Skip to main content
Erschienen in: International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics 6/2021

14.01.2021 | Original Article

Consensus model based on probability K-means clustering algorithm for large scale group decision making

verfasst von: Qian Liu, Hangyao Wu, Zeshui Xu

Erschienen in: International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics | Ausgabe 6/2021

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Nowadays, the increasing complexity of the social environment brings much difficulty in group decision making. The more uncertainty exists in a decision-making problem, the more collective wisdom is needed. Therefore, large scale group decision making has attracted a lot of researchers to investigate. Since the probabilistic linguistic terms have impressive performance in expressing DMs’ opinions, this paper proposes a novel method for large scale group decision making with probabilistic linguistic preference relations. More specifically, (1) a probability k-means clustering algorithm is introduced to segment DMs with similar features into different sub-groups; (2) an integration method is proposed to construct the collective probabilistic preference relation that retains initial information to the most extent; (3) taking the personality of each DM into account, a consensus model is constructed to improve the rationality and efficiency of consensus reaching process. Several simulation experiments are designed to analyze the influence factor in the feedback mechanism and make some comparative analysis with the existing method. Finally, an illustrative example of contractor selection is conducted to verify the validity of the proposed method.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Weitere Produktempfehlungen anzeigen
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Lehrer K, Wagner C (1981) Rational consensus in science and society: a philosophical and mathematical study. Kluwer Academic, BostonMATHCrossRef Lehrer K, Wagner C (1981) Rational consensus in science and society: a philosophical and mathematical study. Kluwer Academic, BostonMATHCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Saint S, James L (1994) Rules for reaching consensus: a modern approach to decision making. Pfeiffer & Company, San Diego Saint S, James L (1994) Rules for reaching consensus: a modern approach to decision making. Pfeiffer & Company, San Diego
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Kacprzyk J, Nurmi H, Fedrizzi M (1997) Consensus under fuzziness. Kluwer Academic, BostonMATHCrossRef Kacprzyk J, Nurmi H, Fedrizzi M (1997) Consensus under fuzziness. Kluwer Academic, BostonMATHCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Alonso S, Pérez IJ, Cabrerizo FJ, Herrera-Viedma E (2013) A linguistic consensus model for Web 2.0 communities. Appl Soft Comput 13:149–157CrossRef Alonso S, Pérez IJ, Cabrerizo FJ, Herrera-Viedma E (2013) A linguistic consensus model for Web 2.0 communities. Appl Soft Comput 13:149–157CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Parreiras RO, Ya Ekel P, Martini JSC, Palhares RM (2010) A flexible consensus scheme for multicriteria group decision making under linguistic assessments. Inf Sci 180:1075–1089CrossRef Parreiras RO, Ya Ekel P, Martini JSC, Palhares RM (2010) A flexible consensus scheme for multicriteria group decision making under linguistic assessments. Inf Sci 180:1075–1089CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Palomares I, Martinez L (2014) A semisupervised multiagent system model to support consensus-reaching processes. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 22:762–777CrossRef Palomares I, Martinez L (2014) A semisupervised multiagent system model to support consensus-reaching processes. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 22:762–777CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Morente-Molinera JA, Wu X, Morfeq A, Al-Hmouz R, Herrera-Viedma E (2020) A novel multi-criteria group decision-making method for heterogeneous and dynamic contexts using multi-granular fuzzy linguistic modelling and consensus measures. Inf Fusion 53:240–250CrossRef Morente-Molinera JA, Wu X, Morfeq A, Al-Hmouz R, Herrera-Viedma E (2020) A novel multi-criteria group decision-making method for heterogeneous and dynamic contexts using multi-granular fuzzy linguistic modelling and consensus measures. Inf Fusion 53:240–250CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Buyukozkan G (2004) Multi-criteria decision making for e-marketplace selection. Internet Res-Electron Netw Appl Policy 14:139–154CrossRef Buyukozkan G (2004) Multi-criteria decision making for e-marketplace selection. Internet Res-Electron Netw Appl Policy 14:139–154CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim J (2008) A model and case for supporting participatory public decision making in e-democracy. Group Decis Negot 17:179–193CrossRef Kim J (2008) A model and case for supporting participatory public decision making in e-democracy. Group Decis Negot 17:179–193CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Sueur C, Deneubourg JL, Petit O (2012) From social network (centralized vs. decentralized) to collective decision-making (unshared vs. shared consensus). PLoS ONE 7:10CrossRef Sueur C, Deneubourg JL, Petit O (2012) From social network (centralized vs. decentralized) to collective decision-making (unshared vs. shared consensus). PLoS ONE 7:10CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Ureña R, Kou G, Dong YC, Chiclana F, Herrera-Viedma E (2019) A review on trust propagation and opinion dynamics in social networks and group decision making frameworks. Inf Sci 478:461–475CrossRef Ureña R, Kou G, Dong YC, Chiclana F, Herrera-Viedma E (2019) A review on trust propagation and opinion dynamics in social networks and group decision making frameworks. Inf Sci 478:461–475CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Palomares I, Martinez L, Herrera F (2014) A consensus model to detect and manage noncooperative behaviors in large-scale group decision making. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 22:516–530CrossRef Palomares I, Martinez L, Herrera F (2014) A consensus model to detect and manage noncooperative behaviors in large-scale group decision making. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 22:516–530CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Labella A, Liu Y, Rodriguez RM, Martinez L (2018) Analyzing the performance of classical consensus models in large scale group decision making: a comparative study. Appl Soft Comput 67:677–690CrossRef Labella A, Liu Y, Rodriguez RM, Martinez L (2018) Analyzing the performance of classical consensus models in large scale group decision making: a comparative study. Appl Soft Comput 67:677–690CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Tang M, Zhou XY, Liao HC, Xu JP, Fujita H, Herrera F (2019) Ordinal consensus measure with objective threshold for heterogeneous large-scale group decision making. Knowl-Based Syst 180:62–74CrossRef Tang M, Zhou XY, Liao HC, Xu JP, Fujita H, Herrera F (2019) Ordinal consensus measure with objective threshold for heterogeneous large-scale group decision making. Knowl-Based Syst 180:62–74CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Quesada FJ, Palomares I, Martinez L (2015) Managing experts behavior in large-scale consensus reaching processes with uninorm aggregation operators. Appl Soft Comput 35:873–887CrossRef Quesada FJ, Palomares I, Martinez L (2015) Managing experts behavior in large-scale consensus reaching processes with uninorm aggregation operators. Appl Soft Comput 35:873–887CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Ding RX, Wang XQ, Shang K (2019) F, Herrera, Social network analysis-based conflict relationship investigation and conflict degree-based consensus reaching process for large scale decision making using sparse representation. Inf Fusion 50:251–272CrossRef Ding RX, Wang XQ, Shang K (2019) F, Herrera, Social network analysis-based conflict relationship investigation and conflict degree-based consensus reaching process for large scale decision making using sparse representation. Inf Fusion 50:251–272CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen XH, Liu R (2006) Improved clustering algorithm and its application in complex huge group decision-making. Syst Eng Electron 28:1695–1699 Chen XH, Liu R (2006) Improved clustering algorithm and its application in complex huge group decision-making. Syst Eng Electron 28:1695–1699
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Liu X, Xu YJ, Montes R, Ding RX, Herrera F (2019) Alternative ranking-based clustering and reliability index-based consensus reaching process for hesitant fuzzy large scale group decision making. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 27:159–171CrossRef Liu X, Xu YJ, Montes R, Ding RX, Herrera F (2019) Alternative ranking-based clustering and reliability index-based consensus reaching process for hesitant fuzzy large scale group decision making. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 27:159–171CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Saaty TL (1980) The analytic hierarchy process. McGraw-Hill, New YorkMATH Saaty TL (1980) The analytic hierarchy process. McGraw-Hill, New YorkMATH
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Chiclana F, Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E (1998) Integrating three representation models in fuzzy multipurpose decision making based on fuzzy preference relations. Fuzzy Sets Syst 97:33–48MathSciNetMATHCrossRef Chiclana F, Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E (1998) Integrating three representation models in fuzzy multipurpose decision making based on fuzzy preference relations. Fuzzy Sets Syst 97:33–48MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
