nach oben

Erschienen in:

2024 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Climate Engineering

Sozialwissenschaftliche Perspektiven auf eine Emerging Technology

verfasst von : Julia Schubert

Erschienen in: Handbuch Umweltsoziologie

Verlag: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Zusammenfassung

Climate Engineering beschreibt die Idee, der globalen Erderwärmung durch gezielte technologische Eingriffe in das Klimasystem entgegenzuwirken. Dieser Beitrag zeigt, wie Climate Engineering zu einer klimapolitischen Option werden konnte, wie diese Option aktuell verhandelt wird und was das für die zukünftige Auseinandersetzung mit diesen umstrittenen Maßnahmen bedeutet. Im Zentrum steht dabei die Frage, wie sich im Fall von Climate Engineering wissenschaftliche mit gesellschaftspolitischen Interessen verknüpfen. Der Beitrag illustriert diese Verknüpfung in historischer, struktureller und epistemischer Hinsicht.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel StadtNaturen: Urbane Assemblagen und ihre Transformation

Nächstes Kapitel Klimawandel und globale Umweltveränderungen

Die Wissenschaftler*innen präsentieren hier ein „peak shaving“ Szenario, bei dem relativ kurzfristig eine starke Erderwärmung verhindert werden muss.

Anderson, K., und G. Peters. 2016. The trouble with negative emissions. Science 354(6309): 182–183.CrossRef

Baskin, J. 2019. Geoengineering, the anthropocene and the end of nature. London: Springer.

Beck, S., und M. Mahony. 2017. The IPCC and the politics of anticipation. Nature Climate Change 7(5): 311–313.CrossRef

———. 2018. The politics of anticipation: The IPCC and the negative emissions technologies experience. Global Sustainability 1:e8.CrossRef

Bellamy, R., und J. Lezaun. 2017. Crafting a public for geoengineering. Public Understanding of Science 26(4): 402–417.CrossRef

Bellamy, R., J. Chilvers, N. E. Vaughan, und T. M. Lenton. 2012. A review of climate geoengineering appraisals. WIREs Climate Change 3(6): 597–615.CrossRef

———. 2013. ‚Opening up‘ geoengineering appraisal: Multi-criteria mapping of options for tackling climate change. Global Environmental Change 23(5): 926–937.CrossRef

Blackstock, J., und S. Low, Hrsg. 2019. Geoengineering our climate? Ethics, politics, and governance. New York: Routledge.

Boettcher, M. 2020. Cracking the code: How discursive structures shape climate engineering research governance. Environmental Politics 29(5): 890–916.

Boettcher, M., und R. Kim. 2022. Arguments and architectures: Discursive and institutional structures shaping global climate engineering governance. Environmental Science & Policy, 128: 121–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2021.11.015

Buck, H. J. 2013. Climate engineering: Spectacle, tragedy or solution? A content analysis of news media framing. In De-/Constructing the greenhouse: Interpretative approaches to global climate governance. London: Routledge.

———. 2021. Ending fossil fuels: Why net zero is not enough. Verso Books.

Budyko, M. I. 1977. Climatic changes. Washington: American Geophysical Union.

Burns, E. T., J. A. Flegal, D. W. Keith, A. Mahajan, D. Tingley, und G. Wagner. 2016. What do people think when they think about solar geoengineering? A review of empirical social science literature, and prospects for future research. Earth’s Future 4(11): 536–542.CrossRef

Carton, W., A. Asiyanbi, S. Beck, H. J. Buck, und J. F. Lund. 2020. Negative emissions and the long history of carbon removal. WIREs Climate Change 11(6): 1–25.

Carton, W., I. Hougaard, N. Markusson, und J. F. Lund. 2023. Is carbon removal delaying emission reductions? WIREs Climate Change. online first: 1–18.

Corner, A., K. A. Parkhill, und N. Pidgeon. 2011. ‚Experiment Earth?‘ Reflections on a public dialogue on geoengineering: Reflections on a public dialogue on geoengineering. Cardiff University, Cardiff.

Dooley, K., P. Christoff, und K. A. Nicholas. 2018. Co-producing climate policy and negative emissions: Trade-offs for sustainable land-use. Global Sustainability 1:e3.CrossRef

Edwards, P. N. 1999. Global climate science, uncertainty and politics: Data-laden models, model-filtered data. Science as Culture 8(4): 437–472.CrossRef

———. 2010. A vast machine: Computer models, climate data, and the politics of global warming. Cambridge/Massachusetts: MIT Press.

