Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
General Considerations on Terminal Planning, Innovations and Challenges Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2020 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

4. Comparison of Fleet Size Determination Models for Horizontal Transportation of Shipping Containers Using Automated Straddle Carriers

verfasst von : Bani Anvari, Apostolos Ziakopoulos, James Morley, Dimitris Pachakis, Panayotis Angeloudis

Erschienen in: Handbook of Terminal Planning

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Planning of horizontal transport is a significant problem with material impact on the development budget and productivity of a container terminal. This contribution uses Queuing Theory, Petri Networks and Discrete Event Simulation to address the fleet size determination problem for tactical planning. Considering the different information and modelling effort required for the three methods, it is recommended that Queuing Theory be applied in the preliminary planning stage as it is conservative, while Discrete Event Simulation which can yield significantly more cost-efficient results is applied for the detailed planning stage. Further development would be still required towards an easily applicable tool based on Petri Nets for practitioners to use in current planning problems, but the methodology itself can provide reasonable yet conservative results at a preliminary planning stage.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Modeling Techniques in Planning of Terminals: The Quantitative Approach
Nächstes Kapitel Automation and Electric Drives
Fußnoten
1
PIANC-135 (2014) reports the range of low, medium, and high productivity per STS crane in large container terminals to be between 20–25 moves/h, 25–30 moves/h, and 30–35 moves/h, respectively. For the case study the assumption is met that one crane move corresponds to one container move.
 
2
A PN is called “k-bounded” when all its places contain no more than k Tokens at any given time, including the initial stage.
 