22.
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Xia MM, Xu ZS (2013) 2013. Managing hesitant information in GDM problems under fuzzy and multiplicative preference relations. Int J Uncertain Fuzz Knowl-Based Syst 21:865MATHCrossRef Xia MM, Xu ZS (2013) 2013. Managing hesitant information in GDM problems under fuzzy and multiplicative preference relations. Int J Uncertain Fuzz Knowl-Based Syst 21:865MATHCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Xu ZS (2002) A method for priorities of triangular fuzzy number complementary judgement matrices. Fuzzy Syst Math 16:47–50MathSciNetMATH Xu ZS (2002) A method for priorities of triangular fuzzy number complementary judgement matrices. Fuzzy Syst Math 16:47–50MathSciNetMATH
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang ZJ, Tong X (2016) Consistency analysis and group decision making based on triangular fuzzy additive reciprocal preference relations. Inf Sci 361–362:29–47MATHCrossRef Wang ZJ, Tong X (2016) Consistency analysis and group decision making based on triangular fuzzy additive reciprocal preference relations. Inf Sci 361–362:29–47MATHCrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Szmidt E, Kacprzyk J (2002) Using intuitionistic fuzzy sets in group decision making. Control Cybern 31:1037–1053MATH Szmidt E, Kacprzyk J (2002) Using intuitionistic fuzzy sets in group decision making. Control Cybern 31:1037–1053MATH
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Dong YC, Li CC, Herrera F (2015) An optimization-based approach to adjusting unbalanced linguistic preference relations to obtain a required consistency level. Inf Sci 292:27–38MathSciNetMATHCrossRef Dong YC, Li CC, Herrera F (2015) An optimization-based approach to adjusting unbalanced linguistic preference relations to obtain a required consistency level. Inf Sci 292:27–38MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Wu J, Chiclana F, Herrera-Viedma E (2015) Trust based consensus model for social network in an incomplete linguistic information context. Appl Soft Comput 35:827–839CrossRef Wu J, Chiclana F, Herrera-Viedma E (2015) Trust based consensus model for social network in an incomplete linguistic information context. Appl Soft Comput 35:827–839CrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Rodriguez RM, Martinez L, Herrera F (2012) Hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets for decision making. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 20:109–119CrossRef Rodriguez RM, Martinez L, Herrera F (2012) Hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets for decision making. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 20:109–119CrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang H, Xu ZS, Zeng XJ (2018) Hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets for linguistic decision making: current developments, issues and challenges. Inf Fusion 43:1–12CrossRef Wang H, Xu ZS, Zeng XJ (2018) Hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets for linguistic decision making: current developments, issues and challenges. Inf Fusion 43:1–12CrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Wei CP, Rodriguez RM, Martinez L (2018) Uncertainty measures of extended hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 26:1763–1768CrossRef Wei CP, Rodriguez RM, Martinez L (2018) Uncertainty measures of extended hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 26:1763–1768CrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Ma ZZ, Zhu JJ, Ponnambalam K, Zhang ST (2019) A clustering method for large-scale group decision-making with multi-stage hesitant fuzzy linguistic terms. Inf Fusion 50:231–250CrossRef Ma ZZ, Zhu JJ, Ponnambalam K, Zhang ST (2019) A clustering method for large-scale group decision-making with multi-stage hesitant fuzzy linguistic terms. Inf Fusion 50:231–250CrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Wu ZB, Xu JP (2018) A consensus model for large-scale group decision making with hesitant fuzzy information and changeable clusters. Inf Fusion 41:217–231CrossRef Wu ZB, Xu JP (2018) A consensus model for large-scale group decision making with hesitant fuzzy information and changeable clusters. Inf Fusion 41:217–231CrossRef
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Pang Q, Wang H, Xu ZS (2016) Probabilistic linguistic linguistic term sets in multi-attribute group decision making. Inf Sci 369:128–143CrossRef Pang Q, Wang H, Xu ZS (2016) Probabilistic linguistic linguistic term sets in multi-attribute group decision making. Inf Sci 369:128–143CrossRef
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang YX, Xu ZS, Wang H, Liao HC (2016) Consistency-based risk assessment with probabilistic linguistic preference relation. Appl Soft Comput 49:817–833CrossRef Zhang YX, Xu ZS, Wang H, Liao HC (2016) Consistency-based risk assessment with probabilistic linguistic preference relation. Appl Soft Comput 49:817–833CrossRef
