Skip to main content

2017 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

2. Criminological and Social Theory: Surveying the Contemporary Landscape

verfasst von : Tim Owen

Erschienen in: Crime, Genes, Neuroscience and Cyberspace

Verlag: Palgrave Macmillan UK

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

There appears to be a mounting reaction in contemporary theory against the ‘cultural turn’ and the extreme relativism of postmodern and poststructuralist theory. Recently, Hall and Winlow (2012: 8) have drawn attention to the urgent need to, ‘abandon criminology’s weirdly postmodern, self-referential gaze’. The authors cogently refer to the recent trend in criminology towards rejecting or modifying the orthodoxy that crime and social harm are the products of criminalisation and control systems. Scholars such as Owen (2012a), Reiner (2012), Wieviorka (2012), Wilson (2012), Ferrell (2012) and Yar (2012) are bringing causes and conditions back into play, and into criminological analysis. More recently, Hall and Winlow (2015) delivered what is arguably a major statement in the form of their cogent call for a ‘New Ultra-Realism’ in criminological theorising. To an extent, it could be argued that there has been a ‘return to’ sociological theory and method reflected in the work of Mouzelis (1991, 1993a, 1996, 2007), McLennan (1995), Holmwood (1996), Stones (1996), Sibeon (1996, 1997a, b, 1999, 2001, 2004, 2007), Layder (1984, 1994, 1997, 2007), Archer (1982, 1988, 1995, 1996, 1998, 2000), and Owen (2006a, b, 2007a, b, 2009a, b, 2012a, b, 2014). This so-called ‘return to’ sociology has been the ‘accumulation of relatively separate intellectual moves that are a blend of renewed interest in classical sociology and in perennial explanatory problems, together with theoretical reflection arising from critical engagement with comparatively recent perspectives that range from neo-functionalism to actor-network theory’ (Sibeon 2001: 1). It is the contention here that the ‘return’ to sociology and the employment of Realist and Ultra-Realist ontologies are certainly welcome moves in the right direction, but we also need to encourage the development of a biological literacy among criminologists, and not be afraid to draw from behavioural genetics, neuroscience and evolutionary psychology in criminological analysis. What appears to unite many contemporary criminologists (Owen 2014; Hall and Winlow 2015) is a scepticism towards the knowledge-claims of relativistic postmodernism and poststructuralism, whether in the form of Lyotardian or Foucauldian relativism or in the so-called, ‘later’ forms such as the criminological theorising of Milovanovic (1996, 1997, 1999, 2013).

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Albrow, M. (1996). The Global Age. Cambridge: Polity Press. Albrow, M. (1996). The Global Age. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Alexander, J. (1992). General Theory in the Postpositivistic Mode: The “Epistemological Dilemma” and the Search for Present Reason. In S. Seidman & D. G. Wagner (Eds.), Postmodernism and Social Theory. Cambridge, MA/Oxford: Blackwell. Alexander, J. (1992). General Theory in the Postpositivistic Mode: The “Epistemological Dilemma” and the Search for Present Reason. In S. Seidman & D. G. Wagner (Eds.), Postmodernism and Social Theory. Cambridge, MA/Oxford: Blackwell.
Zurück zum Zitat Archer, M. (1982). Structuration Versus Morphogenesis: On Combining Structure and Action. British Journal of Sociology, 33(4), 445–483.CrossRef Archer, M. (1982). Structuration Versus Morphogenesis: On Combining Structure and Action. British Journal of Sociology, 33(4), 445–483.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Archer, M. (1988). Culture and Agency: The Place of Culture in Social Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Archer, M. (1988). Culture and Agency: The Place of Culture in Social Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Archer, M. (1995). Realist Social Theory: The Morphogenetic Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Archer, M. (1995). Realist Social Theory: The Morphogenetic Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Archer, M. (1996). Social Integration and System Integration: Developing the Distinction. Sociology, 30(4), 679–699.CrossRef Archer, M. (1996). Social Integration and System Integration: Developing the Distinction. Sociology, 30(4), 679–699.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Archer, M. (1998). Social Theory and the Analysis of Society. In T. May & M. Williams (Eds.), Knowing the Social World. Buckingham: Open University Press. Archer, M. (1998). Social Theory and the Analysis of Society. In T. May & M. Williams (Eds.), Knowing the Social World. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Archer, M. (2000). Being Human: The Problem of Agency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Archer, M. (2000). Being Human: The Problem of Agency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Armstrong, D. (1987). Theoretical Terrains in Biopsychosocial Medicine. Social Science and Medicine, 25, 1213–1218.CrossRef Armstrong, D. (1987). Theoretical Terrains in Biopsychosocial Medicine. Social Science and Medicine, 25, 1213–1218.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Barthes, R. (1967). Elements of Semiology. London: Cape. Barthes, R. (1967). Elements of Semiology. London: Cape.
Zurück zum Zitat Baudrillard, J. (1983). In the Shadow of the Silent Majorities or the End of the Social and Other Essays. New York: Semiotext(e). Baudrillard, J. (1983). In the Shadow of the Silent Majorities or the End of the Social and Other Essays. New York: Semiotext(e).
Zurück zum Zitat Bauman, Z. (1992). Intimations of Postmodernity. London: Routledge. Bauman, Z. (1992). Intimations of Postmodernity. London: Routledge.
Zurück zum Zitat Benton, T. (1991). Biology and Social Science: Why the Return of the Repressed Should Be Given a (Cautious) Welcome. Sociology, 25(1), 1–29.CrossRef Benton, T. (1991). Biology and Social Science: Why the Return of the Repressed Should Be Given a (Cautious) Welcome. Sociology, 25(1), 1–29.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Benton, T. (1994). Biology and Social Theory in the Environmental Debate. In M. Redclift & T. Benton (Eds.), Social Theory and the Global Environment. London: Routledge. Benton, T. (1994). Biology and Social Theory in the Environmental Debate. In M. Redclift & T. Benton (Eds.), Social Theory and the Global Environment. London: Routledge.
