Skip to main content
main-content

Tipp

Weitere Kapitel dieses Buchs durch Wischen aufrufen

2021 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

8. Conclusion

verfasst von : Peng Bo

Erschienen in: China and Global Governance

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

share
TEILEN

Abstract

In the conclusion chapter, the book argues that the “International Leadership with Chinese Characteristics” (ILCC) provides a useful conceptual tool and is a contribution to supplement the existing Western-based IR concepts and theories on interpreting China’s role in international relations. By conducting the empirical verification of the ILCC and making a comparative assessment of the strength and weakness of the ILCC among the four selected cases, this chapter supposes that the different extent to which the ILCC is manifested in various issue-areas. However, the conclusion also points out the explanatory limitations of the ILCC in terms of its inapplicability of analyzing the issues related to China’s national core interests including national sovereignty, national security, and territorial integration.
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Coicaud, J.-M. (2017). Debating Daniel A. Bell: on Political Meritocracy and Democracy in China and Beyond. Philosophy and Public Issues, 7(1), 3–14. Coicaud, J.-M. (2017). Debating Daniel A. Bell: on Political Meritocracy and Democracy in China and Beyond. Philosophy and Public Issues, 7(1), 3–14.
Zurück zum Zitat Information Office of the State Council. (2011). China’s Peaceful Development. The State Council The People’s Republic of China. Information Office of the State Council. (2011). China’s Peaceful Development. The State Council The People’s Republic of China.
Zurück zum Zitat Shi, Y. (2010). How to Boost China’s Peaceful Rise. China Daily. Shi, Y. (2010). How to Boost China’s Peaceful Rise. China Daily.
Zurück zum Zitat Vangeli, A. (2018). Global China and Symbolic Power: The Case of 16+1 Cooperation. Journal of Contemporary China, 27(113), 674–687. CrossRef Vangeli, A. (2018). Global China and Symbolic Power: The Case of 16+1 Cooperation. Journal of Contemporary China, 27(113), 674–687. CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Zeng, J., Xiao, Y., & Breslin, S. (2015). Securing China’s Core Interests: The State of the Debate in China. International Affairs, 91(2), 245–266. CrossRef Zeng, J., Xiao, Y., & Breslin, S. (2015). Securing China’s Core Interests: The State of the Debate in China. International Affairs, 91(2), 245–266. CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Conclusion
verfasst von
Peng Bo
Copyright-Jahr
2021
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70497-1_8

Premium Partner