Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Cognitive Computation

13.09.2019

Computational Imaging Method with a Learned Plug-and-Play Prior for Electrical Capacitance Tomography

verfasst von: J. Lei, Q. B. Liu, X. Y. Wang

Erschienen in: Cognitive Computation

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Electrical capacitance tomography (ECT) is a potent image-based measurement technology for monitoring industrial processes, but low-quality images generally limit its application scope and measurement reliability. To increase the precision of reconstruction, in this study, a data-driven plug-and-play prior abstracted by a deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) and the sparseness prior of imaging objects, in form of regularizers, are jointly leveraged to generate a potent imaging model, in which the L1 norm of the mismatch error acts as a data fidelity term (DFT) to weaken the sensitivity of estimation result to noisy input data. The DCNN is embedded into the split Bregman (SB) technique to generate a powerful computing scheme for solving the built imaging model and the fast iterative shrinkage-thresholding algorithm (FISTA) is applied to solve the sub-problems efficiently. Extensive numerical results verify that the proposed imaging technique has competitive reconstruction ability and better robustness in comparison with the state-of-the-art methods. This study demonstrates the validity and efficacy of the proposed algorithm in reducing reconstruction error. Most importantly, the research outcomes verify that the data-driven plug-and-play prior and the sparseness prior can be jointly embedded into the imaging model, leading to a remarkable decline in reconstruction error.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Literatur
1.
Tikhonov AN, Arsenin VY. Solution of ill-posed problems. New York: V.H. Winston & Sons; 1977.
2.
Liu S, Fu L, Yang WQ, Wang HG, Jiang F. Prior-online iteration for image reconstruction with electrical capacitance tomography. IEE Proc: Sci Meas Technol. 2004;151:195–200.
3.
Landweber L. An iteration formula for Fredholm integral equations of the first kind. Am J Math. 1951;73:615–24.
4.
Yan H, Wang YF, Zhou YG, Sun YH. 3D ECT reconstruction by an improved Landweber iteration algorithm. Flow Meas Instrum. 2014;37:92–8.
5.
Guo G, Tong GW, Lu L, Liu S. Iterative reconstruction algorithm for the inverse problems in electrical capacitance tomography. Flow Meas Instrum. 2018;64:204–12.
6.
Arrabal-Campos FM, Aguilera-Sáez LM, Fernández I. Algebraic reconstruction technique for diffusion NMR experiments. Application to the molecular weight prediction of polymers. J Phys Chem A. 2019;123:943–50.PubMed
7.
Dong XY, Ye ZY, Soleimani M. Image reconstruction for electrical capacitance tomography by using soft-thresholding iterative method with adaptive regulation parameter. Meas Sci Technol. 2013;24:1–8.
8.
Wang HC, Fedchenia I, Shishkin SL, Finn A, Smith LL, Colket M. Sparsity-inspired image reconstruction for electrical capacitance tomography. Flow Meas Instrum. 2015;43:59–71.
9.
Ye JM, Wang HG, Yang WQ. Image reconstruction for electrical capacitance tomography based on sparse representation. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas. 2015;64:89–102.
10.
Hosani EA, Zhang M, Abascal J, Soleimani M. Imaging metallic samples using electrical capacitance tomography: forward modelling and reconstruction algorithms. Meas Sci Technol. 2016;27:1–11.
11.
Frias MAR, Yang WQ. Real-time model-based image reconstruction with a prior calculated database for electrical capacitance tomography. Meas Sci Technol. 2017;28:1–14.
12.
13.
Xia C, Su C, Cao J, Li P. Reconstruction of electrical capacitance tomography images based on fast linearized alternating direction method of multipliers for two-phase flow system. Chin J Chem Eng. 2016;24:597–605.
14.
Wang P, Lin JS, Wang M. An image reconstruction algorithm for electrical capacitance tomography based on simulated annealing particle swarm optimization. J Appl Res Technol. 2015;13:197–204.
15.
Taylor SH, Garimella SV. Shape-energy evolutionary reconstruction algorithm for electrical capacitance tomography in a high-aspect-ratio domain. Sensors Actuators A Phys. 2015;233:349–59.
16.
Wu X, Huang G, Wang J, Xu C. Image reconstruction method of electrical capacitance tomography based on compressed sensing principle. Meas Sci Technol. 2013;24:1–7.