Zurück zum Zitat Berger, P., & Luckmann, T. (1971). The Social Construction of Reality. Harmondsworth: Penguin. Berger, P., & Luckmann, T. (1971). The Social Construction of Reality. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Zurück zum Zitat Best, S., & Kellner, D. (1991). Postmodern Theory: Critical Interrogations. London: Macmillan.CrossRef Best, S., & Kellner, D. (1991). Postmodern Theory: Critical Interrogations. London: Macmillan.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Betts, K. (1986). The Conditions of Action, Power and the Problem of Interests. Sociological Review, 34(1), 39–64.CrossRef Betts, K. (1986). The Conditions of Action, Power and the Problem of Interests. Sociological Review, 34(1), 39–64.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Blackledge, D., & Hunt, B. (1993). Sociological Interpretations of Education. London: Routledge. Blackledge, D., & Hunt, B. (1993). Sociological Interpretations of Education. London: Routledge.
Zurück zum Zitat Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Bourdieu, P. (1990). In Other Words: Essays Towards a Reflexive Sociology. Cambridge: Polity Press. Bourdieu, P. (1990). In Other Words: Essays Towards a Reflexive Sociology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Bourdieu, P. (1998). Practical Reason: On the Theory of Action. Cambridge: Polity Press. Bourdieu, P. (1998). Practical Reason: On the Theory of Action. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Brown, S. (2013). Virtual Criminology. In E. McLaughlin & J. Muncie (Eds.), The Sage Dictionary of Criminology (3rd ed.). London: Sage. Brown, S. (2013). Virtual Criminology. In E. McLaughlin & J. Muncie (Eds.), The Sage Dictionary of Criminology (3rd ed.). London: Sage.
Zurück zum Zitat Bury, M. R. (1997). Health and Illness in a Changing Society. London: Routledge. Bury, M. R. (1997). Health and Illness in a Changing Society. London: Routledge.
Zurück zum Zitat Calhoun, C., et al. (Eds.). (2002). Contemporary Sociological Theory. Oxford: Blackwell. Calhoun, C., et al. (Eds.). (2002). Contemporary Sociological Theory. Oxford: Blackwell.
Zurück zum Zitat Callon, M. (1986). Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fisherman of St. Brieuc Bay. In J. Law (Ed.), Power Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge? London: Routledge. Callon, M. (1986). Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fisherman of St. Brieuc Bay. In J. Law (Ed.), Power Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge? London: Routledge.
Zurück zum Zitat Callon, M., & Latour, B. (1981). Unscrewing the Big Leviathan: How Actors Macro-Structure Reality and How Sociologists Help Them to Do So. In K. Knorr-Cetina & A. V. Cicourel (Eds.), Advances in Social Theory and Methodology: Towards an Integration of Micro-and Macro-Sociologies. London: Routledge. Callon, M., & Latour, B. (1981). Unscrewing the Big Leviathan: How Actors Macro-Structure Reality and How Sociologists Help Them to Do So. In K. Knorr-Cetina & A. V. Cicourel (Eds.), Advances in Social Theory and Methodology: Towards an Integration of Micro-and Macro-Sociologies. London: Routledge.
Zurück zum Zitat Cohen, I. (1987). Structuration Theory and Social Praxis. In A. Giddens & J. Turner (Eds.), Social Theory Today. Cambridge: Polity Press. Cohen, I. (1987). Structuration Theory and Social Praxis. In A. Giddens & J. Turner (Eds.), Social Theory Today. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Cohen, I. (1989). Structuration Theory: Anthony Giddens and the Constitution of Social Life. London: Macmillan.CrossRef Cohen, I. (1989). Structuration Theory: Anthony Giddens and the Constitution of Social Life. London: Macmillan.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Connell, R. (2000). The Men and the Boys. Berkeley: University of California Press. Connell, R. (2000). The Men and the Boys. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Curry, O. (2003, January 28). Evolutionary Psychology: “Fashionable Ideology” or “New Foundation”? Human Nature Review, 3, 81–92. Curry, O. (2003, January 28). Evolutionary Psychology: “Fashionable Ideology” or “New Foundation”? Human Nature Review, 3, 81–92.
Zurück zum Zitat Daly, M., & Wilson, M. (1998). The Truth About Cinderella: A Darwinian View of Parental Love. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson. Daly, M., & Wilson, M. (1998). The Truth About Cinderella: A Darwinian View of Parental Love. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.
Zurück zum Zitat Danaher, G., et al. (2000). Understanding Foucault. London: Sage. Danaher, G., et al. (2000). Understanding Foucault. London: Sage.
Zurück zum Zitat Davies, I. (1993). Cultural Theory in Britain: Narrative and Episteme. Theory, Culture and Society, 10(3), 115–154.CrossRef Davies, I. (1993). Cultural Theory in Britain: Narrative and Episteme. Theory, Culture and Society, 10(3), 115–154.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Delanty, G. (1999). Social Theory in a Changing World: Conceptions of Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press. Delanty, G. (1999). Social Theory in a Changing World: Conceptions of Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Derrida, J. (1982). Différence. In A. Bass (Trans.), Margins of Philosophy. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf. Derrida, J. (1982). Différence. In A. Bass (Trans.), Margins of Philosophy. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Zurück zum Zitat Durkheim, E. (1982). The Rules of Sociological Method. London: Macmillan.CrossRef Durkheim, E. (1982). The Rules of Sociological Method. London: Macmillan.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Dye, T. (1998). Understanding Public Policy. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall. Dye, T. (1998). Understanding Public Policy. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.
Zurück zum Zitat Elias, N. (1978). What Is Sociology? London: Hutchison. Elias, N. (1978). What Is Sociology? London: Hutchison.
Zurück zum Zitat Ferrell, J. (2012). Outline of a Criminology of Drift. In S. Hall & S. Winlow (Eds.), New Directions in Criminological Theory. London: Routledge. Ferrell, J. (2012). Outline of a Criminology of Drift. In S. Hall & S. Winlow (Eds.), New Directions in Criminological Theory. London: Routledge.
Zurück zum Zitat Foucault, M. (1970). The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences. London: Tavistock. Foucault, M. (1970). The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences. London: Tavistock.
Zurück zum Zitat Foucault, M. (1972). The Archaeology of Knowledge. New York: Pantheon Books. Foucault, M. (1972). The Archaeology of Knowledge. New York: Pantheon Books.
Zurück zum Zitat Foucault, M. (1980a). Power/Knowledge. New York: Pantheon Books. Foucault, M. (1980a). Power/Knowledge. New York: Pantheon Books.