Literatur
Bonet P, Lladó CM, Puigjaner R, Knottenbelt WJ (2007) PIPE v2.5: a Petri Net tool for performance modeling. In: Proceedings of the XXXIII Latin American conference on informatics
Cai B, Huang S, Liu D, Yuan S, Dissanayake G, Lau H, Pagac D (2013) Multiobjective optimization for autonomous straddle carrier scheduling at automated container terminals. IEEE Trans Autom Sci Eng 10(3):711–725
Carlo HJ, Vis IF, Roodbergen KJ (2014a) Storage yard operations in container terminals: literature overview. Eur J Oper Res 235(2):412–430
Carlo HJ, Vis IF, Roodbergen KJ (2014b) Transport operations in container terminals: literature overview, trends, research directions and classification scheme. Eur J Oper Res 236(1):1–13
Carlo HJ, Vis IF, Roodbergen KJ (2015) Seaside operations in container terminals: literature overview, trends, and research directions. Flex Serv Manuf J 27(2–3):224–262
Carteni A, de Luca S (2012) Tactical and strategic planning for a container terminal: modelling issues within a discrete event simulation approach. Simul Model Pract Theory 21(1):123–145
Chen C, Hsu W, Huang S (2003) Simulation and optimization of container yard operations: a survey. In: Proceedings of international conference on port and maritime R and D and technology, pp 23–29
Di Meglio LJ, Sisson M (2013) Planning for the TraPac automated container terminal. In: Proceedings of the 13th Triannual international conference on ports 2013, American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, pp 1882–1890
Dingle NJ, Knottenbelt WJ, Suto T (2009) Pipe2: A tool for the performance evaluation of generalised stochastic petri nets. ACM SIGMETRICS Perform Eval Rev 36(4):34–39
Durrant-Whyte H, Pagac D, Rogers B, Stevens M, Nelmes G (2007) An autonomous straddle carrier for movement of shipping containers. IEEE Robot Autom 14(3):14–23
Gross D, Shortle JF, Thompson JM, Harris CM (2017) Fundamentals of queueing theory. Wiley, Hoboken
Jensen K, Kristensen LM, Wells L (2007) Coloured petri nets and CPN tools for modelling and validation of concurrent systems. Int J Softw Tools Technol Transfer 9(3–4):213–254
Kalmar (ed) (2018c) Kalmar Shuttle carrier. Data sheet, Cargotec, Helsinki
Kendall DG (1953) Stochastic processes occurring in the theory of queues and their analysis by the method of the imbedded Markov chain. Ann Math Stat 24(3):338–354
Kezić D, Vujović I, Gudelj A (2007) Petri net approach of collision prevention supervisor design in port transport system. Promet – Traffic Transp 19(5):269–275
Kim W, Kim J, Kim K, Kwon H, Morrison J (2010) Capacity and queueing evaluation of port systems with offshore container unloading. In: Proceedings of the 1th international conference in logistics and maritime systems (LOGMS 2010), National Research Foundation of Korea, Daejeon
Konecranes [Konecranes Noell Straddle Carriers (ed)] (2017) The all-rounders straddle carriers. Technical equipment description, Konecranes, Hyvinkää
Kumanan S, Raja K (2008) Modeling and simulation of projects with petri nets. Am J Appl Sci 5(12):1742–1749
Law AM (2014) Simulation modeling and analysis. McGraw-Hill Education, New York
Lenka A, Das C (2012) A review of petri net modeling of dynamical systems. Indian J Comput Sci Eng 3(4):605–622
Li ZW, Zhou MC (2009) Deadlock resolution in automated manufacturing systems. Springer, Berlin
Liebherr [Liebherr Container Cranes Ltd. (ed)] (2018) Technical description straddle carrier. Technical equipment description, Liebherr-International AG, Bulle
Liu CI, Ioannou P (2002a) Petri net modeling and analysis of automated container terminal using automated guided vehicle systems. J Transp Res Board 1782(1):73–84
Liu CI, Ioannou PA (2002b) A petri net based approach for AGV dispatch scheduling and fleet size determination. IFAC Proc Vol 35(1):19–24
Meisel F (2009) Seaside operations planning in container terminals. Springer, Berlin
Mrnjavac E, Zenzerović Z (2000) Modelling of port container terminal using the queuing theory. Eur Transp VI(15):54–58
Murata T (1989) Petri nets: properties, analysis and applications. Proc IEEE 77(4):541–580
Pachakis D, Libardo A, Menegazzo P (2017) The Venice offshore-onshore terminal concept. Case Stud Transp Policy 5(2):367–379
Park T, Choe R, Kim YH, Ryu KR (2011) Dynamic adjustment of container stacking policy in an automated container terminal. Int J Prod Econ 133(1):385–392
PIANC-135 [MarCom Working Group 135] (2014) Design principles for small and medium marine container terminals. Technical report no. 14, Permanent International Association of Navigation Congresses (PIANC), Brussels
PIANC-158 [MarCom Working Group 158] (2014) Masterplans for the development of existing ports. Technical report, Permanent International Association of Navigation Congresses (PIANC), Brussels
Rodrigue JP, Comtois C, Slack B (2017) The geography of transport systems. Routledge, New York
Saanen YA, Valkengoed MV (2005) Comparison of three automated stacking alternatives by means of simulation. In: Proceedings of the 37th conference on winter simulation, INFORMS, Catonsville, pp 1567–1576
Salt J (2008) The seven habits of highly defective simulation projects. J Simul 2(3):155–161
UNCTAD [United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (ed)] (2016) Review of maritime transport. Technical report, United Nations, New York
Vis I, Harika I (2004) Comparison of vehicle types at an automated container terminal. OR Spectr 26(1):117–143
Wiese J, Kliewer N, Suhl L (2009) A survey of container terminal characteristics and equipment types. Working paper 0901, DS & OR Lab, Paderborn
Wiese J, Suhl L, Kliewer N (2011) Planning container terminal layouts considering equipment types and storage block design. In: Böse JW (ed) Handbook of terminal planning, Springer, New York, pp 219–245
Zehendner E, Rodriguez-Verjan G, Absi N, Dauzère-Pérès S, Feillet D (2013) Optimized allocation of straddle carriers to reduce overall delays at multimodal container terminals. Flex Serv Manuf J 27(2–3):300–330
Metadaten
Titel
Comparison of Fleet Size Determination Models for Horizontal Transportation of Shipping Containers Using Automated Straddle Carriers
verfasst von
Bani Anvari
Apostolos Ziakopoulos
James Morley
Dimitris Pachakis
Panayotis Angeloudis
Copyright-Jahr
2020
Buch
Handbook of Terminal Planning

Print ISBN: 978-3-030-39989-4

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-030-39990-0

Copyright-Jahr: 2020

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39990-0_4

Premium Partner

    Bildnachweise