17.
Soleimani M, Lionheart WRB. Nonlinear image reconstruction for electrical capacitance tomography using experimental data. Meas Sci Technol. 2005;16:1987–96.
18.
Chen J, Zhang M, Liu Y, Chen J, Li Y. Image reconstruction algorithms for electrical capacitance tomography based on ROF model using new numerical techniques. Meas Sci Technol. 2017;28:1–11.
19.
Haddadi MB, Maddahian R. A new algorithm for image reconstruction of electrical capacitance tomography based on inverse heat conduction problems. IEEE Sensors J. 2016;16:1786–94.
20.
Lei J, Liu WY, Liu QB, Wang XY, Liu S. Robust dynamic inversion algorithm for the visualization in electrical capacitance tomography. Measurement. 2014;50:305–18.
21.
Lei J, Mu HP, Liu QB, Wang XY, Liu S. Data-driven reconstruction method for electrical capacitance tomography. Neurocomputing. 2018;273:333–45.
22.
Zhao JY, Xu LJ, Cao Z. Direct image reconstruction for electrical capacitance tomography using shortcut D-Bar method. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas. 2019;68:483–92.
23.
Martin R, Ogarko V, Komatitsch D, Jessell M. Parallel three-dimensional electrical capacitance data imaging using a nonlinear inversion algorithm and Lp norm-based model regularization. Measurement. 2018;128:428–45.
24.
Yang WQ, Peng LH. Image reconstruction algorithms for electrical capacitance tomography. Meas Sci Technol. 2003;14:R1–R13.
25.
26.
Zhang Y, Wang Y, Zhou G, Jin J, Wang B, Wang X, et al. Multi-kernel extreme learning machine for EEG classification in brain-computer interfaces. Expert Syst Appl. 2018;96:302–10.
27.
Jiao Y, Zhang Y, Wang Y, Wang B, Jin J, Wang X. A novel multilayer correlation maximization model for improving CCA-based frequency recognition in SSVEP brain-computer interface. Int J Neural Syst. 2018;28:1–14.
28.
Wang R, Zhang Y, Zhang L. An adaptive neural network approach for operator functional state prediction using psychophysiological data. Integrated Computer-Aided Engineering. 2015;23:81–97.
29.
Liu N, Wan L, Zhang Y, Zhou T, Huo H, Fang T. Exploiting convolutional neural networks with deeply local description for remote sensing image classification. IEEE Access. 2018;6:11215–28.
30.
Lan X, Zhang S, Yuen PC, Chellappa R. Learning common and feature-specific patterns: a novel multiple-sparse-representation-based tracker. IEEE Trans Image Process. 2018;27:2022–37.
31.
Lan X, Ma AJ, Yuen PC, Chellappa R. Joint sparse representation and robust feature-level fusion for multi-cue visual tracking. IEEE Trans Image Process. 2015;24:5826–41.PubMed
32.
33.
34.
Feng S, Wang Y, Song K, Wang D, Yu G. Detecting multiple coexisting emotions in microblogs with convolutional neural networks. Cogn Comput. 2017;10:136–55.
35.
Li R, Gu D, Liu Q, Long Z, Hu H. Semantic scene mapping with spatio-temporal deep neural network for robotic applications. Cogn Comput. 2017;10:260–71.
36.
Ren P, Sun W, Luo C, Hussain A. Clustering-oriented multiple convolutional neural networks for single image super-resolution. Cogn Comput. 2017;10:165–78.
37.
Aljarah I, Al-Zoubi AM, Faris H, Hassonah MA, Mirjalili S, Saadeh H. Simultaneous feature selection and support vector machine optimization using the grasshopper optimization algorithm. Cogn Comput. 2018;10:478–95.
38.
Huang GB. What are extreme learning machines? Filling the gap between Frank Rosenblatt’s dream and John von Neumann’s puzzle. Cogn Comput. 2015;7:263–78.
39.
40.
Lan XY, Ye M, Shao R, Zhong B, Jain DK, Zhou HY. Online non-negative multi-modality feature template learning for RGB-assisted infrared tracking. IEEE Access. 2019;7:67761–71.
41.
Yang XS, Deb S, Mishra SK. Multi-species cuckoo search algorithm for global optimization. Cogn Comput. 2018;10:1085–95.
42.
Zeng NY, Wang ZD, Zhang H, Alsaadi FE. A novel switching delayed PSO algorithm for estimating unknown parameters of lateral flow immunoassay. Cogn Comput. 2016;8:143–52.
43.
Goldstein T, Osher S. The split Bregman method for L1-regularized problems. SIAM J Imag Sci. 2009;2:323–43.
44.
Boyd S, Parikh N, Chu E, Peleato B, Eckstein J. Distributed optimization and statistical learning via the alternating direction method of multipliers. Foundations and Trends® in Machine Learning. 2011;3:1–122.
45.
Beck A, Teboulle M. A fast iterative shrinkage/thresholding algorithm for linear inverse problems. SIAM J Imag Sci. 2009;2:183–202.