Zurück zum Zitat Foucault, M. (1980b). The History of Sexuality. New York: Vintage Books. Foucault, M. (1980b). The History of Sexuality. New York: Vintage Books.
Zurück zum Zitat Foucault, M. (1982). The Subject and Power. In H. L. Dreyfus & P. Rabinow (Eds.), Michael Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics, with an Afterword by Michel Foucault. Brighton: Harvester Wheatsheaf. Foucault, M. (1982). The Subject and Power. In H. L. Dreyfus & P. Rabinow (Eds.), Michael Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics, with an Afterword by Michel Foucault. Brighton: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Zurück zum Zitat Foucault, M. (1991). Governmentality. In G. Burchell (Ed.), The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf. Foucault, M. (1991). Governmentality. In G. Burchell (Ed.), The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Zurück zum Zitat Fox, C. J., & Miller, H. T. (1995). Postmodern Public Administration. London: Sage. Fox, C. J., & Miller, H. T. (1995). Postmodern Public Administration. London: Sage.
Zurück zum Zitat Friedrichs, R. W. (1972). A Sociology of Sociology. New York: Free Press. Friedrichs, R. W. (1972). A Sociology of Sociology. New York: Free Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Gellner, E. (1993). Postmodernism, Reason and Religion. London/New York: Routledge. Gellner, E. (1993). Postmodernism, Reason and Religion. London/New York: Routledge.
Zurück zum Zitat Gibbs, J. P. (1989). Control: Sociology’s Central Notion. Urbana: University of Illinois Press. Gibbs, J. P. (1989). Control: Sociology’s Central Notion. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Giddens, A. (1979). Central Problems in Social Theory: Action, Structure and Contradiction in Social Analysis. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRef Giddens, A. (1979). Central Problems in Social Theory: Action, Structure and Contradiction in Social Analysis. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Giddens, A. (1981). Agency, Institution and Time-Space Analysis. In K. Knorr-Cetina & A. V. Cicourel (Eds.), Advances in Social Theory and Methodology: Towards an Integration of Micro-and Macro-Sociologies. London: Routledge. Giddens, A. (1981). Agency, Institution and Time-Space Analysis. In K. Knorr-Cetina & A. V. Cicourel (Eds.), Advances in Social Theory and Methodology: Towards an Integration of Micro-and Macro-Sociologies. London: Routledge.
Zurück zum Zitat Giddens, A. (1982). Profiles and Critiques in Social Theory. London: Macmillan.CrossRef Giddens, A. (1982). Profiles and Critiques in Social Theory. London: Macmillan.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Giddens, A. (1984). The Constitution of Society. Cambridge: Polity Press. Giddens, A. (1984). The Constitution of Society. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Giddens, A. (1987). Social Theory and Modern Sociology. Cambridge: Polity Press. Giddens, A. (1987). Social Theory and Modern Sociology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Giddens, A. (1989). A Reply to My Critics. In D. Held & J. Thompson (Eds.), Social Theory and Modern Societies: Anthony Giddens and His Critics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Giddens, A. (1989). A Reply to My Critics. In D. Held & J. Thompson (Eds.), Social Theory and Modern Societies: Anthony Giddens and His Critics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Giddens, A. (1991a). Structuration Theory: Past, Present and Future. In C. Bryant & D. Jary (Eds.), Giddens’s Theory of Structuration: A Critical Appreciation. London: Routledge. Giddens, A. (1991a). Structuration Theory: Past, Present and Future. In C. Bryant & D. Jary (Eds.), Giddens’s Theory of Structuration: A Critical Appreciation. London: Routledge.
Zurück zum Zitat Giddens, A. (1991b). Modernity and Self-Identity. Cambridge: Polity Press. Giddens, A. (1991b). Modernity and Self-Identity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Giddens, A. (1993). Sociology. Cambridge: Polity Press. Giddens, A. (1993). Sociology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Gurnah, A., & Scott, A. (1992). The Uncertain Science: Criticisms of Sociological Formalism. London: Routledge. Gurnah, A., & Scott, A. (1992). The Uncertain Science: Criticisms of Sociological Formalism. London: Routledge.
Zurück zum Zitat Habermas, J. (1986). The Theory of Communicative Action. Vol. 1: Reason and the Rationalization of Society. Cambridge: Polity Press. Habermas, J. (1986). The Theory of Communicative Action. Vol. 1: Reason and the Rationalization of Society. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Habermas, J. (1987). The Theory of Communicative Action. Vol. II: The Critique of Functionalist Reason. Cambridge: Polity Press. Habermas, J. (1987). The Theory of Communicative Action. Vol. II: The Critique of Functionalist Reason. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Habermas, J. (1989). The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Habermas, J. (1989). The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Hall, S., & Winlow, S. (Eds.). (2012). New Directions in Criminological Theory. London: Routledge. Hall, S., & Winlow, S. (Eds.). (2012). New Directions in Criminological Theory. London: Routledge.
Zurück zum Zitat Hall, S., & Winlow, S. (2015). Criminological Theorizing: Towards a New Ultra-Realism. London: Routledge. Hall, S., & Winlow, S. (2015). Criminological Theorizing: Towards a New Ultra-Realism. London: Routledge.
Zurück zum Zitat Hall, S., Critcher, C., Jefferson, T., Clarke, J., & Roberts, B. (1978). Policing the Crisis: Mugging, the State and Law and Order. London: Macmillan.CrossRef Hall, S., Critcher, C., Jefferson, T., Clarke, J., & Roberts, B. (1978). Policing the Crisis: Mugging, the State and Law and Order. London: Macmillan.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Harre, R. (1981). Philosophical Aspects of the Macro-Micro Problem. In K. C. Knorr-Cetina & A. V. Cicourel (Eds.), Advances in Social Theory and Methodology: Towards an Integration of Micro-and Macro-Sociologies. London: Routledge. Harre, R. (1981). Philosophical Aspects of the Macro-Micro Problem. In K. C. Knorr-Cetina & A. V. Cicourel (Eds.), Advances in Social Theory and Methodology: Towards an Integration of Micro-and Macro-Sociologies. London: Routledge.
Zurück zum Zitat Harvey, D. (1989). The Condition of Postmodernity. Oxford: Blackwell. Harvey, D. (1989). The Condition of Postmodernity. Oxford: Blackwell.
