Skip to main content

2006 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Concluding Remarks and Recommendations

verfasst von : Marcelo Masera, Adrian Gheorghe, Margot Weijnen

Erschienen in: Critical Infrastructures at Risk

Verlag: Springer Netherlands

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

There is a manifest need to secure the European Critical Electricity Infrastructure. Our analysis of the ECEI system and its dynamic behaviour inevitably led to the conclusion that the reliability and quality of electricity service provision to the European citizen are not adequately secured if all actors are allowed to run their activities at subsystem levels in the “old ways” of the pre-liberalisation era. The established lack of supply security applies to the short term as well as to the long term security of electricity service provision. There are multiple reasons for this conclusion: the emerging European Critical Electricity Infrastructure (ECEI) – including the European electricity market – is a fundamentally different construct from the old situation of interconnected national grids. Even if the latter situation seems comparable with the current ECEI in terms of geographical scale and scope, the complexity of the ECEI is beyond comparison, as it reaches far beyond physical network complexity. With the liberalisation process, many new players have entered the playing field, new roles have been introduced, the rules of the game have changed and are still changing. The complexity of the multi-actor network is unprecedented, and its behaviour is highly unpredictable. On the one side, this unpredictability is a consequence of the multitude of actors involved, our lack of insight in their intentional relationships, their strategic behaviour and learning behaviour. On the other side, the evolution of the multi-actor network and the socio-economic subsystem in which it is embedded are subject to many uncertainties pertaining to market development and evolving regulation, technological innovation and institutional change. Given our lack of experience with liberalised electricity markets in Europe, it is evident that we are not able to identify all the risks that are generated by the dynamic interactions between the physical and socio-economic subsystems that constitute the ECEI.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Metadaten
Titel
Concluding Remarks and Recommendations
verfasst von
Marcelo Masera
Adrian Gheorghe
Margot Weijnen
Copyright-Jahr
2006
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4364-3_6

Premium Partner