Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Stochastic DCA for Sparse Multiclass Logistic Regression Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2018 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Comparison of Feedback Strategies for Supporting Programming Learning in Integrated Development Environments (IDEs)

verfasst von : Jarno Coenen, Sebastian Gross, Niels Pinkwart

Erschienen in: Advanced Computational Methods for Knowledge Engineering

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

In this paper we investigate whether providing feedback to learners within an Integrated Development Environment (IDE) helps them write correct programs. Here, we use two approaches: feedback based on stack trace analysis, and feedback based on structural comparisons of a learner program and appropriate sample programs. In order to investigate both approaches, we developed two prototypical extensions for the Eclipse IDE. In a laboratory study, we empirically evaluated the impact of the extensions on learners’ performance while they solved programming tasks. The statistical analyses did not reveal any statistically significant effects of the prototype extensions on the performance of the learners, however, the results of a qualitative analysis imply that the provided feedback had at least a marginal impact on the performance of some learners. Also, feedback from the participants confirmed the benefit of providing feedback directly within IDEs.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Enhancing Reduced Order Model Predictive Control for Autonomous Underwater Vehicle
Nächstes Kapitel Using Online Synchronous Interschool Tournaments to Boost Student Engagement and Learning in Hands-On Physics Lessons
Fußnoten
1
Processing is both a Java based IDE, as well as a kind of simplified Java programming language for educational purposes. The project website is available at http://​www.​processing.​org/​.
 
2
NetBeans is an open source IDE supporting, amongst others, Java (see https://​netbeans.​org/​).
 
3
IntelliJ IDEA is an Apache 2 licensed IDE for non-commercial use supporting, amongst others, Java (see https://​www.​jetbrains.​com/​idea/​).
 
4
In this survey in 2016, Eclipse is ranked second to IntelliJ for the first time in their survey, however only by a marginal 5%.
 
5
For more details, see the homepage of the toolbox, available here: https://​openresearch.​cit-ec.​de/​projects/​tcs.
 
Literatur
1.
2.
Balanskat, A., Engelhardt, K.: Computing Our Future - Computer Programming and Coding - Priorities, School Curricula and Initiatives Across Europe. European Schoolnet, Brussels (2015)
3.
4.
Zweben, S., Bizot, B.: 2015 taulbee survey: continued booming undergraduate CS enrollment; doctoral degree production dips slightly. Comput. Res. News 28(5), 2–60 (2016)
5.
Self, J.: The defining characteristics of intelligent tutoring systems research: ITS care, precisely. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ. (IJAIED) 10, 350–364 (1998)
6.
Nienaltowski, M., Pedroni, M., Meyer, B.: Compiler error messages: what can help novices? In: Proceedings of the 39th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, pp. 168–172 (2008)
7.
Marceau, G., Fisler, K., Krishnamurthi, S.: Mind your language: on novices’ interactions with error messages. In: Proceedings of the 10th SIGPLAN Symposium on New Ideas, New Paradigms, and Reflections on Programming and Software (Onward! 2011), pp. 3–18 (2011)
8.
Hristova, M., Misra, A., Rutter, M., Mercuri, R.: Identifying and correcting Java programming errors for introductory computer science students. In: Proceedings of the 34th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE 2003), pp. 153–156 (2003)
9.
Murphy, C., Kim, E., Kaiser, G., Cannon, A.: Backstop: a tool for debugging runtime errors. In: Proceedings of the 39th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE 2008), pp. 173–177 (2008)
10.
Hartmann, B., MacDougall, D., Brandt, J., Klemmer, S.: What would other programmers do: suggesting solutions to error messages. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2010), pp. 1019–1028 (2010)
11.
Flowers, T., Carver, C.A., Jackson, J.: Empowering students and building confidence in novice programmers through Gauntlet. In: 34th Annual Frontiers in Education, FIE 2004, pp. T3H10–T3H13 (2004)
12.
Holland, J., Mitrovic, A., Martin, B.: J-LATTE: a constraint-based tutor for Java. In: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Computers in Education, pp. 142–146 (2009)
13.
Sykes, E.: Design, development and evaluation of the Java intelligent tutoring system. Tech. Inst. Cogn. Learn. 8, 25–65 (2010)
14.
Abu-Naser, S., Ahmed, A., Al-Masri, N., Deeb, A., Moshtaha, E., Abu-Lamdy, M.: An intelligent tutoring system for learning Java objects. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Appl. (IJAIA) 2(2), 68–77 (2011)
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
Jackson, J., Cobb, M., Carver, C.: Identifying top Java errors for novice programmers. In: Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, p. T4C (2005)
20.
Jadud, J.: A first look at novice compilation behaviour using BlueJ. Comput. Sci. Educ. 15, 25–40 (2005)CrossRef
21.
Altadmri, A., Brown, N.: 37 million compilations: investigating novice programming mistakes in large-scale student data. In: Proceedings of the 46th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, pp. 522–527 (2015)
22.
Tabanao, E., Rodrigo, M., Jadud, M.: Predicting at-risk novice Java programmers through the analysis of online protocols. In: Proceedings of the Seventh International Workshop on Computing Education Research (ICER 2011), pp. 85–92 (2011)
23.
McCall, D., Kölling, M.: Meaningful categorisation of novice programmer errors. In: Frontiers in Education Conference, pp. 2589–2596 (2014)
24.
Becker, B.: An effective approach to enhancing compiler error messages. In: Proceedings of the 47th ACM Technical Symposium on Computing Science Education (SIGCSE 2016), pp. 126–131 (2016)
25.
Denny, P., Luxton-Reilly, A., Tempero, E.: All syntax errors are not equal. In: Proceedings of the 17th ACM Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (ITiCSE 2012), pp. 75–80 (2012)
26.
Gross, S., Mokbel, B., Hammer, B., Pinkwart, N.: Learning feedback in intelligent tutoring systems. KI - Künstliche Intell. 29(4), 413–418 (2015)CrossRef
27.
Gross, S., Pinkwart, N.: How do learners behave in help-seeking when given a choice? Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ. 9112, 600–603 (2015)CrossRef
28.
Mokbel, B., Gross, S., Paassen, B., Pinkwart, N., Hammer, B.: Domain-independent proximity measures in intelligent tutoring systems. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Educational Data Mining (EDM), pp. 334–335 (2013)
Metadaten
Titel
Comparison of Feedback Strategies for Supporting Programming Learning in Integrated Development Environments (IDEs)
verfasst von
Jarno Coenen
Sebastian Gross
Niels Pinkwart
Copyright-Jahr
2018
Buch
Advanced Computational Methods for Knowledge Engineering

Print ISBN: 978-3-319-61910-1

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-61911-8

Copyright-Jahr: 2018

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61911-8_7

Premium Partner

    Bildnachweise