Zurück zum Zitat Hay, C. (2002). Political Analysis: A Critical Introduction. Basingstoke: Palgrave.CrossRef Hay, C. (2002). Political Analysis: A Critical Introduction. Basingstoke: Palgrave.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Heidegger, M. (2010). Being and Time (Translated by Joan Stambaugh, revised by Dennis J. Schmidt). Albany: State University of New York Press. Heidegger, M. (2010). Being and Time (Translated by Joan Stambaugh, revised by Dennis J. Schmidt). Albany: State University of New York Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Hindess, B. (1986a). Actors and Social Relations. In M. L. Wardell & S. P. Turner (Eds.), Sociological Theory in Transition. London: Allen and Unwin. Hindess, B. (1986a). Actors and Social Relations. In M. L. Wardell & S. P. Turner (Eds.), Sociological Theory in Transition. London: Allen and Unwin.
Zurück zum Zitat Hindess, B. (1986b). Interests in Political Analysis. In J. Law (Ed.), Power Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge? London: Routledge. Hindess, B. (1986b). Interests in Political Analysis. In J. Law (Ed.), Power Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge? London: Routledge.
Zurück zum Zitat Hindess, B. (1988). Choice, Rationality and Social Theory. London: Unwin Hyman. Hindess, B. (1988). Choice, Rationality and Social Theory. London: Unwin Hyman.
Zurück zum Zitat Holmwood, J. (1996). Founding Sociology? Talcott Parsons and the Idea of General Theory. London/New York: Longman. Holmwood, J. (1996). Founding Sociology? Talcott Parsons and the Idea of General Theory. London/New York: Longman.
Zurück zum Zitat James, S. (1997). British Government: A Reader in Policy Making. London: Routledge.CrossRef James, S. (1997). British Government: A Reader in Policy Making. London: Routledge.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Jameson, F. (1991). Postmodernism or the Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism. London: Verso. Jameson, F. (1991). Postmodernism or the Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism. London: Verso.
Zurück zum Zitat Jones, M. (1996). Posthuman Agency: Between Theoretical Traditions. Sociological Theory, 14(3), 290–309.CrossRef Jones, M. (1996). Posthuman Agency: Between Theoretical Traditions. Sociological Theory, 14(3), 290–309.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Knorr-Cetina, K. (1981). The Manufacture of Knowledge: An Essay on the Constuctivist and Contextual Nature of Science. Oxford: Pergamon. Knorr-Cetina, K. (1981). The Manufacture of Knowledge: An Essay on the Constuctivist and Contextual Nature of Science. Oxford: Pergamon.
Zurück zum Zitat Knorr-Cetina, K. D., & Cicourel, A. V. (Eds.). (1981). Advances in Social Theory and Methodology: Towards an Integration of Micro-and Macro-Sociologies. London: Routledge. Knorr-Cetina, K. D., & Cicourel, A. V. (Eds.). (1981). Advances in Social Theory and Methodology: Towards an Integration of Micro-and Macro-Sociologies. London: Routledge.
Zurück zum Zitat Kooiman, J. (2003). Governing as Governance. London: Sage. Kooiman, J. (2003). Governing as Governance. London: Sage.
Zurück zum Zitat Kumar, K. (1995). From Post-Industrial to Post-Modern Society: New Theories of The Contemporary World. Oxford: Blackwell. Kumar, K. (1995). From Post-Industrial to Post-Modern Society: New Theories of The Contemporary World. Oxford: Blackwell.
Zurück zum Zitat Lacan, J. (1977). Ecrits: A Selection. London: Tavistock. Lacan, J. (1977). Ecrits: A Selection. London: Tavistock.
Zurück zum Zitat Laclau, E., & Mouffe, C. (1985). Hegemony and Socialist Strategy. London: Verso. Laclau, E., & Mouffe, C. (1985). Hegemony and Socialist Strategy. London: Verso.
Zurück zum Zitat Laclau, E., & Mouffe, C. (1987). Post-Marxism Without Apologies. New Left Review, 166, 79–106. Laclau, E., & Mouffe, C. (1987). Post-Marxism Without Apologies. New Left Review, 166, 79–106.
Zurück zum Zitat Latour, B. (1986). The Powers of Association. In J. Law (Ed.), Power Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge? London: Routledge. Latour, B. (1986). The Powers of Association. In J. Law (Ed.), Power Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge? London: Routledge.
Zurück zum Zitat Latour, B. (1988). The Pasteurization of France. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Latour, B. (1988). The Pasteurization of France. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Law, J. (1986a). On Power and Its Tactics: A View from the Sociology of Science. Sociological Review, 34(1), 1–38.CrossRef Law, J. (1986a). On Power and Its Tactics: A View from the Sociology of Science. Sociological Review, 34(1), 1–38.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Law, J. (1986b). Power Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge? London: Routledge. Law, J. (1986b). Power Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge? London: Routledge.
Zurück zum Zitat Law, J. (Ed.). (1991a). A Sociology of Monsters: Essays on Power, Technology and Domination. London: Routledge. Law, J. (Ed.). (1991a). A Sociology of Monsters: Essays on Power, Technology and Domination. London: Routledge.
Zurück zum Zitat Law, J. (1991b). Power, Discretion and Strategy. In J. Law (Ed.), ibid. Law, J. (1991b). Power, Discretion and Strategy. In J. Law (Ed.), ibid.
Zurück zum Zitat Law, J. (1994). Organising Modernity. Oxford: Blackwell. Law, J. (1994). Organising Modernity. Oxford: Blackwell.
Zurück zum Zitat Layder, D. (1984). Sources and Levels of Commitment in Actors’ Careers. Work and Occupations, 11(2), 198–216.CrossRef Layder, D. (1984). Sources and Levels of Commitment in Actors’ Careers. Work and Occupations, 11(2), 198–216.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Layder, D. (1994). Understanding Social Theory. London: Sage. Layder, D. (1994). Understanding Social Theory. London: Sage.