Fialka, J. 2020, January 23. NOAA gets go-ahead to study controversial climate plan B. Scientific American. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/noaa-gets-go-ahead-to-study-controversial-climate-plan-b/. Zugegriffen am 23.03.2023.

Flegal, J. A. 2018. The evidentiary politics of the geoengineering imaginary. Berkeley: University of California.

Flegal, J. A., A.-M. Hubert, D. R. Morrow, und J. B. Moreno-Cruz. 2019. Solar geoengineering: Social science, legal, ethical, and economic frameworks. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 44:399–423.CrossRef

Fleming, J. 1998. Historical perspectives on climate change. New York: Oxford University Press.

———. 2006. The pathological history of weather and climate modification: Three cycles of promise and hype. Historical Studies in the Physical and Biological Sciences 37(1): 3–25.CrossRef

———. 2010. Fixing the sky: The checkered history of weather and climate control. Cambridge/Massachusetts: Columbia University Press.

Fragniere, A., und S. Gardiner. 2016. Why geoengineering is not ‚Plan B‘. In Justice and geoengineering. London: Rowman and Littlefield.

Gramelsberger, G., und J. Feichter. 2011. Modelling the climate system: An overview. In Climate change and policy, 9–90. Heidelberg: Springer.

Gupta, A., und I. Möller. 2019. De facto governance: How authoritative assessments construct climate engineering as an object of governance. Environmental Politics 28(3): 480–501.CrossRef

Hamilton, Clive. 2013. Earthmasters: The dawn of the age of climate engineering. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Harper, K. C. 2017. Make it rain: State control of the atmosphere in twentieth-century America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Huttunen, S., E. Skytén, und M. Hildén. 2015. Emerging policy perspectives on geoengineering: An international comparison. The Anthropocene Review 2(1): 14–32.CrossRef

Irvine, P., K. Emanuel, J. He, L. W. Horowitz, G. Vecchi, und D. Keith. 2019. Halving warming with idealized solar geoengineering moderates key climate hazards. Nature Climate Change 9(4): 295–299.CrossRef

Irvine, P. J., B. Kravitz, M. G. Lawrence, und H. Muri. 2016. An overview of the Earth system science of solar geoengineering. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change 7(6): 815–833.

Jones, A. C., J. M. Haywood, und A. Jones. 2016. Climatic impacts of stratospheric geoengineering with sulfate, black carbon and titania injection. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 16(5): 2843–2862.CrossRef

Keith, D. W. 2000. Geoengineering the climate: History and prospect. Annual Review of Energy and the Environment 25(1): 245–284.CrossRef

Kintisch, E. 2010. Hack the planet: Science’s best hope-or worst nightmare-for averting climate catastrophe. Hoboken/New Jersey: Wiley.

Kravitz, B., A. Robock, D. T. Shindell, und M. A. Miller. 2012. Sensitivity of stratospheric geoengineering with black carbon to aerosol size and altitude of injection. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 117(D9): 1–22.

Low, S., und H. J. Buck. 2020. The practice of responsible research and innovation in „climate engineering“. WIREs Climate Change 11(3): 1–17.

Low, S., und S. Schäfer. 2019. Tools of the trade: Practices and politics of researching the future in climate engineering. Sustainability Science 14(4): 953–962.CrossRef

Low, S., C. M. Baum, und B. K. Sovacool. 2022. Undone science in climate interventions: Contrasting and contesting anticipatory assessments by expert networks. Environmental Science & Policy 137:249–270.CrossRef

Marchetti, C. 1977. On geoengineering and the CO2 problem. Climatic Change 1(1): 59–68.CrossRef

Markusson, N., M. D. Gjefsen, J. C. Stephens, und D. Tyfield. 2017. The political economy of technical fixes: The (mis) alignment of clean fossil and political regimes. Energy Research & Social Science 23:1–10.CrossRef

McLaren, D., und O. Corry. 2021. The politics and governance of research into solar geoengineering. WIREs Climate Change 12(3): 1–20.

McLaren, D. P. 2018. Whose climate and whose ethics? Conceptions of justice in solar geoengineering modelling. Energy Research & Social Science 44:209–221.CrossRef

Minx, J. C., W. F. Lamb, M. W. Callaghan, L. Bornmann, und S. Fuss. 2017. Fast growing research on negative emissions. Environmental Research Letters 12(3): 035007.CrossRef

Möller, I. 2020. Political perspectives on geoengineering: Navigating problem definition and institutional fit. Global Environmental Politics 20(2): 57–82.CrossRef

Morrow, D. 2017. International governance of climate engineering: A survey of reports on climate engineering, 2009–2015. SSRN Electronic Journal. FCEA Working Paper Series: 001, June, 2017. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2982392

NAS, United States National Academies of Science. 2019. Negative emissions technologies and reliable sequestration: A research agenda. Washington: National Academies Press.