46.
Hale ET, Yin WT, Zhang Y. Fixed-point continuation for L1-minimization: methodology and convergence. SIAM J Optim. 2008;19:1107–30.
47.
Hao BB, Zhu JG. Fast L1 regularized iterative forward backward splitting with adaptive parameter selection for image restoration. J Vis Commun Image Represent. 2017;44:139–47.
48.
Chambolle A, Pock T. A first-order primal-dual algorithm for convex problems with applications to imaging. J Math Imaging Vision. 2011;40:120–45.
49.
Figueiredo M, Nowak R, Wright SJ. Gradient projection for sparse reconstruction: application to compressed sensing and other inverse problems. IEEE J Sel Top Sign Process. 2007;1:586–97.
50.
Li SJ, Qi HR. A Douglas-Rachford splitting approach to compressed sensing image recovery using low-rank regularization. IEEE Trans Image Process. 2015;24:4240–9.PubMed
51.
Yun S, Toh KC. A coordinate gradient descent method for L1-regularized convex minimization. Comput Optim Appl. 2011;48:273–307.
52.
Candès EJ, Wakin MB, Boyd SP. Enhancing sparsity by reweighted L1 minimization. J Fourier Anal Appl. 2008;14:877–905.
53.
Venkatakrishnan S, Bouman C, Wohlberg B. Plug-and-play priors for model based reconstruction. IEEE Global Conference on Signal and Information Processing 2013; pp. 945–948.
54.
Chan SH, Wang X, Elgendy OA. Plug-and-play ADMM for image restoration: fixed point convergence and applications. IEEE Transactions on Computational Imaging. 2017;3:84–98.
55.
Rond A, Giryes R, Elad M. Poisson inverse problems by the plug-and-play scheme. J Vis Commun Image Represent. 2016;41:96–108.
56.
Zhang K, Zuo W, Gu S, Zhang L. Learning deep CNN denoiser prior for image restoration. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) 2017; pp. 2808–2817.
57.
Brifman A, Romano Y, Elad M. Turning a denoiser into a superresolver using plug and play priors. IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP) 2016; pp. 1404–1408.
58.
Isaac Y, Barthélemy Q, Gouy-Pailler C, Sebag M, Atif J. Multi-dimensional signal approximation with sparse structured priors using split Bregman iterations. Signal Process. 2017;130:389–402.
59.
Gopi VP, Palanisamy P, Wahid KA, Babyn P, Cooper D. Multiple regularization based MRI reconstruction. Signal Process. 2014;103:103–13.
60.
Wang Q, Wu Z, Jin J, Wang T, Shen Y. Low rank constraint and spatial spectral total variation for hyperspectral image mixed denoising. Signal Process. 2018;142:11–26.
61.
Zhang Z, Xiahou J, Bai ZJ, Hancock ER, Zhou D, Chen SB, et al. Discriminative Lasso. Cogn Comput. 2016;8:847–55.
62.
Goodfellow I, Bengio Y, Courville A. Deep Learning. Cambridge: MIT Press; 2016.
63.
Hinton GE, Salakhutdinov RR. Reducing the dimensionality of data with neural networks. Science. 2006;313:504–7.PubMed
64.
Bengio Y. Learning deep architectures for AI. Foundations and Trends® in Machine Learning. 2009;2:1–127.
65.
LeCun Y, Bengio Y, Hinton G. Deep learning. Nature. 2015;521:436–44.PubMed
66.
Liu XL, Deng ZD. Segmentation of drivable road using deep fully convolutional residual network with pyramid pooling. Cogn Comput. 2016;10:272–81.
67.
Esteva A, Kuprel B, Novoa RA, Ko J, Swetter SM, Blau HM, et al. Dermatologist-level classification of skin cancer with deep neural networks. Nature. 2017;542:115–8.PubMed
68.
Li YJ, Zhang T. An introduction to deep learning and case analysis. Beijing: China Machine Press; 2016.
69.
LeCun Y, Bottou L, Bengio Y, Haffner P. Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition. Proc IEEE. 1998;86:2278–324.
70.
He XP, Liu B. Deep learning: theory and practice. Beijing: Science Press; 2017.
71.
Zhang K, Zuo W, Chen Y, Meng D, Zhang L. Beyond a Gaussian denoiser: residual learning of deep CNN for image denoising. IEEE Trans Image Process. 2017;26:3142–55.PubMed
72.
Li JP, Zhang ZX, He HG. Hierarchical convolutional neural networks for EEG-based emotion recognition. Cogn Comput. 2018;10:368–80.
73.
Wang YF. Computing methods for inverse problems and their applications. Beijing: Higher Education Press; 2007.
Metadaten
Titel
Computational Imaging Method with a Learned Plug-and-Play Prior for Electrical Capacitance Tomography
verfasst von
J. Lei
Q. B. Liu
X. Y. Wang
Publikationsdatum
13.09.2019
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Cognitive Computation
Print ISSN: 1866-9956
Elektronische ISSN: 1866-9964
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12559-019-09682-8