Zurück zum Zitat Layder, D. (1997). Modern Social Theory: Key Debates and New Directions. London: UCL Press. Layder, D. (1997). Modern Social Theory: Key Debates and New Directions. London: UCL Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Layder, D. (1998a). Sociological Practice: Linking Theory and Social Research. London: Sage.CrossRef Layder, D. (1998a). Sociological Practice: Linking Theory and Social Research. London: Sage.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Layder, D. (1998b). The Reality of Social Domains: Implications for Theory and Method. In T. May & M. Williams (Eds.), Knowing the Social World. Buckingham: Open University Press. Layder, D. (1998b). The Reality of Social Domains: Implications for Theory and Method. In T. May & M. Williams (Eds.), Knowing the Social World. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Layder, D. (2007). Self-Identity and Personhood in Social Analysis: The Inadequacies of Postmodernism and Social Constructionism. In J. L. Powell & T. Owen (Eds.), Reconstructing Postmodernism: Critical Debates. New York: Nova Science Publishers. Layder, D. (2007). Self-Identity and Personhood in Social Analysis: The Inadequacies of Postmodernism and Social Constructionism. In J. L. Powell & T. Owen (Eds.), Reconstructing Postmodernism: Critical Debates. New York: Nova Science Publishers.
Zurück zum Zitat Lemert, C. (1993). After Modernity. In C. Lemert (Ed.), Social Theory: The Multicultural and Classical Readings. San Francisco: Westview Press. Lemert, C. (1993). After Modernity. In C. Lemert (Ed.), Social Theory: The Multicultural and Classical Readings. San Francisco: Westview Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Levi-Strauss, C. (1963). Structural Anthropology. New York: Basic Books. Levi-Strauss, C. (1963). Structural Anthropology. New York: Basic Books.
Zurück zum Zitat Levi-Strauss, C. (1974). The Savage Mind. London: Weidenfeld and Nicholson. Levi-Strauss, C. (1974). The Savage Mind. London: Weidenfeld and Nicholson.
Zurück zum Zitat Lockwood, D. (1964). Social Integration and System Integration. In G. K. Zollschan & W. Hirsch (Eds.), Explorations in Social Change. London: Routledge. Lockwood, D. (1964). Social Integration and System Integration. In G. K. Zollschan & W. Hirsch (Eds.), Explorations in Social Change. London: Routledge.
Zurück zum Zitat Luhmann, N. (1982). The Differentiation of Society. New York: Columbia University Press. Luhmann, N. (1982). The Differentiation of Society. New York: Columbia University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Lyon, D. (1994). Postmodernity. Milton Keynes: Open University Press. Lyon, D. (1994). Postmodernity. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Lyotard, J. F. (1973). La Fenomenologia. Buenos Aires: EUDEBA. Lyotard, J. F. (1973). La Fenomenologia. Buenos Aires: EUDEBA.
Zurück zum Zitat Lyotard, J. F. (1986–1987). Rules and Paradoxes and Svelte Paradox. Cultural Critique, 5, 209–219. Lyotard, J. F. (1986–1987). Rules and Paradoxes and Svelte Paradox. Cultural Critique, 5, 209–219.
Zurück zum Zitat Marsh, D. (Ed.). (1998). Comparing Policy Networks. Buckingham: Open University Press. Marsh, D. (Ed.). (1998). Comparing Policy Networks. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Marsh, D., & Smith, M. (2000). Understanding Policy Networks: Towards a Dialectical Approach. Political Studies, 48(1), 4–21.CrossRef Marsh, D., & Smith, M. (2000). Understanding Policy Networks: Towards a Dialectical Approach. Political Studies, 48(1), 4–21.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Marsh, D., & Stoker, G. (Eds.). (1995). Theory and Methods in Political Science. London: Macmillan. Marsh, D., & Stoker, G. (Eds.). (1995). Theory and Methods in Political Science. London: Macmillan.
Zurück zum Zitat McLennan, C. (1995). After Postmodernism: Back to Sociological Theory? Sociology, 29(1), 117–132.CrossRef McLennan, C. (1995). After Postmodernism: Back to Sociological Theory? Sociology, 29(1), 117–132.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Mead, G. H. (1967). Mind, Self and Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRef Mead, G. H. (1967). Mind, Self and Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Milovanovic, D. (1996). Postmodern Criminology. Justice Quarterly, 13(4), 567–609.CrossRef Milovanovic, D. (1996). Postmodern Criminology. Justice Quarterly, 13(4), 567–609.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Milovanovic, D. (1997). Chaos, Criminology and Social Justice. New York: Praeger. Milovanovic, D. (1997). Chaos, Criminology and Social Justice. New York: Praeger.
Zurück zum Zitat Milovanovic, D. (1999). Catastrophe Theory, Discourse and Conflict Resolution. In B. Arrigo (Ed.), Social Justice/Criminal Justice. Belmont: Wadsworth. Milovanovic, D. (1999). Catastrophe Theory, Discourse and Conflict Resolution. In B. Arrigo (Ed.), Social Justice/Criminal Justice. Belmont: Wadsworth.
Zurück zum Zitat Milovanovic, D. (2013). Postmodernism. In E. McLaughlin & J. Muncie (Eds.), The Sage Dictionary of Criminology (3rd ed.). London: Sage. Milovanovic, D. (2013). Postmodernism. In E. McLaughlin & J. Muncie (Eds.), The Sage Dictionary of Criminology (3rd ed.). London: Sage.
Zurück zum Zitat Mouzelis, N. (1989). Restructuring Structuration Theory. The Sociological Review, 37(4), 613–635.CrossRef Mouzelis, N. (1989). Restructuring Structuration Theory. The Sociological Review, 37(4), 613–635.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Mouzelis, N. (1991). Back to Sociological Theory: The Construction of Social Order. London: Macmillan.CrossRef Mouzelis, N. (1991). Back to Sociological Theory: The Construction of Social Order. London: Macmillan.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Mouzelis, N. (1993a). The Poverty of Sociological Theory. Sociology, 27(4), 675–695.CrossRef Mouzelis, N. (1993a). The Poverty of Sociological Theory. Sociology, 27(4), 675–695.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Mouzelis, N. (1993b). Comparing the Durkheimian and Marxist Traditions. The Sociological Review, 41(3), 572–582.CrossRef Mouzelis, N. (1993b). Comparing the Durkheimian and Marxist Traditions. The Sociological Review, 41(3), 572–582.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Mouzelis, N. (1994). In Defence of “Grand” Historical Sociology. British Journal of Sociology, 45(1), 31–36.CrossRef Mouzelis, N. (1994). In Defence of “Grand” Historical Sociology. British Journal of Sociology, 45(1), 31–36.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Mouzelis, N. (1995). Sociological Theory: What Went Wrong? Diagnosis and Remedies. London: Routledge. Mouzelis, N. (1995). Sociological Theory: What Went Wrong? Diagnosis and Remedies. London: Routledge.