———. 2020. Developing a research agenda and research governance approaches for climate intervention strategies that reflect sunlight to cool earth. Washington: National Academies Press.

NRC, United States National Research Council. 2015a. Climate intervention: Reflecting sunlight to cool earth. Washington: The National Academy Press.

———. 2015b. Climate intervention: Carbon dioxide removal and reliable sequestration. Washington: The National Academy Press.

Oldfield, J. D., und M. Poberezhskaya. 2023. Soviet and Russian perspectives on geoengineering and climate management. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, e829. Online first. 1–14.

Oomen, J., und M. Meiske. 2021. Proactive and reactive geoengineering: Engineering the climate and the lithosphere. WIREs Climate Change 12(6): 1–15.

Owen, R., P. Macnaghten, und J. Stilgoe. 2012. Responsible research and innovation. From science in society to science for society, with society. Science and Public Policy 39(6): 751–760.CrossRef

Parson, E. A. 2017. Climate policymakers and assessments must get serious about climate engineering. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 114(35): 9227–9230.CrossRef

Pindyck, R. S. 2017. The use and misuse of models for climate policy. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 11(1): 100–114.

PWCM, Panel on Weather and Climate Modification to the Committee on Atmospheric Sciences, U.S. National Academies of Science (1966). Weather and climate modification: Problems and prospects. Washington: National Academy of Sciences-National Research Council.

Rogelj, J., D. Huppmann, V. Krey, K. Riahi, L. Clarke, M. Gidden, Z. Nicholls, und M. Meinshausen. 2019. A new scenario logic for the Paris Agreement long-term temperature goal. Nature 573(7774): 357–363.CrossRef

Royal Society. 2009. Geoengineering the climate: Science, governance and uncertainty. London: The Royal Society.

Sapinski, J., H. J. Buck, und A. Malm. 2020. Has it come to this? The promises and perils of geoengineering on the brink. New Brunswick/New Jersey: Rutgers University Press.

Schubert, J. 2019. Measuring, modeling, controlling the climate? Numerical expertise in US climate engineering politics. In Science, Numbers and Politics, 181–202. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

———. 2021. Engineering the climate: Science, politics, and visions of control. Manchester: Mattering Press.

———. 2022. Science-state alliances and climate engineering: A „Longue-Durée“ picture. WIREs Climate Change. 13(6): 1–13.

SCWM, Special Commission on Weather Modification of the U.S. National Science Foundation. 1965. Weather and climate modification. Washington: National Science Foundation.

Shukla, P. R., J. Skea, R. Slade, A. Al Khourdajie, R. Van Diemen, D. McCollum, M. Pathak, S. Some, P. Vyas, R. Fradera, und others. 2022. IPCC, 2022: Climate change 2022: Mitigation of climate change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, UK/New York: Cambridge University Press.

Smith, H. B., N. E. Vaughan, und J. Forster. 2022. Long-term national climate strategies bet on forests and soils to reach net-zero. Communications Earth & Environment 3(1): 305.CrossRef

Stephens, J. C., P. Kashwan, D. McLaren, und K. Surprise. 2023. The dangers of mainstreaming solar geoengineering: A critique of the national academies report. Environmental Politics 32(1): 135–144.

Stilgoe, J. 2015. Experiment earth: Responsible innovation in geoengineering. New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.CrossRef

Surprise, K. 2020. Stratospheric imperialism: Liberalism, (eco)modernization, and ideologies of solar geoengineering research. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space 3(1): 141–163.

Weisenstein, D. K., und D. W. Keith. 2015. Solar geoengineering using solid aerosol in the stratosphere. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions 15(8): 11799–11851.

Wiertz, T. 2016. Visions of climate control: Solar radiation management in climate simulations. Science, Technology & Human Values 41(3): 438–460.CrossRef

Titel: Climate Engineering
verfasst von: Julia Schubert
Verlag: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden
Buch: Handbuch Umweltsoziologie
Print ISBN: 978-3-658-37217-0

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-658-37218-7

Copyright-Jahr: 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-37218-7_35