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang YX, Xu ZS, Liao HC (2017) A consensus process for group decision making with probabilistic linguistic preference relations. Inf Sci 414:260–275MATHCrossRef Zhang YX, Xu ZS, Liao HC (2017) A consensus process for group decision making with probabilistic linguistic preference relations. Inf Sci 414:260–275MATHCrossRef
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Luo SZ, Zhang HY, Wang JQ, Lin L (2019) Group decision-making approach for evaluating the sustainability of constructed wetlands with probabilistic linguistic preference relations. J Oper Res Soc 70(12):2039–2055CrossRef Luo SZ, Zhang HY, Wang JQ, Lin L (2019) Group decision-making approach for evaluating the sustainability of constructed wetlands with probabilistic linguistic preference relations. J Oper Res Soc 70(12):2039–2055CrossRef
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Liu AJ, Qiu HW, Lu H, Guo XR (2019) A consensus model of probabilistic linguistic preference relations in group decision making based on feedback mechanism. IEEE Access 7:148231–148244CrossRef Liu AJ, Qiu HW, Lu H, Guo XR (2019) A consensus model of probabilistic linguistic preference relations in group decision making based on feedback mechanism. IEEE Access 7:148231–148244CrossRef
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Gao HX, Ju YB, Santibanez Gonzalez DR, Ernesto WKZ (2020) Green supplier selection in electronics manufacturing: an approach based on consensus decision making. J Clean Prod 245:118781CrossRef Gao HX, Ju YB, Santibanez Gonzalez DR, Ernesto WKZ (2020) Green supplier selection in electronics manufacturing: an approach based on consensus decision making. J Clean Prod 245:118781CrossRef
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang H, Xu ZS (2016) Interactive algorithms for improving incomplete linguistic preference relations based on consistency measures. Appl Soft Comput 42:66–79CrossRef Wang H, Xu ZS (2016) Interactive algorithms for improving incomplete linguistic preference relations based on consistency measures. Appl Soft Comput 42:66–79CrossRef
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Li CC, Dong YC, Herrera F (2019) A Consensus model for large-scale linguistic Group decision making with a feedback recommendation based on clustered personalized individual semantics and opposing consensus groups. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 27:221–233CrossRef Li CC, Dong YC, Herrera F (2019) A Consensus model for large-scale linguistic Group decision making with a feedback recommendation based on clustered personalized individual semantics and opposing consensus groups. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 27:221–233CrossRef
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Wu T, Liu XW (2016) An interval type-2 fuzzy clustering solution for large-scale multiple-criteria group decision-making problems. Knowl-Based Syst 114:118–127CrossRef Wu T, Liu XW (2016) An interval type-2 fuzzy clustering solution for large-scale multiple-criteria group decision-making problems. Knowl-Based Syst 114:118–127CrossRef
45.
Zurück zum Zitat Ureña R, Cabrerizo FJ, Morente-Molinera JA, Herrera-Viedma E (2016) GDM-R: a new framework in R to support fuzzy group decision making processes. Inf Sci 357:161–181CrossRef Ureña R, Cabrerizo FJ, Morente-Molinera JA, Herrera-Viedma E (2016) GDM-R: a new framework in R to support fuzzy group decision making processes. Inf Sci 357:161–181CrossRef
46.
Zurück zum Zitat Liao HC, Xu ZS, Zeng XJ, Xu DL (2016) An enhanced consensus reaching process in group decision making with intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations. Inf Sci 329:274–286CrossRef Liao HC, Xu ZS, Zeng XJ, Xu DL (2016) An enhanced consensus reaching process in group decision making with intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations. Inf Sci 329:274–286CrossRef
47.
Zurück zum Zitat Yu SM, Du ZJ, Xu XH (2020) Hierarchical punishment-driven consensus model for probabilistic linguistic large-group decision making with application to global supplier selection. Group Decis Negot 2:1–30 Yu SM, Du ZJ, Xu XH (2020) Hierarchical punishment-driven consensus model for probabilistic linguistic large-group decision making with application to global supplier selection. Group Decis Negot 2:1–30
Metadaten
Titel
Consensus model based on probability K-means clustering algorithm for large scale group decision making
verfasst von
Qian Liu
Hangyao Wu
Zeshui Xu
Publikationsdatum
14.01.2021
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics / Ausgabe 6/2021
Print ISSN: 1868-8071
Elektronische ISSN: 1868-808X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13042-020-01258-5

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2021

International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics 6/2021 Zur Ausgabe

Neuer Inhalt