Zurück zum Zitat Mouzelis, N. (1996). After Postmodernism: A Reply to Gregor McLennan. Sociology, 30(1), 131–135.CrossRef Mouzelis, N. (1996). After Postmodernism: A Reply to Gregor McLennan. Sociology, 30(1), 131–135.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Mouzelis, N. (1997). Social and System Integration: Lockwood, Habermas, Giddens. Sociology, 31(1), 111–119.CrossRef Mouzelis, N. (1997). Social and System Integration: Lockwood, Habermas, Giddens. Sociology, 31(1), 111–119.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Mouzelis, N. (2000). The Subjectivist-Objectivist Divide: Against Transcendence. Sociology, 34(4), 741–762. Mouzelis, N. (2000). The Subjectivist-Objectivist Divide: Against Transcendence. Sociology, 34(4), 741–762.
Zurück zum Zitat Mouzelis, N. (2007). Cognitive Relativism: Between Positivistic and Relativistic Thinking in the Social Sciences. In J. L. Powell & T. Owen (Eds.), Reconstructing Postmodernism: Critica Debates. New York: Nova Science Publishers. Mouzelis, N. (2007). Cognitive Relativism: Between Positivistic and Relativistic Thinking in the Social Sciences. In J. L. Powell & T. Owen (Eds.), Reconstructing Postmodernism: Critica Debates. New York: Nova Science Publishers.
Zurück zum Zitat Munch, R., & Smelser, N. (1987). Relating the Micro and Macro. In J. Alexander, B. Giesen, R. Munch, & N. Smelser (Eds.), The Micro-Macro Link. Berkeley: University of California Press. Munch, R., & Smelser, N. (1987). Relating the Micro and Macro. In J. Alexander, B. Giesen, R. Munch, & N. Smelser (Eds.), The Micro-Macro Link. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Newton, T. (2003). Truly Embodied Sociology: Marrying the Social and the Biological? Sociological Review, 51(1), 20–41.CrossRef Newton, T. (2003). Truly Embodied Sociology: Marrying the Social and the Biological? Sociological Review, 51(1), 20–41.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Nicholson, L., & Seidman, S. (1995). Introduction. In L. Nicholson & S. Seidman (Eds.), Social Postmodernism: Beyond Identity Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Nicholson, L., & Seidman, S. (1995). Introduction. In L. Nicholson & S. Seidman (Eds.), Social Postmodernism: Beyond Identity Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Owen, T. (2006a). Towards a Post-Foucauldian Sociology of Ageing. In J. L. Powell & A. Wahidin (Eds.), Foucault and Ageing. New York: Nova Science Publishers. Owen, T. (2006a). Towards a Post-Foucauldian Sociology of Ageing. In J. L. Powell & A. Wahidin (Eds.), Foucault and Ageing. New York: Nova Science Publishers.
Zurück zum Zitat Owen, T. (2006b). Genetic-Social Science and the Study of Human Biotechnology. Current Sociology, 54(6), 897–917.CrossRef Owen, T. (2006b). Genetic-Social Science and the Study of Human Biotechnology. Current Sociology, 54(6), 897–917.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Owen, T. (2007a). After Postmodernism: Towards an Evolutionary Sociology. In J. L. Powell & T. Owen (Eds.), Reconstructing Postmodernism: Critical Debates. New York: Nova Science Publishers. Owen, T. (2007a). After Postmodernism: Towards an Evolutionary Sociology. In J. L. Powell & T. Owen (Eds.), Reconstructing Postmodernism: Critical Debates. New York: Nova Science Publishers.
Zurück zum Zitat Owen, T. (2009a). Social Theory and Human Biotechnology. With a Foreword by Professor Derek Layder [University of Leicester]. New York: Nova Science Publishers. Owen, T. (2009a). Social Theory and Human Biotechnology. With a Foreword by Professor Derek Layder [University of Leicester]. New York: Nova Science Publishers.
Zurück zum Zitat Owen, T. (2009b). England and Wales: The Criminal Justice System in ‘Post-Industrial Society’. In J. L. Powell & J. Hendricks (Eds.), The Welfare State in Post-Industrial Society: A Global Perspective. New York: Springer. Owen, T. (2009b). England and Wales: The Criminal Justice System in ‘Post-Industrial Society’. In J. L. Powell & J. Hendricks (Eds.), The Welfare State in Post-Industrial Society: A Global Perspective. New York: Springer.
Zurück zum Zitat Owen, T. (2012a). The Biological and the Social in Criminological Theory. In S. Hall & S. Winlow (Eds.), New Directions in Criminological Theory. London: Routledge. Owen, T. (2012a). The Biological and the Social in Criminological Theory. In S. Hall & S. Winlow (Eds.), New Directions in Criminological Theory. London: Routledge.
Zurück zum Zitat Owen, T. (2012b). Theorizing Masculinities and Crime: A Genetic-Social Approach. International Journal of Criminology and Sociological Theory, 5(3), 972–984. Owen, T. (2012b). Theorizing Masculinities and Crime: A Genetic-Social Approach. International Journal of Criminology and Sociological Theory, 5(3), 972–984.
Zurück zum Zitat Owen, T. (2014). Criminological Theory: A Genetic-Social Approach. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRef Owen, T. (2014). Criminological Theory: A Genetic-Social Approach. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Owen, T., & Owen, J. A. (2015). Virtual Criminology; Insights from Genetic-Social Science and Heidegger. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Criminology, 7(1), 17–31. Owen, T., & Owen, J. A. (2015). Virtual Criminology; Insights from Genetic-Social Science and Heidegger. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Criminology, 7(1), 17–31.
Zurück zum Zitat Owen, T., & Powell, J. L. (2006). “Trust”, Professional Power and Social Theory: Lessons from a Post-Foucauldian Framework. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 26(3/4), 110–120.CrossRef Owen, T., & Powell, J. L. (2006). “Trust”, Professional Power and Social Theory: Lessons from a Post-Foucauldian Framework. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 26(3/4), 110–120.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Parsons, W. (1995). Public Policy: An Introduction to the Theory and Practice of Policy Analysis. Aldershot: Edward Elgar. Parsons, W. (1995). Public Policy: An Introduction to the Theory and Practice of Policy Analysis. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.
