., Shankar, N. (eds.) IJCAR 2006. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4130, pp. 292–297. Springer, Heidelberg (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/11814771_26CrossRef

63.

Tudorache, T., Nyulas, C.I., Noy, N.F., Musen, M.A.: Using semantic web in ICD-11: three years down the road. In: Alani, H., et al. (eds.) ISWC 2013. LNCS, vol. 8219, pp. 195–211. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41338-4_13CrossRef

64.

Turhan, A.-Y.: Reasoning and explanation in \(\cal{EL}\) and in expressive description logics. In: Aßmann, U., Bartho, A., Wende, C. (eds.) Reasoning Web 2010. LNCS, vol. 6325, pp. 1–27. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15543-7_1CrossRef

65.

Turhan, A.-Y.: Introductions to description logics – a guided tour. In: Rudolph, S., Gottlob, G., Horrocks, I., van Harmelen, F. (eds.) Reasoning Web 2013. LNCS, vol. 8067, pp. 150–161. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39784-4_3CrossRef

66.

Vardi, M.Y.: Why is modal logic so robustly decidable? In: Immerman, N., Kolaitis, P.G. (eds.) Descriptive Complexity and Finite Models, Proceedings of a DIMACS Workshop 1996, Princeton, New Jersey, USA, 14–17 January 1996. DIMACS Series in Discrete Mathematics and Theoretical Computer Science, vol. 31, pp. 149–183. DIMACS/AMS (1996)

67.

Vescovi, M.: Exploiting SAT and SMT techniques for automated reasoning and ontology manipulation in description logics. Ph.D. thesis, University of Trento, Italy (2011). http://eprints-phd.biblio.unitn.it/477/

68.

Zhao, L., Ichise, R., Mita, S., Sasaki, Y.: Core ontologies for safe autonomous driving. In: Villata, S., Pan, J.Z., Dragoni, M. (eds.) Proceedings of the ISWC 2015 Posters & Demonstrations Track co-located with the 14th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC-2015), Bethlehem, PA, USA, 11 October 2015. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 1486. CEUR-WS.org (2015). http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1486/paper_9.pdf

Titel: Classical Algorithms for Reasoning and Explanation in Description Logics
verfasst von: Birte Glimm
Yevgeny Kazakov
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Buch: Reasoning Web. Explainable Artificial Intelligence
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-31422-4

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-030-31423-1

Copyright-Jahr: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31423-1_1

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Premium Partner