Zurück zum Zitat Pickering, A. (2001). The Mangle of Practice: Time, Agency and Science (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Pickering, A. (2001). The Mangle of Practice: Time, Agency and Science (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Pierre, J., & Peters, B. G. (2000). Governance, Politics and the State. London: Macmillan. Pierre, J., & Peters, B. G. (2000). Governance, Politics and the State. London: Macmillan.
Zurück zum Zitat Powell, J. L., & Owen, T. (2005). The Bio-medical Model and Aging: Towards an Anti-reductionist Model? International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 25(9), 27–40.CrossRef Powell, J. L., & Owen, T. (2005). The Bio-medical Model and Aging: Towards an Anti-reductionist Model? International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 25(9), 27–40.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Reiner, R. (2012). Political Economy and Criminology: The Return of the Repressed. In S. Hall & S. Winlow (Eds.), New Directions in Criminological Theory. London: Routledge. Reiner, R. (2012). Political Economy and Criminology: The Return of the Repressed. In S. Hall & S. Winlow (Eds.), New Directions in Criminological Theory. London: Routledge.
Zurück zum Zitat Rhodes, R. A. W. (1997). Understanding Governance: Policy Networks, Governance, Reflexivity and Accountability. Buckingham: Open University Press. Rhodes, R. A. W. (1997). Understanding Governance: Policy Networks, Governance, Reflexivity and Accountability. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Richardson, J. (1996). Policy-Making in the EU: Interests, Ideas, and Garbage Cans of Primeval Soup. In J. Richardson (Ed.), European Union: Power and Policy Making. London: Routledge. Richardson, J. (1996). Policy-Making in the EU: Interests, Ideas, and Garbage Cans of Primeval Soup. In J. Richardson (Ed.), European Union: Power and Policy Making. London: Routledge.
Zurück zum Zitat Ritzer, G. (1990). Micro-Macro Linkages in Sociology; Applying a Metatheoretical Tool. In G. Ritzer (Ed.), Frontiers of Social Theory; The New Syntheses. New York: Columbia University Press. Ritzer, G. (1990). Micro-Macro Linkages in Sociology; Applying a Metatheoretical Tool. In G. Ritzer (Ed.), Frontiers of Social Theory; The New Syntheses. New York: Columbia University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Ritzer, G. (1992). Metatheorising in Sociology: Explaining the Coming of Age. In G. Ritzer (Ed.), Metatheorizing. London: Sage. Ritzer, G. (1992). Metatheorising in Sociology: Explaining the Coming of Age. In G. Ritzer (Ed.), Metatheorizing. London: Sage.
Zurück zum Zitat Ritzer, G. (2000). Modern Sociological Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill. Ritzer, G. (2000). Modern Sociological Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Zurück zum Zitat Ritzer, G., & Ryan, J. M. (2007). Postmodern Social Theory and Sociology: On Symbolic Exchange with a “Dead” Theory. In J. L. Powell & T. Owen (Eds.), Reconstructing Postmodernism: Critical Debates. New York: Nova Science Publishers. Ritzer, G., & Ryan, J. M. (2007). Postmodern Social Theory and Sociology: On Symbolic Exchange with a “Dead” Theory. In J. L. Powell & T. Owen (Eds.), Reconstructing Postmodernism: Critical Debates. New York: Nova Science Publishers.
Zurück zum Zitat Rojek, C., & Turner, B. (2000). Decorative Sociology: Towards a Critique of the Cultural Turn. The Sociological Review, 48(4), 629–648.CrossRef Rojek, C., & Turner, B. (2000). Decorative Sociology: Towards a Critique of the Cultural Turn. The Sociological Review, 48(4), 629–648.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Russett, B., & Starr, H. (1996). World Politics: The Menu for Choice. New York: Freeman and Company. Russett, B., & Starr, H. (1996). World Politics: The Menu for Choice. New York: Freeman and Company.
Zurück zum Zitat Saussure, F. de. (1916 [1974]). Course in General Linguistics (W. Baskin, Trans.). London: Collins. Saussure, F. de. (1916 [1974]). Course in General Linguistics (W. Baskin, Trans.). London: Collins.
Zurück zum Zitat Scholes, R. (1974). Structuralism in Literature. New Haven: Yale University Press. Scholes, R. (1974). Structuralism in Literature. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Seidman, S. (1992). Postmodern Social Theory as Narrative with a Moral Intent. In S. Seidman & D. Wagner (Eds.), Postmodernism and Social Theory. Oxford: Blackwell. Seidman, S. (1992). Postmodern Social Theory as Narrative with a Moral Intent. In S. Seidman & D. Wagner (Eds.), Postmodernism and Social Theory. Oxford: Blackwell.
Zurück zum Zitat Seidman, S. (1994). Contested Knowledge: Social Theory in the Postmodern Era. Oxford: Blackwell. Seidman, S. (1994). Contested Knowledge: Social Theory in the Postmodern Era. Oxford: Blackwell.
Zurück zum Zitat Sharp, R. (1980). Knowledge, Ideology and the Politics of Schooling: Towards a Marxist Analysis of Schooling. London: Routledge. Sharp, R. (1980). Knowledge, Ideology and the Politics of Schooling: Towards a Marxist Analysis of Schooling. London: Routledge.
Zurück zum Zitat Shilling, C. (1993). The Body and Social Theory. London: Sage. Shilling, C. (1993). The Body and Social Theory. London: Sage.
Zurück zum Zitat Sibeon, R. (1996). Contemporary Sociology and Policy Analysis: The New Sociology of Public Policy. London: Kogan Page and Tudor. Sibeon, R. (1996). Contemporary Sociology and Policy Analysis: The New Sociology of Public Policy. London: Kogan Page and Tudor.
Zurück zum Zitat Sibeon, R. (1997a, April). Power Agency/Structure and Micro-Macro; an Excursus in Anti-reductionist Sociology. Paper Presented at Annual Conference of the British Sociological Association, University of York. Sibeon, R. (1997a, April). Power Agency/Structure and Micro-Macro; an Excursus in Anti-reductionist Sociology. Paper Presented at Annual Conference of the British Sociological Association, University of York.
Zurück zum Zitat Sibeon, R. (1997b, September). Anti-reductionist Sociology and the Study of Postnational Governance. Paper Presented at the Third Conference of the European Sociological Association, University of Essex. Sibeon, R. (1997b, September). Anti-reductionist Sociology and the Study of Postnational Governance. Paper Presented at the Third Conference of the European Sociological Association, University of Essex.
Zurück zum Zitat Sibeon, R. (1999). Anti-reductionist Sociology. Sociology, 32(2), 317–334.CrossRef Sibeon, R. (1999). Anti-reductionist Sociology. Sociology, 32(2), 317–334.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Sibeon, R. (2001, April 9–12). The Reconstruction of Sociological Theory. Paper Presented at the 50th Anniversary Conference of the British Sociological Association, Manchester. Sibeon, R. (2001, April 9–12). The Reconstruction of Sociological Theory. Paper Presented at the 50th Anniversary Conference of the British Sociological Association, Manchester.
Zurück zum Zitat Sibeon, R. (2004). Rethinking Social Theory. London: Sage. Sibeon, R. (2004). Rethinking Social Theory. London: Sage.
Zurück zum Zitat Sibeon, R. (2007). An Excursus in Post-Postmodern Social Science. In J. L. Powell & T. Owen (Eds.), Reconstructing Postmodernism: Critical Debates. New York: Nova Science Publishers. Sibeon, R. (2007). An Excursus in Post-Postmodern Social Science. In J. L. Powell & T. Owen (Eds.), Reconstructing Postmodernism: Critical Debates. New York: Nova Science Publishers.
Zurück zum Zitat Smart, C. (1995). Law, Crime and Sexuality. London: Sage. Smart, C. (1995). Law, Crime and Sexuality. London: Sage.
Zurück zum Zitat Stones, R. (1996). Sociological Reasoning: Towards a Past-Modern Sociology. London: Macmillan.CrossRef Stones, R. (1996). Sociological Reasoning: Towards a Past-Modern Sociology. London: Macmillan.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Suler, J. (2004). The Online Disinhibition Effect. CyberPsychology and Behaviour, 7(3), 321–326.CrossRef Suler, J. (2004). The Online Disinhibition Effect. CyberPsychology and Behaviour, 7(3), 321–326.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Swingewood, A. (2000). A Short History of Sociological Thought. London: Macmillan. Swingewood, A. (2000). A Short History of Sociological Thought. London: Macmillan.
Zurück zum Zitat Tooby, J., & De Vore, I. (Eds.). (1987). The Reconstruction of Hominid Behavioural Evolution Through Strategic Modelling. In The Evolution of Human Behaviour: Primate Models. Albany: SUNY Press. Tooby, J., & De Vore, I. (Eds.). (1987). The Reconstruction of Hominid Behavioural Evolution Through Strategic Modelling. In The Evolution of Human Behaviour: Primate Models. Albany: SUNY Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Touraine, A. (1981). The Voice and the Eye: An Analysis of Social Movements. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Touraine, A. (1981). The Voice and the Eye: An Analysis of Social Movements. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Touraine, A. (1995). Critique of Modernity. Oxford: Blackwell. Touraine, A. (1995). Critique of Modernity. Oxford: Blackwell.
Zurück zum Zitat Turner, B. S. (1990). Conclusion: Peroration on Ideology. In N. Abercrombie, S. Hill, & B. S. Turner (Eds.), Dominant Ideologies. London: Unwin Hyman. Turner, B. S. (1990). Conclusion: Peroration on Ideology. In N. Abercrombie, S. Hill, & B. S. Turner (Eds.), Dominant Ideologies. London: Unwin Hyman.
Zurück zum Zitat Turner, B. S., & Rojek, C. (2001). Society and Culture: Principles of Scarcity and Solidarity. London: Sage. Turner, B. S., & Rojek, C. (2001). Society and Culture: Principles of Scarcity and Solidarity. London: Sage.
Zurück zum Zitat White, H. C. (1992). Identity and Control: A Structural Theory of Social Action. Princeton: Princeton University Press. White, H. C. (1992). Identity and Control: A Structural Theory of Social Action. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Wieviorka, M. (2012). From Social Order to the Personal Subject: A Major Reversal. In S. Hall & S. Winlow (Eds.), New Directions in Criminological Theory. London: Routledge. Wieviorka, M. (2012). From Social Order to the Personal Subject: A Major Reversal. In S. Hall & S. Winlow (Eds.), New Directions in Criminological Theory. London: Routledge.
Zurück zum Zitat Williams, S. J. (1998). ‘Capitalising’ on Emotions? Rethinking the Inequalities in Health Debate. Sociology, 32(1), 121–139.CrossRef Williams, S. J. (1998). ‘Capitalising’ on Emotions? Rethinking the Inequalities in Health Debate. Sociology, 32(1), 121–139.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Williams, S. J. (2003). Marrying the Social and the Biological? A Rejoinder to Newton. Sociological Review, 51(4), 550–561.CrossRef Williams, S. J. (2003). Marrying the Social and the Biological? A Rejoinder to Newton. Sociological Review, 51(4), 550–561.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wilson, D. (2012). Late Capitalism, Vulnerable Populations and Violent Predatory Crime. In S. Hall & S. Winlow (Eds.), New Directions in Criminological Theory. London: Routledge. Wilson, D. (2012). Late Capitalism, Vulnerable Populations and Violent Predatory Crime. In S. Hall & S. Winlow (Eds.), New Directions in Criminological Theory. London: Routledge.
Zurück zum Zitat Yar, M. (2012). Critical Criminology, Critical Theory and Social Harm. In S. Hall & S. Winlow (Eds.), New Directions in Criminological Theory. London: Routledge. Yar, M. (2012). Critical Criminology, Critical Theory and Social Harm. In S. Hall & S. Winlow (Eds.), New Directions in Criminological Theory. London: Routledge.
Zurück zum Zitat Young, A. (1995). Imagining Crime. London: Sage. Young, A. (1995). Imagining Crime. London: Sage.
Metadaten
Titel
Criminological and Social Theory: Surveying the Contemporary Landscape
verfasst von
Tim Owen
Copyright-Jahr
2017
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-52688-5_2